Common-mode noise rejection using fringe-locking method in WEP test by simultaneous dual-species atom interferometers

doi:10.1088/1674-1056/26/4/043702

中国物理B ›› 2017, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (4): 43702-043702.doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/26/4/043702

• ATOMIC AND MOLECULAR PHYSICS • 上一篇下一篇

Common-mode noise rejection using fringe-locking method in WEP test by simultaneous dual-species atom interferometers

Xiao-Bing Deng(邓小兵), Xiao-Chun Duan(段小春), De-Kai Mao(毛德凯), Min-Kang Zhou(周敏康), Cheng-Gang Shao(邵成刚), Zhong-Kun Hu(胡忠坤)

MOE Key Laboratory of Fundamental Physical Quantities Measurements, School of Physics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China

收稿日期:2016-11-15 修回日期:2017-01-25 出版日期:2017-04-05 发布日期:2017-04-05
通讯作者: Zhong-Kun Hu E-mail:zkhu@hust.edu.cn
基金资助:
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41127002, 11574099, and 11474115) and the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. 2010CB832806).

Common-mode noise rejection using fringe-locking method in WEP test by simultaneous dual-species atom interferometers

Xiao-Bing Deng(邓小兵), Xiao-Chun Duan(段小春), De-Kai Mao(毛德凯), Min-Kang Zhou(周敏康), Cheng-Gang Shao(邵成刚), Zhong-Kun Hu(胡忠坤)

MOE Key Laboratory of Fundamental Physical Quantities Measurements, School of Physics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China

Received:2016-11-15 Revised:2017-01-25 Online:2017-04-05 Published:2017-04-05
Contact: Zhong-Kun Hu E-mail:zkhu@hust.edu.cn
Supported by:
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41127002, 11574099, and 11474115) and the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. 2010CB832806).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： We theoretically investigate the application of the fringe-locking method (FLM) in the dual-species quantum test of the weak equivalence principle (WEP). With the FLM, the measurement is performed invariably at the midfringe, and the extraction of the phase shift for atom interferometers is linearized. For the simultaneous interferometers, this linearization enables a good common-mode rejection of vibration noise, which is usually the main limit for high precision WEP tests of the dual-species kind. We note that this method also allows for an unbiased determination of the gravity accelerations difference, which meanwhile is ready to be implemented.

关键词: weak equivalence principle, dual-species atom interferometers, fringe locking, vibration noise rejection

Abstract: We theoretically investigate the application of the fringe-locking method (FLM) in the dual-species quantum test of the weak equivalence principle (WEP). With the FLM, the measurement is performed invariably at the midfringe, and the extraction of the phase shift for atom interferometers is linearized. For the simultaneous interferometers, this linearization enables a good common-mode rejection of vibration noise, which is usually the main limit for high precision WEP tests of the dual-species kind. We note that this method also allows for an unbiased determination of the gravity accelerations difference, which meanwhile is ready to be implemented.

Key words: weak equivalence principle, dual-species atom interferometers, fringe locking, vibration noise rejection

中图分类号: (Atom interferometry techniques)

37.25.+k

04.80.-y (Experimental studies of gravity) 03.75.Dg (Atom and neutron interferometry) 04.20.Cv (Fundamental problems and general formalism)

邓小兵, 段小春, 毛德凯, 周敏康, 邵成刚, 胡忠坤. Common-mode noise rejection using fringe-locking method in WEP test by simultaneous dual-species atom interferometers[J]. 中国物理B, 2017, 26(4): 43702-043702.

Xiao-Bing Deng(邓小兵), Xiao-Chun Duan(段小春), De-Kai Mao(毛德凯), Min-Kang Zhou(周敏康), Cheng-Gang Shao(邵成刚), Zhong-Kun Hu(胡忠坤). Common-mode noise rejection using fringe-locking method in WEP test by simultaneous dual-species atom interferometers[J]. Chin. Phys. B, 2017, 26(4): 43702-043702.

参考文献 58

[1]	Kasevich M and Chu S 1991 Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 181
[2]	Peters A, Chung K Y and Chu S 1999 Nature 400 849
[3]	Peters A, Chung K Y and Chu S 2001 Metrologia 38 25
[4]	Le Gouët J, Mehlstäubler T, Kim J, Merlet S, Clairon A, Landragin A and Dos Santos F P 2008 Appl. Phys. B 92 133
[5]	Müller H, Chiow S w, Herrmann S, Chu S and Chung K Y 2008 Phys.Rev. Lett. 100 031101
[6]	Zhou M K, Hu Z K, Duan X C, Sun B L, Chen L L, Zhang Q Z and Luo J 2012 Phys. Rev. A 86 043630
[7]	Bidel Y, Carraz O, Charrière R, Cadoret M, Zahzam N and Bresson A 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 102 144107
[8]	Altin P A, Johnsson M T, Negnevitsky V, Dennis G R, Anderson R P, Debs J E, Szigeti S S, Hardman K S, Bennetts S, McDonald G D,Turner L D, Close J D and Robins N P 2013 New J. Phys. 15 023009
[9]	Hu Z K, Sun B L, Duan X C, Zhou M K, Chen L L, Zhan S, Zhang Q Z and Luo J 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 043610
[10]	Gillot P, Francis O, Landragin A, Dos Santos F P and Merlet S 2014 Metrologia 51 L15
[11]	Snadden M, McGuirk J, Bouyer P, Haritos K and Kasevich M 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 971
[12]	McGuirk J, Foster G, Fixler J, Snadden M and Kasevich M 2002 Phys. Rev. A 65 033608
[13]	Sorrentino F, Bodart Q, Cacciapuoti L, Lien Y H, Prevedelli M, Rosi G, Salvi L and Tino G 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 023607
[14]	Yu N, Kohel J, Kellogg J and Maleki L 2006 Appl. Phys. B 84 647
[15]	Sorrentino F, Bertoldi A, Bodart Q, Cacciapuoti L, De Angelis M, Lien Y H, Prevedelli M, Rosi G and Tino G 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 101 114106
[16]	Duan X C, Zhou M K, Mao D K, Yao H B, Deng X B, Luo J and Hu Z K 2014 Phys. Rev. A 90 023617
[17]	Lenef A, Hammond T D, Smith E T, Chapman M S, Rubenstein R A and Pritchard D E 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 760
[18]	Gustavson T, Bouyer P and Kasevich M 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 2046
[19]	Wu S, Su E and Prentiss M 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 173201
[20]	Gauguet A, Canuel B, Léveque T, Chaibi W and Landragin A 2009 Phys. Rev. A 80 063604
[21]	Stockton J, Takase K and Kasevich M 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 133001
[22]	Tackmann G, Berg P, Schubert C, Abend S, Gilowski M, Ertmer W and Rasel E 2012 New J. Phys. 14 015002
[23]	Rakholia A V, McGuinness H J and Biedermann G W 2014 Phys. Rev. Appl. 2 054012
[24]	Davis J and Narducci F 2008 J. Mod. Opt. 55 3173
[25]	Zhou M K, Hu Z K, Duan X C, Sun B L, Zhao J B and Luo J 2010 Phys. Rev. A 82 061602
[26]	Hu Z K, Duan X C, Zhou M K, Sun B L, Zhao J B, Huang M M and Luo J 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 013620
[27]	Barrett B, Chan I and Kumarakrishnan A 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 063623
[28]	Fixler J B, Foster G, McGuirk J and Kasevich M 2007 Science 315 74
[29]	Lamporesi G, Bertoldi A, Cacciapuoti L, Prevedelli M and Tino G 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 050801
[30]	Rosi G, Sorrentino F, Cacciapuoti L, Prevedelli M and Tino G 2014 Nature 510 518
[31]	Fray S, Diez C A, Hänsch T W and Weitz M 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 240404
[32]	Bonnin A, Zahzam N, Bidel Y and Bresson A 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 043615
[33]	Bonnin A, Zahzam N, Bidel Y and Bresson A 2015 Phys. Rev. A 92 023626
[34]	Schlippert D, Hartwig J, Albers H, Richardson L L, Schubert C, Roura A, Schleich W P, Ertmer W and Rasel E M 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 203002
[35]	Tarallo M, Mazzoni T, Poli N, Sutyrin D, Zhang X and Tino G 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 023005
[36]	Zhou L, Long S, Tang B, Chen X, Gao F, Peng W, Duan W, Zhong J, Xiong Z, Wang J, Zhang Y and Zhan M 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 013004
[37]	Duan X C, Deng X B, Zhou M K, Xu W J, Xiong F, Xu Y Y, Shao C G, Luo J and Hu Z K 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 023001
[38]	Williams J G, Turyshev S G and Boggs D H 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 261101
[39]	Schlamminger S, Choi K Y, Wagner T, Gundlach J and Adelberger E 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 041101
[40]	Colella R, Overhauser A W and Werner S A 1975 Phys. Rev. Lett. 34 1472
[41]	Lämmerzahl C 1998 Class. Quantum Grav. 15 13
[42]	Dimopoulos S, Graham P W, Hogan J M and Kasevich M A 2008 Phys. Rev. D 78 042003
[43]	Aguilera D, Ahlers H, Battelier B, et al. 2014 Class. Quantum Grav. 31 115010
[44]	Altschul B, Bailey Q G, Blanchet L, et al. 2015 Adv. Space Res. 55 501
[45]	Sugarbaker A, Dickerson S M, Hogan J M, Johnson D M and Kasevich M A 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 113002
[46]	Kuhn C, McDonald G, Hardman K, Bennetts S, Everitt P, Altin P, Debs J, Close J and Robins N 2014 New J. Phys. 16 073035
[47]	Foster G, Fixler J, McGuirk J and Kasevich M 2002 Opt. Lett. 27 951
[48]	Stockton J K, Wu X and Kasevich M A 2007 Phys. Rev. A 76 033613
[49]	Varoquaux G, Nyman R A, Geiger R, Cheinet P, Landragin A and Bouyer P 2009 New J. Phys. 11 113010
[50]	Chen X, Zhong J, Song H, Zhu L, Wang J and Zhan M 2014 Phys. Rev. A 90 023609
[51]	Dos Santos F P 2015 Phys. Rev. A 91 063615
[52]	Barrett B, Antoni-Micollier L, Chichet L, Battelier B, Gominet P A, Bertoldi A, Bouyer P and Landragin A 2009 New J. Phys. 17 085010
[53]	Clairon A, Lauren P t, Santarelli G, Ghezali S, Lea S and Bahoura M 1995 IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 44 128
[54]	Cheinet P, Dos Santos F P, Petelski T, Le Gouët J, Kim J, Therkildsen K, Clairon A and Landragin A 2006 Appl. Phys. B 84 643
[55]	Merlet S, Le Gouët J, Bodart Q, Clairon A, Landragin A, Dos Santos F P and Rouchon P 2009 Metrologia 46 87
[56]	Zhou M K, Pelle B, Hilico A and dos Santos F P 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 013604
[57]	Li X, Shao C G and Hu Z K 2015 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 32 248
[58]	Cheinet P, Canuel B, Dos Santos F P, Gauguet A, Yver-Leduc F and Landragin A 2008 IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 57 1141

Common-mode noise rejection using fringe-locking method in WEP test by simultaneous dual-species atom interferometers

Common-mode noise rejection using fringe-locking method in WEP test by simultaneous dual-species atom interferometers

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 58

相关文章 5

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	段维涛, 何川, 闫思彤, 冀宇航, 周林, 陈曦, 王谨, 詹明生. Suppression of Coriolis error in weak equivalence principle test using ⁸⁵Rb-⁸⁷Rb dual-species atom interferometer[J]. 中国物理B, 2020, 29(7): 70305-070305.
[2]	罗杰, 沈良程, 邵成刚, 刘祺, 张惠捷. Correlation method estimation of the modulation signal in the weak equivalence principle test[J]. 中国物理B, 2018, 27(8): 80402-080402.
[3]	段小春, 毛德凯, 邓小兵, 周敏康, 邵成刚, 祝竺, 胡忠坤. Comparison of the sensitivities for atom interferometers in two different operation methods[J]. 中国物理B, 2018, 27(1): 13701-013701.
[4]	占文泽, 罗杰, 邵成刚, 郑第, 殷蔚明, 王典洪. Determination of the thermal noise limit in test of weak equivalence principle with a rotating torsion pendulum[J]. 中国物理B, 2017, 26(9): 90401-090401.
[5]	徐家豪, 邵成刚, 罗杰, 刘祺, 邾琳, 赵慧慧. Effect of gravity gradient in weak equivalence principle test[J]. 中国物理B, 2017, 26(8): 80401-080401.