Tunable localized surface plasmon resonances in one-dimensional h-BN/graphene/h-BN quantum-well structure
Zhang Kaibiao1, 2, Zhang Hong1, 3, 4, †, , Cheng Xinlu1
Institute of Atomic and Molecular Physics, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
School of Science, Sichuan University of Science and Engineering, Zigong 643000, China
College of Physical Science and Technology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
Key Laboratory of High Energy Density Physics and Technology of Ministry of Education, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: hongzhang@scu.edu.cn

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11474207 and 11374217) and the Scientific Research Fund of Sichuan University of Science and Engineering, China (Grant No. 2014PY07).

Abstract
Abstract

The graphene/hexagonal boron-nitride (h-BN) hybrid structure has emerged to extend the performance of graphene-based devices. Here, we investigate the tunable plasmon in one-dimensional h-BN/graphene/h-BN quantum-well structures. The analysis of optical response and field enhancement demonstrates that these systems exhibit a distinct quantum confinement effect for the collective oscillations. The intensity and frequency of the plasmon can be controlled by the barrier width and electrical doping. Moreover, the electron doping and the hole doping lead to very different results due to the asymmetric energy band. This graphene/h-BN hybrid structure may pave the way for future optoelectronic devices.

1. Introduction

Graphene has emerged as a promising plasmonic material that combines the appealing optoelectronic properties with the ability of being tuned by chemical doping or electrostatic gating.[13] This allows for the realization of optical signal processors,[4] sensors, and light modulators.[5,6] To further enhance and extend the performance of these graphene-based devices, one of the challenges concerning this ultra-thin material is to enhance light-graphene coupling in a wide spectral range. Many discontinuous graphene structures have been designed to enhance the optical response associated with the excitation of graphene plasmon.[713] Instead of propagation, the plasmons in these patterned graphene arrays can be localized in a small region. These localized surface plasmons can significantly increase the light–matter interaction. Another new popular approach to extend its functionalities is plasmon hybridization due to the excellent compatibility of graphene.[1417] In a hybrid structure, the resonant frequency can be tuned in a broader range.

Recently, graphene/hexagonal boron-nitride (h-BN) hybrid structures have been realized experimentally.[1824] Ci et al. used a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) process to synthesize an atomic structure consisting of hybridized h-BN and graphene domains. This system exhibited a semiconducting behavior due to the carrier confinement within the graphene paths embedded in BN domains. Zhang et al. fabricated periodic graphene/h-BN heterostructures with precisely controlled domain sizes by using lithography patterning and sequential CVD grown step.[25] Theoretically, it has been predicted that one can manipulate the electronic band structure of graphene by doping with h-BN.[2629] Band gap engineering plays an important role in applications of graphene. A minimal lattice mismatch allows graphene and h-BN to form a lateral planar heterostructure. Additionally, the large band gap difference between pure h-BN (∼ 5.9 eV) and graphene leads to distinct phase separation in the sheet of C and BN domains. Shinde et al. suggested that a zigzag BN chain on either side of a graphene nanoribbon may produce a major effect of quantum confinement. In this case, the BN domains act as infinite barriers due to the very large bandgap.[30] The charge carriers are confined within the graphene domain, which form a quasi-one-dimensional quantum well. Thus, the graphene plasmons in this heterostructure are expected to couple more strongly to their local environment.

In the present study, we numerically present a fully quantum-mechanical study of localized plasmon resonances in one-dimensional h-BN/graphene/h-BN quantum-well structures. The collective oscillations are mainly localized in the graphene domain due to the quantum confinement effect of the BN barrier. Compared with isolate graphene, the resonance absorption and the field enhancement exhibit a distinct strengthening in this hybrid structure. In addition, the intensity and frequency of the plasmon can be controlled by the barrier width and electrical doping, which provides the highly desirable feature of tunability to the plasmonic device. This study may provide a visible strategy for the well-ordered graphene/h-BN hybrid structure in the development of future devices.

2. Method of calculations

The calculations have been performed using the real-space time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) approach as implemented in the OCTOPUS computer code.[31] TDDFT is a generalization of the static density functional theory to describe the electronic excitation and other time-dependent behaviors. This scheme offers a good compromise between computational cost and accuracy. In the previous works, it has been successfully used in predicting the absorption and plasmon resonances of nanostructures.[3236] In the calculation, the inner shell electrons are treated by the Troullier–Martins norm-conserving pseudopotentials,[37] and the exchange and correlation interaction is included within the local-density approximation (LDA).[38] The linear response can be obtained by propagating the system with time-dependent Kohn–Sham equations under an impulse perturbation with a damping parameter of 0.15 a.u. Then the frequency-dependent absorption spectra are extracted by Fourier transform of the dipole strength. The simulation zone is a sphere around each atom with a radius of 6 Å and a uniform mesh grid of 0.3 Å. The Kohn–Shan wave functions are typically evolved for 6000 steps with a time step of Δt = 0.003 ħ/eV.

3. Result and discussion

According to the experiment result,[18] it is more likely that graphene and h-BN domains could form a B–N–C configuration with N bonded to C atoms. The symmetrical one-dimensional quantum-well structures are constructed by integrating h-BN at the two sides of rectangular graphene flakes to form a seamless in-plane h-BN/graphene/h-BN structure, as depicted in Fig. 1(a). The relaxed C–C bond lengths of these systems vary from 1.40 Å to 1.43 Å, the B–N bond lengths vary from 1.40 Å to 1.44 Å, and the C–N bond lengths vary from 1.39 Å to 1.41 Å. Following the conventional nomenclature of graphene nanoribbons, we will denote these quantum-well structures as (BN)n/Cm/(BN)n, where m represents the number of zigzag chains of C and n represents the number of zigzag chains of BN. The edges of all structures are passivated with H atoms.

Fig. 1. (a) Schematic of (BN)n/Cm/(BN)n quantum-well structure. Carbon, nitrogen, and boron atoms are represented by black, blue, and red balls, respectively. (b)–(e) The induced charge density distributions at the energy resonance point 0.72 eV for (b) (BN)1/C6/(BN)1, (c) (BN)2/C6/(BN)2, (d) (BN)4/C6/(BN)4, (e) (BN)6/C6/(BN)6.

We first consider a series of 1D (BN)n/Cm/(BN)n quantum-well structures with fixed graphene length (m = 6) and varied BN length (n = 1, 2, 4, 6). The polarization direction of the impulse excitation light is maintained along the horizontal axis. Here, we focus on the optical response in the near-infrared region, aiming at a better understanding of the low-energy dipolar plasmon properties in these quantum-well structures. Figures 1(b)1(e) display the surface induced charge density distributions of these (BN)n/C6/(BN)n (n = 1, 2, 4, 6) systems at the energy resonance point 0.72 eV. The spatial-dependent density profiles reveal that the induced charge oscillations have a strong dipolar plasmon characteristic. These plasmons arise from the long-range electronic motion along the edges of the graphene flakes under the electromagnetic interaction. Yamijala and coworkers also contributed the oscillatory in a graphene/h-BN hybrid structure to charge transfer of border/edge C atoms.[39] Thus, the armchair edges of these 1D structures offer a crucial path for the charge transport in these truly nanometer-size graphene structures. It is also worth noting that the electrons and holes are mainly localized in the graphene domain. As discussed above, the BN domains act as an insulator or a barrier to confine the charge within the graphene domain and the interface regions.

To gain more insight, we show the optical absorption spectra associated with these dipole oscillations in all the (BN)n/C6/(BN)n (n = 1, 2, 4, 6) systems in Fig. 2(a). For comparison, the absorption spectrum of the isolate graphene (C6) is also shown. As a result of quantum confinement, the resonance peaks of graphene with BN barriers exhibit an overall red shift and absorption enhancement relative to that of the isolate graphene. The shift of the resonance frequency can be attributed to both the carrier mobility decrease and the travel path increase. In the previous experimental studies, the decrease in carrier mobility after BN inclusion in graphene has been reported.[18,19] Additionally, the carrier will travel a longer distance in graphene with a BN-terminal than that with an H-terminal. As expected, the plasmon resonance frequencies of all (BN)n/C6/(BN)n systems are independent of the width of the BN domain. These fixed frequencies further confirm that the collective oscillations are merely confined in the graphene flakes. In the quantum-well system, the carriers trapped in the interface states can be resonant with the plasmon in the graphene domain. This coherent combination and the enhanced quantum finite size effect give rise to the absorption enhancement and broadening in graphene.

Fig. 2. (a) Absorption spectra of a series of (BN)n/Cm/(BN)n quantum-well structures with fixed zigzag C chains (m = 6) and variable BN zigzag chains (n = 1, 2, 4, 6). (b) Energy-dependent field enhancement of graphene flakes in (BN)n/Cm/(BN)n. For comparison, the absorption spectrum and field enhancement (inset) of isolate graphene (C6) are also displayed.

In general, the oscillating charge distribution is responsible for the large induced electric field enhancement. The field enhancement is obtained by deriving the effective potential.[40] Figure 2(b) displays the frequency-dependent electric field enhancement nearby the graphene flake in the (BN)n/C6/(BN)n structure. The prominent peaks also appear around the plasmon resonance frequency. Importantly, the field enhancement of the graphene with BN is nearly two orders of magnitude higher than that of the graphene without BN. This behavior implies that the quantum confinement effect is significant in such small-size quantum-well systems. In addition, the field enhancement monotonically increases with increasing BN length. This trend and distribution are in line with the absorption spectra.

The electronic nature of plasmons suggests electrical tunability, which is convenient for integrable and high-speed modulation. Clear evidence has been obtained recently which demonstrates the ability to control the optical response in graphene by both electron and hole dopings.[41,42] However, these two dopings would lead to very different results due to the asymmetric energy band.[43,44] Here, the tunable plasmon properties can be obtained by adding or removing net electrons. A negative value means that we are adding electrons, while a positive value means removing electrons from the system. We first add electrons to the (BN)2/C6/(BN)2 quantum-well structure. Figure 3(a) shows the absorption spectra associated with the π -plasmon as a function of net doped charge. The resonance frequencies shift toward the higher energy side with the doping. Moreover, the strengths of the plasmon peaks display a distinct enhancement with the net electron increasing. This result demonstrates that low-energy plasmon in the (BN)n/Cm/(BN)n quantum-well structure can be controlled by several electrons. More interestingly, the field enhancement near the graphene surface is reduced with the net electron increasing, as shown in Fig. 3(b).

Fig. 3. (a) Absorption spectra of (BN)2/C6/(BN)2 quantum-well structure as a function of net doped charge Q/e. (b) Energy-dependent field enhancement of graphene flakes in (BN)2/C6/(BN)2 structure as a function of net doped charge Q/e.

To elaborate the mechanism of field enhancement reduction, we show in Fig. 4 the induced charge density distributions of the (BN)2/C6/(BN)2 structure at the resonance frequency. The electrons are uniformly added to the hybrid structure. However, they are mainly pulled and confined in the graphene domain by the dipole–dipole interaction of the carriers. Moreover, compared with the neutral case, a small anti-parallel dipole is clearly observed near the center of the graphene domain. In addition, it is enhancing with the net doped electrons increasing. The formation of the small dipole is mainly attributed to the screening effect. This opposite charge distribution arising from the screening effect can decrease the electric field enhancement near the graphene flake.

Fig. 4. The induced charge density distributions of (BN)2/C6/(BN)2 with Q/e of (a) −2, (b) −3, and (c) −4.

Then the hole doping is realized by removing electrons from the (BN)2/C6/(BN)2 quantum-well structure. The absorption spectrum displays a dramatic difference compared with that of electron doping, as shown in Fig. 5(a). Particularly, the mode around 1.8 eV, which can be negligible in the electron doping cases, exhibits a significant enhancement with the hole doping increasing, while the absorption mode around 1 eV shows a nonlinear enhancement. However, their resonance frequencies shift toward the high-energy side with the doping increasing. This result is similar to the previous experimental finding for a graphene/h-BN heterostructure, where a blue-shift of plasmon resonance was observed when the negative gate voltage or hole doping increased.[25] This frequency shift behavior is attributed to the dipole–dipole interaction of the carriers.

Fig. 5. (a) Absorption spectra of (BN)2/C6/(BN)2 quantum-well structure as a function of net doped charge Q/e. (b)–(f) The induced charge density distributions of (BN)2/C6/(BN)2 with different net charge at the resonance energy point.

To confirm this argument, we display in Figs. 5(b)5(f) the induced charge density distributions corresponding to the plasmon resonance peaks. A distinct difference is noticed that the dipole charge appears in both the graphene domain and the edges of BN after hole doping. This means that the confinement effect is relatively weak for doped holes. Partial carriers can be localized at the BN edges to form new dipoles. The existence of dipole–dipole interaction results in charge redistribution in the graphene domain. Different plasmon modes arise from different spatial charge distributions. The induced charge at the BN edges tends to distribute around the center (Figs. 5(b) and 5(c)) for the modes near 1 eV. While for the modes around 1.8 eV, the induced charge at the BN edges tends to distribute at the corners (Figs. 5(e) and 5(f)). Furthermore, the dipole strengths are enhanced with the charge density increasing. This enhanced dipole–dipole coherent interaction leads to the frequency shift and absorption enhancement.

4. Conclusion

We have investigated the tunable plasmon in 1D (BN)n/Cm/(BN)n quantum-well structures. The analysis of optical response and field enhancement demonstrate that these systems exhibit a distinct quantum confinement effect for the collective oscillations. Importantly, the plasmon in this structure can be sensitively tuned by electrostatic doping. The electron doping and hole doping lead to very different results due to the asymmetric energy band,[45] which lead to different confinement effects and different dipole–dipole interactions. This graphene/h-BN hybrid structure may pave a way for novel optoelectronic devices.

Reference
1Grigorenko A NPolini MNovoselov K S 2012 Nat. Photon. 6 749
2Fei ZRodin A SAndreev G OBao WMcleod A SWagner MZhang L MZhao ZThiemens MDominguez GFogler M MCastro Neto A HLau C NKeilmann FBasov D N 2012 Nature 487 82
3Yan BYang XFang JHuang YQin HQin S 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 015203
4Vakil AEngheta N 2011 Science 332 1291
5Schedin FGeim A KMorozov S VHill E WBlake PKatsnelson M INovoselov K S 2007 Nat. Mater. 6 652
6Liu MYin XUlin-Avila EGeng BZentgraf TJu LWang FZhang X 2011 Nature 474 64
7Ju LGeng BHorng JGirit CMartin MHao ZBechtel H ALiang XZettl AShen Y RWang F 2011 Nat. Nanotechnol. 6 630
8Vasic BIsic GGajic R 2013 J. Appl. Phys. 113 013110
9Nikitin A YGuinea FMartin-Moreno L 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 101 151119
10Begliarbekov MSul OSantanello JAi NZhang XYang E HStrauf S 2011 Nano Lett. 11 1254
11Fang ZThongrattanasiri SSchlather ALiu ZMa L LWang Y MAjayan P MNordlander PHalas N JGarcıa de Abajo F J 2013 ACS Nano 7 2388
12Wang WKinaret J M 2013 Phys. Rev. B 87 195424
13Christensen TWang WJauho A PWubs MMortensen N A 2014 Phys. Rev. B 90 241414
14Liu YCheng RLiao LZhou HBai JLiu GLiu LHuang YDuan X 2011 Nat. Commun. 2 579
15Wang PZhang WLiang OPantoja MKatzer JSchroeder TXie Y H 2012 ACS Nano 6 6244
16Yao YKats M AGenevet PYu NSong YKong JCapasso F 2013 Nano Lett. 13 1257
17Fang ZLiu ZWang YAjayan P MNordlander PHalas N J 2012 Nano Lett. 12 3808
18Chang C KKataria SKuo C CGanguly AWang B YHwang J YHuang K JYang W HWang S BChuang C HChen MHuang C IPong W FSong K JChang S JGuo J HTai YTsujimoto MIsoda SChen C WChen L CChen K H 2013 ACS Nano 7 1333
19Ci LSong LJin CJariwala DWu DLi YSrivastava AWang Z FStorr KBalicas LLiu FAiayan P M 2010 Nat. Mater. 9 430
20Liu ZMa LShi GZhou WGong YLei SYang XZhang JYu JHackenberg K PBabakhani AIdrobo J CVajtai RLou JAjayan P M 2013 Nat. Nanotechnol. 8 119
21Kim S MHsu A PAraujo TLee Y HPalacios TDresselhaus MIdrobo J CKim K KKong J 2013 Nano Lett. 13 933
22Pruneda J M 2010 Phys. Rev. B 81 161409
23Sun QDai YMa YWei WHuang B 2015 RSC Adv. 5 33037
24Ding YWang YNi J 2009 Appl. Phys. Lett. 95 123105
25Zhang KYap F LLi KNg C TLi L JLoh K P 2014 Adv. Funct. Mater. 24 731
26Seol GGuo J 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 98 143107
27Pruneda J M 2010 Phys. Rev. B 81 161409(R)
28Bernardi MPalummo MGrossman1 J C 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 226805
29Xu BLu Y HFeng Y PLin J Y 2010 J. Appl. Phys. 108 073711
30Shinde P PKumar V 2011 Phys. Rev. B 84 125401
31Marques M A LCastro ABertsch G FRubio A 2003 Comput. Phys. Commun. 151 60
32Yan JGao S 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 216602
33Zhang KZhang H 2014 J. Phys. Chem. C 118 635
34Yin HZhang H 2012 J. Appl. Phys. 111 103502
35Liu DZhang H 2011 Chin. Phys. B 20 097105
36Zhang HYin HZhang KLin J 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 57300 (in Chinese)
37Troullier NMartins J 1991 Phys. Rev. B 43 1993
38Ceperley D MAlder B J 1980 Phys. Rev. Lett. 45 566
39Yamijala S S R K CBandyopadhyay APati S K 2013 J. Phys. Chem. C 117 23295
40Song PNordlander PGao S 2011 J. Chem. Phys. 134 074701
41Christensen JManjavacas AThongrattanasiri SKoppens F H LGarcıa de Abajo F J 2012 ACS Nano 6 431
42Manjavacas AMarchesin FThongrattanasiri SKoval PNordlander PSanchez-Portal DGarcıa de Abajo F J 2013 ACS Nano 7 3635
43Han WWang W HPi KMcCreary K MBao WLi YMiao FLau C NKawakami R K 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 137205
44Huard BStander NSulpizio J AGoldhaber-Gordon D 2008 Phys. Rev. B 78 121402(R)
45Kaloni T PJoshi R PAdhikari N PSchwingenschlogl U 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett. 104 073116