Proof-of-principle experimental demonstration of quantum secure imaging based on quantum key distribution

doi:10.1088/1674-1056/ab3e66

中国物理B ›› 2019, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (10): 104203-104203.doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/ab3e66

• ELECTROMAGNETISM, OPTICS, ACOUSTICS, HEAT TRANSFER, CLASSICAL MECHANICS, AND FLUID DYNAMICS • 上一篇下一篇

Proof-of-principle experimental demonstration of quantum secure imaging based on quantum key distribution

Yi-Bo Zhao(赵义博), Wan-Li Zhang(张万里), Dong Wang(王东), Xiao-Tian Song(宋萧天), Liang-Jiang Zhou(周良将), Chi-Biao Ding(丁赤飚)

1 National Key Laboratory of Microwave Imaging Technology, Beijing 100190, China;
2 Institute of Electronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;
3 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

收稿日期:2019-06-05 修回日期:2019-08-15 出版日期:2019-10-05 发布日期:2019-10-05
通讯作者: Liang-Jiang Zhou E-mail:ljzhou@mail.ie.ac.cn

Proof-of-principle experimental demonstration of quantum secure imaging based on quantum key distribution

Yi-Bo Zhao(赵义博)^1,2, Wan-Li Zhang(张万里)^1,2, Dong Wang(王东)^1,2, Xiao-Tian Song(宋萧天)^1,2, Liang-Jiang Zhou(周良将)^1,2,3, Chi-Biao Ding(丁赤飚)^1,2,3

1 National Key Laboratory of Microwave Imaging Technology, Beijing 100190, China;
2 Institute of Electronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;
3 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2019-06-05 Revised:2019-08-15 Online:2019-10-05 Published:2019-10-05
Contact: Liang-Jiang Zhou E-mail:ljzhou@mail.ie.ac.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

We present a quantum secure imaging (QSI) scheme based on the phase encoding and weak+vacuum decoy-state BB84 protocol of quantum key distribution (QKD). It allows us to implement a computational ghost imaging (CGI) system with more simplified equipment and reconstructed algorithm by using a digital micro-mirror device (DMD) to preset the specific spatial distribution of the light intensity. What is more, the quantum bit error rate (QBER) and the secure key rate analytical functions of QKD are used to see through the intercept-resend jamming attacks and ensure the authenticity of the imaging information. In the experiment, we obtained the image of the object quickly and efficiently by measuring the signal photon counts with a single-photon detector (SPD), and achieved a secure key rate of 571.0 bps and a secure QBER of 3.99%, which is well below the lower bound of QBER of 14.51%. Besides, our imaging system uses a laser with invisible wavelength of 1550 nm, whose intensity is as low as single-photon, that can realize weak-light imaging and is immune to the stray light or air turbulence, thus it will become a better choice for quantum security radar against intercept-resend jamming attacks.

关键词: quantum secure imaging (QSI), quantum key distribution (QKD), digital micro-mirror device (DMD), quantum bit error rate (QBER)

Abstract:

Key words: quantum secure imaging (QSI), quantum key distribution (QKD), digital micro-mirror device (DMD), quantum bit error rate (QBER)

中图分类号: (Image forming and processing)

42.30.Va

03.67.Dd (Quantum cryptography and communication security)

赵义博, 张万里, 王东, 宋萧天, 周良将, 丁赤飚. Proof-of-principle experimental demonstration of quantum secure imaging based on quantum key distribution[J]. 中国物理B, 2019, 28(10): 104203-104203.

Yi-Bo Zhao(赵义博), Wan-Li Zhang(张万里), Dong Wang(王东), Xiao-Tian Song(宋萧天), Liang-Jiang Zhou(周良将), Chi-Biao Ding(丁赤飚). Proof-of-principle experimental demonstration of quantum secure imaging based on quantum key distribution[J]. Chin. Phys. B, 2019, 28(10): 104203-104203.

参考文献 31

[1]	Zhang J D, Zhu D Y and Zhang G 2013 IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 49 1290 doi: 10.1109/TAES.2013.6494414
[2]	Butt F A, Naqvi I H and Najam A I 2012 Proceedings of 2012 15th International Multitopic Conference (INMIC), December 13-15, 2012, Islamabad, Pakistan, p. 137
[3]	Gobby C, Yuan Z L and Shields A J 2004 Appl. Phys. Lett. 84 3762 doi: 10.1063/1.1738173
[4]	Zhao Y, Qi B, Ma X F, Lo H K and Qian L 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 070502 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.070502
[5]	Lo H K, Ma X F and Chen K 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 230504 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.230504
[6]	Pittman T B, Shih Y H, Strekalov D V and Sergienko A V 1995 Phys. Rev. A 52 R3429
[7]	Zhang P L, Gong W L, Shen X and Han S S 2010 Phys. Rev. A 82 033817 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.82.033817
[8]	Malik M, Maga? na-Loaiza O S and Boyd R W 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 101 241103 doi: 10.1063/1.4770298
[9]	Bennink R S, Bentley S J and Boyd R W 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 113601 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.113601
[10]	Gatti A, Brambilla E, Bache M and Lugiato L A 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 093602 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.093602
[11]	Valencia A, Scarcelli G, D'Angelo M and Shih Y H 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 063601 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.063601
[12]	Xiong J, Cao D Z, Huang F, Li H G, Sun X J and Wang K G 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 173601
[13]	Zhang D, Zhai Y H, Wu L A and Chen X H 2005 Opt. Lett. 30 2354 doi: 10.1364/OL.30.002354
[14]	Cheng J and Han S S 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 093903 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.093903
[15]	Zhang M H, Wei Q, Shen X, Liu Y F, Liu H L, Chen J and Han S S 2007 Phys. Rev. A 75 021803 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.021803
[16]	Si Y, Kong L J, Li Y N, Tu C H and Wang H T 2016 Chin. Phys. Lett. 33 034203 doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/33/3/034203
[17]	Li H X, Bai Y F, Shi X H, Nan S Q, Qu L J, Shen Q and Fu X Q 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 104204 doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/26/10/104204
[18]	Luo B, Wu G H and Yin L F 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 094202 doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/27/9/094202
[19]	Shapiro J H 2008 Phys. Rev. A 78 061802 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.061802
[20]	Bromberg Y, Katz O and Silberberg Y 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 053840 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.79.053840
[21]	Katz O, Bromberg Y and Silberberg Y 2009 Appl. Phys. Lett. 95 131110 doi: 10.1063/1.3238296
[22]	Khamoushi S M M, Nosrati Y and Tavassoli S H 2015 Opt. Lett. 40 3452 doi: 10.1364/OL.40.003452
[23]	Shapiro J H 2007 Proceedings of SPIE 6603 Noise and Fluctuations in Photonics, Quantum Optics, and Communications, June 7, 2007, Florence, Italy, p. 660306
[24]	Jiang K B, Lee H, Gerry C C and Dowling J P 2013 J. Appl. Phys. 114 193102 doi: 10.1063/1.4829016
[25]	Abouraddy A F, Saleh B E A, Sergienko A V and Teich M C 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 123602 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.123602
[26]	Lo H K and Chau H F 1999 Science 283 2050 doi: 10.1126/science.283.5410.2050
[27]	Shor P W and Preskill J 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 441 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.441
[28]	Ma X F, Qi B, Zhao Y and Lo H K 2005 Phys. Rev. A 72 012326 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.012326
[29]	Curty M and Lütkenhaus N 2005 Phys. Rev. A 71 062301 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.062301
[30]	Bai B, He Y C, Liu J B, Zhou Y, Zheng H B, Zhang S L and Xu Z 2017 Optik 147 136 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2017.08.057
[31]	Dupuis J R and Mansur D J 2012 Proceedings of Emerging Digital Micromirror Device Based Systems and Applications IV, February 13, 2012, San Francisco, California, United States, p. 82540J

Proof-of-principle experimental demonstration of quantum secure imaging based on quantum key distribution

Proof-of-principle experimental demonstration of quantum secure imaging based on quantum key distribution

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 31

相关文章 1

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0