“Refractivity-from-clutter” based on local empirical refractivity model

doi:10.1088/1674-1056/27/12/128401

中国物理B ›› 2018, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (12): 128401-128401.doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/27/12/128401

• INTERDISCIPLINARY PHYSICS AND RELATED AREAS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY • 上一篇下一篇

“Refractivity-from-clutter” based on local empirical refractivity model

Xiaofeng Zhao(赵小峰)

College of Meteorology and Oceanography, National University of Defense Technology, Nanjing 211101, China

收稿日期:2018-07-14 修回日期:2018-09-23 出版日期:2018-12-05 发布日期:2018-12-05
通讯作者: Xiaofeng Zhao E-mail:zxf_best@126.com
基金资助:
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41775027 and 41405025).

“Refractivity-from-clutter” based on local empirical refractivity model

Xiaofeng Zhao(赵小峰)

College of Meteorology and Oceanography, National University of Defense Technology, Nanjing 211101, China

Received:2018-07-14 Revised:2018-09-23 Online:2018-12-05 Published:2018-12-05
Contact: Xiaofeng Zhao E-mail:zxf_best@126.com
Supported by:
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41775027 and 41405025).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

Constructing sophisticated refractivity models is one of the key problems for the RFC (refractivity from clutter) technology. If prior knowledge of the local refractivity environment is available, more accurate parameterized model can be constructed from the statistical information, which in turn can be used to improve the quality of the local refractivity retrievals. The validity of this proposal was demonstrated by range-dependent refractivity profile inversions using the adjoint parabolic equation method to the Wallops'98 experimental data.

关键词: refractivity-from-clutter, parabolic equation, adjoint method, empirical refractivity model

Abstract:

Key words: refractivity-from-clutter, parabolic equation, adjoint method, empirical refractivity model

中图分类号: (Radiowave and microwave (including millimeter wave) technology)

84.40.-x

07.07.Df (Sensors (chemical, optical, electrical, movement, gas, etc.); remote sensing)

赵小峰. “Refractivity-from-clutter” based on local empirical refractivity model[J]. 中国物理B, 2018, 27(12): 128401-128401.

Xiaofeng Zhao(赵小峰). “Refractivity-from-clutter” based on local empirical refractivity model[J]. Chin. Phys. B, 2018, 27(12): 128401-128401.

参考文献 16

[1]	Zhang J P, Zhang Y S, Wu Z S, Zhang Y S and Hu R X 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 124101 (in Chinese)
[2]	Penton S E and Hackett E E 2018 Radio Sci. 53 804 doi: 10.1029/2017RS006440
[3]	Douvenot R, Fabbro V, Gerstoft P, Bourlier C and Saillard J 2008 Radio Sci. 43 RS6005
[4]	Zhao X F, Huang S X, Xiang J and Shi W L 2011 Chin. Phys. B 20 099201 doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/20/9/099201
[5]	Zhu X, Li J, Zhu M, Jiang Z and Li Y 2018 IEEE Geosci. Remote S. 15 1307 doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2018.2842235
[6]	Zhao X F and Huang S X 2012 J. Atmos. Sci. 69 2808 doi: 10.1175/JAS-D-12-073.1
[7]	Zhao X F and Huang S X 2014 J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. 31 1250 doi: 10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00025.1
[8]	Zhao X F, Yardim C, Wang D X and Howe B M 2017 J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. 34 1113 doi: 10.1175/JTECH-D-16-0125.1
[9]	Karimian A, Yardim C, Gerstoft P, HodgkissWS and Barrios A E 2011 Radio Sci. 46 RS6013
[10]	Rogers L T, Hattan C P and Stapleton J K 2000 Radio Sci. 35 955 doi: 10.1029/1999RS002275
[11]	Gerstoft P, Rogers L T, Krolik J L and Hodgkiss W S 2003 Radio Sci. 38 8053
[12]	Liu X, Huang W and Gill E W 2017 IEEE Geosci. Remote S. 14 1740 doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2017.2733538
[13]	Xie J, Chen W, Zhang D, Zu S and Chen Y 2017 IEEE Geosci. Remote S. 14 1213 doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2017.2703611
[14]	Li J, Innanen K A, Tao G 2017 Geophysics 82 D265
[15]	Kuttler J R and Dockery G D 1991 Radio Sci. 26 381 doi: 10.1029/91RS00109
[16]	Zhu C, Byrd R H, Lu P and Nocedal J 1997 ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 23 550 doi: 10.1145/279232.279236

“Refractivity-from-clutter” based on local empirical refractivity model

“Refractivity-from-clutter” based on local empirical refractivity model

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 16

相关文章 8

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	Chuan-Xiu Xu(徐传秀) and Guang-Ying Zheng(郑广赢). Wave mode computing method using the step-split Padé parabolic equation[J]. 中国物理B, 2022, 31(9): 94301-094301.
[2]	Kai Yang(杨凯), Zhensen Wu(吴振森), Xing Guo(郭兴), Jiaji Wu(吴家骥), Yunhua Cao(曹运华), Tan Qu(屈檀), and Jiyu Xue(薛积禹). Estimation of co-channel interference between cities caused by ducting and turbulence[J]. 中国物理B, 2022, 31(2): 24102-024102.
[3]	汪洋, 赵小峰. Theoretical framework for geoacoustic inversion by adjoint method[J]. 中国物理B, 2019, 28(10): 104301-104301.
[4]	张东民, 廖成, 周亮, 邓小川, 冯菊. Reliable approach for bistatic scattering of three-dimensional targets from underlying rough surface based on parabolic equation[J]. 中国物理B, 2018, 27(7): 74102-074102.
[5]	唐骏, 朴胜春, 张海刚. Three-dimensional parabolic equation model for seismo-acoustic propagation:Theoretical development and preliminary numerical implementation[J]. 中国物理B, 2017, 26(11): 114301-114301.
[6]	徐传秀, 唐骏, 朴胜春, 刘佳琪, 张士钊. Developments of parabolic equation method in the period of 2000-2016[J]. 中国物理B, 2016, 25(12): 124315-124315.
[7]	董灏, 聂玉峰, 崔俊芝, 武亚涛. Second-order two-scale analysis and numerical algorithms for the hyperbolic-parabolic equations with rapidly oscillating coefficients[J]. 中国物理B, 2015, 24(9): 90204-090204.
[8]	盛峥. Estimation of lower refractivity uncertainty from radar sea clutter using Bayesian-MCMC method[J]. 中国物理B, 2013, 22(2): 29302-029302.