Polarization and fundamental sensitivity of 39K (133Cs)-85Rb-21Neco-magnetometers

doi:10.1088/1674-1056/ab7d94

中国物理B ›› 2020, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4): 43206-043206.doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/ab7d94

• ATOMIC AND MOLECULAR PHYSICS • 上一篇下一篇

Polarization and fundamental sensitivity of ³⁹K (¹³³Cs)-⁸⁵Rb-²¹Neco-magnetometers

Jian-Hua Liu(刘建华), Dong-Yang Jing(靖东洋), Lin Zhuang(庄琳), Wei Quan(全伟), Jiancheng Fang(房建成), Wu-Ming Liu(刘伍明)

1 Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;
2 School of Physical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;
3 School of Science, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China;
4 School of Physics, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China;
5 School of Instrument Science and Opto-Electronics Engineering, and Science and Technology on Inertial Laboratory, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China

收稿日期:2019-10-11 修回日期:2020-02-28 出版日期:2020-04-05 发布日期:2020-04-05
通讯作者: Wu-Ming Liu E-mail:wliu@iphy.ac.cn
基金资助:
Project supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFA0301500), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61835013), and the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant Nos. XDB01020300 and XDB21030300).

Polarization and fundamental sensitivity of ³⁹K (¹³³Cs)-⁸⁵Rb-²¹Neco-magnetometers

Jian-Hua Liu(刘建华)^1,3, Dong-Yang Jing(靖东洋)^1,2, Lin Zhuang(庄琳)⁴, Wei Quan(全伟)⁵, Jiancheng Fang(房建成)⁵, Wu-Ming Liu(刘伍明)^1,2

1 Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;
2 School of Physical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;
3 School of Science, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China;
4 School of Physics, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China;
5 School of Instrument Science and Opto-Electronics Engineering, and Science and Technology on Inertial Laboratory, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China

Received:2019-10-11 Revised:2020-02-28 Online:2020-04-05 Published:2020-04-05
Contact: Wu-Ming Liu E-mail:wliu@iphy.ac.cn
Supported by:
Project supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFA0301500), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61835013), and the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant Nos. XDB01020300 and XDB21030300).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： The hybrid optical pumping spin exchange relaxation free (HOPSERF) atomic co-magnetometers make ultrahigh sensitivity measurement of inertia achievable. The wall relaxation rate has a big effect on the polarization and fundamental sensitivity for the co-magnetometer, but it is often neglected in the experiments. However, there is almost no work about the systematic analysis of the influence factors on the polarization and the fundamental sensitivity of the HOPSERF co-magnetometers. Here we systematically study the polarization and the fundamental sensitivity of ³⁹K-⁸⁵Rb-²¹Ne and ¹³³Cs-⁸⁵Rb-²¹Ne HOPSERF co-magnetometers with low polarization limit and the wall relaxation rate. The ²¹Ne number density, the power density and wavelength of pump beam will affect the polarization greatly by affecting the pumping rate of the pump beam. We obtain a general formula on the fundamental sensitivity of the HOPSERF co-magnetometers due to shot-noise and the fundamental sensitivity changes with multiple systemic parameters, where the suitable number density of buffer gas and quench gas make the fundamental sensitivity highest. The fundamental sensitivity 7.5355×10^-11 rad·^-1·Hz^-1/2 of ¹³³Cs-⁸⁵Rb-²¹Ne co-magnetometer is higher than the ultimate theoretical sensitivity 2×10^-10 rad·^-1·Hz^-1/2 of K-²¹Ne co-magnetometer.

关键词: hybrid optical pumping spin exchange relaxation free, co-magnetometer, wall relaxation rate

Abstract: The hybrid optical pumping spin exchange relaxation free (HOPSERF) atomic co-magnetometers make ultrahigh sensitivity measurement of inertia achievable. The wall relaxation rate has a big effect on the polarization and fundamental sensitivity for the co-magnetometer, but it is often neglected in the experiments. However, there is almost no work about the systematic analysis of the influence factors on the polarization and the fundamental sensitivity of the HOPSERF co-magnetometers. Here we systematically study the polarization and the fundamental sensitivity of ³⁹K-⁸⁵Rb-²¹Ne and ¹³³Cs-⁸⁵Rb-²¹Ne HOPSERF co-magnetometers with low polarization limit and the wall relaxation rate. The ²¹Ne number density, the power density and wavelength of pump beam will affect the polarization greatly by affecting the pumping rate of the pump beam. We obtain a general formula on the fundamental sensitivity of the HOPSERF co-magnetometers due to shot-noise and the fundamental sensitivity changes with multiple systemic parameters, where the suitable number density of buffer gas and quench gas make the fundamental sensitivity highest. The fundamental sensitivity 7.5355×10^-11 rad·^-1·Hz^-1/2 of ¹³³Cs-⁸⁵Rb-²¹Ne co-magnetometer is higher than the ultimate theoretical sensitivity 2×10^-10 rad·^-1·Hz^-1/2 of K-²¹Ne co-magnetometer.

Key words: hybrid optical pumping spin exchange relaxation free, co-magnetometer, wall relaxation rate

中图分类号: (Level crossing and optical pumping)

32.80.Xx

07.55.Ge (Magnetometers for magnetic field measurements) 42.60.Rn (Relaxation oscillations and long pulse operation)

刘建华, 靖东洋, 庄琳, 全伟, 房建成, 刘伍明. Polarization and fundamental sensitivity of ³⁹K (¹³³Cs)-⁸⁵Rb-²¹Neco-magnetometers[J]. 中国物理B, 2020, 29(4): 43206-043206.

Jian-Hua Liu(刘建华), Dong-Yang Jing(靖东洋), Lin Zhuang(庄琳), Wei Quan(全伟), Jiancheng Fang(房建成), Wu-Ming Liu(刘伍明). Polarization and fundamental sensitivity of ³⁹K (¹³³Cs)-⁸⁵Rb-²¹Neco-magnetometers[J]. Chin. Phys. B, 2020, 29(4): 43206-043206.

参考文献 63

[1]	Schreiber K U, Klügel T, Wells J P, Hurst R B and Gebauer A 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 173904 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.173904
[2]	Schreiber K U and Wells J P R 2013 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 84 041101 doi: 10.1063/1.4798216
[3]	Shahriar M S and Salit M 2008 J. Mod. Opt. 55 3133 doi: 10.1080/09500340802454989
[4]	Stedman G E 1997 Rep. Prog. Phys. 60 615 doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/60/6/001
[5]	Everitt C W F, DeBra D B, Parkinson B W et al 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 221101 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.221101
[6]	Lefevre H C 2013 Opt. Fiber. Technol. 19 828 doi: 10.1016/j.yofte.2013.08.007
[7]	Kominis I K, Kornack T W, Allred J C and Romalis M V 2003 Nature 422 596 doi: 10.1038/nature01484
[8]	Kornack T W, Ghosh R K and Romalis M V 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 230801 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.230801
[9]	Meyer D and Larsen M 2014 Gyroscopy Navigation 5 75 doi: 10.1134/S2075108714020060
[10]	Brown J M, Smullin S J, Kornack T W, Romalis M V 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 151604 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.151604
[11]	Smiciklas M, Brown J M, Cheuk L W, Smullin S J and Romalis M V 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 171604 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.171604
[12]	Vasilakis G, Brown J M, Kornack T W and Romalis M V 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 261801 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.261801
[13]	Tullney K, Allmendinger F, Burghoff M, Heil W, Karpuk S, Kilian W, Knappe-Grüneberg S, Müller W, Schmidt U, Schnabel A, Seifert F, Sobolev Y and Trahms L 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 100801 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.100801
[14]	Bulatowicz M, Griffith R, Larsen M, Mirijanian J, Walker T G, Fu C B, Smith E, Snow W M and Yan H 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 102001 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.102001
[15]	Arvanitaki A and Geraci A A 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 161801 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.161801
[16]	Rosenberry M A and Chupp T E 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 22 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.22
[17]	Kornack T W 2005 A test of CPT and Lorentz Symmetry Using a K-3He Co-magnetometer (PhD Dissertation) (New Jersey: Princeton University)
[18]	Fang J C, Wan S A, Qin J, Zhang C, Quan W, Yuan H and Dong H F 2013 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 84 083108 doi: 10.1063/1.4819306
[19]	Zeng X, Wu Z, Call T, Miron E, Schreiber D and Happer W 1985 Phys. Rev. A 31 260 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.31.260
[20]	Jiang L W, Quan W, Li R J, Duan L H, Fan W F, Wang Z, Liu F, Xing L and Fang J C 2017 Phys. Rev. A 95 062103 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.95.062103
[21]	Jiang L W, Quan W, Li R J, Fan W F and Fang J C 2018 Appl. Phys. Lett. 112 054103 doi: 10.1063/1.5018015
[22]	Quan W, Wei K, Zhao T, Li H R, Zhai Y Y 2019 Phys. Rev. A 100 012118 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.100.012118
[23]	Jiang L W, Quan W, Liu F, Fan W F, Xing L, Duan L H, Liu W M and Fang J C 2019 Phys. Rev. Appl. 12 024017 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.12.024017
[24]	Liu J H, Jing D Y, Wang L L, Li Y, Quan W, Fang J C and Liu W M 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 6776 doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06434-2
[25]	Alcock C B, Itkin V P and Horrigan M K 1984 Can. Metall. Quart. 23 309 doi: 10.1179/cmq.1984.23.3.309
[26]	Ito Y, Sato D, Kamada K and Kobayashi T 2016 Opt. Express 24 015391 doi: 10.1364/OE.24.015391
[27]	Seltzer S J 2008 PhD Dissertation (New Jersey: Princeton University)
[28]	Happer W and Tam A C 1977 Phys. Rev. A 16 1877 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.16.1877
[29]	Dong H F, Xuan L F, Zhuo C and Lin H B 2012 J. Test Measurement Technol. 26 468 (in Chinese)
[30]	Babcock E, Nelson I, Kadlecek S, Driehuys B, Anderson L W, Hersman F W and Walker T G 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 123003 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.123003
[31]	Romalis M V, Miron E and Cates G D 1997 Phys. Rev. A 56 4569 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.56.4569
[32]	Citron M L, Gray H R, Gabel C W and Stroud C R 1977 Phys. Rev. A 16 1507 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.16.1507
[33]	Cole H R and Olson R E 1985 Phys. Rev. A 31 2137 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.31.2137
[34]	Fang J C, Wang T, Zhang H, Li Y and Zou S 2014 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85 123104 doi: 10.1063/1.4902567
[35]	Chen Y, Quan W, Duan L H, Lu Y, Jiang L W and Fang J C 2016 Phys. Rev. A 94 052705 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.94.052705
[36]	Allred J C, Lyman R N, Kornack T W and Romalis M V 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 130801 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.130801
[37]	Schaefer S R, Cates G D, Chien T R, Gonatas D, Happer W and Walker T G 1989 Phys. Rev. A 39 5613 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.39.5613
[38]	Ghosh R K and Romalis M V 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 043415 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.81.043415
[39]	Franz F A and Volk C 1982 Phys. Rev. A 26 85 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.26.85
[40]	Franz F A and Sooriamoorthi C E 1974 Phys. Rev. A 10 126 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.10.126
[41]	Franz F A and Volk C 1976 Phys. Rev. A 14 1711 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.14.1711
[42]	Silver J A 1984 J. Chem. Phys. 81 5125 doi: 10.1063/1.447458
[43]	Fang J C, Chen Y, Zou S, Liu X J, Hu Z H, Quan W, Yuan H, Ding M 2016 J. Phys. B 49 065006 doi: 10.1088/0953-4075/49/6/065006
[44]	Ledbetter M P, Savukov I M, Acosta V M, Budker D and Romalis M V 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77 033408 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.033408
[45]	Hager G D, Lott G E, Archibald A J, Blank L, Weeks D E and Perram G P 2014 J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 147 261 doi: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2014.06.005
[46]	Walker T G and Happer W 1997 Rev. Mod. Phys. 69 629 doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.69.629
[47]	Migdalek J and Kim Y K 1998 J. Phys. B 31 1947 doi: 10.1088/0953-4075/31/9/011
[48]	Caliebe E and Niemax K 1979 J. Phys. B 12 L45
[49]	Lwin N and McCartan D G 1978 J. Phys. B 11 3841 doi: 10.1088/0022-3700/11/22/012
[50]	Appelt A, Baranga B A, Erickson C J, Romalis M V, Young A R and Happer W 1998 Phys. Rev. A 58 1412 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.58.1412
[51]	Gibbs H M and Hull R J 1967 Phys. Rev. 153 132 doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.153.132
[52]	Ressler N W, Sands R H and Stark T E 1969 Phys. Rev. 184 102 doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.184.102
[53]	Shao W J, Wang G D and Hughes E W 2005 Phys. Rev. A 72 022713 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.022713
[54]	Quan W, Li Y and Liu B 2015 Europhys. Lett. 110 60002 doi: 10.1209/0295-5075/110/60002
[55]	Aleksandrov E B, Balabas M V, Vershovskii A K, Okunevich A I and Yakobson N N 1999 Opt. Spectrosc. 87 329
[56]	Franzen W 1959 Phys. Rev. 115 850 doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.115.850
[57]	Beverini N, Minguzzi P and Strumia F 1972 Phys. Rev. A 5 993
[58]	Kadlecek S, Anderson L W and Walker T 1998 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. 402 208 doi: 10.1016/S0168-9002(97)00836-X
[59]	Fang J C and Qin J 2012 Sensors 12 6331 doi: 10.3390/s120506331
[60]	Fang J C, Li R J, Duan L H, Chen Y and Quan W 2015 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 86 073116 doi: 10.1063/1.4927460
[61]	Chen Y, Quan W, Zou S, Lu Y, Duan L H, Li Y, Zhang H, Ding M and Fang J C 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 36547 doi: 10.1038/srep36547
[62]	Vliegen E, Kadlecek S, Anderson L W, Walker T G, Erickson C J and Happer W 2001 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 460 444 doi: 10.1016/S0168-9002(00)01061-5
[63]	Bhaskar N D, Pietras J, Camparo J, Happer W and Liran J 1980 Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 930 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.44.930

Polarization and fundamental sensitivity of ³⁹K (¹³³Cs)-⁸⁵Rb-²¹Neco-magnetometers

Polarization and fundamental sensitivity of ³⁹K (¹³³Cs)-⁸⁵Rb-²¹Neco-magnetometers

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 63

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	Xin-Ping Dong(董新平), Zhi-Bo Feng(冯志波), Xiao-Jing Lu(路晓静), Ming Li(李明), and Zheng-Yin Zhao(赵正印). Fast population transfer with a superconducting qutrit via non-Hermitian shortcut to adiabaticity[J]. 中国物理B, 2023, 32(3): 34201-034201.
[2]	Zheng-Yin Zhao(赵正印), Run-Ying Yan(闫润瑛), and Zhi-Bo Feng(冯志波). Shortcut-based quantum gates on superconducting qubits in circuit QED[J]. 中国物理B, 2021, 30(8): 88501-088501.
[3]	Xin-Chuan Ouyang(欧阳鑫川), Bo-Wen Yang(杨博文), Jian-Liao Deng(邓见辽), Jin-Yin Wan(万金银), Ling Xiao(肖玲), Hang-Hang Qi(亓航航), Qing-Qing Hu(胡青青), and Hua-Dong Cheng(成华东). An effective pumping method for increasing atomic utilization in a compact cold atom clock[J]. 中国物理B, 2021, 30(8): 83202-083202.
[4]	Lei Han(韩蕾), Fang Fang(房芳), Wei-Liang Chen(陈伟亮), Kun Liu(刘昆), Ya-Ni Zuo(左娅妮), Fa-Song Zheng(郑发松), Shao-Yang Dai(戴少阳), and Tian-Chu Li(李天初). Optical state selection process with optical pumping in a cesium atomic fountain clock[J]. 中国物理B, 2021, 30(8): 80602-080602.
[5]	Lei Han(韩蕾), Fang Fang(房芳), Wei-Liang Chen(陈伟亮), Kun Liu(刘昆), Shao-Yang Dai(戴少阳), Ya-Ni Zuo(左娅妮), and Tian-Chu Li(李天初). Improvement of the short-term stability of atomic fountain clock with state preparation by two-laser optical pumping[J]. 中国物理B, 2021, 30(5): 50602-050602.
[6]	. [J]. 中国物理B, 2021, 30(4): 44214-.
[7]	卢妍, 翟跃阳, 张勇, 范文峰, 邢力, 全伟. Spin-exchange relaxation of naturally abundant Rb in a K-Rb-²¹Ne self-compensated atomic comagnetometer[J]. 中国物理B, 2020, 29(4): 43204-043204.
[8]	杨晨, 左冠华, 田壮壮, 张玉驰, 张天才. Influence of pump intensity on atomic spin relaxation in a vapor cell[J]. 中国物理B, 2019, 28(11): 117601-117601.
[9]	王汉睦, 成红, 张珊珊, 辛培培, 徐子珊, 刘红平. Laser frequency offset-locking using electromagnetically induced transparency spectroscopy of ⁸⁵Rb in magnetic field[J]. 中国物理B, 2018, 27(9): 94205-094205.
[10]	刘学静, 丁铭, 李阳, 胡焱晖, 靳伟, 房建成. Transverse relaxation determination based on light polarization modulation for spin-exchange relaxation free atomic magnetometer[J]. 中国物理B, 2018, 27(7): 73201-073201.
[11]	李蒙蒙, 谭新生, 戴坤哲, 赵鹏, 于海峰, 于扬. Demonstration of superadiabatic population transfer in superconducting qubit[J]. 中国物理B, 2018, 27(6): 63202-063202.
[12]	丁志超, 袁杰, 罗晖, 龙兴武. Retraction: Optical pumping nuclear magnetic resonance system rotating in a plane parallel to the quantization axis[J]. 中国物理B, 2017, 26(11): 113301-113301.
[13]	王梦冰, 赵大法, 张桂迎, 赵凯锋. Indirect pumping bell-bloom magnetometer[J]. 中国物理B, 2017, 26(10): 100701-100701.
[14]	丁志超, 袁杰, 罗晖, 龙兴武. Optical pumping nuclear magnetic resonance system rotating in a plane parallel to the quantization axis[J]. 中国物理B, 2017, 26(9): 93301-093301.
[15]	张锐, 汪之国, 彭翔, 黎文浩, 李松健, 郭弘. Spin dynamics of magnetic resonance with parametric modulation in a potassium vapor cell[J]. 中国物理B, 2017, 26(3): 30701-030701.