Broadband strong optical dichroism in topological Dirac semimetals with Fermi velocity anisotropy
Lim J1, Ooi K J A2, 3, Zhang C4, Ang L K1, †, Ang Yee Sin4, ‡
Science, Math and Technology, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore
School of Energy and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University Malaysia, Selangor Darul Ehsan 43900, Malaysia
College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China
School of Physics, University of Wollongong, Northfields Avenue, New South Wales 2522, Australia

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: ricky_ang@sutd.edu.sg yeesin_ang@sutd.edu.sg

Project supported by Singapore Ministry of Education (MOE) Tier 2 Grant No. (2018-T2-1-007) and USA ONRG Grant No. (N62909-19-1-2047). JL is supported by MOE PhD RSS. KJAO acknowledges the funding support of Xiamen University Malaysia Research Fund, Grant Nos. XMUMRF/2019-C3/IECE/0003 and XMUMRF/2020-C5/IENG/0025, and the Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia under the Fundamental Research Grant No. Scheme, Grant No. FRGS/1/2019/TK08/XMU/02. CZ acknowledges the funding support by the Australian Research Council (Grant No. DP160101474).

Abstract

Prototypical three-dimensional (3D) topological Dirac semimetals (DSMs), such as Cd3As2 and Na3Bi, contain electrons that obey a linear momentum–energy dispersion with different Fermi velocities along the three orthogonal momentum dimensions. Despite being extensively studied in recent years, the inherent Fermi velocity anisotropy has often been neglected in the theoretical and numerical studies of 3D DSMs. Although this omission does not qualitatively alter the physics of light-driven massless quasiparticles in 3D DSMs, it does quantitatively change the optical coefficients which can lead to nontrivial implications in terms of nanophotonics and plasmonics applications. Here we study the linear optical response of 3D DSMs for general Fermi velocity values along each direction. Although the signature conductivity-frequency scaling, σ(ω) ∝ ω, of 3D Dirac fermion is well-protected from the Fermi velocity anisotropy, the linear optical response exhibits strong linear dichroism as captured by the universal extinction ratio scaling law, Λij = (vi/vj)2 (where ij denotes the three spatial coordinates x,y,z, and vi is the i-direction Fermi velocity), which is independent of frequency, temperature, doping, and carrier scattering lifetime. For Cd3As2 and Na3Bi3, an exceptionally strong extinction ratio larger than 15 and covering a broad terahertz window is revealed. Our findings shed new light on the role of Fermi velocity anisotropy in the optical response of Dirac semimetals and open up novel polarization-sensitive functionalities, such as photodetection and light modulation.

1. Introduction

In recent decades, significant effort has been dedicated to the study of topological insulators (TIs) and low-dimension semimetals like graphene. In the low-energy limit, the electrons in these exotic materials obey relativistic, Dirac-like Hamiltonians. Their pseudo-massless particle behavior confers these materials unique optical properties such as high electromagnetic field confinement[14] and strong optical nonlinearity,[516] making them desirable for uses like table-top generation of high-brightness coherent radiation spanning from the x-ray to the terahertz regimes through mechanisms such as free-electron-graphene plasmon scattering,[17,18] high-harmonic generation,[1922] and transition radiation,[23] and also as saturable absorbers for infrared ultrafast lasers.[2427]

Recently, a new class of quantum materials which behave like the bulk analogues of graphene have also attracted significant attention – 3D Dirac semimetals (DSMs). Unlike their TI counterparts which possess only conducting surface states, 3D DSMs are also conducting in the bulk. The dispersion of 3D DSMs is formed from a superposition of two Weyl cones of opposite chiralities.[29,28] Each Weyl cone is linearly dispersing in all three momentum directions and is doubly-degenerate at a single band-touching point (Weyl node). Hence, the energy bands are doubly-degenerate for all momenta except at the Dirac point, where a four-fold degeneracy arises from the overlap of two Weyl nodes. Topologically unprotected Dirac points may occur at a quantum critical point in the phase transition between a TI and a normal insulator[3036] or between weak and strong TIs.[37] Some Dirac points are guaranteed by virtue of crystal symmetries[29,30,38,39] and unlike graphene, are robust against spin–orbit interaction-induced gapping. These stable Dirac points have been predicted in materials like BiO2[38] and A3Bi (A = K, Rb),[29] and experimentally detected in Cd3As2[4042] and Na3Bi.[44,43]

As the electrons in 3D DSMs also possess linear dispersions, they have been expected to exhibit qualitatively-similar field response to graphene.[21,45] Hence, for applications where the properties of graphene are desired in bulk materials, 3D DSMs present themselves as natural candidates.[40,44,45] For instance, Cd3As2[4648] has been shown to perform well as saturable absorbers in the mid-IR regime[49] owing to its strong broadband light–matter interaction,[50,51] much like graphene. Furthermore, they can be realized as optical thin films,[51,52] enabling the application of conventional semiconductor methods for parameter control.[51] Recent exciting experiments have also demonstrated generation of terahertz radiation up to the 3rd[53] and 7th[54] harmonics, and a theoretical study predicted the generation of harmonics beyond the 31st order with conversion efficiencies far exceeding the high-harmonic generation (HHG) in graphene by virtue of a finite interaction volume. For these reasons, 3D DSMs are attractive candidates for novel nanophotonic and nanoplasmonic applications or as viable alternatives to graphene. With increasing exploration into the potential applications of 3D DSMs, a theoretical understanding of how Dirac physics determine the linear and nonlinear optical properties is crucial. The slope of the linearly dispersing Dirac conic band structure around the nodal band touching point is commonly referred as the Fermi velocity, which serves as an important velocity-like parameter that characterizes the electronic band structure of Dirac materials. While a few works[45,55,56] have provided a theoretical treatment for the linear optical response of a 3D Dirac dispersion, none has studied the effects of the pronounced anisotropy between the Fermi velocities along different directions – a property inherently present in 3D DSMs which have been discovered so far, on the linear optical response. As such, it is crucial to include these effects and examine if these anisotropies can be exploited for novel applications.

In this work, we derive the linear interband and intraband conductivities using the Kubo formula. We use a Hamiltonian which describes arbitrary Fermi velocity in each direction, taking us beyond previous works which were restricted to the isotropic dispersion. In obtaining our expressions for the dynamic conductivities in each direction, we find that both the intraband and interband conductivities of 3D DSMs scale as σiivi/(vjvk), where i,j,k∈{x,y,z}, i is the direction parallel to the incident light polarization, and j and k are the directions perpendicular to the incident light polarization. Additionally, we show that the anisotropy between the responses of the i and j directions exhibits the analytical universal scaling relation for the optical conductivity, σi/σj ∝ (vi/vj)2.

For realistic 3D DSMs such as Cd3As2 and Na3Bi, this anisotropy ratio can exceed an order of magnitude, emphasizing the importance of including anisotropy in optical calculations. More intriguingly, the optical extinction ratio reaches 15.8 and 19.2, respectively, for Cd3As2 and Na3Bi, which is substantially higher than that of vast majority of anisotropic optical materials previously reported (see Table 2 below). Importantly, such optical anisotropy covers a broad terahertz (THz) window of sub-THz to at least 50 THz and is insensitive to temperature and defect scattering effects. Our findings thus reveal the nontrivial role of the anisotropic Fermi velocities on the optical response of 3D DSMs and the previously unknown potential of 3D DSM as an exceptionally strong and ultra broadband anisotropic optical material. These results shall form the harbinger for the designs of novel polarization-sensitive nanophotonic, chip-integrable plasmonic, and optoelectronic platforms for a wide array of applications such as optical switching, photodetection, energy conversion, and light modulation.

2. Theory

Close to the Dirac point, an electron within a 3D Dirac semimetal with momentum p = (px,py,pz) obeys the following low-energy effective Hamiltonian:

where i∈{x,y,z} are the Cartesian components, and σi and vi are the Pauli matrix and the Fermi velocity aligned along direction i, respectively. The Hamiltonian admits eigenenergies , where the positive (negative) branch represents the conduction (valence) band energies. The wavefunction of an electron in band s ∈ {c,v} in the plane wave basis normalized over bulk volume V is

where r is the position vector and is the crystal momentum vector. The spinor component for band s, Φp,s, reads

The angles θ = arccos(qz/qr) and ϕ = arctan(qy/qx) are defined in the scaled momentum space coordinates q = (vxpx,vypy,vzpz). Note that the radial component . The subscripts c and v denote the conduction and valence band wavefunctions, respectively. We compute the i,j element of the linear conductivity tensor using the Kubo–Greenwood formula

where g is the combined spin and valley degeneracy, is the Fermi–Dirac distribution, is the group velocity operator along direction i, ω is the angular frequency of the driving field, and 0+ is a broadening factor about the pole. The primed (unprimed) variables denote the quantities of the final (initial) state. We concentrate only on the longitudinal (i = j) conductivities as the transverse conductivities (ij) vanish, leaving only the diagonal tensor terms. The group velocity expectation values are computed as

where the † superscript denotes the hermitian conjugate. For the intraband conductivity, we have the general form

where the inelastic scattering time is τ. The interband conductivity reads

where we define the difference between the Fermi–Dirac distributions of the two bands as , where β = 1/kBT, kB is the Boltzmann constant, and T is the temperature. We can further cast the integral into a form more suitable for numerical calculations

where is the cutoff energy beyond which the band dispersion is no longer linear. We take this values to be [55] throughout our work, where is the Fermi level. To include the interband losses, we make the change ωω + iτ–1. The total conductivity in the ii-direction is simply . In the isotropic limit, our expressions reduce to the results of previous studies. Note that while the τ in and are generally different, we choose to use the same value for both as there are no qualitative changes to the physics we discuss here. However, one could in principle explicitly derive the scattering terms arising as a result of various mechanisms, such as electron–phonon scattering, and long- and short-range impurity scatterings.

3. Results

Figure 1 shows the longitudinal conductivity of two recently discovered 3D DSMs Cd3As2 and Na3Bi in each Cartesian direction i ∈{x,y,z}. These 3D DSMs possess a strong Fermi velocity anisotropy between the pxpy and pz directions: vz < vx,vy. Figures 1(b) and 1(e) indicate that the characteristic dependence of the optical conductivity of the 3D Dirac fermions on the frequency of the incident light, as seen in previous works,[55] remains invariant with respect to direction. However, the difference in the magnitudes of Re(σii) and Im(σii) as a function of direction is drastic. The nontrivial difference in the strength of the optical response in each direction is further emphasized by the polar plots in Figs. 1(c),1(d), 1(f), and 1(g), which show the dependence of the magnitude of the conductivity[57]

on the polarization angles ϑ and φ of some arbitrarily oriented driving field with respect to the major axes. Here, we define σ such that it obeys , where J is the current density, E is the driving electric field, and the unit vector is . As Re(σii) and Im(σii) share the same dependence on direction, we only plot the real part. With reference to Eqs. (6) and (8), we find that the strongly anisotropic response originates from the following scaling relation: σiivi/vjvk, where ijk. This implies that if the Fermi velocities perpendicular to the direction of polarization are smaller than the Fermi velocity parallel to the direction of polarization, the optical response is enhanced. For DSMs such as those mentioned above, it is typical that vxvy and vzvx,vy, indicating that for polarization along x or y, the optical response will be the stongest. This is in agreement with our result in Fig. 1, which clearly shows the strongest optical response along the direction of the largest Fermi velocity (along x for Na3Bi and along y for Cd3As2). We characterize this strong directional dependence through an optical extinction ratio between an i-directional and a j-directional linear response Λij = Ji(ω) / Jj(ω), where Ji(j)(ω) = σii(jj)(ω) E(t) is the magnitude of the i (j)-directional optical current density when subjected to an external time-varying electric field E(t), which exhibits the following universal scaling relation:

This ratio can be can be as large as Λyz ≈ 15.8 for Cd3As2 and Λxz ≈ 19.2 for Na3Bi. The extinction ratios for other directions and the experimentally measured values of the Fermi velocities are presented in Table 1. It should be noted that equation (10) is independent of the optical frequency, temperature, Fermi level, and defect scattering effects. Thus, the strong optical anisotropy of Cd3As2 and Na3Bi is expected to persist broadly over the frequency windows as long as the optically excited electrons remain well-described by the 3D Dirac conic band structure. For Cd3As2, the energy scale of the Dirac cone reaches ≫ 200 meV.[58] This suggests that the strong optical anisotropy of the anisotropic 3D DSMs should cover over an ultrabroad frequency band from sub-THz (limited by low energy Fermi velocity renormalization induced by many-body effects[59,60]) to at least 50 THz.

Fig. 1. Anisotropic optical response of 3D Dirac semiemtals. (a) Schematic depiction of a 3D Dirac cone band structure with anisotropic Fermi velocities in each momentum direction. Longitudinal conductivities of anisotropic 3D DSMs Cd3As2 (b) and Na3Bi (e) in each direction as a function of angular frequency ω. Due to the extreme anisotropy of the Fermi velocities between the in-plane (px, py) and out-of-plane (pz) directions in both 3D DSMs, σzzσxx,σyy. The polar plots in (c), (d), (f), and (g) show the directional dependence of the optical conductivity σ as a function of angles. For all cases considered here, we considered 3D DSMs doped to meV at temperature T = 4 K, a scattering time of 450 fs, and a combined spin and valley degeneracy g = 4. We consider experimentally determined values of the Fermi velocities, as listed in Table 1.
Table 1.

Strong optical anisotropy of 3D Dirac semimetals Cd3As2 and Na3Bi. The optical extinction ratio Λij (ij) is defined in Eq. (10). We considered experimentally measured values of the Fermi velocities.[40,44]

.

We now turn our attention to the dielectric function of anisotropic DSMs. We compute the diagonal (i.e., longitudinal) elements of the dielectric tensor from the conductivity by

where ϵbg,i is the background dielectric constant along the i direction, which depends on the plasma frequency along i∈{x,y,z}, ωp,i, and the effective background dielectric constant accounting for the interband transitions obtained experimentally ϵ. However, as ϵ for 3D DSMs is typically measured as an isotropic value, we assume the ωp,x = ωp,y = ωp,z = ωp, which we compute as

where is the electron density per Weyl cone, kF is the Fermi wavevector magnitude, m* is the effective mass, is the fine structure constant calculated using the geometric mean Fermi velocity . We then calculate ϵbg,i by finding the zeros of the real part of Eq. (11),

where is obtained numerically from Eqs. (6) and (8) using a cubic spline. We consider ϵ = 13,[61] which applies to both Cd3As2 and Na3Bi. These values yield the following background conductivities: (ϵbg,x,ϵbg,y,ϵbg,z)≈ (28.8, 29.7, 1.88) for Cd3As2, and (ϵbg,x,ϵbg,y,ϵbg,z)≈ (25.1, 19.0, 1.30) for Na3Bi. By setting vx = vy = vz = 106 m/s, we recover the isotropic value ϵbg ≈ 12.0 presented in Ref. [55].

We see from Fig. 2, which shows the real part of ϵii(ω) for Cd3As2 (a) and Na3Bi (b), that when Re(ϵii) < 0 (Re(ϵii) > 1), the 3D DSMs exhibit metallic (dielectric) response, a behavior predicted[55] in isotropically dispersing 3D DSMs. We find once again that besides a qualitatively similar response in each direction, the magnitude in each direction possesses the same vi/vjvk scaling as the conductivity. As a result, the anisotropy ϵii/ϵjj is also described by the universal scaling law given by Eq. (10). As 3D DSMs operating in the metallic regime can support the surface plasmon-polaritons (SPPs), the anisotropic dielectric function implies that the incident field polarization direction could potentially be used to tune the field confinement factor and propagation length of the SPPs. As opposed to isotropic DSMs such as graphene, this provides an additional degree of freedom for tuning the strength of light–matter interaction within 3D DSMs, which can potentially be a useful feature for plasmonic and sensing device applications.

Fig. 2. Real part of the dielectric function ϵii(ω) in each direction for 3D DSMs Cd3As2 (a) and Na3Bi (b). The plasma frequency in each direction ωp,i corresponds to Re[ϵii(ω)] = 0, indicated by the horizontal dashes in both panels. The plots indicate the vast difference in the dielectric (Re[ϵii(ϵ)] > 1) or metallic (Re[ϵii(ω)] < 0) response of 3D DSMs between directions at a given frequency . Unless otherwise stated, we consider the same parameters as those Fig. 1}

In the above analysis, we have considered an isotropic value of ϵ which is frequently measured in experiments. We expect that the measured value of ϵ should be significantly different in each direction, the incident light polarization (with ω appropriately chosen) could tune not only parameters like the field confinement factor, but also serve as a switch between dielectric and metallic operation regimes. This arises as the zero-crossing Re(ϵii) = 0 occurs at different values of ωp,i for each direction i. Hence the anisotropy could additionally serve as a tuning parameter for the nature of light–matter interaction within 3D DSMs.

We now calculate the absorption coefficient in the i ∈ {x,y,z} Cartesian direction as[62,63]

For compactness, we have defined and , which we compute using Eq. (11) and the numerical solution to the anisotropic linear conductivity σii(ω). Figure 3 shows the strong anisotropy of αi(ω) manifested as linear dichorism in Cd3As2 and Na3Bi. In both cases, we find that in the frequency regimes ωωp (metallic region) and (beyond the Pauli-blocked region), the anisotropy of the absorption coefficient in different directions is the clearest. In the intermediate frequency regime , we see that αi(ω) is strongly quenched since . An inspection of Eq. (14) reveals that the anisotropy ratio of the absorption coefficient between different directions scales as αi/αj = vi/vj for all frequencies – less drastic than the quadratic scaling of σii/σjj and ϵii/ϵjj. However, despite the less pronounced anisotropy of the absorption coefficient, the linear dichroism of 3D DSMs can still be experimentally detected using the setup which we schematically illustrate in Fig. 3(e). When the polarization of the laser normally incident on the plane of the 3D DSM thin film with the greatest Fermi velocity anisotropy is changed, the strength of the transitted fields should vary by a few times for both Na3Bi and Cd3As2 – an easily detectable difference.

Fig. 3. Linear dichroism of 3D DSMs Cd3As2 and Na3Bi. We see from panels (a) and (b) that there is a large linear dichroism exhibited in the z-direction (black solid lines) due to the strong out-of-plane Fermi velocity anisotropy in pz. We show in panels (c) and (d) that the anisotropy of the absorption coefficient persists over a range of realistic Fermi levels. We find that the anisotropy ratio of the absorption coefficient, αi/αjvi/vj. Unless otherwise stated, we consider the same parameters as those in Figs. 1 and 2. We compute the absorption coefficient using Eq. (14). We schematically illustrate in panel (e) a possible experimental geometry which could potentially enable the detection of the strong optical anisotropy of 3D DSM thin films. By changing the polarization of a linearly polarized laser normally incident on the xz plane of the 3D DSM thin film (since vx exceeds vz by a significant amount), the strength of the transmitted field detected will change.
4. Discussion

We have shown, using the Kubo–Greenwood formula, that when the anisotropic Fermi velocities in each direction are included, the optical response along each direction varies significantly. While the characteristic optical signatures of 3D Dirac electrons like the σ(ω) ∝ ω scaling are retained, our results show that the magnitude along each direction scales as vi/(vjvk). This leads to the following universal scaling of the optical anisotropy ratio between the i and j directions: σii/σjj = ϵii/ϵjj = (vi/vj)2 – a value which exceeds 15 times for Cd3As2 and 19 times for Na3Bi, as shown in Table 1. While we find that the qualitative trend of ϵii(ω) remains the same in all directions, the large anisotropy implies that for plasmonic applications, the polarization of the incident light can serve as an additional degree of freedom with which the field confinement factor and propagation length of SPPs can be tuned. In the case where ϵ is different in each direction, the plasma frequency ωp will acquire a directional dependence. This implies that at an appropriately chosen frequency, dielectric (e.g., waveguide modes) or metallic (SPPs) behavior can dominate depending on the direction of the incident light, thus opening up a novel device architecture where both the strength and the nature of light–matter interaction could be tailored using the incident light polarization. We further note that the linear dichroism of 3D DSMs with Fermi velocities anisotropy is substantially stronger than that of many anisotropic optical materials as shown in Table 2.[62,6473] Although the extinction ratio is dwarfed by other exceptionally strong anisotropic optical materials, such as bilayer tellurene,[73] and antimonene, the broadband linear dichroism of Cd3As2 and Na3Bi represents a unique strength not found in bilayer tellurene and antimonene.

Table 2.

Comparison of the extinction ratios of different anisotropic optical materials.[62,6474]

.
5. Conclusion

In summary, we studied the linear optical response of topological Dirac semimetal. We found that the optical conductivity exhibits strong anisotropy with the universal scaling law, Λij = (vi/vj)2, independent of temperature, Fermi level, and scattering effects, and is broadly applicable to the sub-THZ to at least 50 THz frequency window. Recently, the optical properties of topological semimetals with nodal topology beyond Dirac semimetal, such as Weyl semimetal[74] and nodal loop semimetal,[7578] have been extensively studied. We expect this ever-expanding family of topological semimetals,[79] in which the optical and electronic properties are highly anisotropic along different crystal directions, to continually offer interesting platforms for the uncovering of exotic anisotropic optics and optoelectronic phenomena critical for the design of next-generation novel devices.

Reference
[1] Koppens F H L Chang D E García de Abajo F J 2011 Nano Lett. 11 3370
[2] García de Abajo F J 2014 ACS Photon. 1 135
[3] Chen J Badioli M Alonso-González P Thongrattanasiri S Huth F Osmond J Spasenović M Centeno A Pesquera A Godignon P Elorza A Z Camara N García de Abajo F J Hillenbrand R Koppens F H L 2012 Nature 487 77
[4] Fei Z Rodin A S Andreev G O Bao W McLeod A S Wagner M Zhang L M Zhao Z Thiemens M Dominguez G Fogler M M Castro Neto A H Lau C N Keilmann F Basov D N 2012 Nature 487 82
[5] Sanderson M Ang Y S Gong S Zhao T Hu M Zhong R Chen X Zhang P Zhang C Liu S 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 107 203113
[6] Wright A R Xu X G Cao J C Zhang C 2009 Appl. Phys. Lett. 95 072101
[7] Ishikawa K L 2010 Phys. Rev. 82 201402
[8] Marini A Cox J D García de Abajo F J 2017 Phys. Rev. 95 125408
[9] Mikhailov S A 2007 Europhys. Lett. 79 27002
[10] Hendry E Hale P J Moger J Savchenko A K Mikhailov S A 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 097401
[11] Huang S Tran M H Zuber J Wang Q Zhu Y Zhang C 2019 J. Opt. Soc. Am. 36 200
[12] Chen Q Ang Y S Lewis R A Wang X Zhang C 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 101 211109
[13] Ang Y S Chen Q Zhang C 2015 Front. Optoelectron. 8 3
[14] Ang Y S Zhang C 2012 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 45 395303
[15] Shareef S Ang Y S Zhang C 2012 J. Opt. Soc. Am. 29 274
[16] Ang Y S Sultan S Zhang C 2010 Appl. Phys. Lett. 97 243110
[17] Wong L J Kaminer I Ilic O Joannopoulos J D Soljačić M 2016 Nat. Photon. 10 46
[18] Rosolen G Wong L J Rivera N Maes B Soljačić M Kaminer I 2018 Light Sci. Appl. 7 64
[19] Cox J D Marini A García de Abajo F J 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 1
[20] Yoshikawa N Tamaya T Tanaka K 2017 Science 356 736
[21] Hafez H A Kovalev S Deinert J C Mics Z Green B Awari N Min Chen Germanskiy S Lehnert U Teichert J Wang Z Tielrooij K J Liu Z Chen Z Narita A Müllen K Bonn M Gensch M Turchinovich D 2018 Nature 561 507
[22] Lee C H Zhang X Guan B 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 18008
[23] Zhang K C Chen X X Sheng C J Ooi K J A Ang L K Yuan X S 2017 Opt. Express 25 20477
[24] Sun Z Hasan T Torrisi F Popa D Privitera D Wang F Bonaccorso F Basko D M Ferrari A C 2010 ACS Nano 4 803
[25] Popa D Sun Z Torrisi F Hasan T Wang F Ferrari A C 2010 Appl. Phys. Lett. 97 203106
[26] Bao Q Zhang H Wang Y Ni Z Yan Y Zhen Z X Loh K P Tang D Y 2009 Adv. Funct. Mater. 19 3077
[27] Zhang M Kelleher E J R Torrisi F Sun Z Hasan T Popa D Wang F Ferrari A C Popov S V Taylor J R 2012 Opt. Express 20 25077
[28] Burkov A A 2016 Nat. Mater. 15 1145
[29] Wang Z Sun Y Chen X Q Franchini C Xu G Weng H Dai X Fang Z 2012 Phys. Rev. 85 195320
[30] Yang B J Nagaosa N 2014 Nat. Commun. 5 4898
[31] Murakami S Iso S Avishai Y Onoda M Nagaosa N 2007 Phys. Rev. 76 205304
[32] Murakami S 2007 New Journ. Phys. 9 356
[33] Murakami S Kuga S 2008 Phys. Rev. 78 165313
[34] Xu S Y Xia Y Wray L A Jia S Meier F Dil J H Osterwalder J Slomski B Bansil A Lin H Cava R J Hasan M Z 2011 Science 332 560
[35] Sato T Segawa K Kosaka K Souma S Nakayama K Eto K Minami T Ando Y Takahashi T 2011 Nat. Phys. 7 840
[36] Zhang W Yu R Zhang H J Dai X Fang Z 2010 New Journ. Phys. 12 065013
[37] Hongming Weng Xi Dai Fang Z 2014 Phys. Rev. 4 011002
[38] Young S M Zaheer S Teo J C Y Kane C L Mele E J Rappe A M 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 140405
[39] Steinberg J A Young S M Zaheer S Kane C L Mele E J Rappe A M 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 036403
[40] Liu Z K Jiang J Zhou B Wang Z J Zhang Y Weng H M Prabhakaran D Mo S K Peng H Dudin P Kim T Hoesch M Fang Z Dai X Shen Z X Feng D L Hussain Z Chen Y L 2014 Nat. Mater. 13 677
[41] Neupane M Xu S Sankar R Alidoust N Bian G Liu C Belopolski I 2014 Nat. Commun. 5 3786
[42] Borisenko S Gibson Q Evtushinsky D Zabolotnyy V Büchner B Cava R J 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 027603
[43] Liang A Chen C Wang Z Shi Y Feng Y Yi H Xie Z He S He J Peng Y Liu Y Liu D 2016 Chin. Phys. 25 77101
[44] Liu Z K Zhou B Zhang Y Wang Z J Weng H M Prabhakaran D Mo S K Shen Z X Fang Z Dai X Hussain Z Chen Y L 2014 Science 343 864
[45] Ooi K J A Ang Y S Zhai Q Tan D T H Ang L K Ong C K 2019 APL Photon. 4 034402
[46] Yang Y K Xiu F X Wang F Q Wang J Shi Y 2019 Chin. Phys. 28 107502
[47] Wang H Wang J 2018 Chin. Phys. 27 107402
[48] Song H D Sheng D Wang A Q Li J G Yu D P Liao Z M 2017 Chin. Phys. 26 37301
[49] Zhu C Wang F Meng Y Yuan X Xiu F Luo H Wang Y Li J Lv X He L Xu Y Liu J Zhang C Shi Y Zhang R Zhu S 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 14111
[50] Wang Q Li C Z Ge S Li J G Lu W Lai J Liu X Ma J Yu D P Liao Z M Sun D 2017 Nano Lett. 17 834
[51] Meng Y Zhu C Li Y Yuan X Xiu F Shi Y Xu Y Wang F 2018 Opt. Lett. 43 1503
[52] Pan H Wu M Yang S A 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 14639
[53] Cheng B Kanda N Ikeda T N Matsuda T Xia P Schumann T Stemmer S Itatani J Armitage N P Matsunaga R 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 117402
[54] Kovalev S Dantas R M A Germanskiy S Deinert J C Green B Ilyakov I Awari N Chen M Bawatna M Ling J Xiu F van Loosdrecht P H M Surówka P Oka T Wang Z 2020 Nat. Commun. 11 2451
[55] Kotov O V Lozovik Y E 2016 Phys. Rev. 93 235417
[56] Tabert C J Carbotte J P Nicol E J 2016 Phys. Rev. 93 085426
[57] Saberi-Pouya S Vazifehshenas T Salavati-fard T Farmanbar M Peeters F M 2017 Phys. Rev. 96 075411
[58] Crassee I Sankar R Lee W L Akrap A Orlita M 2018 Phys. Rev. Mater. 2 120302
[59] Throckmorton R E Hofmann J Barnes E Das Sarma S 2015 Phys. Rev. 92 115101
[60] Hofmann J Barnes E Das Sarma S 2015 Phys. Rev. 92 045104
[61] Huang S H Xu S Y Belopolski L Lee C C Chang G Wang B Alidoust N Bian G Neupane M Zhang C Jia S Bansil A Lin H Hasan M Z 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 7373
[62] Liu Y Wu Z Liu X Han S Li Y Yang T Ma Y Hong M Luo J Sun Z 2019 Adv. Opt. Mater. 7 1901049
[63] Zhao Y Q Ma Q R Liu B Yu Z L Yang J Cai M Q 2018 Nanoscale 10 8677
[64] Graham R Miller C Oh E Yu D 2011 Nano Lett. 11 717
[65] Youngblood N Li M 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 110 051102
[66] Song H Li T Zhang J Zhou Y Luo J Chen C Yang B Ge C Wu Y Tang J 2017 Adv. Mater. 29 1700441
[67] Gong P L Zhang F Li L Deng B Pan H Huang L F Shi X Q 2019 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 31 395501
[68] Cheng X Ma J Zhou Y Fang C Wang J Li J Wen X Li D 2020 J. Phys. Photon. 2 014008
[69] Yang Y Liu S C Yang W Li Z Wang Y Wang X Zhang S Zhang Y Long M Zhang G Xue D J Hu J S Wan L J 2018 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 4150
[70] Liu F Zheng S He X Chaturvedi A He J Chow W L Mion T R Wang X Zhou J Fu Q Fan H J Tay B K Song L He R H Kloc C Ajayan P M Liu Z 2016 Adv. Func. Mater. 26 1169
[71] Wang X Li Y Huang L Jiang X W Jiang L Dong H Wei Z Li J Hu W 2017 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 14976
[72] Gao S Sun C Zhang X 2019 Nanophotonics 2019-0435 10.1021/jacs.7b06314
[73] Chu F Chen M Wang Y Xie Y Liu B Yang Y An X Zhang Y 2018 J. Mater. Chem. 6 2509
[74] Zuber J W Zhao T Gong S Hu M Zhong R B Zhang C Liu S G 2020 Phys. Rev. 101 085307
[75] Hong G H Wang C W Jiang J Chen C Cui S T Yang H F Liang A J Liu S Lv Y Y Zhou J Chen Y B Yao S H Lu M H Chen Y F Wang M X Yang L X Liu Z K Chen Y L 2018 Chin. Phys. 27 17105
[76] Fang C Weng H Dai X Fang Z 2016 Chin. Phys. 25 117106
[77] Lee C H Yap H H Tai T Xu G Zhang X Gong J 2019 arXiv: 1906.11806 [cond-mat.mes-hall]
[78] Duan W Yang C Ma Z Zhu Y Zhang C 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99 045124
[79] Ahn J Park S Kim D Kim Y Yang B J 2019 Chin. Phys. 28 117101