Radio-frequency-heating capability of silica-coated manganese ferrite nanoparticles
Qiu Qing-Weia)†, Xu Xiao-Wena), He Manga), Zhang Hong-Wangb)
School of Information and Electronics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
Department of Physics, University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo, New York 14260, USA

Corresponding author. E-mail: qiuqingwei@bit.edu.cn

Abstract

MnFe2O4 nanoparticles (NPs) with various sizes and tight size-distribution were synthesized by a chemical solution-phase method. The as-synthesized NPs were coated with a silica shell of 4 nm–5 nm in thickness, enabling the water-solubility and biocompatibility of the NPs. The MnFe2O4 NPs with a size of less than 18 nm exhibit superparamagnetic behavior with high saturated magnetization. The capacity of the heat production was enhanced by increasing particle sizes and radio frequency (RF) field strengths. MnFe2O4/SiO2 NPs with 18-nm magnetic cores showed the highest heat-generation ability under an RF field. These MnFe2O4/SiO2 NPs have great potentiality to cancer treatments, controlled drug releases, and remote controls of single cell functions.

Keyword: 75.47.Lx; 75.75.–c; manganese ferrite; magnetic nanoparticles; silica coating; hyperthermia
1. Introduction

In the past few years, the applications of magnetic nanoparticles (NPs) have expanded rapidly from just high-density storage media to a variety of technologies. In particular, their potential biomedical applications have drawn great attention, such as targeted drug delivery, biological separation, contrast agent in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and hyperthermia cancer treatment.[19] The latter one, magnetic hyperthermia, employs a novel therapeutic concept to kill tumor cells, first proposed by Gilchrist in 1957.[10] This treatment involves delivering magnetic NPs to the target tissue and then applying an alternative magnetic field of sufficient frequency and amplitude to cause the NPs to heat. Ferrite magnetic NPs are often selected in magnetic hyperthermia because of their biocompatibility and availability.[1113] In order to minimize the potential side effects arising in magnetic hyperthermia, ferrite NP should be applied at a low dose as possible, while this dosage can still maintain a sufficient heating source. To satisfy the latter case, magnetic NPs with higher energy transfer efficiency are mostly preferred.[1417] Therefore, to develop new NPs with sufficient heating ability is of great importance. The heat generation capacity of magnetic NPs under an alternative magnetic field is expressed by the specific absorption rate (SAR). The SAR of NPs is determined by their intrinsic properties, such as magnetization and magnetic anisotropy. High saturated magnetization and moderate anisotropy are suitable for increasing the heating ability of NPs.[1820]

MnFe2O4 NPs are chosen to be an ideal candidate for magnetic hyperthermia because it has very high magnetization and stability against oxidation. Magnetic NPs with high productivity and narrow size distribution are usually synthesized by the thermal decomposition method in an organic solvent.[2123] Thus, these NPs are usually covered by a layer of surfactants (e.g., oleic acid and/or oleylamine), which enable their good dispersability in non-polar solvents. However, to be used in hyperthermal therapy, magnetic NPs are expected to be water-soluble and disperse well in aqueous solution. Therefore, magnetic NPs obtained in the organic-phase are usually coated with various surface layers, such as polymer, silica, or carbon in order to enhance their hydrophilicity. Silica coating has been widely used in biomedical applications because of its excellent biocompatibility, high stability, nontoxicity, and easy functionalization.[2426] Herein, we report our studies on the synthesis of size-tunable MnFe2O4 NPs coated with a silica shell and their heating efficiency under a radio frequency (RF) field in a solution. Our results show that the SAR value of MnFe2O4/silica core/shell NPs is strongly dependent on the size of magnetic cores and the strength of applied magnetic fields.

2. Experimental methods

Monodisperse MnFe2O4 NPs were synthesized by the thermal decomposition method in an organic phase.[21, 22] The silica shells were coated on the hydrophobic MnFe2O4 NPs via a reverse microemulsion method.[24, 26] The size and morphology of the NPs were characterized by a Hitachi H7650 (120 kV) transmission electron microscope (TEM). The composition was investigated by energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDX). The magnetic hysteresis loops were measured using a Quantum Design Physical Property Measurement System Model 6000. Hyperthermia performance of MnFe2O4 NPs was investigated by a HYPER5 machine fabricated by the MSI Company under a radio frequency field of 400 kHz.

3. Results and discussion

The sizes of MnFe2O4 NPs were tuned by varying the experimental conditions. Figure 1 shows the TEM images of the as-synthesized MnFe2O4 NPs with sizes of 7, 12, and 18 nm. The 7-nm and 12-nm MnFe2O4 NPs were obtained directly through thermal decomposition of iron acetylacetonate and manganese acetylacetonate with surfactants in a high-boiling point organic solvent, while 18-nm MnFe2O4 NPs were produced by a seed-mediated growth method. An energy dispersive x-ray (EDX) elemental analysis of the MnFe2O4 NPs was performed and the atomic composition is shown in Table 1. EDX results revealed that the composition of NPs is very close to the stoichiometry of MnFe2O4. A thin layer of silica coating on the magnetic NPs was performed by the reverse microemulsion method. The silica-coated NPs dispersed well in an aqueous solution and are stable for months without agglomeration. The TEM images of MnFe2O4/SiO2 with different magnetic cores are shown in Figs. 1(d)– 1(f). It was observed that the silica shells were 4 nm– 5 nm in thickness, and no free silica particles appeared.

Fig. 1. TEM images of MnFe2O4 nanoparticles of (a) 7 nm, (b) 12 nm, and (c) 18 nm; and MnFe2O4/SiO2 nanoparticles using (d) 7 nm, (e) 12-nm, and (f) 18-nm MnFe2O4 nanoparticles as seeds.

Table 1. The composition of MnFe2O4 NPs examined by EDX.

The magnetic hysteresis loops of uncoated MnFe2O4 NPs were demonstrated in Fig. 2. All the MnFe2O4 NPs are superparamagnetic at both 5 K and 300 K, and larger NPs show higher saturation magnetization (MS). As the particles size was increased from 7 nm to 18 nm, the saturated magnetization at 300 K rose from 65 emu/g to 80 emu/g. The MS value of 18-nm MnFe2O4 NPs was only a little less than that of bulk MnFe2O4 (90 emu/g), which suggested the excellent crystallinity of the NPs. The slightly reduced magnetization may be due to surface spin disorder.

Fig. 2. The magnetic hysteresis loops of as-synthesized MnFe2O4 nanoparticles of (a) 7 nm, (b) 12 nm, and (c) 18 nm, measured at 5 K and 300 K. The unit 1 Oe = 79.5775 A· m− 1.

To demonstrate the heating capability, the aqueous solutions of MnFe2O4/SiO2 NPs (10-mg MnFe2O4 per mL) were placed under an RF field of 400 kHz. The temperature of the solution was monitored by an optic fiber probe. The temperature-rising curves measured in the aqueous suspensions of MnFe2O4/SiO2 NPs were described in Fig. 3. The contribution from pure water under the same conditions was also measured and deducted. It was shown that 7-nm MnFe2O4/SiO2 NPs were unable to be heated even though the RF strength reached 320 Gs (1 Gs = 10− 4 T). On the other side, MnFe2O4/SiO2 NPs with the core sizes of 12 and 18 nm exhibited a heat generation ability under a RF field. MnFe2O4/SiO2 NPs with 18-nm magnetic core showed a much higher heating efficiency than those with 12-nm cores. When the core sizes were larger than 18 nm, MnFe2O4/SiO2 NPs tend to aggregate in the solution due to the magnetic interaction. Therefore, they are excluded from further characterization in this work. It was also apparent that the heating capability of MnFe2O4/SiO2 NPs was enhanced by increasing the magnitude of the RF fields. The temperature rise of the aqueous suspensions containing MnFe2O4/SiO2 NPs should be dose-dependent. Therefore, it is necessary to measure the temperature-rising curve of the aqueous suspensions with different concentration of MnFe2O4/SiO2 NPs, as shown in Fig. 4. It is found that the temperature rise of the aqueous suspensions is strongly dependent on the concentration of MnFe2O4/SiO2 NPs.

Fig. 3. Temperature rise measured in the aqueous suspensions of MnFe2O4/SiO2 nanoparticles with different core sizes of (a) 7 nm, (b) 12 nm, and (c) 18 nm under the RF field of 400 kHz with different field magnitudes.

Fig. 4. Temperature rise measured in the aqueous suspensions (a) 5-mg MnFe2O4 per mL and (b) 2.5-mg MnFe2O4 per mL of MnFe2O4/SiO2 nanoparticles with 18-nm magnetic core.

The physical mechanism of heating for superparamagnetic fluid was proposed by Rosensweig.[27] The heat generation of superparamagnetic fluid results from Né el and Brown relaxation processes. The Brown relaxation mechanism is related to the mechanical movement of NPs in the fluid, while Né el relaxation is attributed to the relaxation of magnetic domain rotation of superparamagnetic NPs. The loss power due to magnetic relaxation can be calculated according to

where μ 0 is the permeability of free space, χ 0 is the DC susceptibility, H is the magnitude of the RF field, f is the frequency of the RF field (f = ω /2π ), and τ is the relaxation time. Equation (1) indicates that the heating ability of magnetic NPs is improved with the enhancement of the RF field. This is consistent with our results. For superparamagnetic NPs with low anisotropy, such as MnFe2O4 NPs, the field- and temperature-dependent magnetization obeys the Langevin function, from which we can derive χ 0:

Equation (3) demonstrates that χ 0 is proportional to the saturated magnetization and NP size. Bigger MnFe2O4 NPs apparently own a larger volume, leading to higher χ 0. Furthermore our magnetic measurements have already shown that larger NPs exhibited higher MS. Therefore, the heating capability of MnFe2O4 NPs was improved by increasing their sizes. This well explains our observations that the core/shell NPs with 7-nm cores can hardly heat, while those with 18-nm cores own the highest heating efficiency.

We then obtained the SAR values of the MnFe2O4/silica NPs in solution according to the following equation:

where C is the specific heat capacity of water per unit volume and m is the concentration of NPs in the solution. The slope of the curve dT/dt was calculated by taking the first few seconds into account. The SAR has the unit of Watts per mass of magnetic nanoparticles (W/g). The SAR values of the 12- and 18-nm MnFe2O4 NPs calculated from Figs. 3(b) and 3(c) were listed in Table 2. It is noted that the SAR of the core/shell NPs with 18-nm cores reached a value of 336 W/g under the RF field of 400 kHz and 320 Gs.

Table 2. Specific absorption rates (SAR) of MnFe2O4/SiO2 NPs with core size of 12 nm and 18 nm. SAR values are given per gram of magnetic core material.
4. Conclusions

In summary, we have synthesized MnFe2O4/SiO2 core/shell NPs with tunable MnFe2O4 core sizes ranging from 7 nm to 18 nm. The NPs with 7-nm magnetic cores cannot be heated in RF field at 400 kHz. However, those with 12-nm and 18-nm cores can generate heat in RF field. The heating capability of MnFe2O4/SiO2 NPs was improved by the increase of RF field strength. Larger particles showed higher MS and χ 0, and consequently exhibited a stronger heating capability. The SAR value of the NPs with 18-nm MnFe2O4 cores was 336 W/g under a magnetic field of 400 kHz and 320 Gs. With their efficient hyperthermia performance, these magnetic core/shell NPs may have broad applications in nanobiotechnology.

Reference
1 Jeong U, Teng X W, Wang Y, Yang H and Xia Y N 2007 Adv. Mater. 19 33 DOI:10.1002/(ISSN)1521-4095 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 14.829]
2 Xu C J and Sun S H 2013 Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev. 65 732 DOI:10.1016/j.addr.2012.10.008 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 12.888]
3 Sun C, Lee J S H and Zhang M Q 2008 Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev. 60 1252 DOI:10.1016/j.addr.2008.03.018 [Cited within:1]
4 Frey N A, Peng S, Cheng K and Sun S H 2009 Chem. Soc. Rev. 38 2532 DOI:10.1039/b815548h [Cited within:1] [JCR: 24.892]
5 Jordan A, Wust P, Fahling H, John W, Hinz A and Felix R 1993 Int. J. Hyperther. 9 51 DOI:10.3109/02656739309061478 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 2.591]
6 Huang X H, El-Sayed I H, Qian W and El-Sayed M A 2006 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128 2115 DOI:10.1021/ja057254a [Cited within:1]
7 Liu T Y, Hu S H, Liu D M, Chen S Y and Chen I W 2009 Nano Today 4 52 DOI:10.1016/j.nantod.2008.10.011 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 17.689]
8 Meffre A, Mehdaoui B, Kelsen V, Fazzini P F, Carrey J, Lachaize S, Respaud M and Chaudret B 2012 Nano Lett. 12 4722 DOI:10.1021/nl302160d [Cited within:1] [JCR: 13.025]
9 Yang C, Hong Y L and Gao S 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 057505 DOI:10.1088/1674-1056/23/5/057505 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 1.148] [CJCR: 1.2429]
10 Gilchrist R K, Medal R, Shorey W D, Hanselman R C, Parrott J C and Taylor C B 1957 Ann. Surg. 146 596 DOI:10.1097/00000658-195710000-00007 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 6.329]
11 Hergt R, Dutz S, Muller R and Zeisberger M 2006 J. Phys. : Condens. Matter 18 S2919 DOI:10.1088/0953-8984/18/38/S26 [Cited within:1]
12 Gupta A K and Gupta M 2005 Biomaterials 26 3995 DOI:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.10.012 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 7.604]
13 Guardia P, Di Corato R, Lartigue L, Wilhelm C, Espinosa A, Garcia-Hernand ez M, Gazeau F, Manna L and Pellegrino T 2012 ACS Nano 6 3080 DOI:10.1021/nn2048137 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 12.062]
14 Chen R, Christiansen M G and Anikeeva P 2013 ACS Nano 7 8990 DOI:10.1021/nn4035266 [Cited within:1]
15 Lee J H, Jang J T, Choi J S, Moon S H, Noh S H, Kim J W, Kim J G, Kim I S, Park K I and Cheon J 2011 Nat. Nanotechnol. 6 418 DOI:10.1038/nnano.2011.95 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 31.17]
16 Mehdaoui B, Meffre A, Carrey J, Lachaize S, Lacroix L M, Gougeon M, Chaudret B and Respaud M 2011 Adv. Funct. Mater. 21 4573 DOI:10.1002/adfm.v21.23 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 9.765]
17 Carrey J, Mehdaoui B and Respaud M 2011 J. Appl. Phys. 110 083921 DOI:10.1063/1.3656719 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 0.71]
18 Habib A H, Ondeck C L, Chaudhary P, Bockstaller M R and McHenry M E 2008 J. Appl. Phys. 10303A307 DOI:10.1063/1.2830975 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 0.71]
19 Kappiyoor R, Liangruksa M, Ganguly R and Puri I K 2010 J. Appl. Phys. 108 094702 DOI:10.1063/1.3500337 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 0.71]
20 Fortin J P, Wilhelm C, Servais J, Menager C, Bacri J C and Gazeau F 2007 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129 2628 DOI:10.1021/ja067457e [Cited within:1] [JCR: 10.677]
21 Sun S H and Zeng H 2002 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124 8204 DOI:10.1021/ja026501x [Cited within:2] [JCR: 10.677]
22 Sun S H, Zeng H, Robinson D B, Raoux S, Rice P M, Wang S X and Li G X 2004 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126 273 DOI:10.1021/ja0380852 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 10.677]
23 Zeng H, Rice P M, Wang S X and Sun S H 2004 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126 11458 DOI:10.1021/ja045911d [Cited within:1] [JCR: 10.677]
24 Ding H L, Zhang Y X, Wang S, Xu J M, Xu S C and Li G H 2012 Chem. Mater. 24 4572 DOI:10.1021/cm302828d [Cited within:2] [JCR: 8.238]
25 Selvan S T, Tan T T and Ying J Y 2005 Adv. Mater. 17 1620 DOI:10.1002/(ISSN)1521-4095 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 14.829]
26 Zhang H, Huang H, He S, Zeng H and Pralle A 2014 Nanoscale 6 13463 DOI:10.1039/C4NR04884A [Cited within:2] [JCR: 6.233]
27 Rosensweig R E 2002 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 252 370 DOI:10.1016/S0304-8853(02)00706-0 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 1.826]