Suppression of Coriolis error in weak equivalence principle test using 85Rb-87Rb dual-species atom interferometer

doi:10.1088/1674-1056/ab969a

中国物理B ›› 2020, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (7): 70305-070305.doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/ab969a

所属专题： SPECIAL TOPIC — Ultracold atom and its application in precision measurement

Suppression of Coriolis error in weak equivalence principle test using ⁸⁵Rb-⁸⁷Rb dual-species atom interferometer

Wei-Tao Duan(段维涛), Chuan He(何川), Si-Tong Yan(闫思彤), Yu-Hang Ji(冀宇航), Lin Zhou(周林), Xi Chen(陈曦), Jin Wang(王谨), Ming-Sheng Zhan(詹明生)

1 State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance and Atomic and Molecular Physics, Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences-Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Wuhan 430071, China;
2 School of Physics, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
3 Center for Cold Atoms Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China

收稿日期:2020-03-31 修回日期:2020-05-04 出版日期:2020-07-05 发布日期:2020-07-05
通讯作者: Lin Zhou, Jin Wang E-mail:lzhou@wipm.ac.cn;wangjin@wipm.ac.cn
基金资助:
Project supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFA0302002), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 91736311 and 11574354), Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDB21010100), and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. 2016300).

Suppression of Coriolis error in weak equivalence principle test using ⁸⁵Rb-⁸⁷Rb dual-species atom interferometer

Wei-Tao Duan(段维涛)^1,2, Chuan He(何川)^1,2, Si-Tong Yan(闫思彤)^1,3, Yu-Hang Ji(冀宇航)¹, Lin Zhou(周林)^1,2,3, Xi Chen(陈曦)^1,2,3, Jin Wang(王谨)^1,2,3, Ming-Sheng Zhan(詹明生)^1,2,3

1 State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance and Atomic and Molecular Physics, Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences-Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Wuhan 430071, China;
2 School of Physics, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
3 Center for Cold Atoms Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China

Received:2020-03-31 Revised:2020-05-04 Online:2020-07-05 Published:2020-07-05
Contact: Lin Zhou, Jin Wang E-mail:lzhou@wipm.ac.cn;wangjin@wipm.ac.cn
Supported by:
Project supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFA0302002), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 91736311 and 11574354), Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDB21010100), and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. 2016300).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： Coriolis effect is an important error source in the weak equivalence principle (WEP) test using atom interferometer. In this paper, the problem of Coriolis error in WEP test is studied theoretically and experimentally. In theoretical simulation, the Coriolis effect is analyzed by establishing an error model. The measurement errors of Eötvös coefficient (η) in WEP test related to experimental parameters, such as horizontal-velocity difference and horizontal-position difference of atomic clouds, horizontal-position difference of detectors, and rotation compensation of Raman laser's mirror are calculated. In experimental investigation, the position difference between ⁸⁵Rb and ⁸⁷Rb atomic clouds is reduced to 0.1 mm by optimizing the experimental parameters, an alternating detection method is used to suppress the error caused by detection position difference, thus the Coriolis error related to the atomic clouds and detectors is reduced to 1.1×10^-9. This Coriolis error is further corrected by compensating the rotation of Raman laser's mirror, and the total uncertainty of η measurement related to the Coriolis effect is reduced as δη=4.4×10 ^-11.

关键词: atom interferometer, weak equivalence principle test, Coriolis effect

Abstract: Coriolis effect is an important error source in the weak equivalence principle (WEP) test using atom interferometer. In this paper, the problem of Coriolis error in WEP test is studied theoretically and experimentally. In theoretical simulation, the Coriolis effect is analyzed by establishing an error model. The measurement errors of Eötvös coefficient (η) in WEP test related to experimental parameters, such as horizontal-velocity difference and horizontal-position difference of atomic clouds, horizontal-position difference of detectors, and rotation compensation of Raman laser's mirror are calculated. In experimental investigation, the position difference between ⁸⁵Rb and ⁸⁷Rb atomic clouds is reduced to 0.1 mm by optimizing the experimental parameters, an alternating detection method is used to suppress the error caused by detection position difference, thus the Coriolis error related to the atomic clouds and detectors is reduced to 1.1×10^-9. This Coriolis error is further corrected by compensating the rotation of Raman laser's mirror, and the total uncertainty of η measurement related to the Coriolis effect is reduced as δη=4.4×10 ^-11.

Key words: atom interferometer, weak equivalence principle test, Coriolis effect

中图分类号: (Atom and neutron interferometry)

03.75.Dg

06.30.Gv (Velocity, acceleration, and rotation) 37.25.+k (Atom interferometry techniques) 32.80.Qk (Coherent control of atomic interactions with photons)

段维涛, 何川, 闫思彤, 冀宇航, 周林, 陈曦, 王谨, 詹明生. Suppression of Coriolis error in weak equivalence principle test using ⁸⁵Rb-⁸⁷Rb dual-species atom interferometer[J]. 中国物理B, 2020, 29(7): 70305-070305.

Wei-Tao Duan(段维涛), Chuan He(何川), Si-Tong Yan(闫思彤), Yu-Hang Ji(冀宇航), Lin Zhou(周林), Xi Chen(陈曦), Jin Wang(王谨), Ming-Sheng Zhan(詹明生). Suppression of Coriolis error in weak equivalence principle test using ⁸⁵Rb-⁸⁷Rb dual-species atom interferometer[J]. Chin. Phys. B, 2020, 29(7): 70305-070305.

参考文献 40

[1]	Wang J 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 053702 doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/24/5/053702
[2]	Kasevich M A and Chu S 1991 Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 181 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.181
[3]	Peters A, Chung K Y and Chu S 1999 Nature 400 849 doi: 10.1038/23655
[4]	Zhou L, Xiong Z Y, Yang W, Tang B, Peng W C, Wang Y B, Xu P, Wang J and Zhan M S 2011 Chin. Phys. Lett. 28 013701 doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/28/1/013701
[5]	Merlet S, Bodart Q, Malossi N, Landragin A, Pereira Dos Santos F, Gitlein O and Timmen L 2010 Metrologia 47 L9
[6]	Poli N, Wang F Y, Tarallo M G, Alberti A, Prevedelli M and Tino G M 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 038501 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.038501
[7]	Hu Z K, Sun B L, Duan X C, Zhou M K, Chen L L, Zhan S, Zhang Q Z and Luo J 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 043610 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.88.043610
[8]	Bidel Y, Carraz O, Charriére R, Cadoret M, Zahzam N and Bresson A 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 102 144107 doi: 10.1063/1.4801756
[9]	Wu B, Wang Z, Cheng B, Wang Q, Xu A and Lin Q 2014 Metrologia 51 452 doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/51/5/452
[10]	Wang S K, Zhao Y, Zhuang W, Li T C, Wu S Q, Feng J Y and Li C J 2018 Metrologia 55 360 doi: 10.1088/1681-7575/aab637
[11]	Huang P W, Tang B, Chen X, Zhong J Q, Xiong Z Y, Zhou L, Wang J and Zhan M S 2019 Metrologia 56 045012 doi: 10.1088/1681-7575/ab2f01
[12]	Snadden M J, McGuirk J M, Bouyer P, Haritos K G and Kasevich M A 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 971 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.971
[13]	Duan X C, Zhou M K, Mao D K, Yao H B, Deng X B, Luo J and Hu Z K 2014 Phys. Rev. A 90 023617 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.90.023617
[14]	Wang Y P, Zhong J Q, Song H W, Zhu L, Li Y M, Chen X, Li R B, Wang J and Zhan M S 2017 Phys. Rev. A 95 053612 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.95.053612
[15]	Canuel B, Leduc F, Holleville D, Gauguet A, Fils J, Virdis A, Clairon A, Dimarcq N, Borde C J, Landragin A and Bouyer P 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 010402 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.010402
[16]	Tackmann G, Berg P, Schubert C, Abend S, Gilowski M, Ertmer W and Rasel E M 2012 New J. Phys. 14 015002 doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/14/1/015002
[17]	Dickerson S M, Hogan J M, Sugarbaker A, Johnson D M S and Kasevich M A 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 083001 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.083001
[18]	Yao Z W, Lu S B, Li R B, Wang K, Cao L, Wang J and Zhan M S 2016 Chin. Phys. Lett. 33 083701 doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/33/8/083701
[19]	Yao Z W, Lu S B, Li R B, Luo J, Wang J and Zhan M S 2018 Phys. Rev. A 97 013620 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.97.013620
[20]	Fray S, Diez C A, Hänsch T W and Weitz M 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 240404 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.240404
[21]	Bonnin A, Zahzam N, Bidel Y and Bresson A 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 043615 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.88.043615
[22]	Schlippert D, Hartwig J, Albers H, Richardson L L, Schubert C, Roura A, Schleich W P, Ertmer W and Rasel E M 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 203002 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.203002
[23]	Tarallo M G, Mazzoni T, Poli N, Sutyrin D V, Zhang X and Tino G M 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 023005 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.023005
[24]	Zhou L, Long S T, Tang B, Chen X, Gao F, Peng W C, Duan W T, Zhong J Q, Xiong Z Y, Wang J, Zhang Y Z and Zhan M S 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 013004 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.013004
[25]	Barrett B, Antoni-Micollier L, Chichet L, Battelier B, Lévéque T, Landragin A and Bouyer P 2016 Nat. Commun. 7 13786 doi: 10.1038/ncomms13786
[26]	Duan X C, Zhou M K, Deng X B, Yao H B, Shao C G, Luo J and Hu Z K 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 023001 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.023001
[27]	Rosi G, D'Amico G, Cacciapuoti L, Sorrentino F, Prevedelli M, Zych M, Brukner Č and Tino G M 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 15529 doi: 10.1038/ncomms15529
[28]	Zhang K, Zhou M K, Cheng Y, Chen L L, Luo Q, Xu W J, Cao L S, Duan X C and Hu Z K 2020 Chin. Phys. Lett. 37 043701 doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/37/4/043701
[29]	Zhou L, He C, Yan S T, Chen X, Duan W T, Xu R D, Zhou C, Ji Y H, Bathwal S, Wang Q, Hou Z, Xiong Z Y, Gao D F, Zhang Y Z, Ni W T, Wang J and Zhan M S 2019 arXiv:1904.07096 [quant-ph]
[30]	Freier C, Hauth M, Schkolnik V, Leykauf B, Schilling M, Wziontek H, Scherneck H G, Müller J and Peters A 2016 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 723 012050 doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/723/1/012050
[31]	Fu Z J, Wu B, Cheng B, Zhou Y, Weng K, Zhu D, Wang Z and Lin Q 2019 Metrologia 56 025001 doi: 10.1088/1681-7575/aafcc7
[32]	Wu X, Pagel Z, Malek B S, Nguyen T H, Zi F, Scheirer D S and Müller H 2019 Sci. Adv. 5 eaax0800
[33]	Peters A, Chung K Y and Chu S 2001 Metrologia 38 25 doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/38/1/4
[34]	Louchet-Chauvet A, Farah T, Bodart Q, Clairon A, Landragin A, Merlet S and Pereira Dos Santos F 2011 New J. Phys. 13 065025 doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/13/6/065025
[35]	Lan S Y, Kuan P C, Estey B, Haslinger P and Müller H 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 090402 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.090402
[36]	Bongs K, Launay R and Kasevich M A 2006 Appl. Phys. B 84 599 doi: 10.1007/s00340-006-2397-5
[37]	Farah T, Gillot P, Cheng B, Landragin A, Merlet S and Pereira Dos Santos F 2014 Phys. Rev. A 90 023606 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.90.023606
[38]	Hogan J M, Johnson D M S and Kasevich M A 2008 arXiv:0806.3261v1 [physics.atom-ph]
[39]	Zhou L, Xiong Z Y, Yang W, Tang B, Peng W C, Hao K, Li R B, Liu M, Wang J and Zhan M S 2011 Gen. Relat. Gravit. 43 1931 doi: 10.1007/s10714-011-1167-9
[40]	Foster G T, Fixler J B, McGuirk J M and Kasevich M A 2002 Opt. Lett. 27 951 doi: 10.1364/OL.27.000951

Suppression of Coriolis error in weak equivalence principle test using ⁸⁵Rb-⁸⁷Rb dual-species atom interferometer

Suppression of Coriolis error in weak equivalence principle test using ⁸⁵Rb-⁸⁷Rb dual-species atom interferometer

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 40

相关文章 13

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	Eng Boon Ng and C. H. Raymond Ooi. Measuring gravitational effect of superintense laser by spin-squeezed Bose—Einstein condensates interferometer[J]. 中国物理B, 2022, 31(5): 53701-053701.
[2]	张炯阳, 陈乐乐, 程源, 罗覃, 舒玉彪, 段小春, 周敏康, 胡忠坤. Movable precision gravimeters based on cold atom interferometry[J]. 中国物理B, 2020, 29(9): 93702-093702.
[3]	李志远. Atom interferometers with weak-measurement path detectors and their quantum mechanical analysis[J]. 中国物理B, 2019, 28(6): 60301-060301.
[4]	罗杰, 沈良程, 邵成刚, 刘祺, 张惠捷. Correlation method estimation of the modulation signal in the weak equivalence principle test[J]. 中国物理B, 2018, 27(8): 80402-080402.
[5]	段小春, 毛德凯, 邓小兵, 周敏康, 邵成刚, 祝竺, 胡忠坤. Comparison of the sensitivities for atom interferometers in two different operation methods[J]. 中国物理B, 2018, 27(1): 13701-013701.
[6]	徐家豪, 邵成刚, 罗杰, 刘祺, 邾琳, 赵慧慧. Effect of gravity gradient in weak equivalence principle test[J]. 中国物理B, 2017, 26(8): 80401-080401.
[7]	邓小兵, 段小春, 毛德凯, 周敏康, 邵成刚, 胡忠坤. Common-mode noise rejection using fringe-locking method in WEP test by simultaneous dual-species atom interferometers[J]. 中国物理B, 2017, 26(4): 43702-043702.
[8]	王启宇, 王兆英, 付志杰, 林强. Investigation of the thermal adaptability for a mobile cold atom gravimeter[J]. 中国物理B, 2016, 25(12): 123701-123701.
[9]	贾爱爱, 杨俊, 颜树华, 胡青青, 罗玉昆, 朱诗尧. Wave–particle duality in a Raman atom interferometer[J]. 中国物理B, 2015, 24(8): 80302-080302.
[10]	周敏康, 段小春, 陈乐乐, 罗覃, 徐耀耀, 胡忠坤. Micro-Gal level gravity measurements with cold atom interferometry[J]. 中国物理B, 2015, 24(5): 50401-050401.
[11]	程冰, 王兆英, 许翱鹏, 王启宇, 林强. Rapid extraction of the phase shift of the cold-atom interferometer via phase demodulation[J]. 中国物理B, 2015, 24(11): 113704-113704.
[12]	李志远. Elementary analysis of interferometers for wave–particle duality test and the prospect of going beyond the complementarity principle[J]. 中国物理B, 2014, 23(11): 110309-110309.
[13]	范洪义, 孙明斋. ANGULAR VELOCITY AND CORIOLIS EFFECT IN TIME-DEPENDENT QUANTUM MECHANICAL SU₂ ROTATION[J]. 中国物理B, 2001, 10(5): 380-383.