中国物理B ›› 2024, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 54207-054207.doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/ad1c57

• • 上一篇    下一篇

A global model of intensity autocorrelation to determine laser pulse duration

Yufei Peng(彭雨菲), Liqiang Liu(刘励强), Lihong Hong(洪丽红), and Zhiyuan Li(李志远)†   

  1. School of Physics and Optoelectronics, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
  • 收稿日期:2023-09-01 修回日期:2023-11-24 接受日期:2024-01-09 出版日期:2024-05-20 发布日期:2024-05-20
  • 通讯作者: Zhiyuan Li E-mail:phzyli@scut.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    Project supported by the Science and Technology Project of Guangdong (Grant No. 2020B010190001), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11974119), the Guangdong Innovative and Entrepreneurial Research Team Program (Grant No. 2016ZT06C594), and the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFA0306200).

A global model of intensity autocorrelation to determine laser pulse duration

Yufei Peng(彭雨菲), Liqiang Liu(刘励强), Lihong Hong(洪丽红), and Zhiyuan Li(李志远)†   

  1. School of Physics and Optoelectronics, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
  • Received:2023-09-01 Revised:2023-11-24 Accepted:2024-01-09 Online:2024-05-20 Published:2024-05-20
  • Contact: Zhiyuan Li E-mail:phzyli@scut.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    Project supported by the Science and Technology Project of Guangdong (Grant No. 2020B010190001), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11974119), the Guangdong Innovative and Entrepreneurial Research Team Program (Grant No. 2016ZT06C594), and the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFA0306200).

摘要: We present a new global model of collinear autocorrelation based on second harmonic generation nonlinearity. The model is rigorously derived from the nonlinear coupled wave equation specific to the autocorrelation measurement configuration, without requiring a specific form of the incident pulse function. A rigorous solution of the nonlinear coupled wave equation is obtained in the time domain and expressed in a general analytical form. The global model fully accounts for the nonlinear interaction and propagation effects within nonlinear crystals, which are not captured by the classical local model. To assess the performance of the global model compared to the classic local model, we investigate the autocorrelation signals obtained from both models for different incident pulse waveforms and different full-widthes at half-maximum (FWHMs). When the incident pulse waveform is Lorentzian with an FWHM of 200 fs, the global model predicts an autocorrelation signal FWHM of 399.9 fs, while the classic local model predicts an FWHM of 331.4 fs. The difference between the two models is 68.6 fs, corresponding to an error of 17.2%. Similarly, for a sech-type incident pulse with an FWHM of 200 fs, the global model predicts an autocorrelation signal FWHM of 343.9 fs, while the local model predicts an FWHM of 308.8 fs. The difference between the two models is 35.1 fs, with an error of 10.2%. We further examine the behavior of the models for Lorentzian pulses with FWHMs of 100 fs, 200 fs and 500 fs. The differences between the global and local models are 17.1 fs, 68.6 fs and 86.0 fs, respectively, with errors approximately around 17%. These comparative analyses clearly demonstrate the superior accuracy of the global model in intensity autocorrelation modeling.

关键词: intensity autocorrelation, global model, ultrashort pulses, pulse-width measurement

Abstract: We present a new global model of collinear autocorrelation based on second harmonic generation nonlinearity. The model is rigorously derived from the nonlinear coupled wave equation specific to the autocorrelation measurement configuration, without requiring a specific form of the incident pulse function. A rigorous solution of the nonlinear coupled wave equation is obtained in the time domain and expressed in a general analytical form. The global model fully accounts for the nonlinear interaction and propagation effects within nonlinear crystals, which are not captured by the classical local model. To assess the performance of the global model compared to the classic local model, we investigate the autocorrelation signals obtained from both models for different incident pulse waveforms and different full-widthes at half-maximum (FWHMs). When the incident pulse waveform is Lorentzian with an FWHM of 200 fs, the global model predicts an autocorrelation signal FWHM of 399.9 fs, while the classic local model predicts an FWHM of 331.4 fs. The difference between the two models is 68.6 fs, corresponding to an error of 17.2%. Similarly, for a sech-type incident pulse with an FWHM of 200 fs, the global model predicts an autocorrelation signal FWHM of 343.9 fs, while the local model predicts an FWHM of 308.8 fs. The difference between the two models is 35.1 fs, with an error of 10.2%. We further examine the behavior of the models for Lorentzian pulses with FWHMs of 100 fs, 200 fs and 500 fs. The differences between the global and local models are 17.1 fs, 68.6 fs and 86.0 fs, respectively, with errors approximately around 17%. These comparative analyses clearly demonstrate the superior accuracy of the global model in intensity autocorrelation modeling.

Key words: intensity autocorrelation, global model, ultrashort pulses, pulse-width measurement

中图分类号:  (Nonlinear optics)

  • 42.65.-k
42.65.Ky (Frequency conversion; harmonic generation, including higher-order harmonic generation) 42.65.Re (Ultrafast processes; optical pulse generation and pulse compression)