Dynamic evolution of vortex structures induced bytri-electrode plasma actuator

doi:10.1088/1674-1056/ab671f

中国物理B ›› 2020, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2): 24704-024704.doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/ab671f

• ELECTROMAGNETISM, OPTICS, ACOUSTICS, HEAT TRANSFER, CLASSICAL MECHANICS, AND FLUID DYNAMICS • 上一篇下一篇

Dynamic evolution of vortex structures induced bytri-electrode plasma actuator

Bo-Rui Zheng(郑博睿), Ming Xue(薛明), Chang Ge(葛畅)

1 School of Automation and Information Engineering, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 710048, China;
2 Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China

收稿日期:2019-11-08 修回日期:2019-12-13 出版日期:2020-02-05 发布日期:2020-02-05
通讯作者: Bo-Rui Zheng E-mail:narcker@xaut.edu.cn
基金资助:
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51607188), the Foundation for Key Laboratories of National Defense Science and Technology, China (Grant No. 614220202011801), the Shaanxi Provincial Natural Science Basic Research Program, China (Grant No. 2019JM-393), the Shaanxi Provincial Key Industry Innovation, Chain (Grant No. 2017ZDCXL-GY-06-01), and Xi'an Muinicipal Science and Technology Project, China (Grant No. 201805037YD15CG21(28)).

Dynamic evolution of vortex structures induced bytri-electrode plasma actuator

Bo-Rui Zheng(郑博睿)¹, Ming Xue(薛明)², Chang Ge(葛畅)¹

1 School of Automation and Information Engineering, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 710048, China;
2 Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China

Received:2019-11-08 Revised:2019-12-13 Online:2020-02-05 Published:2020-02-05
Contact: Bo-Rui Zheng E-mail:narcker@xaut.edu.cn
Supported by:
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51607188), the Foundation for Key Laboratories of National Defense Science and Technology, China (Grant No. 614220202011801), the Shaanxi Provincial Natural Science Basic Research Program, China (Grant No. 2019JM-393), the Shaanxi Provincial Key Industry Innovation, Chain (Grant No. 2017ZDCXL-GY-06-01), and Xi'an Muinicipal Science and Technology Project, China (Grant No. 201805037YD15CG21(28)).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： Plasma flow control is a new type of active flow control approach based on plasma pneumatic actuation. Dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) actuators have become a focus of international aerodynamic research. However, the practical applications of typical DBDs are largely restricted due to their limited discharge area and low relative-induced velocity. The further improvement of performance will be beneficial for engineering applications. In this paper, high-speed schlieren and high-speed particle image velocimetry (PIV) are employed to study the flow field induced by three kinds of plasma actuations in a static atmosphere, and the differences in induced flow field structure among typical DBD, extended DBD (EX-DBD), and tri-electrode sliding discharge (TED) are compared. The analyzing of the dynamic evolution of the maximum horizontal velocity over time, the velocity profile at a fixed horizontal position, and the momentum and body force in a control volume reveals that the induced velocity peak value and profile velocity height of EX-DBD are higher than those of the other two types of actuation, suggesting that EX-DBD actuation has the strongest temporal aerodynamic effect among the three types of actuations. The TED actuation not only can enlarge the plasma extension but also has the longest duration in the entire pulsed period and the greatest influence on the height and width of the airflow near the wall surface. Thus, the TED actuation has the ability to continuously influencing a larger three-dimensional space above the surface of the plasma actuator.

关键词: plasma flow control, dielectric barrier discharge, vortex dynamics, tri-electrode sliding discharge

Abstract: Plasma flow control is a new type of active flow control approach based on plasma pneumatic actuation. Dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) actuators have become a focus of international aerodynamic research. However, the practical applications of typical DBDs are largely restricted due to their limited discharge area and low relative-induced velocity. The further improvement of performance will be beneficial for engineering applications. In this paper, high-speed schlieren and high-speed particle image velocimetry (PIV) are employed to study the flow field induced by three kinds of plasma actuations in a static atmosphere, and the differences in induced flow field structure among typical DBD, extended DBD (EX-DBD), and tri-electrode sliding discharge (TED) are compared. The analyzing of the dynamic evolution of the maximum horizontal velocity over time, the velocity profile at a fixed horizontal position, and the momentum and body force in a control volume reveals that the induced velocity peak value and profile velocity height of EX-DBD are higher than those of the other two types of actuation, suggesting that EX-DBD actuation has the strongest temporal aerodynamic effect among the three types of actuations. The TED actuation not only can enlarge the plasma extension but also has the longest duration in the entire pulsed period and the greatest influence on the height and width of the airflow near the wall surface. Thus, the TED actuation has the ability to continuously influencing a larger three-dimensional space above the surface of the plasma actuator.

Key words: plasma flow control, dielectric barrier discharge, vortex dynamics, tri-electrode sliding discharge

中图分类号: (Vortex dynamics)

47.32.C-

52.40.-w (Plasma interactions (nonlaser)) 52.50.Nr (Plasma heating by DC fields; ohmic heating, arcs)

郑博睿, 薛明, 葛畅. Dynamic evolution of vortex structures induced bytri-electrode plasma actuator[J]. 中国物理B, 2020, 29(2): 24704-024704.

Bo-Rui Zheng(郑博睿), Ming Xue(薛明), Chang Ge(葛畅). Dynamic evolution of vortex structures induced bytri-electrode plasma actuator[J]. Chin. Phys. B, 2020, 29(2): 24704-024704.

参考文献 22

[1]	Corke T C, Enloe C L and Wilkinson S P 2010 Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 42 505 doi: 10.1146/annurev-fluid-121108-145550
[2]	Wang J J, Choi K S, Feng L H, Jukes T N and Whalley R D 2013 Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 62 52 doi: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2013.05.003
[3]	Li Y H, Liang H, Wu Y, Wang J and Wei 2008 J. Air Force Engineering University 9 5
[4]	Wei B, Wu Y, Liang H, Zhu Y F, Chen J, Zhao G Y, Song H M and Jia M 2019 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 138 163 doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.04.051
[5]	Zheng B R, Ge C, Ke X Z, Xue M and Wang Y S 2019 AIAA 2019 0306
[6]	Enloe C L, McLaughlin T E and VanDyken R D 2004 AIAA J. 42 595 doi: 10.2514/1.3884
[7]	Thomas F O, Corke T C, Iqbal M, Kozlov A and Schatzman D 2009 AIAA J. 47 2169 doi: 10.2514/1.41588
[8]	Zheng B R, Gao C, Li Y B, Feng L and Luo S J 2013 Plasma Sci. Technol. 15 350 doi: 10.1088/1009-0630/15/4/08
[9]	Louste C, Artana G, Moreau E and Touchard G 2005 J. Electrostat. 63 615 doi: 10.1016/j.elstat.2005.03.026
[10]	Moreau E, Sosa R and Artana G 2008 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 41 115204 doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/41/11/115204
[11]	Zheng B R, Chen J, Ge C, Ke X Z and Liang H 2019 Proc. IMechE Part. G: J. Aerosp. Eng. 233 4788 doi: 10.1177/0954410019830266
[12]	Moreau E, Louste C and Touchard G 2008 J. Electrostat. 66 107 doi: 10.1016/j.elstat.2007.08.011
[13]	Benard N and Moreau E 2014 Exp. Fluids 55 1846 doi: 10.1007/s00348-014-1846-x
[14]	Steven D S, Richard E H, William B, Liu D, Reeder M F and Stults J 2016 AIAA J. 54 3313
[15]	Steven D S, Richard E H, William B, Liu D, Reeder M F and Stults J 2011 AIAA 2011 3732
[16]	Zheng B R, Xue M, Ke X Z, Ge C, Wang Y S, Liu F and Luo S J 2019 AIAA J. 57 467 doi: 10.2514/1.J057596
[17]	Zheng B R, Ke X Z, Ge C, Zhu Y F, Wu Y, Liu F and Luo S J 2020 AIAA J. 58 In Press
[18]	Nishida H and Shiraishi T 2015 AIAA J. 53 3483 doi: 10.2514/1.J053784
[19]	Soloviev V R and Krivtsov V M 2009 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42 125208 doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/42/12/125208
[20]	Gibalov V I and Pietsch G J 2000 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 33 2618 doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/33/20/315
[21]	Soloviev V R 2012 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 45 025205 doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/45/2/025205
[22]	Whalley R D and Kwing S C 2012 J. Fluid Mech. 703 192 doi: 10.1017/jfm.2012.206

Dynamic evolution of vortex structures induced bytri-electrode plasma actuator

Dynamic evolution of vortex structures induced bytri-electrode plasma actuator

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 22

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	Liping Zhang(张丽萍), Zuyu Xu(徐祖雨), Xiaojie Li(黎晓杰), Xu Zhang(张旭), Mingyang Qin(秦明阳), Ruozhou Zhang(张若舟), Juan Xu(徐娟), Wenxin Cheng(程文欣), Jie Yuan(袁洁), Huabing Wang(王华兵), Alejandro V. Silhanek, Beiyi Zhu(朱北沂), Jun Miao(苗君), and Kui Jin(金魁). Cascade excitation of vortex motion and reentrant superconductivity in flexible Nb thin films[J]. 中国物理B, 2023, 32(4): 47302-047302.
[2]	Zhen Liu(刘震), Zi-Xuan Yang(杨子萱), Chuan Xu(徐川), Jia-Ji Zhao(赵嘉佶), Lu-Junyu Wang(王陆君瑜), Yun-Qi Fu(富云齐), Xue-Lei Liang(梁学磊), Hui-Ming Cheng(成会明), Wen-Cai Ren(任文才), Xiao-Song Wu(吴孝松), and Ning Kang(康宁). Finite superconducting square wire-network based on two-dimensional crystalline Mo₂C[J]. 中国物理B, 2022, 31(9): 97404-097404.
[3]	关弘路, 陈向荣, 江铁, 杜浩, Ashish Paramane, 周浩. Electrical modeling of dielectric barrier discharge considering surface charge on the plasma modified material[J]. 中国物理B, 2020, 29(7): 75204-075204.
[4]	郑博睿, 薛明, 葛畅. Forebody asymmetric vortex control with extended dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators[J]. 中国物理B, 2020, 29(6): 64703-064703.
[5]	韩蓉, 董丽芳, 黄加玉, 孙浩洋, 刘彬彬, 米彦霖. Influence of vibration on spatiotemporal structure of the pattern in dielectric barrier discharge[J]. 中国物理B, 2019, 28(7): 75204-075204.
[6]	周思引, 车学科, 王迪, 聂万胜. Effect of actuating frequency on plasma assisted detonation initiation[J]. 中国物理B, 2018, 27(2): 25208-025208.
[7]	苏志, 李军, 梁华, 郑博睿, 魏彪, 陈杰, 谢理科. UAV flight test of plasma slats and ailerons with microsecond dielectric barrier discharge[J]. 中国物理B, 2018, 27(10): 105205-105205.
[8]	张志波, 吴云, 贾敏, 宋慧敏, 孙正中, 李应红. Modeling and optimization of the multichannel spark discharge[J]. 中国物理B, 2017, 26(6): 65204-065204.
[9]	宋慧敏, 贾敏, 金迪, 崔巍, 吴云. Electric and plasma characteristics of RF discharge plasma actuation under varying pressures[J]. 中国物理B, 2016, 25(3): 35204-035204.
[10]	范伟丽, 董丽芳. Spontaneous transition of one-dimensional plasma photonic crystal's orientation in dielectric barrier discharge[J]. Chin. Phys. B, 2013, 22(1): 14213-014213.
[11]	李雪辰, 牛东莹, 许龙飞, 贾鹏英, 常媛媛 . Simulation of transition from Townsend mode to glow discharge mode in a helium dielectric barrier discharge at atmospheric pressure[J]. 中国物理B, 2012, 21(7): 75204-075204.
[12]	尚万里, 张远涛, 王德真, 桑超峰, 江少恩, 杨家敏, 刘慎业, M. G. Kong. Concentric-ring structures in an atmospheric pressure helium dielectric barrier discharge[J]. 中国物理B, 2011, 20(1): 15201-015201.
[13]	吕博, 王新新, 罗海云, 梁卓. Characterizing uniform discharge in atmospheric helium by numerical modelling[J]. 中国物理B, 2009, 18(2): 646-651.
[14]	张红艳, 王德真, 王晓钢. Numerical studies of atmospheric pressure glow discharge controlled by a dielectric barrier between two coaxial electrodes[J]. 中国物理B, 2007, 16(4): 1089-1096.
[15]	董丽芳, 毛志国, 冉俊霞. Spatial uniformity of dielectric barrier discharge at moderate pd values[J]. 中国物理B, 2005, 14(8): 1618-1621.