Double differential cross sections for ionization of H by 75 keV proton impact: Assessing the role of correlated wave functions

doi:10.1088/1674-1056/abb7f8

中国物理B ›› 2020, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (12): 120301-.doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/abb7f8

• RAPID COMMUNICATION • 上一篇下一篇

收稿日期:2020-07-01 修回日期:2020-08-21 接受日期:2020-09-14 出版日期:2020-12-01 发布日期:2020-11-13

Double differential cross sections for ionization of H by 75 keV proton impact: Assessing the role of correlated wave functions

Jungang Fan(范军刚)^1,3, Xiangyang Miao(苗向阳)^1,2,3,†, and Xiangfu Jia(贾祥福)^1,2,3,‡

¹ Key Laboratory of Spectral Measurement and Analysis of Shanxi Province, Shanxi Normal University, Linfen 041004, China; ² College of Physics and Information Engineering, Shanxi Normal University, Linfen 041004, China; ³ College of Chemistry and Materials Science, Shanxi Normal University, Linfen 041004, China

Received:2020-07-01 Revised:2020-08-21 Accepted:2020-09-14 Online:2020-12-01 Published:2020-11-13
Contact: ^†Corresponding author. E-mail: sxxymiao@126.com ^‡Corresponding author. E-mail: jiaxf@dns.sxnu.edu.cn
Supported by:
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11974229 and 11274215).

摘要/Abstract

Abstract: The effect of final-state dynamic correlation is investigated for ionization of atomic hydrogen by 75-keV proton impact by analyzing double differential cross sections. The final state is represented by a continuum correlated wave (CCW-PT) function which accounts for the interaction between the projectile and the target nucleus (PT interaction). The correlated final state is nonseparable solutions of the wave equation combining the dynamics of the electron motion relative to the target and projectile, satisfying the Redmond's asymptotic conditions corresponding to long range interactions. The transition matrix is evaluated using the CCW-PT function and the undistorted initial state. Both the correlation effects and the PT interaction are analyzed by the present calculations. The convergence of the continuous correlated final state is examined carefully. Our results are compared with the absolute experimental data measured by Laforge et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 053201 (2009)] and Schulz et al. [Phys. Rev. A 81, 052705 (2010)], as well as other theoretical models (especially the results of the latest non perturbation theory). We have shown that the dynamic correlation plays an important role in the ionization of atomic hydrogen by proton impact. While overall agreement between theory and the experimental data is encouraging, detailed agreement is still lacking. However, such an analysis is meaningful because it provides valuable information about the dynamical correlation and PT interaction in the CCW-PT theoretical model.

Key words: ionization, three-body Coulomb problem, correlated wave functions, double differential cross section

中图分类号: (Scattering theory)

03.65.Nk

34.80.Dp (Atomic excitation and ionization) 34.50.Fa (Electronic excitation and ionization of atoms (including beam-foil excitation and ionization))

. [J]. 中国物理B, 2020, 29(12): 120301-.

Jungang Fan(范军刚), Xiangyang Miao(苗向阳), and Xiangfu Jia(贾祥福). Double differential cross sections for ionization of H by 75 keV proton impact: Assessing the role of correlated wave functions[J]. Chin. Phys. B, 2020, 29(12): 120301-.

参考文献

[1] Dimopoulou C, Moshammer R, Fischer D, Höhr C, Dorn A, Fainstein P D, Crespo López Urrutia J R, Schröter C D, Kollmus H, Mann R, Hagmann S and Ullrich J Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 123203 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.1232032004
[2] Hasan A, Sharma S, Arthanayaka T P, Lamichhane B R, Remolina J, Akula S, Madison D H and Schulz M J. Phys. B 47 215201 DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/47/21/2152012014
[3] Dhital M, Bastola S, Silvus A, Hasan A, Lamichhane B R, Ali E, Ciappina M F, Lomsadze R A, Cikota D, Boggs B, Madison D H and Schulz M Phys. Rev. A 99 062710 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.99.0627102019
[4] Schulz M, Hasan A, Maydanyuk N V, Foster M, Tooke B and Madison D H Phys. Rev. A 73 062704 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.0627042006
[5] Gassert H, Chuluunbaatar O, Waitz M, Trinter F, Kim H-K, Bauer T, Laucke A, Müller Ch, Voigtsberger J, Weller M, Rist J, Pitzer M, Zeller S, Jahnke T, Schmidt L Ph H, Williams J B, Zaytsev S A, Bulychev A A, Kouzakov K A, Schmidt-Böcking H, Dörner R, Popov Yu V and Schöffler M S Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 073201 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.0732012016
[6] Chuluunbaatar O, Kouzakov K A, Zaytsev S A, Zaytsev A S, Shablov V L, Popov Yu V and Gassert H, Waitz M, Kim H K, Bauer T and Laucke A Phys. Rev. A 99 062711 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.99.0627112019
[7] Dhital M, Bastola S, Silvus A, Lamichhane B R, Ali E, Ciappina M F, Lomsadze R, Hasan A, Madison D H and Schulz M Phys. Rev. A 100 032707 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.100.0327072019
[8] Laforge A C, Egodapitiya K N, Alexander J S, Hasan A, Ciappina M F, Khakoo M A and Schulz M Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 053201 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.0532012009
[9] Schulz M, Laforge A C, Egodapitiya K N, Alexander J S, Hasan A, Ciappina M F, Roy A C, Dey R, Samolov A and Godunov A L Phys. Rev. A 81 052705 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.81.0527052010
[10] Sarkadi L Phys. Rev. A 82 052710 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.82.0527102010
[11] Walters H R J and Whelan Colm T Phys. Rev. A 92 062712 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.92.0627122015
[12] Abdurakhmanov I B, Bailey J J, Kadyrov A S and Bray I Phys. Rev. A 97 032707 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.97.0327072018
[13] Ciappina M F and Cravero W R Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. B 266 555 DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2007.12.0772008
[14] Gasaneo G, Colavecchia F D, Garibotti C R, Miraglia J E and Macri P Phys. Rev. A 55 2809 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.55.28091997
[15] Gasaneo G, Colavecchia F D, Garibotti C R, Miraglia J E and Macri P 1997 J. Phys. B 30 L265 https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0953-4075/30/8/002
[16] Colavecchia F D, Gasaneo G and Garibotti C R J. Phys. B 33 L467 DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/33/12/1082000
[17] Colavecchia F D, Gasaneo G and Garibotti C R Phys. Rev. A 58 2926 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.58.29261998
[18] Colavecchia F D, Gasaneo G and Garibotti C R Physica Scripta T80 411 DOI: 10.1238/Physica.Topical.080a004111999
[19] Ciappina M F, Otranto S and Garibotti C R Phys. Rev. A 66 052711 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.0527112002
[20] Ciappina M F, Cravero W R and Schulz M J. Phys. B 40 2577 DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/40/13/0042007
[21] Duan Y H, Sun S Y and Jia X F Europhys. Lett. 110 13001 DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/110/130012015
[22] Li X, Ma X Y, Sun S Y and Jia X F Chin. Phys. B 21 113403 DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/21/11/1134032012
[23] Lu C W, An W F, Sun S Y and Jia X F 2015 Chin. Phys. Lett. 32 093401 DOI: 10.1088/0256-307X/32/9/093401
[24] Niu X J, Sun S Y, Wang F J and Jia X F Phys. Rev. A 96 022703 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.96.0227032017
[25] Silvus A, Dhital M, Bastola S, Buxton J, Klok Z, Ali E, Ciappina M F, Boggs B, Cikota D, Madison D H and Schulz M J. Phys. B 52 125202 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6455/ab1df52019
[26] Hasan A, Arthanayaka T, Lamichhane B R, Sharma S, Gurung S, Remolina J, Akula S, Madison D H, Ciappina M F, Rivarola R D and Schulz M 2016 J. Phys. B 49 04LT01 DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/49/4/04LT01
[27] Igarashi A and Gulyás L J. Phys. B 51 035201 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6455/aa9d672018
[28] Nassar T E I Results in Physics 7 2506 DOI: 10.1016/j.rinp.2017.07.0332017
[29] Garibotti C R and Miraglia J E Phys. Rev. A 21 572 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.21.5721980
[30] Brauner M, Briggs J S and Klar H J. Phys. B 22 2265 DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/22/14/0101989
[31] Abramowitz M and Stegun I A (Eds.) 1964 Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, Appl. Math. Ser., Vol. 55(Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office) p. 507
[32] Sun S Y, Zhao H J and Jia X F Europhys. Lett. 123 23002 DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/123/230022018
[33] Jia X F, Shi Q C, Chen Z J, Chen J and Xu K Z Phys. Rev. A 55 1971 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.55.19711997
[34] Bandyopadhyayt A, Roy K, Mandal P and Sil N C J. Phys. B 27 4337 DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/27/18/0271994
[35] Ma X Y, Li X, Sun S Y and Jia X F Europhys. Lett. 98 53001 DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/98/530012012
[36] Ciappina M F and Cravero W R J. Phys. B 39 2183 DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/39/9/0072006

Double differential cross sections for ionization of H by 75 keV proton impact: Assessing the role of correlated wave functions

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	Xuzhen Cao(曹序桢), Zhaoxin Liang(梁兆新), and Ying Hu(胡颖). Floquet scattering through a parity-time symmetric oscillating potential[J]. 中国物理B, 2023, 32(3): 30302-030302.
[2]	Yiao Wang(王亦傲), Zhenpeng Wang(王振鹏), Maomao Gong(宫毛毛), Chunkai Xu(徐春凯), and Xiangjun Chen(陈向军). Theoretical study of (e, 2e) triple differential cross sections of pyrimidine and tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol molecules using multi-center distorted-wave method[J]. 中国物理B, 2022, 31(1): 10202-010202.
[3]	柴若霖, 谢琼涛, 刘小良. Exact scattering states in one-dimensional Hermitian and non-Hermitian potentials[J]. 中国物理B, 2020, 29(9): 90301-090301.
[4]	段立伟, 陈庆虎. Single-photon scattering controlled by an imperfect cavity[J]. 中国物理B, 2020, 29(7): 70301-070301.
[5]	张伟, 史彦超, 胡碧涛, 张毅. A new fully quantum-mechanical method used to calculate the collisional broadening coefficients and shift coefficients of Rb D₁ lines perturbed by noble gases He and Ar[J]. 中国物理B, 2018, 27(1): 13201-013201.
[6]	唐翰昭, 要晓腾, 刘建军. Spin transport in a chain of polygonal quantum rings with Dresselhaus spin-orbit coupling[J]. 中国物理B, 2017, 26(11): 117203-117203.
[7]	Ahmet Taş, Ali Havare. Bound states resulting from interaction of the non-relativistic particles with the multiparameter potential[J]. 中国物理B, 2017, 26(10): 100301-100301.
[8]	Yazarloo B H, Mehraban H, Hassanabadi H. Non-relativistic scattering amplitude for a new multi-parameter exponential-type potential[J]. 中国物理B, 2016, 25(8): 80302-080302.
[9]	蒋小军, 李晓林, 张海潮, 王育竹. Demonstration of a cold atom beam splitter on atom chip[J]. 中国物理B, 2016, 25(8): 80311-080311.
[10]	唐翰昭, 翟利学, 沈曼, 刘建军. Spin transport properties of a Dresselhaus-polygonal quantum ring[J]. 中国物理B, 2015, 24(3): 30303-030303.
[11]	王保平, 王明军, 吴振森, 李应乐, 向宁静. Doppler shift of a laser pulse beam scattered by a rotating cone and cylinder[J]. 中国物理B, 2014, 23(5): 50303-050303.
[12]	陈昌远, 陆法林, 孙东升, 董世海. Analytic solutions of the double ring-shaped Coulomb potential in quantum mechanics[J]. 中国物理B, 2013, 22(10): 100302-100302.
[13]	秦洁宇, 杜刚, 刘晓彦. The effects of strain and surface roughness scattering on the quasi-ballistic characteristics of a Ge nanowire p-channel field-effect transistor[J]. 中国物理B, 2013, 22(10): 107104-107104.
[14]	S. Hassanabadi, M. Ghominejad, S. Zarrinkamar, H. Hassanabadi. The Yukawa potential in semirelativistic formulation via supersymmetry quantum mechanics[J]. 中国物理B, 2013, 22(6): 60303-060303.
[15]	叶会亮, 吴艳, 张敬涛, 邵初寅. Calculation of the photoelectron spectra under the scaling transform[J]. Chin. Phys. B, 2013, 22(1): 13207-013207.