Ramsey-CPT spectrum with the Faraday effect and its application to atomic clocks*
Tian Yuana), Tan Bo-Zhongc), Yang Jingb), Zhang Yib), Gu Si-Honga),b),c)†
School of Optical and Electronic Information, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
Key Laboratory of Atomic Frequency Standards, Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China
School of Physics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China

Corresponding author. E-mail: shgu@wipm.ac.cn

*Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11304362 and 11204351).

Abstract

A method that obtains the Ramsey-coherent population trapping (CPT) spectrum with the Faraday effect is investigated. An experiment is implemented to detect the light polarization components generated from the Faraday effect. The experimental results agree with the theoretical calculations based on the Liouville equation. By comparing with the method without using the Faraday effect, the potential of this method for a CPT-based atomic clock is assessed. The results indicate that this method should improve the short-term frequency stability by several times.

Keyword: 33.57.+c; 78.20.Ls; 42.25.Hz; 32.30.Jc; Faraday effect; Ramsey-CPT; atomic clock; frequency stability
1. Introduction

The scheme popularly employed for coherent population trapping (CPT) atomic clocks uses the vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser (VCSEL) to provide lasing.[1] The VCSEL excited with microwave-modulated current emits a multichromatic laser beam, where the ± 1 sidebands are used to interact with the ensemble of atoms. The linearly polarized laser field of the VCSEL output is converted to a circularly polarized one by a quarter-wave plate, which is then used to prepare the atoms in the CPT state. The CPT signal is extracted from the transmission light after the multichromatic light interacts with the atoms. This scheme has a simple structure and is widely applied in the physics package of miniature CPT atomic clocks and chip-scale atomic clocks.[2] However, this scheme has three main shortcomings: (i) the non-coupled Zeeman end-states, via which the circularly polarized laser field interacts with atoms, results in low atom use, (ii) sidebands besides the ± 1 sidebands add shot noise, and (iii) the laser beam emitted from the VCSEL with a 100-MHz linewidth causes strong FM– AM conversion and AM noises.[3]

To overcome the limitations of this popular scheme, many improved schemes have been proposed. Push-pull optical pumping, [4, 5]σ + σ , [6, 7] lin⊥ lin, [8] four-wave mixing, [9] lin∥ lin, [10, 11] and quasi-bichromatic lin⊥ lin[12] can eliminate the end-state atoms. The polarization-selective method only detect the ± 1 sidebands so the noise caused by the other sidebands can be removed.[13, 14] A differential detection method reduces the FM– AM noise by a factor of 10.[15] In addition, the combination of CPT resonance and Ramsey interference, which produces the Ramsey-CPT fringes with narrower linewidths as a frequency discriminating signal over the traditional CPT signal, is also a promising route towards realizing a more accurate CPT atomic clock.[16, 17]

Our group has performed related experiments, such as lin∥ lin CPT, [18] multipulse Ramsey-CPT, [19] and more recently, a frequency-switching scheme for a packaged Ramsey-CPT atomic clock, defined as the non-Faraday– Ramsey-CPT (NFRC) scheme.[20] Inspired by our previous research, we now propose a method using the Faraday effect to obtain a Ramsey-CPT spectrum, called the Faraday– Ramsey-CPT (FRC) scheme, and discuss its potential for a packaged atomic clock. The findings are presented below.

2. Theory

As shown in Fig. 1, a linearly polarized bichromatic laser field with angular frequency ω 1 and ω 2 interacts with alkali-metal atoms in the presence of a magnetic field B. The laser field is equivalent to the superposition of right-handed (σ + ) and left-handed (σ ) circularly polarized laser fields. Two Λ -type CPT resonances occur and are marked as solid and dashed lines, respectively. The calculation is based on the Liouville equation with a phenomenological term for spontaneous decay ρ :

For the Λ -type CPT resonance configuration (dashed line of Fig. 1), the Hamiltonian can be expressed as

where Δ + = ω 1ω 2 − (ω hfsω B) = Δ + ω B. Here, Δ and Δ + are the Raman detuning angular frequencies for B = 0 and B ≠ 0, respectively, and ω B denotes the variation of the angular frequency difference between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state due to the magnetic field B.

Fig. 1. Scheme depicting the interaction between the lin∥ lin field and alkali-metal atoms.

Ramsey-CPT interference can be generated from two processes by which a bichromatic laser field interacts with the atoms which evolve freely when the laser field disappears. When the atoms evolve freely, Ω ij = 0, reducing the above Hamiltonian to

.

We assume that the Rabi frequencies of Eq. (2) obey Ω 10 = Ω 20 = − Ω 30 = Ω 40 = Ω . The minus sign appears in − Ω 30 because the transition phase of | 3〉 → | 0〉 is opposite to that of | 4〉 → | 0〉 . After the system undergoes interaction of the laser field and the atoms, free evolution of the atoms, and a further interaction, we take the time Δ t and use Eqs. (2) and (3) to solve Eq. (1) to obtain the mean of ρ 10 and ρ 40. To the first-order approximation, we have

where ξ (Δ + ) is the dispersion generated by the CPT resonance corresponding to the dashed line of Fig. 1 when B ≠ 0, γ is the relaxation rate of the coherence between the ground state hyperfine levels, T is the free evolution time, Ω p is the effective optical Rabi frequency given by Ω p = Ω 2/Γ with Γ the relaxation rate of the population from the excited state to the ground state.

Similarly, for the CPT resonance (solid line in Fig. 1), we obtain

where Δ = ω 1ω 2 − (ω hfs + ω B) = Δ ω B. ξ (Δ ) is the dispersion generated by the CPT resonance corresponding to the solid line of Fig. 1 when B ≠ 0.

In both Eqs. (4) and (5), we have

The polarization of the laser field will be rotated due to the Faraday effect when it interacts with atoms when B ≠ 0.[2123] We define the light components in the vertical direction of the original polarization of the laser field as the vertical components. The intensity of the vertical components is derived as

where i is 1 or 2, Ei and ki denote the electric field and wave vector of ω i, respectively, and denote the refractive factor and absorptive factor for σ ± of ω i, respectively, L denotes the length of the medium, ε 0 the free space permittivity, and c the speed of light.

When the intensity of the laser field is weak and B is small, and

where N is the atomic density.

Figures 2(a) and 2(b) is based on Eqs. (6) and (8), respectively. According to Eq. (6), the dispersions of σ ± are identical when B = 0 and the Ramsey-CPT spectrum corresponding to ξ (Δ ) is depicted as the solid line in Fig. 2(a). When B increases, the Zeeman splitting of the ground state levels of alkali-metal atoms shifts the Ramsey-CPT spectra corresponding to ξ (Δ + ) and ξ (Δ ) in opposite directions. The Ramsey-CPT spectrum corresponding to of Eq. (8) is shown in Fig. 2(b) for B when the maximum magnitude of ξ (Δ + ) and the minimum magnitude of ξ (Δ ) both appear at Δ = 0. From Eq. (8), this kind of Ramsey-CPT spectrum will appear periodically with increasing B. Calculations suggest that the Ramsey-CPT spectrum corresponding to on first occurrence includes the amplitude peak of the central fringe.

Fig. 2. (a) Dispersions of the two CPT resonances when B = 0 and B = 6 μ T. The solid line represents ξ (Δ ) when B = 0, the dashed line represents ξ (Δ + ) when B = 6 μ T, and the dotted line represents ξ (Δ ) when B = 6 μ T. (b) Ramsey-CPT spectrum corresponding to when B = 6 μ T. 87Rb atoms are used; total incident intensity is 1.6 mW/cm2; other parameter values are: Ω p = 2.5 kHz, γ = 1 kHz, T = 1 ms, ω B = 336π Hz.
3. Experimental arrangement

We performed an experimental study on the Ramsey-CPT spectrum corresponding to the setup is shown in Fig. 3, which follows the setup of the NFRC scheme.[20] We used 87Rb as working atoms and as laser source a VCSEL (ULM795-01), which provides a 100-MHz-linewidth linearly polarized laser field and a 795-nm wavelength corresponding to the 87Rb D1 transition. To obtain CPT resonance between 87Rb and the laser field, a 3.417-GHz microwave from the microwave generator (Agilent: E8257D) modulates the DC using a Bias-Tee, which is then injected into the VCSEL. The VCSEL subsequently outputs a frequency-modulated multichromatic laser beam. The ± 1 sidebands are used to CPT-resonate with the atoms. The lens converts the divergent laser beam into parallel light. The cylindrical vapor cell (diameter ϕ = 40 mm and length L = 25 mm) is filled with 87Rb accompanied by a 4-Torr (1 Torr = 1.33322× 102 Pa) buffer gas in the ratio of 1 N2 to 2 CH4. A solenoid situated outside the cell provides a magnetic field B along the laser-beam direction. The field provides the quantum axis for the system and produces the Zeeman shift in 87Rb. A permalloy shell shields the cell from stray fields in the environment. The temperature of the VCSEL is stabilized at about 35 ° C with a temperature controller (Thorlabs: ITC4001), and the temperature of the cell is stabilized at about 45 ° C with a custom temperature control system. The two controllers have mK-level accuracy. By a periodic on-off control of the microwave field, the VCSEL emits a continuous beam that changes between monochromatic and multichromatic modes leading to Ramsey-CPT interference.[20] A SPDT RF switch (Mini-Circuits: ZYSWA-2-50DR) is used to control the microwave field; the timing sequence is the same as stated in Ref. [20].

Fig. 3. Schematic diagram of the experimental setup. λ /4: quarter-wave plate, PD: photo detector, DC: direct current, PA: polarization analyzer, B: applied magnetic field.

With the setup of the FRC scheme, the orientation of the quarter-wave plate (λ /4) axis is parallel to the laser-field polarization and crossed with respect to the polarization analyzer (PA), which is placed on a guide rail before the photo detector (PD). Therefore, a lin∥ lin field is incident on the vapor cell and the PD only detects the vertical components through the PA. To compare with the NFRC scheme, the axis of λ /4 is adjusted to convert the polarization of the beam from linear to circular and the PA is removed from the guide rail, so the setup reverts to that of Ref. [20]. The Ramsey-CPT spectra from the FRC and NFRC schemes are recorded with the same experimental parameters.

4. Experimental results

We calculated an optimum B using Eq. (8) and experimentally measured the amplitude of the central fringe of the Ramsey-CPT spectrum corresponding to against the field around this optimum. Figure 4 plots the measurements. The amplitude is maximum for B ≈ 6 μ T in accordance with the result of the theoretical calculation. Setting B = 6 μ T, we recorded the Ramsey-CPT spectrum for the FRC and NFRC schemes in identical experimental conditions. From Eq. (8), the Ramsey-CPT spectrum corresponding to stems from changes in the dispersion signals caused by the interaction of the laser field with the atoms when B ≠ 0. This is different from the Ramsey-CPT spectrum for the NFRC scheme. Figure 5 shows the two spectra. The detected signal for the FRC scheme is only from the vertical components of the ± 1 sidebands so the signal amplitude is reduced.

We also measured the noise density of the two Ramsey-CPT spectra. Because the data sampling frequency is nearly 82 Hz, the effective Fourier frequency range is less than 41 Hz. We stabilized the microwave frequency to the value corresponding to the peak of the central Ramsey-CPT fringe (Fig. 5) and recorded the photoelectric signals (Fig. 6); curves a and b′ show the noise density calculated from the signals. As only the vertical components are detected for the FRC scheme, the amplitude of the central Ramsey-CPT fringe is decreased to 1/25 that for the NFRC scheme. To compare the SNRs for the two schemes, we multiplied the recorded data from the FRC scheme by a factor of 25. The curve b of Fig. 6 shows the noise density after amplification. The SNR for the FRC scheme has improved three-fold over that for the NFRC scheme (curve a and b of Fig. 6). The curve c of Fig. 6 shows the noise density of the PD.

Fig. 4. Amplitude of the central fringe as a function of B. The total incident intensity is 1.6 mW/cm2.
Fig. 5. Ramsey-CPT spectra obtained from the FRC (dashed line) and NFRC (solid line) schemes. The total incident intensity is 1.6 mW/cm2 and B = 6 μ T. There is a 10-fold variation between the ratios of amplitude of the central Ramsey-CPT fringe to background for the two schemes.
Fig. 6. Amplitude noise under different conditions. Curve a for NFRC scheme, b for FRC scheme after amplification. b′ for FRC scheme, and c for no light being incident on PD.
5. Discussion

The motivation in studying Ramsey-CPT interference for the FRC scheme is to seek a better scheme for a packaged CPT-based atomic clock. The SNR is improved with the Faraday effect and B set to nearly 6 μ T, which falls within the ideal range from 5 μ T to 10 μ T for the magnetic field in the popular CPT scheme. Therefore, the proposed FRC scheme is suitable.

The NFRC scheme uses the VCSEL as laser source, as for the popular CPT scheme. It has the advantage of small volume and lower power consumption. However, the fluctuations of the output light power cause the AM noise. In addition, the laser spectrum of the VCSEL is wide. Furthermore, the popular CPT scheme adopts the Doppler absorption line to stabilize the laser frequency. With these features, small variations in laser frequency cause amplitude fluctuations in the detected signal that induce strong FM– AM noise.

From Fig. 5, most of the optical signal for the FRC scheme is blocked by the PA, which includes the multichromatic laser field other than the ± 1 sidebands. Therefore, the AM and shot noises are reduced greatly. Moreover, only a few of the Doppler absorption signal are detected due to the vertical components detection that results in the suppression of the FM– AM noise. The self-noise of the PD could not be reduced and has a large proportion from curves b′ and c of Fig. 6.

To discuss differences in the short-term stability between the two schemes, we use the following general expression for noise, [24, 25]

where S/N is the SNR, measured in a 1-Hz bandwidth at the modulation frequency, and Q the resonance quality factor given by Q = ω hfs/(2 π Δ ν ) with Δ ν the signal linewidth.

From Fig. 5, the linewidths of the central Ramsey-CPT fringes for the two schemes are nearly the same. In practice, the short-term stability is measured after the microwave frequency is stabilized. From Fig. 6, the FRC scheme has the potential to improve the short-term stability by several times when the modulation frequency is half of the data sampling frequency.

6. Conclusion

We proposed a scheme that uses the Faraday effect to obtain the Ramsey-CPT interference spectrum. By solving the Liouville equation, we derived an expression for the interference spectrum and studied its characteristics. From the calculations, the spectrum is generated from the dispersion signals caused by the interaction between laser field and atoms for B ≠ 0, which varies with B. We chose appropriate field strength to obtain a high SNR spectrum.

We performed an experiment to verify the theory. Experimental and theoretical results were in agreement basically. We also performed a comparative experiment for the FRC and NFRC schemes. Through the reduction of the AM, shot, and FM– AM noises in the detected signal, the FRC scheme could be employed to build an atomic clock with short-term stability several times better than that for the NFRC scheme.

Compared with the popular packaged CPT-based atomic clock, the electronics of the NFRC scheme includes a microwave switch[20] whereas the FRC scheme includes a PA in the physics package again. The FRC scheme still has a similar volume and power consumption as that for the popular scheme despite the addition of two devices. The short-term stability for the NFRC-scheme atomic clock has been increased significantly with the FRC scheme having further potential to improve short-term stability by several times. Therefore, the FRC scheme can be seen as preferable in a high-performance compact atomic clock based on CPT.

Reference
1 Vanier J 2005 Appl. Phys. B 81 421 DOI:10.1007/s00340-005-1905-3 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 1.782]
2 Kitching J Knappe S and Liew L A Schwindt P D D Gerginov V Shah V Moreland V Brannon A Breitbarth J Popovic Z Hollberg L 2005 Proceedings of the ION GNSS 18th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division September 13–16, 2005 Long Beach, USA 1662 [Cited within:1]
3 Kitching J, Robinson H G, Hollberg L, Knappe S and Wynand s R 2001 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 18 1676 DOI:10.1364/JOSAB.18.001676 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 2.21]
4 Jau Y Y, Miron E, Post A B, Kuzma N N and Happer W 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 160802 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.160802 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 7.943]
5 Zhang Y, Qu S P and Gu S H 2012 Opt. Express 20 6400 DOI:10.1364/OE.20.006400 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 3.546]
6 Kargapoltsev S V, Kitching J, Hollberg L, Taichenachev A V, Velichansky V L and Yudin V I 2004 Laser Phys. Lett. 1 495 DOI:10.1002/lapl.200410107 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 7.714]
7 Rosenbluh M, Shah V, Knappe S and Kitching J 2006 Opt. Express 14 6588 DOI:10.1364/OE.14.006588 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 3.546]
8 Zanon T, Guerand el S, Clercq E D, Holleville D, Dimarcq N and Clairon A 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 193002 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.193002 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 7.943]
9 Shah V, Knappe S, Hollberg L and Kitching J 2007 Opt. Lett. 32 1244 DOI:10.1364/OL.32.001244 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 3.385]
10 Taichenachev A V, Yudin V I, Velichansky V L and Zibrov S A 2005 JETP Lett. 82 398 DOI:10.1134/1.2142864 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 1.524]
11 Zibrov S A, Velichanskya V L, Zibrov S A, Taichenachev A V and Yudin V I 2005 JETP Lett. 82 477 DOI:10.1134/1.2150865 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 1.524]
12 Tan B Z, Yun P, Yang J, Tian Y and Gu S H 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 102 161117 DOI:10.1063/1.4803481 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 3.794]
13 Zhu M 2003 Proceedings of the IEEE Frequency Control Symposium and PDA Exhibition Jointly with the 17th European Frequency and Time Forum May 4–8, 2003 Tampa, USA 16 DOI:10.1109/FREQ.2003.1274978 [Cited within:1]
14 Zhu M(U. S. Patent) US6993058 B2 [2006-01-31] [Cited within:1]
15 Gerginov V, Knappe S, Shah V, Hollberg L and Kitching J 2008 IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 57 1357 DOI:10.1109/TIM.2007.915123 [Cited within:1]
16 Danet J M Lours M Yun P Guerand el S Clercq E D 2014 Proceedings of the IEEE Frequency Control Symposium (FCS) May 19–22, 2014 Taibei, China 586 DOI:10.1109/FCS.2014.6859919 [Cited within:1]
17 Chen X, Yang G Q, Wang J and Zhan M S 2010 Chin. Phys. Lett. 27 113201 DOI:10.1088/0256-307X/27/11/113201 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 0.811] [CJCR: 0.4541]
18 Yang J Liu G B Gu S H 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 043202 (in Chinese) [Cited within:1] [JCR: 1.016] [CJCR: 1.691]
19 Yun P, Zhang Y, Liu G, Deng W, You L and Gu S H 2012 Europhys. Lett. 97 63004 DOI:10.1209/0295-5075/97/63004 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 2.26]
20 Yang J, Tian Y, Tan B Z, Yun P and Gu S H 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 115 093109 DOI:10.1063/1.4867915 [Cited within:6] [JCR: 0.71]
21 Lin J, Deng J L, Ma Y S, He H J and Wang Y Z 2012 Opt. Lett. 37 5036 DOI:10.1364/OL.37.005036 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 3.385]
22 Peng Y F, Tang J X and Wang Q J 1993 Chin. Phys. B 2 1 DOI:10.1088/1004-423X/2/1/001 [Cited within:1]
23 She Y C Zhang W X Wang D L 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. 60 064205(in Chinese) [Cited within:1] [JCR: 1.016] [CJCR: 1.691]
24 Breschi E Mileti G 2009 Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of the European Time and Frequency Forum and the IEEE Frequnecy Control Symposium April 20–24, 2009 Besancon, France 559 DOI:10.1109/FREQ.2009.5168243 [Cited within:1]
25 Vanier J and Bernier L G 1981 IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 30 277 DOI:10.1109/TIM.1981.6312408 [Cited within:1]