Adsorption and desorption phenomena on thermally annealed multi-walled carbon nanotubes by XANES study
Rodolphe Tchenguem Kamto Camile1, Thiodjio Sendja Bridinette2, †, Mane Mane Jeannot2, 3
University of Yaounde I, Faculty of Science, Department of Physics, Yaounde, Cameroon
University of Yaounde I, National Advanced School of Engineering, Department of Mathematic and Physical Science, Yaounde, Cameroon
University of Dschang, Dschang, Cameroon

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: sbridine@yahoo.fr

Abstract

The multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) studied in this work were synthesized by the catalytic chemical vapor deposition (CCVD) process, and were thermally annealed by the hot filament plasma enhanced (HF PE) method at 550 °C for two hours. The x-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) technique was used to investigate the adsorption and desorption phenomena of the MWCNTs at normal and grazing incidence angles. The adsorbates were found to have different sensitivities to the thermal annealing. The geometry of the incident beam consistently gave information about the adsorption and desorption phenomena. In addition, the adsorption of non-intrinsic potassium quantitatively affected the intrinsic adsorbates and contributed to increase the conductivity of the MWCNTs. The desorption of potassium was almost 70% greater after the thermal annealing. The potassium non-intrinsic adsorbates are from a physisorption mechanism whereas the intrinsic adsorbates result from chemisorption.

1. Introduction

The theoretical and experimental knowledge of the structure of a system is required to elucidate new materials with novel properties. Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have intensively undergone theoretical and experimental studies because of their versatilities. During the first decade of the discovery of CNTs by Sumio Iijima, they were usually obtained at high temperature (about 3500 °C) using graphite electrodes by the electric discharge process.[1] Nowadays, they are produced in industries at intermediate temperatures (between 700–950 °C) by the well-known catalytic chemical vapor deposition (CCVD) process,[2,3] electric discharge,[1] or laser ablation.[4] Among these, CCVD is one of the most suitable methods for synthesizing aligned CNTs since it can be carried out at low temperatures and pressures.[5] However, CCVD synthesized CNTs usually contain catalytic metallics and impurities whose nature and proportion depend on the synthesis parameters. The presence of impurities can significantly affect the properties of CNTs and consequently the global behavior of these materials.[6] The samples studied herein are multi-walled CNTs (MWCNTs) synthesized by the hot filament plasma enhanced catalytic chemical vapor deposition (HF PE CCVD) process fully described in Ref. [7]. CNTs are mostly characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM)[8] and transmission electron microscopy (TEM),[9] which are both qualitative methods. These techniques do not give enough information about the electronic and structural properties of the CNTs. The x-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) technique on the contrary is a powerful tool that provides the structural and electronic information on the local environment around the absorber atom in the medium range order due to its angular dependence of the absorption transition.[7] This technique is sensitive to the chemical adsorption and impurities, defects, and orbital rehybridization.[7] MWCNTs with large diameter are advantageous for various applications like molecular compounds for instance, in organic solar cells,[10] infrared detectors,[11] and biological systems.[12] The adsorption and desorption phenomena of the MWCNTs are of great interest since they provide a full understanding of the performance for water and wastewater treatment applications.

In this study, through XANES technique, we investigate the adsorption and desorption phenomena of MWCNTs grown by CCVD process and thermally annealed at 550 °C. The XANES spectra are collected at normal incidence (NI) and grazing incidence (GI) angles to evaluate the adsorption percentage.

2. Theory

MWCNT is made up of a bundle of single walled CNTs (SWCNT) arranged such that they all have the same vertical axis. The external diameter of the MWCNT depends on the growth process. By the electric arc discharge, the external diameter is about 20 nm, whereas it can reach 100 nm with the CCVD process.[2] In general, as a consequence of the synthesis process, the surfaces of the CNTs are usually covered by some adsorbates mostly considered as impurities.[13] These adsorbates can affect, in different ways, the structure of the surfaces since they can be linked physically by van der Waals forces or chemical covalent bonds.[13] The former is named physisorption mechanism while the latter is chemisorption. If the free bonds are saturated, the strongly linked adsorbates can either eliminate or favor the restructuring of the free surface, which thus may or may not affect the properties of the surface.[13] It has been established that the Lennard–Jones interactions prevail in the adsorption mechanism,[14] suggesting that the interaction potential V between two species with a distance r can be written as a sum of the terms of the repulsion and attraction contributions, as follows: where ε and are the Lennard–Jones parameters for each couple of species at the equilibrium distance.

Chemisorption is a dominant process in SWCNTs.[15] On the contrary, physisorption, which is a characteristic of MWCNTs, is a reversible process that can occur at low temperatures.[15] Adsorption capacity depends on the specific surface area and the number of walls in the MWCNT. The specific surface area reduces with an increase in diameter and in the number of walls.[16] The average specific surface area of the MWCNTs is between 30 m2/g and 400 m2/g depending on the mean diameter and the number of walls.[16] The specific surface area S of a MWCNT is given by[16] where R1 and R2 are the external and internal radii, respectively, and n is the number of walls. In the above formula, the density ρ=2.26 g/cm3 and R 1-R 2 is 3.36 Å, which correspond to those of graphite. Physisorption offers the possibility to modify the electronic properties of the substrate. The adsorbate species can leave the surface, leading to desorption, their speciation and the determination of their characteristics can allow to extract valuable information on the desorption process. This can be done by breaking the chemical or physical bonds existing on the surface. XANES spectroscopy is a powerful tool that can give structural and electronic information on the atoms and molecules as well as the local chemical functionalities.[17] The experimental details and the CCVD growth process of our studied MWCNTs have been fully described elsewhere.[7,18]

3. Results and discussion

The XANES spectra collected at the carbon K edge are shown in Figs. 1 and 2. The data have been collected at normal incidence angle (θ = 0° with parallel to the surface) (Figs. 1(a) and 2(a)) and at grazing incidence angle (θ = 90° with normal to the surface) (Figs. 1(b) and 2(b)). Note that θ is the angle between the axis of the sample and the direction of the electric field vector of the x-ray incident beam. The XANES spectra can be divided into three main regions as described in Ref. [18]. The first region located at 285.5 eV corresponds to peak A. The second region between 286.5 eV and 290.5 eV is assigned to the free electron like interlayer (FELI) states and the adsorbed or chemisorbed molecular states. The third region, corresponding to the transitions towards the and empty states is above 291.8 eV. From our XANES spectra, the intrinsic and non-intrinsic adsorbates can be distinguished. The intrinsic adsorbates, namely, , and are the results of the gas, atomic, and/or molecular adsorption of different species such as oxygen (O2), water (H2O), and transition metals (TM) during the synthesis process.[7,19] The non-intrinsic adsorbate observed in our XANES spectra (Fig. 2) is attributed to the potassium element which appears accidentally during the synthesis process.[18]

Fig. 1. Experimental and simulated XANES spectra of MWCNTs annealed and without contaminants at (a) normal and (b) grazing incidences.
Fig. 2. Experimental and simulated XANES spectra of MWCNTs annealed and contaminated with potassium at (a) normal and (b) grazing incidences.

Tables 1 and 2 show the intrinsic and non-intrinsic adsorbates with their corresponding intensities and final states in the Brilouin zone, for annealed and un-annealed samples contaminated with potassium, respectively.

Table 1.

Main feature parameters for annealed and potassium-contaminated MWCNTs from XANES spectra at normal and grazing incidence angles. The intensity is in units of counts per second.

.
Table 2.

Main feature parameters for unannealed and potassium-contaminated MWCNTs from XANES spectra at grazing and normal incidence angles. The intensity is in units of counts per second.

.

Each adsorbate corresponds to a specific electronic transition which is assigned to peaks , and or , and . These peaks are strongly linked to the height of the adsorbates. Also, the probability for a chemical species to be adsorbed depends on the nature of the surface. The types of bonds and the associated physical properties considerably depend on the types of the adsorbed atoms.[22] The quantity of the adsorbates on the surface varies as a function of the curvature radius of the CNTs since the adsorption strongly depends on the specific surface area.[19]

The individual contributions of the adsorbates present in our samples exhibit significant differences at normal and grazing incidence angles. During the adsorption process, rehybridization can occur in which the sp2 and sp3 orbitals are mixed leading to two free hybrid orbitals. Such that, if the contribution of sp3 increases, this will lead to the presence of more free bonds, resulting in the increase of the reactivity.

Figure 3 presents a comparison of the histogram of the intensities of the contaminated MWCNTs un-annealed and annealed for different adsorbates at normal and grazing incidence angles respectively.

Fig. 3. The trend of the intensities of the adsorbates for the contaminated un-annealed and annealed MWCNTs at normal and grazing incidence angles.

Comparing the intensities of the annealed and un-annealed contaminated MWCNTs shows that the non-intrinsic adsorbates and almost disappear in the presence of potassium adsorbates in the two studied angles. The quantity of the intrinsic adsorbates considerably reduces after the thermal annealing process at normal and grazing incidences. It can also be seen that the non-intrinsic adsorbates are less sensitive to the thermal treatment. However, it is shown that when the potassium is adsorbed at 12%, the intrinsic adsorbates increase by 2.12 and 1.64 times at normal and grazing incidence angles, respectively. At normal incidence, the x-ray beam is parallel to the surface of the sample, hence the π states are excited to and some adsorbed chemical species are masked by others. On the contrary, at grazing incidence where the x-ray beam is perpendicular to the surface, the σ states are excited to . These findings show that the adsorption process is also affected by the direction of the x-ray beam as demonstrated by Huang et al.[6] It can be understood that the adsorbates are either affected or desorbed with different sensitivities. This can be explained by the types of bonds that are formed on the surface and/or the temperature of the annealing process (which might not be sufficient). Quantification of the sensitivity of the adsorbates can provide information on the purification method. Thus, the desorption yield of the adsorbates can be expressed as where Iinitial and Ifinal are the intensities of the adsorbates before and after thermal annealing, respectively. The histogram representing the desorption yield of the adsorbates evaluated from XANES results is shown in Fig. 4 at normal incidence and grazing incidence angles.

Fig. 4. Desorption yield of the adsorbates at normal incidence and grazing incidence angles.

It can be observed that potassium adsorbates ( , and ) are more sensitive to thermal annealing compared to the intrinsic adsorbates ( , and ). Also, the geometry at grazing incidence angle is favorable to the desorption process. On the one hand, the high sensitivity of potassium adsorbates to the thermal annealing demonstrates that the physical bonds are established on the surface, leading to the physisorption mechanism. On the other hand, since the intrinsic adsorbates are not sensitive enough to the thermal annealing, suggesting the existence of chemical bonds on the surface, the chemisorption mechanism can be attributed to these types of adsorbates. Chemical bonds are more difficult to break. Incidentally, the potassium donor species can easily be used to dope the MWCNTs. Ding et al.[23] and Dresselhaus et al.[24] showed that doping the SWCNTs with potassium can improve the conductivity and Fermi energy. The conductivity of our MWCNT is modified in the presence of potassium and is increased by about 12% after thermal annealing.

4. Conclusion

The characterization of the carbon nanostructures after synthesis is mandatory since the properties of these materials can be well understood for applications related to adsorption and desorption. These nanostructures can then be applied to solve problems of water, air, and soil purification. XANES spectroscopy was used to qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate the adsorbed species on the MWCNTs. We observed that the quantity adsorbed on the surface is proportional to the diameter of the multi-walls. In addition, the incident angle of the incoming beam plays a key role in understanding the adsorption phenomenon. The results showed that the potassium non-intrinsic adsorbates are resulted from the physisorption mechanism whereas the intrinsic adsorbates are from chemisorption. Also, the intrinsic adsorbates are less sensitive to the thermal treatment compared to the non-intrinsic potassium adsorbates. In addition, it is seen that the presence of potassium increases the conductivity of the MWCNTs after thermal treatment, and the desorption process is mostly affected at grazing incidence. It is worth noting that the adsorbates are useful for non-covalent functionalization with potential applications in electronic, biologic, water treatment, and environmental protection. Moreover, thermal annealing is one of the efficient methods for the purification and controlling the conductivity of the MWCNTs.

Reference
[1] Iijima S 1991 Nature 354 56
[2] Dresselhaus M S Dresselhaus G Avouris P 2001 Carbon Nanotubes: Synthesis, Structure. Properties And Applications Berlin Springer 29
[3] Cojocaru C S 2003 Ph. D Thesis Strasbourg I Université Louis Pasteur
[4] Thess A Lee R Nikolaev P Dai H Petit P Robert J Xu C Lee Y H Kim S G Rinzler A G Colbert D T Scuseria G E Tomanek D Fischer J E Smalley R E 1996 Science 273 483
[5] Lin K S Mai Y J Li S R Shu C W Wang C H 2012 J. Nanomater 23 939683
[6] Huang W Wang Y Luo G Wie F 2003 Carbon 41 2585
[7] Eba Medjo R Thiodjio Sendja B Mane Mane J Owono Ateba P 2009 Phys. Scr. 80 045601
[8] Cojocaru C S Le Normand F 2006 Thin Solid Films 515 53
[9] Taschner C Pacal F Leonhardt A Spatenka P Bartsch K Graff A Kaltofen R 2003 Surf. Coat. Technol. 174-175 81
[10] Hatton R A Blanchard N P Miller A J Silva S R P 2007 Physica E 37 124
[11] Varghese O K Kichambre P D Gong D Ong K G Dickey E C Grimes G A 2001 Sens. Actuators B Chem. 81 32
[12] Zhu L Chang D W Dai L Hong Y 2007 Nano Lett. 7 3592
[13] Ibach H 2006 Physics of Surfaces and Interfaces Berlin Springer-Verlag 30
[14] Lennard-Jones J E 1932 Trans Faraday Soc. 28 333
[15] Dabrowski A 2001 Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 93 135
[16] Peigney A Laurent C Flahaut E Bacsa R R Rousset A 2001 Carbon 39 507
[17] Kuznetsova A Popova I Yates J T Bronikowski M J Huffman C B Liu J Smalley R E Hwu H H Chen J G 2001 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123 10699
[18] Eba Medjo R Thiodjio Sendja B Mane Mane J 2014 Mater. Sci. Appl. 5 95
[19] Jun Z Chang L 2005 Xanes Study of Carbon Based Nanotubes 29 Conference proceedings
[20] Eba Medjo R 2015 Contamination in Manufacturing of Carbon Nanostructures
[21] Rosenberg R A Love P J Rehn V 1986 Phys. Rev. B 33 4034
[22] Durgun E Dag S Bagci V M K et al. 2003 Phys. Rev. B 67 201401 R
[23] Ding Y Yang X B Ni J 2006 Front Phys. Chin. 1 317
[24] Dresselhaus M S Williams K A Eklund P C 1999 MRS Bull. 24 45