Wider frequency domain for negative refraction index in a quantized composite right–left handed transmission line*

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61205205 and 6156508508), the General Program of Yunnan Provincial Applied Basic Research Project, China (Grant No. 2016FB009), and the Foundation for Personnel Training Projects of Yunnan Province, China (Grant No. KKSY201207068).

Wu Qi-Xuan1, Zhao Shun-Cai2, †
Faculty of Foreign Languages and Culture, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: zhaosc@kmust.edu.cn

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61205205 and 6156508508), the General Program of Yunnan Provincial Applied Basic Research Project, China (Grant No. 2016FB009), and the Foundation for Personnel Training Projects of Yunnan Province, China (Grant No. KKSY201207068).

Abstract

The refraction index of the quantized lossy composite right-left handed transmission line (CRLH-TL) is deduced in the thermal coherence state. The results show that the negative refraction index (herein the left-handedness) can be implemented by the electric circuit dissipative factors(i.e., the resistances R and conductances G) in a higher frequency band (1.446 GHz≤ ω ≤ 15 GHz), and flexibly adjusted by the left-handed circuit components (Cl, Ll) and the right-handed circuit components (Cr, Lr) at a lower frequency (ω = 0.995 GHz). The flexible adjustment for left-handedness in a wider bandwidth will be significant for the microscale circuit design of the CRLH-TL and may make the theoretical preparation for its compact applications.

1. Introduction

A well-established route to constructing negative refractive index materials (NRMs)[1,2] is based on Veselago’s theory of left-handed materials (LHM), simultaneous negative permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) with different types of metamaterials.[39] Although very exciting from a physics point of view, the negative ϵ and μ produced by electromagnetic resonance may bring about a very highloss[10,11] and narrow bandwidth consequently. Due to the weaknesses of resonant-type structures, three groups almost simultaneously introduced a transmission line (TL) approach for NRM,[1215] i.e., the composite right–left handed transmission line (CRLH-TL), which refers to the right-handedness accompanying the positive refraction index at high frequencies and to the left-handedness with the negative refraction index (NRI) at lower frequencies.[16] The CRLH-TL, initially the non-resonant-type one, is perhaps one of the most representative and potential candidates due to its low loss, broad operating frequency band, and planar configuration,[16,17] which is often related to the easy fabrication for NRI applications in a suite of novel guided-wave,[18] radiated-wave,[19] and refracted-wave devices and structures.[20,21] Nowadays, the CRLH-TLs show a tendency to the compact applications influenced by the nanotechnology and microelectronics.[2224] Recently, a new class of miniaturized nonreciprocal leaky-wave antenna is proposed for miniaturization, nonreciprocal properties and wide-angle scanning at the same time.[25] With four unit cells of CRLH-TL a wide-band loop antenna is proposed in a compact size.[26]

However, when the compact size of the CRLH-TL approaches to the Fermi wavelength, the quantum effects[2224,27] on the CRLH-TL must be taken into account. In our former work, we firstly deduced the quantum features of NRI of the lossless mesoscopic left-handed transmission line (LH-TL).[28,29] Then we quantized the lossy LH-TL and discussed the quantum influence of dissipation on the NRI[30] in a displaced squeezed Fock state. Some novel quantum effects were revealed and the significance for the miniaturization application of LH-TL was pointed out.

In this paper, the flexible adjustment of negative refraction index is achieved from a wider frequency bandwidth than in the former work[16,2830] in the quantized lossy CRLH-TL in the thermal coherence state. The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we quantize the travelling current field in the unit-cell circuit of the CRLH-TL, and deduce its refraction index in the thermal coherence state. Then we evaluate the refraction index via the numerical approach in Section 3. Section 4 is devoted to our summary and conclusions.

2. Quantized refraction index in thermal coherence state

The equivalent unit-cell circuit model of the proposed lossy CRLH-TL is shown in Fig. 1. Compared with the lossless CRLH-TL,[28,29] the imported resistance R and conductance G represent the loss except the series capacitor Cl and inductance Lr, shunt inductance Ll and capacitor Cr[31] in each unit cell circuit. The dimension Δz of the equivalent unit-cell circuit is much less than the wavelength at operating frequency. Hence, we now consider Kirchhoff’s voltage and current laws for this unit-cell circuit in Fig. 1, which respectively read

where u(z) is the voltage, j(z) is the current, and ω is the angle frequency. When Δz → 0, the above equations lead to the following system:
The above electric current equation leads to the forward plane-wave solution:
in which
In Eq. (3), A* is the complex conjugate of A for normalization purposes. We adopt the quantization method similar to Louisell’s[32] to achieve the current operator. In Fig. 1, the given unit-length, i.e., z0 = where λ is the wavelength labelled typically by wavenumber k and frequency ω, its Hamiltonian can be written as follows:
where
Then, with the definitions , and , we achieve the Hamiltonian of the unit-cell circuit:
According to the canonical quantization principle, we can quantize the system by operators and , which satisfy the commutation relation . The annihilation and creation operators â and â are defined by the relations
Thus the quantum Hamiltonian of Fig. 1 can be rewritten as . Thus the current in the lossy unit cell equivalent circuit for CRLH-TL can be quantized as
The thermal coherent state we adopted here is .[3335] Here, D(α) = exp(αaα*a) and T(θ) = exp[−θ(aã)] with sinh2(θ) = [exp(ħω/kBT) − 1]−1, in which kB is the Boltzmann constant. In thermo-field dynamic (TFD) theory, the tilde space is accompanied with the Hilbert space, and the tilde operators commute with the non-tilde operators.[36] Thus the creation and annihilation operators â and â are associated with their tilde operators and are according to the rules:[36] , . We can prove the following equalities easily,
with u = cosh(θ) and v = sinh(θ). Then with Eqs. (6) and (7), the quantum fluctuation of the current in the thermal coherent state is
It notes that σz is infinitesimal when z is dimensionless, and we can transform Eq. (8) by using the first order approximation of Taylor expansion as follows:
With the relation 2σβ = η deduced from Eq. (4), and the relation (n = c0 β/ω,[37] c0 is the light speed in a vacuum) between propagation constant and refraction index in the CRLH-TL, the refraction index can be deduced from Eq. (9),

Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of an equivalent unit-cell circuit of the mesoscopic lossy CRLH-TL.
3. Numerical simulations and discussions

In a previous work,[16] the negative refraction index happened in the lower frequency bandwidth of the microwave wave. In order to investigate the minus refraction index, we should work with the refraction index from Eq. (10). However, the analytical equation (10) of the refraction index is rather cumbersome to obtain, so, we follow the numerical approach to analyze the refraction index of the CRLH-TL. Several parameters should be selected prior to the analysis. The length of the unit CRLH-TL circuit is z = 4z0 = 4 nm, and the quantum fluctuation of the current 〈(Δj)2〉 = 10−9. Other parameters used in our simulation are listed in Table 1 whose order of magnitudes are cited from Ref. [38].

Table 1.

Parameters of the circuit components in the quantized lossy CRLH-TL.

.

The frequency bandwidth for negative refraction index (i.e., the left-handedness) is of interest to the mesoscopic CRLH-TL. Besides the role of the imported resistance R and conductance G representing the loss is also important here. Figure 2 shows the refraction index-dependent input resistance R and conductance G in the frequency domain. The relation between the refraction index and the resistance R is shown in Fig. 2(a). It is noted that in the lower frequency band [0, 1.446 GHz] the refraction indices are positive, and that its values are negative in the higher frequency band [1.446 GHz, 15 GHz], which surpasses the frequency band for left-handedness mentioned by Ref. [16]. We notice that the resistance R plays a passive role in both left-handedness and right-handedness frequency bands, i.e., the resistance R restrains the growth of the refraction index n in the two frequency bands. Figure 2(b) shows a similar behavior of the conductance G to that of the refraction index. The positive refraction index in the lower frequency band [0, 1.428 GHz] and the negative refraction index in the higher frequency band [1.428 GHz, 15 GHz] can be observed from the curves in Fig. 2(b). While increasing conductance G increased by 0.2 μS can enhance the refraction index from the dotted curve to the solid curve in both frequency bands, i.e., [0, 1.428 GHz] and [1.428 GHz, 15 GHz]. We note that the frequency band for negative refraction index (i.e., the left-handedness ) in Fig. 2 surpasses what was mentioned in Ref. [16]. Generally speaking, neither of the resistance R and the conductance G is a desired role in electricity produced from the Joule heat via the Ohm law. In this quantized CRLH-TL, the resistance R and the conductance G can adjust the refraction index except the classic Ohm law. Throughout Fig. 2, this quantized CRLH-TL demonstrates the positive refraction index (i.e., the right-handedness) in the lower frequency band and the negative refraction index (i.e., the left-handedness) in the higher frequency band.

Fig. 2. Variations of refraction index n with frequency ω tuned by different values of (a) resistance R and (b) conductance G, respectively.

A notable question is whether it is possible to realize negative refraction index (i.e., the left-handedness) in the lower frequency bands. Figures 3 and 4 provide the refraction index dependent parameters of the circuit components at a lower frequency ω = 0.995 GHz.

Fig. 3. Curves of refraction index n versus the shunt capacitor Cr tuned by different values of (a) series capacitor Cl and (b) inductance Lr, respectively.
Fig. 4. Refraction index n versus series inductance Lr tuned by different series capacitors Cl (a) and shunt inductances Ll (b), respectively.

The refraction index dependent shunt capacitor Cr is provided in Fig. 3 at frequency ω = 0.995 GHz. The curves each show that the refraction index is positive when the values of series capacitor Cl are assigned to 7.0 pF and 7.5 pF in Fig. 3(a), respectively. However, the refraction index is negative and reaches its maximum in a range [10 nF, 15 nF] of the shunt capacitor Cr when the series capacitor Cl is set to be the larger values, i.e., Cl = 8.5 pF and 9.0 pF, respectively. The curves from dotted to solid in Fig. 3(b) show a similar feature when the refraction index is tuned by the different series inductances Lr’s. However, we also note that a larger negative refraction index can be implemented by a smaller shunt capacitor Cr ≈ 1 nF but a larger series inductance Lr = 1150 nH. Figure 3 demonstrates that the refraction index can be negative at a lower frequency ω = 0.995 GHz with the appropriate parameters of series capacitor Cl and inductance Lr within the range [0, 20 nF] of the shunt capacitor Cr.

At the lower frequency ω = 0.995 GHz, figure 4 shows the refraction index dependent series inductance Lr for different values of series capacitor Cl in Fig. 4(a) and shunt inductance Ll’s in Fig. 4(b), respectively. The increasing series capacitor Cl expands the range of the series inductance Lr’s for negative refraction index and gradually increases the values of negative refraction indices in Fig. 4(a). The curves in Fig. 4(b) display the similar growth trends for negative refraction indices, but the increase of the negative refraction index in Fig. 4(a) is larger than that in Fig. 4(b). These results demonstrate that the left-handed circuit components (Cl, Ll) can enhance the negative refraction index in the mesoscopic lossy CRLH-TL.

Before concluding this paper, we should point out that how to broaden the frequency band for a negative refraction index is an active field for metamaterials, and the metamaterials within a wider band are always a research object. However, the frequency bands for negative refraction index only exist in the microwave band introduced by the first researchers[1013] in the CRLH-TL. In our current study, we implement the negative refraction index within a wider frequency band in the quantized CRLH-TL and conclude that the negative refraction index in the higher frequency band (1.446 GHz≤ ω ≤ 15 GHz) tuned by resistance R and conductance G and at a lower frequency (ω = 0.995 GHz) tuned by the parameters of the circuit components. These achievements show the new characteristic for the quantized CRLH-TL, which should receive enough attention in the near future.

4. Conclusions

In the present paper, the negative refraction index has been obtained in a wider frequency band for the quantized CRLH-TL. The frequency domain for a negative refraction index is 1.446 GHz≤ ω ≤ 15 GHz with the values of negative refraction index being opposite through tuning the resistance R and conductance G, respectively. At a much lower frequency (ω = 0.995 GHz), the negative refraction indices can also be flexibly obtained by the left-handed circuit components (Cl, Ll), and the right-handed circuit components (Cr, Lr), respectively. The adjusting of negative refraction index within a wider bandwidth in this quantized CRLH-TL is significant for the microscale circuit design and compact applications for the CRLH-TL.

Reference
[1] Veselago V 1968 Soviet Physics Uspekhi 10 509
[2] Zhao S C Liu Z D Zheng J Li G 2011 Chin. Phys. 20 067802
[3] Thommen Q Mandel P 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 053601
[4] Shelby R A Smith D R 2001 Science 292 77
[5] Zhao S C Wu Q X Ma K 2016 Chin. J. Phys. 54 756
[6] Cubukcu E Aydin K Ozbay E Foteinopoulou S Soukoulis C M 2003 Nature 423 604
[7] Zhao S C Liu Z D Wu Q X 2010 Chin. Phys. 19 014211
[8] Zhao S C Qian X F Zhang Y P Zhang Y A 2012 Prog. Theor. Phys. 128 243
[9] Zhao S C Guo H W Wei X J 2017 Opt. Commun. 400 30
[10] Pendry J B Holden A J Robbins D J Stewart W J 1999 IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 47 2075
[11] Smith D R Padilla W J Vier D C Nemat-Nasser S C Schultz S 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 4184
[12] Grbic A Eleftheriades G V 2002 Proc. IEEE-AP-S USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting 4 June, 2002 San Antonio, TX 340 10.1109/APS.2002.1016992
[13] Oliner A A 2002 URSI Digest, IEEE-AP-S USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting June 2002 San Antonio, TX 618
[14] Caloz C Itoh T 2002 Proc. IEEE-AP-S USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting June 2002 San Antonio, TX 412 10.1109/APS.2002.1016111
[15] Caloz C Okabe H Iwai T Itoh T 2002 URSI Digest, IEEE-AP-S USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting June, 2002 San Antonio, TX 224
[16] Caloz C Itoh T 2003 IEEE-MIT Int. Symp. June, 2003 Philadelphia, PA 195 10.1109/MWSYM.2003.1210914
[17] Collin R E 1992 Foundations for Microwave Engineering 2 McGraw-Hill
[18] Horii Y Caloz C Itoh T 2005 IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 53 1527
[19] Sanada A Murakami K Awai I Kubo H Caloz C Itoh T 2004 34th European Microwave Conference October, 2004 Amsterdam, The Netherlands 1341 1344
[20] Sanada A Murakami K Aso S Kubo H Awai I 2004 IEEE-MTT Int. Symp. June, 2004 Fort Worth, TX 301 10.1109/MWSYM.2004.1335877
[21] Lim S Caloz C Itoh T 2005 IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 53 161
[22] Flores J C 2001 Phys. Rev. 64 235309
[23] Ji Y H Luo H M Guo Q 2006 Phys. Lett. 349 104
[24] Ji Y H 2008 Phys. Lett. 372 3874
[25] Apaydin N Sertel K Volakis J L 2014 IEEE Trans. Anten. Propag. 62 2954
[26] Cao W P Cao Y N Li S M Li B B 2016 11th International Symposium on Antennas, Propagation and EM Theory 56 145
[27] Zhang S Liu Y H 2004 Phys. Lett. 322 356
[28] Zhao S C Guo H W Wei X J 2017 Opt. Quantum Electron. 49 222
[29] Wei X J Zhao S C Guo H W 2017 Superlat. Microstr. 110 313
[30] Guo H W Zhao S C Wei X J 2017 Chin. Phys. Lett. 34 034201
[31] Eleftheriades G V Siddiqui O Iyer A K 2003 IEEE Microw. Wireless Components Lett. 13 51
[32] Louisell W H 1973 Quantum Statistical Properties of Radiation New York John Wiley
[33] Vourdas A Bishop R F 1994 Phys. Rev. 50 3331
[34] Oz-Vogt J Mann A Revzen M 1991 J. Mod. Opts. 38 2339
[35] Ni G J Xu J J Chen W 1985 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 18 149
[36] Umezawa H Yamanaka Y 1988 Adv. Phys. 37 531
[37] Caloz C Itoh T 2004 IEEE Trans. Anten. Propag. 52 1159
[38] Egger D J Wilhelm F K 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 163601