Magnetic properties and magnetocaloric effects in HoPd intermetallic*
Mo Zhao-Juna),b), Shen Junb)†, Gao Xin-Qiangb), Liu Yaoc), Wu Jian-Fengb), Shen Bao-Genc), Sun Ji-Rongc)
School of Material Science and Engineering, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin 300384, China
Key Laboratory of Cryogenics, Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
State Key Laboratory of Magnetism, Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics and Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

Corresponding author. E-mail: jshen@mail.ipc.ac.cn

*Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51322605, 11104337, 51271192, and 11274357) and the Knowledge Innovation Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Abstract

A large reversible magnetocaloric effect accompanied by a second order magnetic phase transition from PM to FM is observed in the HoPd compound. Under the magnetic field change of and the refrigerant capacity R C for the compound are evaluated to be 20 J/(kg · K) and 342 J/kg, respectively. In particular, large (11.3 J/(kg · K)) and R C (142 J/kg) are achieved under a low magnetic field change of 0–2 T with no thermal hysteresis and magnetic hysteresis loss. The large reversible magnetocaloric effect (both the large -Δ SM and the high R C) indicates that HoPd is a promising material for magnetic refrigeration at low temperature.

Keyword: 75.30.Sg; 65.40.gd; 75.30.Kz; magnetocaloric effect; magnetic entropy change; magnetic phase transformation
1. Introduction

The magnetic refrigerator is based on the magnetocaloric effect (MCE), which plays an important role in the refrigeration area for its higher energy efficiency and lower environmental hazard, especially, compared with the conventional gas compression refrigeration.[14] The advanced magnetic materials are crucial for the magnetic refrigerant application, so it is necessary to go on exploring the advanced magnetic refrigerant materials with a large isothermal magnetic entropy change (Δ SM) and/or a large adiabatic temperature change (Δ Tad).[5] Up to now, many magnetic materials with large -Δ SM have been found, such as LaFe13 − xSix, [68] MnFeP0.45As0.55, [911]and Gd5Si2Ge2.[1214] The MCE materials working at room temperature can reduce the emission of green house gases. So much attention has been paid to search for magnetic refrigerants near room temperature.[15] On the other hand, the materials working at the low temperature regime are important for their potential applications in special technological areas, such as space science, liquefaction of hydrogen in the fuel industry, and liquefaction of helium, and can also help the facility to reach millikelvin.[16]

Until now, only the paramagnetic salts such as Gd3Gd5O12, GdLiF4, and GdF3[17, 18]have been commercially used. However the paramagnetic salts exhibit small MCE and strongly depend on the temperature. The rare earth-transition metal intermetallic compounds with ferromagnetic (FM) to paramagnetic (PM) transition or antiferromagnetic (AFM) to FM metamagnetic transition are believed to possess large MCE, and a series of materials have been reported, such as ErMn2Si2, [19] ErCr2Si2, [20]ErRu2Si2, [21] HoCuSi, [22] TmGa, [23] and TmCuAl.[24] They can be expected to have effective commercial applications in the technology of magnetic refrigeration at low temperature. In this paper, we report a study on the magnetic and magnetocaloric properties of the HoPd compound. The reversible is 11.3  J/(kg · K) and 6.4  J/(kg · K) receptively with zero thermal hysteresis and magnetic hysteresis for low magnetic field changes of 2  T and 1  T. The RC value of the HoPd compound is increased with increasing field changes and reaches to 124  J/kg and 342  J/kg for the field changes of 2  T and 5  T, respectively. The results imply that the HoPd compound may have effective applications in low temperature magnetic refrigeration.

2 Experiments

The polycrystalline sample of HoPd was synthesized by arc melting of stoichiometric amounts of the elements with purity better than 99.9  at.% in argon atmosphere on a water-cooled copper hearth using a titanium zirconium alloy as the getter (the content of Ho was 3  at.% more than the theoretical value). The ingot was melted three times with the button being turned over after each melting to ensure the homogeneity. The sample was annealed at 1123  K for 7  days, and a subsequent quenching to room temperature was performed to obtain the crystalline sample. Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements with Cu radiation were performed at room temperature to identify the crystal structure and the lattice parameters. Magnetizations were measured by employing a commercial superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) magnetometer, model MPMS-7 from Quantum Design Inc.

3 Results and disscussion

Figure  1 shows the typical temperature dependence of the magnetization M(T) for the HoPd compound under an applied magnetic field of H = 0.01  T. The compound exhibits a magnetic transition from FM to PM, and the Curie temperature (TC) is determined to be 10  K, defined at the maximum slope of the MT curve. It can be seen that there is almost no thermal hysteresis between the ZFC and FC curves as observed usually in SOPT when the temperature increases above TC. However, a significant thermal irreversibility is clearly observed below TC. The thermomagnetic irreversibility can be observed in many cases, such as spin-glass systems, materials with competing magnetic interactions, and materials with high anisotropy and low ordering temperature, [25] where the domain wall width could be comparable to the lattice spacing, thus resulting in a large pinning effect.[26] Considering the magnetic anisotropy due to the large orbital angular momentum in Ho atoms (or ions) and low TC for HoPd, the thermomagnetic irreversibility is likely arising from the narrow domain wall pinning effect. With increasing magnetic field, the thermomagnetic irreversibility becomes smaller as shown in Fig.  1(b), and vanishes completely under a higher field. This indicates that the higher magnetic field would provide more energy for the domain walls to conquer the barriers of the pinning effect, thus reducing the irreversibility. The inset of Fig.  1(b) shows the reciprocal magnetic susceptibility versus temperature for HoPd. The magnetic susceptibility of the HoPd compound at temperatures above 15  K follows the Curie-Weiss law . Here θ p is the PM Curie temperature and Cm is the Curie– Weiss constant. The θ p for HoPd is 10  K, which is equal to TC from the MT curve. The effective magnetic moment μ eff= 10.68 μ B is obtained based on the value of Cm, which is close to the theoretical value 10.6μ B for the Ho3 + ion.

Figure  2 shows the isothermal magnetization curves as a function of the magnetic field, which was measured in applied fields up to 5  T in a wide temperature range. It can be seen from Fig.  2 that there is a considerable difference among the MH curves for the HoPd compound in different temperature ranges. In the 20– 47  K temperature range, the field dependence of the magnetization shows a linear relation, whereas the isothermal curves for TC< T < 20  K show an appreciable nonlinearity. The curvatures in the MH curves above TC probably indicate the existence of short-range FM correlations in the PM state. Additionally, it should be noticed that although the isothermal magnetization curves are gradually saturated with increasing magnetic field at considerably lower fields below TC, the complete saturation is not realized at 5  T. The magnetic moment per Ho atom reaches about 7.2μ B at 2  K and 5  T, which is much smaller than the theoretical ordered state magnetic moment of 10.6μ B for the Ho atom. The lack of complete saturation in the HoPd compound is likely due to the crystalline electric field. Additionally, the magnetization isotherms of HoPd measured on increasing (solid) and decreasing (open) fields around TC exhibit no magnetic hysteresis loss.

Fig.  1. Temperature dependences of ZFC and FC magnetizations under the magnetic fields of (a) 0.01  T and (b) 0.1  T. The inset in panel (a) is dM/dTT curve; that in panel (b) is reciprocal magnetic susceptibility χ m− 1 versus temperature.

Fig.  2. Magnetization isotherms of HoPd collected in the temperature range of 4– 47  K; the MH curves in decreasing field mode around TC (open symbols) are also shown.

Figure  3 shows the Arrott plots of the HoPd compound in the temperature range of 4– 20  K. According to the Banwejee criterion, [27] a magnetic transition is expected to be of the first order when the slope of M2 versus H/M is negative, whereas it is of the second order when the slope is positive. Neither negative slope nor inflection point is observed in the Arrott plots of the HoPd compound, indicating a second-order FM– PM magnetic transition.

Fig.  3. Arrott plots of HoPd in the temperature range of 4– 20  K.

The MCE in terms of isothermal magnetic entropy change has been determined by utilizing Maxwell's relationship , where T is the absolute temperature and H is the applied field. The values of -Δ SM for different magnetic field changes as a function of temperature are shown in Fig.  4. The is found to increase monotonically with the increase of the applied magnetic field. Under the magnetic field change of 5  T, is 20  J/(kg · K) for the HoPd compound around TC, which is near the boiling point of hydrogen (20.4  K). The is found to be 11.3  J/(kg · K) for HoPd under a low magnetic change of 2  T. Meanwhile, the HoPd compound has confirmed a characteristic of second-order FM– PM magnetic transition, no thermal hysteresis, and zero field hysteresis. The permanent magnets in the present market can only provide a maximum field of ∼ 2  T; this indicates that a large MCE under a low magnetic field change is desirable for the fulfillment of a magnetic refrigerator simply using permanent magnets. The low field MCE parameters of HoPd are comparable to or larger than those of most potential magnetic refrigerant materials with a similar magnetic transition temperature, as listed in Table  1.

Fig.  4. Temperature dependences of magnetic entropy change in HoPd for different magnetic field changes.

Table 1. Magnetic ordertransition temperature T, – Δ SMmax and RC with the field change of 2  T for HoPd and other MCE materials around 10  K.

A high RC is another important requirement of a potential magnetic refrigerant, which is a measure of how much heat can be transferred between the cold and hot sinks in one ideal refrigerant cycle.[35] It is defined as , where T1 and T2 are the temperatures corresponding to the half-maximum values at the two sides of the -Δ SM peak, respectively. One can find that the RC of the HoPd compound increases with increasing field change and reaches to 142  J/kg and 342  J/kg for the field changes of 0– 2  T and 0– 5  T, respectively. This RC value is comparable to or larger than that of many magnetic refrigerant materials with a similar magnetic transition temperature. Our results suggest that the HoPd compound could be a very attractive candidate material for the magnetic refrigerator working at low temperature.

4 Conclusion

The polycrystalline HoPd compound with a single phase has been synthesized. A reversible MCE without thermal and magnetic hysteresis loss has been observed in the compound, which originates from the second order magnetic phase transition from PM to FM. With the magnetic field change of 0– 5  T, is evaluated to be 20  J/(kg · K) and RC is 342  J/kg. In particular, for the HoPd compound, and RC are 11.3  J/(kg · K) and 142  J/kg under a magnetic field change of 0– 2  T at low temperature. The present results indicate that HoPd is one of the promising candidates for magnetic refrigeration at low temperature, particularly for helium liquefaction.

Reference
1 Gschneidner Jr K A, Pecharsky V K and Tsokol A O 2005 Rep. Prog. Phys. 68 1479 DOI:10.1088/0034-4885/68/6/R04 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 13.232]
2 Franco V, Blázquez J S and Conde A 2006 Appl. Phys. Lett. 89 222512 DOI:10.1063/1.2399361 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 3.794]
3 Shen B G, Sun J R, Hu F X, Zhang H W and Cheng Z H 2009 Adv. Mater. 21 4545 DOI:10.1002/adma.v21:45 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 14.829]
4 Shen B G, Hu F X, Dong Q Y and Sun J R 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 017502 DOI:10.1088/1674-1056/22/1/017502 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 1.148] [CJCR: 1.2429]
5 Gutfleisch O, Willard M A, Brück E, Chen C H, Sankar S G and Liu J P 2011 Adv. Mater. 23 821 DOI:10.1002/adma.v23.7 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 14.829]
6 Hu F X, Shen B G, Sun J R, Chen Z H, Rao G H and Zhang X X 2001 Appl. Phys. Lett. 78 3675 DOI:10.1063/1.1375836 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 3.794]
7 Hu F X, Shen B G, Sun J R and Zhang X X 2000 Chin. Phys. 9 550 DOI:10.1088/1009-1963/9/7/016 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 0.811] [CJCR: 0.4541]
8 Shen J, Gao B, Yan L Q, Li Y X, Zhang H W, Hu F X and Sun J R 2007 Chin. Phys. 16 3848 DOI:10.1088/1009-1963/16/12/049 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 0.811] [CJCR: 0.4541]
9 Tegus O, Brück E, Buschow K H J and de Boer F R 2002 Nature 415 150 DOI:10.1038/415150a [Cited within:1] [JCR: 38.597]
10 Tegus O, Bao L H and Song L 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 037506 DOI:10.1088/1674-1056/22/3/037506 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 1.148] [CJCR: 1.2429]
11 Geng Y X, Tegus O and Bi L G 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 037504 DOI:10.1088/1674-1056/21/3/037504 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 1.148] [CJCR: 1.2429]
12 Pecharsky V K, Holm A P, Gschneidner, Jr K A and Rink R 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 198 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 7.943]
13 Pecharsky V K and Gschneidenr Jr K A 1997 Appl. Phys. Lett. 70 3299 DOI:10.1063/1.119206 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 3.794]
14 Zou J D 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 142176 DOI:10.1088/1674-1056/21/3/142176 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 1.148] [CJCR: 1.2429]
15 Hu F X, Shen B G and J R Sun 2000 Appl. Phys. Lett. 76 3460 DOI:10.1063/1.126677 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 3.794]
16 Tishin A M, Spichkin Y I, in: Coey J M D, Tilley D R and Vij D R (Eds. ) 2003 The Magnetocaloric Effect and its Applications Bristol Institute of Physics Publishing [Cited within:1]
17 Barclay J A and W A Steyert 1982 Cryogenics 22 73 DOI:10.1016/0011-2275(82)90098-4 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 1.17]
18 DiPirro M, Tuttle J, Jackson M, Canavan E, Warner B and Shirron P 2006 Adv. Cryog. Eng. 51A 969 [Cited within:1]
19 Li L, Nishimura K, Hutchison W D, Qian Z, Huo D and Namiki T 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 100 152403 DOI:10.1063/1.4704155 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 3.794]
20 Li L, Hutchison W D, Huo D X, Namiki T, Qian Z H and Nishimura K 2012 Scr. Mater. 67 237 DOI:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.04.028 [Cited within:1]
21 Samanta T, Das I and Banerjee S 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 91 152506 DOI:10.1063/1.2798594 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 3.794]
22 Chen J, Shen B G, Dong Q Y, Hu F X and Sun J R 2010 Appl. Phys. Lett. 96 152501 DOI:10.1063/1.3386536 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 3.794]
23 Mo Z J, Shen J, Yan L Q, Tang C C, Lin J, Wu J F, Sun J R, Wang L C, Zheng X Q and Shen B G 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 103 052409 DOI:10.1063/1.4816729 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 3.794]
24 Mo Z J, Shen J, Yan L Q, Wu J F, Wang L C, Lin J, Tang C C and Shen B G 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 102 192407 DOI:10.1063/1.4804576 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 3.794]
25 Zhang H, Shen B G, Xu Z Y, Shen J, Hu F X, Sun J R and Long Y 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 102 092401 DOI:10.1063/1.4794415 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 3.794]
26 Zhang X X, Wang F W and Wen G H 2001 J. Phys. : Condens. Matter 13L747 DOI:10.1088/0953-8984/13/31/102 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 2.355]
27 Banerjee S K 1964 Phys. Lett. 12 16 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 3.794]
28 Samanta T, Das I and Banerjee S 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 91 152506 DOI:10.1063/1.2798594 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 3.794]
29 Li L, Nishimura K, Huo D, Kadonaga M, Namiki T and Qian Z H 2011 Appl. Phys. Exp. 4 093101 DOI:10.1143/APEX.4.093101 [Cited within:1]
30 Li L, Nishimura K, Usui G, Huo D and Qian Z H 2012 Intermetallics 23 101 DOI:10.1016/j.intermet.2011.12.002 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 1.857]
31 Chen J, Shen B G, Dong Q Y and Sun J R 2010 Solid State Commun. 150 1429 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0087569 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 1.534]
32 Phan M H, Wood G T, Chaturvedi A, Stefanoski S, Nolas G S and Srikanth H 2008 Appl. Phys. Lett. 93 252505 DOI:10.1063/1.3055833 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 3.794]
33 Shen J, Zhao J L, Hu F X, Wu J F, Sun J R and Shen B G 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 047502 DOI:10.1088/1674-1056/19/4/047502 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 1.148] [CJCR: 1.2429]
34 Li L and Nishimura K 2009 Appl. Phys. Lett. 95 132505 DOI:10.1063/1.3240399 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 3.794]
35 Shen B G, Sun J R, Hu F X, Zhang H W and Chen Z H 2009 Adv. Mater. 21 4545 DOI:10.1002/adma.v21:45 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 14.829]