H synchronization of the coronary artery system with input time-varying delay
Li Xiao-Meng1, Zhao Zhan-Shan1, †, , Zhang Jing2, 3, Sun Lian-Kun1
School of Computer Science & Software Engineering, Tianjin Polytechnic University, Tianjin 300387, China
School of Textiles, Tianjin Polytechnic University, Tianjin 300387, China
Tianjin Vocational Institute, Tianjin 300410, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: zhzhsh127@163.com

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61503280, 61403278, and 61272006).

Abstract
Abstract

This paper investigates the H synchronization of the coronary artery system with input delay and disturbance. We focus on reducing the conservatism of existing synchronization strategies. Base on the triple integral forms of the Lyapunov–Krasovskii functional (LKF), we utilize single and double integral forms of Wirtinger-based inequality to guarantee that the synchronization feedback controller has good performance against time-varying delay and external disturbance. The effectiveness of our strategy can be exhibited by simulations under the different time-varying delays and different disturbances.

PACS: 05.45.Gg;05.45.Xt;87.19.lr
1. Introduction

In recent decades, chaos has combined with biological engineering due to it being widely encountered in the nervous system, brain activity, epidemic diseases and coronary artery system.[13] The coronary artery system is a complex system which conveys oxygen and nutrients to the myocardium day and night. Healthy coronary artery vessels are important to maintain our life. In clinical practice, myocardial infarction caused by obstructing or spasm of the coronary artery will threaten our life. Due to its important effect on our health, this system deserves considerable attention in many areas. With the development of nonlinear science, researchers made a lot of effort in the investigation of the coronary artery system. Based on the muscle mechanics model, Guanggui Bao proposed the mechanics equation of the coronary artery vessel. Utilizing this equation, the mathematical model of the coronary artery vessel is derived in Ref. [4]. We find that this model is a chaotic system.

Since the coronary artery system can be described as a chaos system, many studies of the coronary artery system are focusing on synchronization of a chaotic system. From a medical point of view, when myocardial infarction occurs, the coronary artery vessel must be thrown into convulsion. It will cause degraded performance of oxygen supply to the myocardium. In order to alleviate this symptom, some emergency medicine should be adopted to expand the coronary artery vessel, such as glyceryl trinitrate. From the perspective of mathematics, glyceryl trinitrate can make the diseased coronary artery vessel synchronize with the healthy one by changing the inner diameter and pressure of the vessel. Therefore, chaotic synchronization of the coronary artery system is an essential work. Reference [5] utilized a backstepping method to achieve chaos synchronization. Reference [6] used a nonlinear state feedback approach to design a controller for the coronary artery system. Considering the structure uncertainties, reference [7] proposed a sliding mode control based chaos synchronization strategy for the coronary artery system. By applying high-order sliding mode adaptive control approach, Zhao et al. studied the finite-time chaos synchronization problem; this approach can obtain a good effect even though the information of perturbation bound is unknown.[8]

However, there are some things worth noting. First, between the paroxysm of myocardial infarction and taking medicine there is always some time lag. Not only that, the effect of medication on the coronary artery will have some delay because the absorbing of medication will cost some time. It is not difficult to understand that the time delays mentioned above are not fixed. That is to say, considering the actual situation the input time-varying delay should not be ignored. Unfortunately, aforementioned literature did not consider that. It is not hard to imagine that if we fail to input time-varying delay, the performance of the existing control strategy will decline even failure.

Time delay is widely encountered in communication systems, neural networks, economic systems, biological systems, and networked control systems.[912] Since time delay will cause serious degradation of system performance, in the last few decades a lot of researchers have been making considerable effort to reduce the influence that comes from time delay. Jensen’s inequality plays an important role in a lot of existing literature. However, it will induce some conservativeness hard to overcome. In order to reduce the conservatism, Wirtinger-based integral inequality,[13] which can be used to obtain even tighter lower bound of single integral terms was proposed. Very recently, a Wirtinger-based double integral inequality was proposed to get even tighter lower bound of double integral terms.[14]

As well as the input of time-varying delay, as a practical system, the coronary artery system must have many nonlinear disturbances which come from the external environment or emotion. These disturbances will make the performance of control strategy decrease seriously. To counter these nonlinear disturbances, lots of techniques have been proposed, such as adaptive tracking control,[15] model predictive control,[16,17] fuzzy control,[1821] sliding mode control.[2226] H control is a valid approach to reduce the effect caused by disturbances. As the application of H control, H synchronization for a chaotic system is studied in Ref. [27]. A criterion for existence of the controller can be given in terms of LMIs. Using the LMI box, the feasible solutions of LMIs can be obtained.

Motivated by the previous discussions, we research H synchronization of the coronary artery system with input time-varying delay and external disturbances. Based on LKF approach and LMI method, we propose a new control strategy. In this strategy, the triple integral forms of LKF, Wirtinger-based inequality and double integral forms of Wirtinger-based inequality will be used to reduce the conservative. It means that the new strategy can ensure the effectiveness of the controller under the appropriate input time-varying delay. Moreover, H control approach has been introduced to conflict with the disturbances. Some simulations show that this control strategy still has better robustness under the input time-varying delay.

2. System description and problem analysis

The coronary artery vessels supply oxygen and nutrients for the myocardium. The mathematical model of the coronary artery vessel is derived in Ref. [4], which can be written as a Duffing equation:

where x1(t) and x2(t) represent inner diameter changes and inner pressure changes of the coronary artery vessel, respectively. E cosσt is the perturbation with a certain period. With the parameters b = 0.15, c = −1.7, λ = −0.5, E = 0.3, σ = 1, and initial condition x1(0) = 0.5, x2(0) = 0, trajectory of system (1) can be shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. Phase portrait of the coronary artery system.

In order to facilitate expression, system (1) can be written as follows:

the above system shows a healthy coronary artery system, where A and C are the matrices determined by the value of b, c, and λ, . The corresponding system which shows a coronary artery system suffering from myocardial infarction can be written as follows:

where is the external disturbance, u(t) = (u1(t),u2(t)) can be considered as drug treatment. We want to synchronize the diseased coronary artery system (3) with the healthy one (2) through an appropriate u(t). Taking time delay of taking medicine and drug absorption into consideration, we can design an input time-varying-delay feedback controller u(t) = Ke(td(t)) (d(t) ∈ [dm,dM], dd = (t)) to achieve this goal. Define e(t) = y(t) − x(t), we can obtain an error system by Eqs. (2) and (3):

where g(t) = g(y(t)) − g(x(t)) satisfies the following Lipschitz condition

where L is a constant matrix.

When ω(t) = 0 and the initial conditions of systems (2) and (3) are (x1(0),x2(0)) = (0.5,0), (y1(0),y2(0)) = (−1,1.5), we can draw the trajectory of e(t) before taking control.

From Fig. 2, we can see error system e(t) cannot approach zero asymptotically. That is, systems (2) and (3) are not synchronized. The rest of this paper will design an input time-varying delay feedback control strategy to synchronize system (3) with (2) under the disturbance ω(t) ≠ 0.

Fig. 2. Synchronization error between the coronary artery systems (2) and (3).

In order to derive the new control strategy, the following lemmas will be used.

Lemma 1[13] R is a symmetric positive-definite matrix, for differentiable function x ∈ [d1,d2] → ℝn, we can obtain

where

Lemma 2[28] For positive definite dv : ℝn → ℝ, dv ⊆ ℝn (v = 1… N), reciprocally convex combination of dv can be written as follows:

where

Lemma 3[14] R is a symmetric positive-definite matrix, for differentiable function x ∈ [ha,hb] → ℝn, we have

where

3. H synchronization of coronary artery system

In this section, we get a new synchronization method by using the aforementioned Lemmas.

Theorem 1 Consider the drive and response systems (2) and (3) under the disturbance ω(t), by application of the input time-varying delay feedback controller, for given scalars dm,dM, dd, χκ − 1(κ = 1,2,3,4), if there are positive symmetric matrices

s ∈ ℝn*n (s = 1,2,3), v ∈ ℝn*n (v = 1,2,…,4), and appropriate dimensions matrices m, satisfying the following LMIs

where

Then, H synchronization with disturbance attenuation γ is achieved.

Proof Construct the following LKF:

where

The time derivative of V(t):

where

with

According to Lemma 1, we obtain

where

inequality (18) can be denoted as

It is clear that the real numbers ρ1 and ρ2 satisfy ρ1 > 0, ρ2 > 0, and ρ1 + ρ2 = 1. Then introduce appropriate dimensions matrices S1 and S2, such that

Applying Lemma 2 to inequalities (19) and (20), we have

Utilizing Lemma 3, ζ4(t) and ζ5(t) can be written as

where

From Eq. (5), we have

where M1 = diag{LTL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 −I 0}. Combining expressions (14)–(17), (21), and (24)–(26), we obtain the following equation

where

To investigate H performance, we define J(e(t),ω(t)) as follows:

where γ > 0 is the disturbance attention rate. With zero initial condition, we can introduce

where Φ = Ξ + M2,

Multiplying both sides of Φ with

and using Schur complement we can get inequality (6). Multiplying both sides of expression (22) with diag, we can get inequality (7). Where

This completes the proof.

We still cannot obtain a feasible solution by LMI tool box according to Theorem 1 because there are nonlinear terms in the form of . The authors in Ref. [29] proposed a cone complementary linearization algorithm (CCLA) to solve this problem.

First, define new variables Uv (v = 1,2,3,4), satisfying

expression (31) can be written as follows:

Set ,,, the LMI (32) can be replaced by

Then, according to CCLA, the following minimization problem can take the place of the original problem of Theorem 1.

Minimize

subject to formulas (6), (7), (33) and

Algorithm:

For given scalars dm, dM, dd, χκ − 1 (κ = 1,2,3,4), find a feasible set

Solve minimization problem with

Minimize:

subject to LMI (34). Set ,, and Fc+1 = F.

If linear matrix inequalities (6) and (7) are feasible for , then drop out. Otherwise, set c = c + 1 and go to item (ii).

Remark 1 In much of the existing literature,[58] synchronization of the coronary artery system can be achieved. However, this literature assumes that patients can take medicines in time and the medicines can be quickly absorbed. In fact, taking medicine and drug absorption must cost some time. In Theorem 1, we regard these lags as input delays and get an effective synchronization strategy.

4. Simulation

In this section, numerical examples are given to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed strategy.

Considering coronary artery systems (2) and (3) with the different time-varying delays and different disturbances

The common parameters are listed as follows:

initial conditions are x(0) = (0.5,0)y(0) = (−1,1.5). In this simulation, we set χ1, χ2,…,χ4 = 0. The performance of our strategy can be displayed in Figs. 3 and 4.

Fig. 3. The behavior of the coronary artery systems (2) and (3) with different time-varying delays and disturbance ω1(t) = (0.3 sin(40t),0.1 sin(30t)): (a) time response of x1,ya1,yc1,ye1, (b) time response of x2,ya2,yc2,ye2, (c) error state of ea,ec,ee when 0 ≤ t ≤ 10, and (d) error state of ea,ec,ee when 5 ≤ t ≤ 100.
Fig. 4. The behavior of the coronary artery systems (2) and (3) with different time-varying delays and disturbance ω2(t) = (0.09sin(4t),0.03sin(5t)): (a) time response of x1,yb1,yd1,yf1, (b) time response of x2,yb2,yd2,yf2, and (c) error state of eb,ed,ef when 0 ≤ t ≤ 15.

The above three cases illustrate the performance of Theorem 1. Figures 3(a) and 3(b) and figures 4(a) and 4(b) show that the coronary artery system (3) can follow the tracks of system (2) under the different time-vary delays and disturbances. From Figs. 3(c) and 3(d) and Fig.4(c), we can clearly see that error systems are converging to a small region around to zero by utilizing our control strategy. That is, our method can make the convulsing coronary artery system synchronize with the healthy one through an input time-varying delay feedback controller.

5. Conclusions

In this paper, considering the disturbance comes from the external environment or emotion and the time delay caused by taking medicine and drug absorption, we research the chaotic synchronization for the coronary artery system. We utilize LKF approach, LMI method, and some advanced inequality technology to reduce the conservatism. From the simulations, we can see our synchronization strategy is valid to make the convulsing coronary artery system synchronize with the healthy coronary artery system under the input delay and external disturbance. As a part of our body, the coronary artery system is an extremely complicated system. Therefore, it is difficult to obtain a precise model of this system. With the development of active shape models[30] and the computer control technology,[31] we can derive accurate models of the coronary artery system in our future work.

Reference
1Zhang Q H YXie X PZhu PChen H PHe G G 2014 Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 19 2793
2Li LSun G QJin Z 2010 Appl. Math. Comput. 216 1226
3Li W L 2012 Int. J. Sys. Sci. 43 21
4Xu ZYand Liu C R1986J. Biomath.1109
5Gong C YLi Y MSun X H2006J. Appl. Sci.24604
6Gong C YLi Y MSun X H2008Math. Prac. Theor.38103
7Lin C JYang S KYau H T 2012 Comput. Math. Appl. 64 988
8Zhao Z SZhang JDing GZhang D K 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 210508 (in Chinese)
9Wen S PZeng Z GHuang T WMeng Q GYao W 2015 IEEE Trans. Neur. Netw. Learning Sys. 26 1493
10Wen SYu XZeng ZWang J 2016 IEEE Trans. Indus. Electron. 63 1308
11Wen S PZeng Z GHuang T WYu X HXiao M Q 2015 IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Sys. 23 2284
12Li HGao YShi PLam H K 2015 IEEE Trans. Autom. Control
13Seuret AGouaisbaut F 2013 Automatica 49 2860
14Park M JKwon O MPark J HLee S MCha E J 2015 Automatica 55 204
15Zhou QShi PTian YWang M Y 2015 IEEE Trans. Cybern. 45 2119
16Wang TGao HQiu J 2016 IEEE Trans. Indus. Electron. 63 2529
17Wang TGao HQiu J 2016 IEEE Trans. Neur. Netw. Learning Sys. 27 416
18Zhou QLi H YShi P 2015 IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Sys. 23 501
19Li HWu CYin SLam H K 2015 IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Sys.
20Xie X PYue D SMa H J 2014 IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Sys. 22 1174
21Zhou QWang LWu CLi HDu H2016IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst.
22Liu JLaghrouche SHarmouche MWack M 2014 Control Eng. Prac. 30 124
23Liu JLaghrouche SWack M C 2014 Int. J. Control 87 1117
24Ding S HWang J DZheng W X 2015 IEEE Trans. Indus. Electron. 62 5899
25Zhou KWang Z HGao L KSun YMa T D 2015 Chin. Phys. 24 030504
26Liu S GChen L Q 2013 Chin. Phys. 22 100506
27Park J HJi D HWon S CLee S M 2008 Appl. Math. Comput. 204 170
28Park P GKo J WJeong C K 2011 Automatica 47 235
29Ghaoui L EOustry FAitRami M 1997 IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 42 1171
30Gao HDing CSong CMei J 2013 IEEE Trans. Indus. Inform. 93 1782
31Wang XGao HKaynak OSun W 2015 IEEEASME Trans. Mech. 21 339