Print ISSN:1674-1056  |  Online ISSN:2058-3834  |  CN:11-5639/O4
  • Cite this article:

    Shi-Hui Wei, Fen-Zhuo Guo, Xin-Hui Li, Qiao-Yan Wen. Robustness self-testing of states and measurements in the prepare-and-measure scenario with 3→1 random access codeJ. Chin. Phys. B, 2019, 28(7): 070304.
    Shi-Hui Wei, Fen-Zhuo Guo, Xin-Hui Li, Qiao-Yan Wen. Robustness self-testing of states and measurements in the prepare-and-measure scenario with 3→1 random access codeJ. Chin. Phys. B, 2019, 28(7): 070304.
  • Robustness self-testing of states and measurements in the prepare-and-measure scenario with 3→1 random access code

    • Recently, Tavakoli et al. proposed a self-testing scheme in the prepare-and-measure scenario, showing that self-testing is not necessarily based on entanglement and violation of a Bell inequalityPhys. Rev. A 98 062307 (2018). They realized the self-testing of preparations and measurements in an N→1 (N ≥ 2) random access code (RAC), and provided robustness bounds in a 2→1 RAC. Since all N→1 RACs with shared randomness are combinations of 2→1 and 3→1 RACs, the 3→1 RAC is just as important as the 2→1 RAC. In this paper, we find a set of preparations and measurements in the 3→1 RAC, and use them to complete the robustness self-testing analysis in the prepare-and-measure scenario. The method is robust to small but inevitable experimental errors.
    • Article Text

    • loading

    Catalog

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return