Spin–orbit coupled Bose–Einstein condensates with Rydberg-dressing interaction
Lü Haoa),b), Zhu Shao-Binga),b), Qian Jun†a), Wang Yu-Zhua)
Key Laboratory for Quantum Optics, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Corresponding author. E-mail: jqian@mail.siom.ac.cn

Project supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. 2011CB921504) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11104292).

Abstract

Interaction between Rydberg atoms can be used to control the properties of interatomic interaction in ultracold gases by weakly dressing the atoms with a Rydberg state. Here we investigate the effect of the Rydberg-dressing interaction on the ground-state properties of a Bose–Einstein condensate imposed by Raman-induced spin–orbit coupling. We find that, in the case of SU(2)-invariant s-wave interactions, the gas is only in the plane-wave phase and the zero-momentum phase is absent. In particular, we also predict an unexpected magnetic stripe phase composed of two plane-wave components with unequal weight when s-wave interactions are non-symmetric, which originates from the Rydberg-dressing interaction.

PACS: 03.75.Mn; 05.30.Jp; 32.80.Rm
Keyword: Bose–Einstein condensation; spin–orbit coupling; Rydberg-dressing gas; quantum phase transition
1. Introduction

A variety of exotic phenomena in condensate matter systems have their physical origin related to the electrons experienced by an external gauge field or in the presence of spin– orbit coupling (SOC), which is crucial for quantum spin Hall effect, topological insulators and superconductors.[14] Neutral atoms originally do not have SOC effect, however, in the past few years synthetic SOC has been generated for ultracold atoms by engineering atom– light interactions.[510] In fact, quantum gases are good candidates to investigate the interplay between interaction and SOC in many-body systems and exotic quantum phases have been observed with Bose– Einstein condensates (BECs) and degenerate Fermi gases.[1119] Furthermore, rich ground-state phases such as meron spin configuration and quantum quasicrystals have been predicted in dipolar spin– orbit-coupled gases.[20, 21] In the present work we are instead interested in the ground-state properties of quantum gas under the effects of long-range interaction and synthetic gauge fields. Recently, great achievements have been made in manipulating the atoms several micrometers apart by engineering long-range interactions especially when the atoms are excited to a high-lying Rydberg state.[2225] Strong van der Waals (vdW) interaction between Rydberg states and off-resonant coupling between ground and Rydberg states lead to Rydberg-dressing interaction subject to degenerate quantum gases, which may lead to the supersolidity of the dressed gas as a result of roton minimum and blockade effect.[26, 27] Moreover, dipole-mediated energy transport by Rydberg interaction[28] and spatially ordered excitations[29] have been observed recently, which demonstrate the potential of Rydberg gases to realize exotic phases of matter, thereby paving the way for quantum simulations of strongly correlated systems with long-range interactions.

2. Theoretical model

We consider a Bose– Einstein condensate (BEC) of rubidium atoms with a Λ -type Raman-transition configuration, as shown in Fig. 1. Two spin states | a⟩ = | 5S1/2, F = 1, mF = 0⟩ and | b⟩ = | 5S1/2, F = 1, mF = − 1⟩ are coupled to an excited state | e⟩ respectively by 804-nm Raman beams which intersect at the angle 90° .[6] The recoil energy is Er = h × 1.77 kHz. In order to introduce the long-range interaction, we couple the state | a⟩ to a high-lying Rydberg state | r⟩ via a two-photon process (for example, choosing | 43S1/2⟩ state as the states | r〉 and | 5P3/2〉 as the intermediate state). Effective Rabi frequencies and the detunings of the Raman and Rydberg transitions are Ω , Ω r, Δ , and Δ r, respectively. In the off-resonant coupling regime, i.e., Δ rΩ r, the Rydberg state | r〉 can be adiabatically eliminated, which results in an effective soft-core interaction with for the | a〉 atoms and the blockade radius Rc = (| C6| /2ħ | Δ r| )1/6 gives the strength of vdW interaction in the Rydberg state (C6 is the vdW coefficient).[26] The laser detuning from the 5P3/2 state was 400 MHz, giving the blockade radius Rc = 1.6 μ m.[30] Generally, Rydberg-dressing interaction is repulsive for a high-lying s-state, [31] however, it can be attractive if we choose a Rydberg d3/2-state with n ≥ 59.[32]

Fig. 1. Level scheme of atoms imposed by a two-photon Raman-induced SOC and a Rydberg-dressing interaction. Two spin states | a〉 and | b〉 are coupled by counter-propagating Raman lasers. The atoms in the state | a〉 interact with each other by a long-range Rydberg-dressing potential, which can be realized by an effective off-resonant Rydberg transition.

Considering an interacting spin-1/2 BEC in Fig. 1, we have the mean-field energy functional (we set ħ = m = 1)

Here, Ψ = (Ψ a, Ψ b)T is the two-component condensate wavefunction. The inter- and intra-component interactions are characterized by the coupling strengths gij = 4π aij (i, j = a, b) with aij the corresponding s-wave scattering lengths. The first term corresponds to Raman-induced SOC Hamiltonian

with the Pauli matrices σ x, y, z and kr the wave vector. For Ω < 4Er, degenerate minima appear in the dispersion relation capable of hosting a condensate with , Er being the recoil energy. Furthermore, km vanishes for Ω ≥ 4Er and all the atoms occupy the single-momentum state with px = 0. The second term in Eq. (1) includes inter- and intra-component s-wave scattering interactions between the atoms. Different from the previous works, we introduce a long-range and soft-core Rydberg interaction between the atoms only in the state | a〉 by coupling to the Rydberg state | r〉 . In fact, one of the ground states becomes an admixture of | a〉 and | r〉 when the Rydberg-dressing interaction works. However, since Ω rΔ r, the Rydberg state with the population pr ∼ (Ω r/2Δ r)2 can be ignored. We assume that all atoms are in the ground states and apply the mean field approximation to the Rydberg-dressing interaction.

In general, the ground-state wavefunction can be determined by minimizing the total energy Eq. (1) with the following ansatz:[33, 34]

where n is average density and k ≥ 0, C± , θ , and k are variational parameters and the normalization constraint | C+ | 2 + | C| 2 = 1 should be satisfied. A general relation cos(2θ ) = k/kr is fixed by minimizing the single-particle Hamiltonian ĥ 0 with respect to k. Using Eq. (2), one can calculate spin polarization as ⟨ σ z〉 = n(| C+ | 2 − | C| 2)/(k/kr). Substituting Eq. (2) into Eq. (1), we obtain the mean energy ε = ε 0 + ε ryd per atom

Here, we have defined the quantities G1 = n(g + gab)/4, G2 = n(ggab)/4, and β = | C+ C| 2. The ε 0 represents the mean energy contributed from the SOC and atomic s-wave interactions, while ε ryd is the Rydberg-dressing interaction. U(k) = U0f(2k) with U(0) = U0 is Fourier transformation of the soft-core interaction V(r), given by

As is well known, distinct quantum phases emerge without the Rydberg interaction, depending on the values of the relevant parameters kr, Ω , gij, and n. For small values of Ω and G2 > 0, the condensation hosts the superposition of two plane-wave (PW) states e± ikx with equal weight (β = 1/4 and 〈 σ z〉 = 0) characterized with density-modulated stripes. This is so-called standing-wave (SW) or stripe phase.[3336] For larger values of the Raman coupling, the condensate is in a single PW state with a finite momentum (i.e., px = ± k ê x with β = 0 and 〈 σ z〉 ≠ = 0). At even larger Ω , the degenerate momenta merge and zero-momentum phase forms spontaneously.[36]

3. Results and discussion

From now on, we are interested in the effects of the long-range Rydberg-dressing interaction on the ground-state quantum phases of the spin– orbit coupled atomic gases. Firstly we consider the simplest case with symmetric s-wave interaction strengths, i.e., G1 = ng/2 and G2 = 0. By using the variation method, we find that the ground state requires β = 0 and the mean total energy reduces to

Here, correspond to repulsive (U0 > 0) and attractive (U0 < 0) Rydberg-dressing potentials. One can immediately find that the single-particle and Rydberg-dressing interaction is dependent on the momentum of the BEC.

For example, we choose two cases with Ω = 2Er, 4Er and give the values of km as a function of the Rydberg interaction strength in Fig. 2. Since in this situation the s-wave interactions are SU(2)-invariant, the s-wave interaction energy is momentum-independent now. The ground state is totally determined by the single-particle and Rydberg-dressing interactions. In the case of the repulsive Rydberg interaction, for a small Ω , there are two minima of the energy and the ground state of the condensate is still in the PW phase. With increasing U0, km grows slightly. When the Rydberg interaction is attractive, however, km grows obviously but no more than kr. For a large Ω , an intriguing feature is that the zero-momentum phase is energetically unfavorable and the PW phases with ± km emerge since Z2 symmetry is broken by the Rydberg interaction. For Ω ≥ 4Er, we can see from Eq. (4) that ε 0 has a minimum at k = 0 while ε ryd has a maximum at k = 0. Therefore the total energy has its minimum at a point with km > 0 to make ε as small as possible. If U0 = 8Er, km can be calculated exactly as , which is not equal to zero obviously.

Fig. 2. The momentum of the ground-state wavefunction as a function of Rydberg-dressing interaction strength ((a) and (b)) and spin polarization | 〈 σ z〉 | ((c) and (d)) versus nU0 and Ω for repulsive ((a) and (c)) and attractive ((b) and (d)) cases. The parameters are Ω /Er = 2 (green solid), 4 (red dashed), and G1 = 0.4Er, G2 = 0.

Once the ground-state wavefunction is obtained, the spin polarization | 〈 σ z〉 | can be easily extracted as shown in Figs. 2(c) and 2(d). It is obvious that the gas is always magnetic for U0 ≠ 0 even for large Ω in both of the repulsive and attractive Rydberg interaction cases. In particular, when Ω > 4Er, an unexpected transition from the non-magnetic phase to the magnetic phase is revealed, which is absent for an s-wave interacting spin– orbit coupled atomic gas. At this time, the system is in the PW phase and | 〈 σ z〉 | is equal to km/kr since β = 0, so we always have | 〈 σ z〉 | ≠ 0 since km changes to be non-zero as illustrated above.

Now we are in the position to analyze the interesting G2 > 0 case, for example, G1 = 0.4Er and G2 = 0.1Er. Without the Rydberg-dressing interaction, the system undergoes phase transition between three distinct phases at two critical values as varying Ω . The system is in the SW phase when Ω < Ω 1 = 2.4Er and in the zero-momentum phase for Ω Ω 1 = 3.6Er, in which the spin polarization of the condensate is zero, while the condensate is in the separated PW phase with non-zero 〈 σ z〉 for a moderate Ω ∈ (Ω 1, Ω 2).[33] In Fig. 3 we plot the ground-state phase diagram and spin polarization for both the repulsive and attractive Rydberg interactions. For large Ω , whether repulsive or attractive, the system is always in the PW phase and | 〈 σ z〉 | proportional to km grows with increasing | U0| . Especially when Ω ≥ 4Er, similar to the case of G2 = 0, the energy evolves continuously from having single minimum (zero-momentum) to having two degenerate minima as increasing | U0| . Accompanied with the PW phase, the system becomes magnetic. The reason is the same as that of the G2 = 0 case.

Fig. 3. Ground-state phase diagrams ((a) and (b)) and spin polarization | 〈 σ z〉 | ((c) and (d)) for the repulsive ((a), (c), and (e)) and attractive ((b), (d), and (f)) Rydberg-dressing interactions, respectively. The spin polarization | 〈 σ z〉 | ((e) and (f)) at Ω /Er = 2 (green solid), 3 (blue dashed), and 4 (red dotted). Other parameters are G1 = 0.4Er, G1 = 0.1Er, and Rc = 1.6 μ m.

Next we focus on the interesting small Ω case in which the system should be favourable with the non-magnetic SW phase for U0 = 0. The ground-state phase diagrams are shown in Figs. 3(a) and 3(b). For U0 > 0, with increasing U0, the phase boundary between the SW and PW phases bends to small Ω because we find on the boundary of the SW and PW phases ( is the critical value of U0 at the phase transition points). Therefore strong Rydberg interaction is required to observe the phase transition with very small Ω . We also find that does not become a finite value when Ω approaches to zero. The SW phase always emerges spontaneously in the regime of weak SOC. However, the PW phase predominates and the SW phase is totally suppressed for U0 < 0. The critical value of n| U0| continually approaches to the maximum 4G2 when Ω approaches to zero. It is clearly shown that the system is favourable to form the PW phase especially imposed by strong Rydberg interaction. The spin polarization is depicted in Figs. 3(c) and 3(d) and the boundary of the SW phase and the PW phase is also remarkably visible. Particularly, the SW phase is not always non-magnetic with equal weight for each momentum component in the presence of the Rydberg interaction. For both the repulsive and attractive Rydberg interaction cases, | 〈 σ z〉 | is increasing as | U0| grows if the gas is in the SW phase.

To analyze the influence of the Rydberg-dressing interaction, we fix the values of Ω and calculate the spin polarization as a function of Rydberg-dressing interaction strength as shown in Figs. 3(e) and 3(f) respectively. For Ω = 2Er, | 〈 σ z〉 | jumps up abruptly, which indicates the phase transition from the SW phase to the separated PW phase. The phase transition is first-order because | 〈 σ z〉 | can be treated as an order parameter[19] and is not a continuous function of U0. Particularly, in the SW phase | C+ | 2 ≠ | C| 2 with 0 < β < 1/4 and the condensate becomes magnetic, which can only be attributed to the Rydberg interaction. Since na = | Ψ a| 2 = n[| C+ | 2 cos(2θ ) + | C| 2 sin(2θ )] is proportional to 1 − | 〈 σ z〉 | , the | a〉 atoms experienced by the Rydberg-dressing potential tend to transfer to the state | b〉 to reduce the total energy. Once n| U0| exceeds a critical value, the system enters the magnetic PW phase with the momentum km or − km. For the cases of Ω = 3Er and Ω = 4Er, the gas is always in the magnetic PW phase and the spin polarization of the BEC increases with increasing | U0| . At this time, the phase transition hardly happens. When Ω Ω 2 = 3.6Er, however, the Rydberg interaction inhibits the emergence of the zero-momentum phase and maintains the separated PW phase.

4. Conclusion

In summary, we have explored the ground-state properties of the Rydberg-dressing BEC imposed by synthetic Raman-induced SOC. In the case of SU(2)-invariant s-wave interactions, for large Ω , the zero-momentum phase is completely suppressed because it is unfavorable in energy compared to the separated PW phase in the presence of the k-dependent long-range Rydberg interaction. This feature also happens in the situation of non-symmetric s-wave interactions. Furthermore, an unexpected magnetic SW phase emerges with small Ω , which arises from the Rydberg-dressing interaction. We remark that the stability and excitation properties of the Rydberg-dressed condensate with SOC are further expected to investigate, and the effect of the long-range Rydberg-dressing potential with the roton nature on the unique stripe phase is particularly significant for potential applications. Our work may provide new insights into quantum gases with synthetic gauge field and long-range interaction.

Reference
1 Kane C L and Mele E J 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 146802 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.146802 [Cited within:1]
2 Bernevig B A and Zhang S C 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 106802 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.106802 [Cited within:1]
3 Hasan M Z and Kane C L 2010 Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 3045 DOI:10.1103/RevModPhys.82.3045 [Cited within:1]
4 Bernevig B A and Hughes T L 2013 Topological Insulators and Topological Superconductors Princeton Princeton University Press [Cited within:1]
5 Lin Y J, Compton R L, Jiménez-García K, Porto J V and Spielman I B 2009 Nature 462 628 DOI:10.1038/nature08609 [Cited within:1]
6 Lin Y J, Jiménez-García K and Spielman I B 2011 Nature 471 83 DOI:10.1038/nature09887 [Cited within:1]
7 Dalibard J, Gerbier F, Juzeliūnas G and Öhberg P 2011 Rev. Mod. Phys. 83 1523 DOI:10.1103/RevModPhys.83.1523 [Cited within:1]
8 Goldman N, Juzeliūnas G, Öhberg P and Spielman I B 2014 Rep. Prog. Phys. 77 126401 DOI:10.1088/0034-4885/77/12/126401 [Cited within:1]
9 Zhai H 2015 Rep. Prog. Phys. 78 026001 DOI:10.1088/0034-4885/78/2/026001 [Cited within:1]
10 Li Y, Martone G I and Stringari S 2014arXiv: 14105526 [cond-mat. quant-gas] [Cited within:1]
11 Liao R, Yu Y X and Liu W M 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 080406 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.080406 [Cited within:1]
12 Zhang W and Yi W 2013 Nat. Commun. 4 2711 DOI:10.1038/ncomms3711 [Cited within:1]
13 Xu Z F, You L and Ueda M 2013 Phys. Rew. A 87 063634 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevA.87.063634 [Cited within:1]
14 Wu C J, Mondragon-Shem I and Zhou X F 2011 Chin. Phys. Lett. 28 097102 DOI:10.1088/0256-307X/28/9/097102 [Cited within:1]
15 Wang X, Tan R B, Du Z J, Zhao W Y, Zhang X F and Zhang S G 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 070308 DOI:10.1088/1674-1056/23/7/070308 [Cited within:1]
16 Wang P, Yu Z Q, Fu Z K, Miao J, Huang L, Chai S, Zhai H and Zhang J 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 095301 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.095301 [Cited within:1]
17 Cheuk L W, Sommer A T, Hadzibabic Z, Yefsah T, Bakr W S and Zwierlein M W 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 095302 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.095302 [Cited within:1]
18 Ji S L, Zhang J Y, Zhang L, Du Z D, Zheng W, Deng Y J, Zhai H, Chen S and Pan J W 2014 Nat. Phys. 10 314 DOI:10.1038/nphys2905 [Cited within:1]
19 Campbell D L, Price R M, Putra A, Valdès-Cuiriel A, Trypogeorgos D and Spielman I B 2015arXiv: 1501. 05984 [cond-mat. quant-gas] [Cited within:2]
20 Gopalakrishnan S, Martin I and Demler E A 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 185304 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.185304 [Cited within:1]
21 Wilson R M, Anderson B M and Clark C W 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 185303 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.185303 [Cited within:1]
22 Béguin L, Vernier A, Chicireau R, Lahaye T and Browaeys A 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 263201 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.263201 [Cited within:1]
23 Balewski J B, Krupp A T, Gaj A, Peter D, Büchler H P, Löw R, Hofferberth S and Pfau T 2013 Nature 502 664 DOI:10.1038/nature12592 [Cited within:1]
24 Maxwell D, Szwer D J, Paredes-Barato D, Busche H, Pritchard J D, Gauguet A, Weatherill K J, Jones M P A and Adams C S 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 103001 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.103001 [Cited within:1]
25 Saffman M, Walker T G and Mølmer K 2010 Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 2313 DOI:10.1103/RevModPhys.82.2313 [Cited within:1]
26 Henkel N, Nath R and Pohl T 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 195302 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.195302 [Cited within:2]
27 Otterbach J and Lemeshko M 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 070401 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.070401 [Cited within:1]
28 Günter G, Schempp H, Robert-de-Saint-Vincent M, Gavryusev V, Helmrich S, Hofmann C S, Whitlock S and Weidemüller M 2013 Science 342 954 DOI:10.1126/science.1244843 [Cited within:1]
29 Schauß P, Cheneau M, Endres M, Fukuhara T, Hild S, Omran A, Pohl T, Gross C, Kuhr S and Bloch I 2012 Nature 491 87 DOI:10.1038/nature11596 [Cited within:1]
30 Löw R, Weimer H, Nipper J, Balewski J B, Butscher B, Büchler H P and Pfau T 2012 J. Phys. B 45 113001 DOI:10.1088/0953-4075/45/11/113001 [Cited within:1]
31 Singer K, Stanojevic J, Weidemüller M and Côtè R 2005 J. Phys. B 38 S295 DOI:10.1088/0953-4075/38/2/021 [Cited within:1]
32 Reinhard A, Liebisch T C, Knuffman B and Raithel G 2007 Phy. Rew. A 75 032712 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevA.75.032712 [Cited within:1]
33 Li Y, Pitaevskii L P and Stringari S 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 225301 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.225301 [Cited within:3]
34 Martone G I, Li Y, Pitaevskii L P and Stringari S 2012 Phys. Rev. A 86 063621 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevA.86.063621 [Cited within:1]
35 Wang C, Gao C, Jian C M and Zhai H 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 160403 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.160403 [Cited within:1]
36 Zheng W, Yu Z Q, Cui X and Zhai H 2013 J. Phys. B 46 134007 DOI:10.1088/0953-4075/46/13/134007 [Cited within:2]