Effects of postselected von Neumann measurement on the properties of single-mode radiation fields

doi:10.1088/1674-1056/ab9f23

中国物理B ›› 2020, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (9): 90302-090302.doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/ab9f23

Effects of postselected von Neumann measurement on the properties of single-mode radiation fields

Yusuf Turek(玉素甫·吐拉克)

School of Physics and Electronic Engineering, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi 830054, China

收稿日期:2020-04-29 修回日期:2020-05-20 接受日期:2020-06-23 出版日期:2020-09-05 发布日期:2020-09-05
通讯作者: Yusuf Turek E-mail:yusufu1984@hotmail.com
基金资助:
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11865017) and the Introduction Program of High-Level Talents of Xinjiang Ministry of Science, China.

Effects of postselected von Neumann measurement on the properties of single-mode radiation fields

Yusuf Turek(玉素甫·吐拉克)

School of Physics and Electronic Engineering, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi 830054, China

Received:2020-04-29 Revised:2020-05-20 Accepted:2020-06-23 Online:2020-09-05 Published:2020-09-05
Contact: Yusuf Turek E-mail:yusufu1984@hotmail.com
Supported by:
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11865017) and the Introduction Program of High-Level Talents of Xinjiang Ministry of Science, China.

摘要/Abstract

摘要： Postselected von Neumann measurement characterized by postselection and weak value has been found to possess potential applications in quantum metrology and solved plenty of fundamental problems in quantum theory. As an application of this new measurement technique in quantum optics and quantum information processing, its effects on the features of single-mode radiation fields such as coherent state, squeezed vacuum state and Schrödinger cat sate are investigated by considering full-order effects of unitary evolution. The results show that the conditional probabilities of finding photons, second-order correlation functions, Q_m-factors and squeezing effects of those states after the postselected measurement is significantly changed are comparable with the corresponding initial pointer states.

关键词: radiation field, postselection, weak value, statistical properties, squeezing parameter

Abstract: Postselected von Neumann measurement characterized by postselection and weak value has been found to possess potential applications in quantum metrology and solved plenty of fundamental problems in quantum theory. As an application of this new measurement technique in quantum optics and quantum information processing, its effects on the features of single-mode radiation fields such as coherent state, squeezed vacuum state and Schrödinger cat sate are investigated by considering full-order effects of unitary evolution. The results show that the conditional probabilities of finding photons, second-order correlation functions, Q_m-factors and squeezing effects of those states after the postselected measurement is significantly changed are comparable with the corresponding initial pointer states.

Key words: radiation field, postselection, weak value, statistical properties, squeezing parameter

中图分类号: (Quantum mechanics)

03.65.-w

42.50.-p (Quantum optics) 03.65.Ta (Foundations of quantum mechanics; measurement theory)

玉素甫·吐拉克. Effects of postselected von Neumann measurement on the properties of single-mode radiation fields[J]. 中国物理B, 2020, 29(9): 90302-090302.

Yusuf Turek(玉素甫·吐拉克). Effects of postselected von Neumann measurement on the properties of single-mode radiation fields[J]. Chin. Phys. B, 2020, 29(9): 90302-090302.

参考文献 65

[1]	Aharonov Y, Albert D Z and Vaidman L 1988 Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 1351 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.60.1351
[2]	von Neumann J 1955 Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton: Princeton University Press) p. 91
[3]	Ritchie N, Story J and Hulet R 1991 Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 1107 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.1107
[4]	Kofman A G, Ashhab S and Nori F 2012 Phys. Rep. 520 43 doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2012.07.001
[5]	Dressel J, Malik M, Miatto F M, Jordan A N and Boyd R W 2014 Rev. Mod. Phys. 86 307 doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.86.307
[6]	Aharonov Y and Botero A 2005 Phys. Rev. A 72 052111 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.052111
[7]	Di Lorenzo A and Egues J C 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77 042108 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.042108
[8]	Pan A K and Matzkin A 2012 Phys. Rev. A 85 022122 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.85.022122
[9]	Nakamura K, Nishizawa A and Fujimoto M K 2012 Phys. Rev. A 85 012113 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.85.012113
[10]	Turek Y, Kobayashi H, Akutsu T, Sun C P and Shikano Y 2015 New J. Phys. 17 083029 doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/17/8/083029
[11]	de Lima Bernardo B, Azevedo S and Rosas A 2014 Opt. Commun. 331 194 doi: 10.1016/j.optcom.2014.06.008
[12]	Turek Y, Maimaiti W, Shikano Y, Sun C P and Al-Amri M 2015 Phys. Rev. A 92 022109 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.92.022109
[13]	Pang S and Brun T A 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 120401 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.120401
[14]	Turek Y and Yusufu T 2018 Eur. Phys. J. D 72 202 doi: 10.1140/epjd/e2018-90258-8
[15]	Kedem Y and Vaidman L 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 230401 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.230401
[16]	Buller G S and Collins R J 2010 Meas. Sci. Technol. 21 12002 doi: 10.1088/0957-0233/21/1/012002
[17]	Khalili F Y, Miao H and Chen Y 2009 Phys. Rev. D 80 042006 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.042006
[18]	Grote H, Weinert M, Adhikari R X, Affeldt C and Wittel H 2016 Opt. Express 24 20107 doi: 10.1364/OE.24.020107
[19]	Braunstein S L and Kimble H J 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 869 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.869
[20]	Milburn G J and Braunstein S L 1999 Phys. Rev. A 60 937 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.60.937
[21]	Jeong H, Kim M S and Lee J 2001 Phys. Rev. A 64 052308 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.052308
[22]	van Enk S J and Hirota O 2001 Phys. Rev. A 64 022313 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.022313
[23]	Ralph T C, Gilchrist A, Milburn G J, Munro W J and Glancy S 2003 Phys. Rev. A 68 042319 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.042319
[24]	Muschik C A, Hammerer K, Polzik E S and Cirac J I 2006 Phys. Rev. A 73 062329 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.062329
[25]	Li L, Dudin Y O and Kuzmich A 2013 Nature 498 466 doi: 10.1038/nature12227
[26]	Hacker B, Welte S, Daiss S, Shaukat A, Ritter S, Li L and Rempe G 2019 Nat. Photon. 13 110 doi: 10.1038/s41566-018-0339-5
[27]	Munro W J, Nemoto K, Milburn G J and Braunstein S L 2002 Phys. Rev. A 66 023819 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.023819
[28]	Glauber R J 1963 Phys. Rev. 131 2766 doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.131.2766
[29]	Carranza R and Gerry C C 2012 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 29 2581 doi: 10.1364/JOSAB.29.002581
[30]	Andersen U L, Gehring T, Marquardt C and Leuchs G 2016 Phys. Scripta 91 053001 doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/91/5/053001
[31]	Monroe C, Meekhof D M, King B E and Wineland D J 1996 Science 272 1131 doi: 10.1126/science.272.5265.1131
[32]	Ourjoumtsev A, Jeong H, Tualle-Brouri R and Grangier P 2007 Nature 448 784 doi: 10.1038/nature06054
[33]	Haroche S 2013 Rev. Mod. Phys. 85 1083 doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.85.1083
[34]	Starling D J, Dixon P B, Jordan A N and Howell J C 2009 Phys. Rev. A 80 041803 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.041803
[35]	Hosten O and Kwiat P 2008 Science 319 787 doi: 10.1126/science.1152697
[36]	Dixon P B, Starling D J, Jordan A N and Howell J C 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 173601 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.173601
[37]	Zhou L, Turek Y, Sun C P and Nori F 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 053815 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.88.053815
[38]	Starling D J, Dixon P B, Jordan A N and Howell J C 2010 Phys. Rev. A 82 063822 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.82.063822
[39]	Magaña Loaiza O S, Mirhosseini M, Rodenburg B and Boyd R W 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 200401 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.200401
[40]	Pfeifer M and Fischer P 2011 Opt. Express 19 16508 doi: 10.1364/OE.19.016508
[41]	de Lima Bernardo B, Azevedo S and Rosas A 2014 Phys. Lett. A 378 2029 doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2014.05.009
[42]	Viza G I, Martínez-Rincón J, Howland G A, Frostig H, Shomroni I, Dayan B and Howell J C 2013 Opt. Lett. 38 2949 doi: 10.1364/OL.38.002949
[43]	Egan P and Stone J A 2012 Opt. Lett. 37 4991 doi: 10.1364/OL.37.004991
[44]	Aharonov Y and Rohrlich D 2005 Quantum Paradoxes-Quantum Theory for the Perplexed (Weinheim: Wiley-VCH) p. 124
[45]	Gerry C and Knight P 2005 Introductory Quantum Optics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) p. 90
[46]	Mandel L 1979 Opt. Lett. 4 205 doi: 10.1364/OL.4.000205
[47]	Agarwal G 2013 Quantum Optics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) p. 230
[48]	Schrödinger E 1926 Naturwissenschaften 14 664 doi: 10.1007/BF01507634
[49]	Klauder J and Skagerstam B 1985 Coherent States (Singpore: World Scientific) p. 134
[50]	Perelomov 1986 Generalized Coherent States and Their Applications (Berlin: Springer) p. 254
[51]	Scully M and Zubairy M 1997 Quantum Optics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) p. 24
[52]	Wu L A, Kimble H J, Hall J L and Wu H 1986 Phys. Rev. Lett. 57 2520 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.57.2520
[53]	Schrödinger E 1935 Naturwissenschaften 23 807 doi: 10.1007/BF01491891
[54]	Sanders B C 1992 Phys. Rev. A 45 6811 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.45.6811
[55]	Wenger J, Hafezi M, Grosshans F, Tualle-Brouri R and Grangier P 2003 Phys. Rev. A 67 012105 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.012105
[56]	Jeong H, Son W, Kim M S, Ahn D and Brukner C 2003 Phys. Rev. A 67 012106 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.012106
[57]	Stobińska M, Jeong H and Ralph T C 2007 Phys. Rev. A 75 052105 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.052105
[58]	Zavatta A, Viciani S and Bellini M 2004 Science 306 660 doi: 10.1126/science.1103190
[59]	Barbieri M, Spagnolo N, Genoni M G, Ferreyrol F, Blandino R, Paris M G A, Grangier P and Tualle-Brouri R 2010 Phys. Rev. A 82 063833 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.82.063833
[60]	Biswas A and Agarwal G S 2007 Phys. Rev. A 75 032104 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.032104
[61]	Agarwal G S 1988 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 5 1940 doi: 10.1364/JOSAB.5.001940
[62]	Xin Z Z, Wang D B, Hirayama M and Matumoto K 1994 Phys. Rev. A 50 2865 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.50.2865
[63]	Xin Z Z, Duan Y B, Zhang H M, Hirayama M and itiMatumoto K 1996 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 29 4493 doi: 10.1088/0953-4075/29/19/020
[64]	Yuen H 1976 Phys. Rev. A 13 2226 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.13.2226
[65]	Blow K, Loudon R, Phoenix S and Shepherd T 1990 Phys. Rev. A 42 4102 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.42.4102

Effects of postselected von Neumann measurement on the properties of single-mode radiation fields

Effects of postselected von Neumann measurement on the properties of single-mode radiation fields

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 65

相关文章 9

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	Sen-Zhi Fang(方森智), Yang Dai(戴阳), Qian-Wen Jiang(姜倩文), Hua-Tang Tan(谭华堂), Gao-Xiang Li(李高翔), and Qing-Lin Wu(吴青林). Signal-recycled weak measurement for ultrasensitive velocity estimation[J]. 中国物理B, 2021, 30(6): 60601-060601.
[2]	邱疆冬, 任昌亮, 李兆雪, 谢林果, 何宇, 张志友, 杜惊雷. Extended validity of weak measurement[J]. 中国物理B, 2020, 29(6): 64214-064214.
[3]	K. Berrada. Maximal entanglement from photon-added nonlinear coherent states via unitary beam splitters[J]. 中国物理B, 2014, 23(2): 24208-024208.
[4]	许雪芬, 王帅, 唐斌. Photon statistical properties of photon-added two-mode squeezed coherent states[J]. 中国物理B, 2014, 23(2): 24206-024206.
[5]	葛愉成, 葛湘洁, 何海萍. Statistical properties of the photoelectron energy spectrum generated by an intense laser pulse and a continuous X-ray[J]. 中国物理B, 2014, 23(11): 114203-114203.
[6]	李静辉. Noise composed of multiplication of two dichotomous noises[J]. 中国物理B, 2008, 17(6): 1990-1997.
[7]	吴炜, 吴令安, 辛宗政. A new class of quantum states generated by m-fold application of Bogoliubov's transformation[J]. 中国物理B, 2004, 13(8): 1269-1275.
[8]	梁贵云, 曹力, 张莉, 吴大进. Statistical properties of a single-mode laser driven by additive and multiplicative coloured noises with a coloured cross-correlation for different correlation times[J]. 中国物理B, 2003, 12(10): 1109-1119.
[9]	徐荣昆, 唐正元, 何锡钧. A method of detecting capture γ-rays in a strong pulsed radiation field[J]. 中国物理B, 2002, 11(11): 1145-1148.