High coercivity in large exchange-bias Co/CoO-MgO nano-granular films*
Ge Chuan-Nana),b), Wan Xian-Ganga)†, Eric Pellegrinc), Hu Zhi-Weid), Wen-I Liange), Michael Brunsf), Zou Wen-Qina), Du You-Weia)
National Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures and Department of Physics, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
Department of Physics, Jiangsu Second Normal University, Nanjing 210013, China
CELLS-ALBA Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Carretera BP 1413, km 3.3, Cerdanyola del Vallès (Barcelona) E-08290, Spain
Max Planck Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids, Nöthnitzer Straße 40, Dresden D-01187, Germany
Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Materials Science Division, Haimei Zheng laboratory, Berkeley CA 94720, USA
Institute for Applied Materials (IAM), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen D-76344, Germany

Corresponding author. E-mail: xgwan@nju.edu.cn

*Project supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. 2012CB932304), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. U1232210, 91122035, 11174124, and 11374137), the Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (Grant No. 14KJB140003), and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, China.

Abstract

We present a detailed study on the magnetic coercivity of Co/CoO-MgO core-shell systems, which exhibits a large exchange bias due to an increase of the uncompensated spin density at the interface between the CoO shell and the metallic Co core by replacing Co by Mg within the CoO shell. We find a large magnetic coercivity of 7120 Oe around the electrical percolation threshold of the Co/CoO core/shell particles, while samples with a smaller or larger Co metal volume fraction show a considerably smaller coercivity. Thus, this study may lead to a route to improving the magnetic properties of artificial magnetic material in view of potential applications.

Keyword: 45.70.Cc; 75.30.Et; 75.50.Vv; 75.60.Ej; granular films; exchange bias; coercivity
1. Introduction

Magnetic nanoparticles are attractive for their potential applications in ultrahigh-density magnetic data storage.[1] The storage density can be improved by scaling down the magnetic particle size, but the magnetic ordering of particles becomes unstable as the particle size is decreased below a certain threshold which is the so-called “ superparamagnetic limit” .[2] Thus, finding a way to stabilize the magnetization in magnetic nanoparticles systems is of both fundamental and technological importance.

Exchange bias[36] (i.e., the shift of the hysteresis loop along the field axis) has been extensively studied in various systems and has been identified as an efficient method to stabilize the magnetization against thermal fluctuations.[2] Although tremendous efforts have been devoted to understanding this intriguing phenomenon, the microscopic origin of the exchange bias (EB) effect is still controversial. The generally accepted uncompensated spin scenario can reasonably well explain the EB due to the existence of pinned uncompensated spins as well as the enhanced coercive field due to the existence of rotatable uncompensated spins at the interface between antiferromagnetic (AFM)/ferromagnetic (FM).[19] Co/CoO core-shell systems typically show a high exchange bias field (HE).[3] Moreover, since the MgO host matrix has a similar lattice parameter as compared with CoO, diluting the Co atoms within the CoO shell with non-magnetic Mg will increase the uncompensated spin density at the AFM/FM CoO/Co interface.[7] Thus, we expect to directly observe the uncompensated spins from the characteristic Co2+ atomic multiplet features in the Co-L2, 3 x-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD) spectra, which is rarely reported in the literature. Although some intriguing correlation exists between HE and the coercive field HC, detailed investigations of the various factors influencing HC are rare.[814] In this work, we thus provide a systematic study on the cooling field- and temperature-dependence of the magnetic coercivity in exchange bias Co/CoO-MgO nano-granular films produced on Si(100) substrates using magnetron sputtering. We find that in this system the EB plays an important role for HC. In addition, the Co metal volume fraction has a considerable effect on both the coercivity and exchange bias and the samples near the electrical percolation threshold exhibit the largest HC. The physical properties of granular films can thus be easily tailored by adjusting the composition, the volume fraction of constituent materials, and the preparation conditions. In addition, nano-granular films are easily fabricated. We therefore believe that this study may lead to a route to improving the above magnetic properties in view of potential applications.

2. Experiment

All nano-granular film samples were prepared on Si(100) substrates by magnetron sputtering with a base oxygen partial pressure of 2 × 10− 7 mbar using a RF power of 140 W and a typical deposition time of one hour. The composite sputtering targets were made by adhering small square-shaped pieces of highly purified cobalt metal onto a MgO plate. All Co/CoO-MgO samples with different Co metal volume ratios were prepared at ambient temperature via sputtering from the above targets with different MgO to Co surface compositions. During the sputtering process, the outer surface of the Co particles is oxidized, thus forming the CoO shells. The ratio of Co metal to MgO surface on the sputtering targets thus determines the resulting Co metal volume composition ratio. The exact composition of all samples was investigated by energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDX).

3. Results and discussion

We have measured the room temperature resistivity data as a function of the Co metal volume ratio and we show the results in Fig. 1. The resistivity of all nano-granular film samples with identical areas and thicknesses was measured at room temperature using the four-terminal measuring technique. For metal/insulator transition-type granular films, the three typical regions which depend on the Co metal volume fraction x are the following: xxp, x < xp, and x > xp, where xp is the percolation threshold at which the granules begin to form an electrically connected network.[15, 16] As shown in Fig. 1, the percolation threshold is around 56% Co metal volume ratio, which is close to that of other granular metal films.[17] When the Co metal volume ratio is less than 56%, the Co/CoO particles are well-separated and the electron hopping between them is small. Consequently, the system shows a high resistivity and exhibits insulating behavior (see Fig. 1). By increasing the Co content, the hopping between the core/shell particles becomes increasingly possible and, consequently, the resistivity decreases. If the Co concentration is larger than the electrical percolation threshold value, an electrically connected network of particles is formed and the Co/CoO-MgO system exhibits metallic properties.

Fig. 1. Resistivity as a function of the Co metal volume ratio measured at room temperature. The samples that are discussed further in the present study are highlighted by their chemical composition.

Using high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), we have investigated the morphology of the Co/CoO-MgO systems. In Fig. 2, high-resolution transmission electron micrographs showing the size and morphology of the sample Co22/(CoO)24-(MgO)15 (Figs. 2(a)), the sample Co56/(CoO)32-(MgO)12 (Figs. 2(b) and 2(c)), and the sample Co75/(CoO)15-(MgO)10 (Fig. 2(d)). Among them there are two representative samples, one being Co56/(CoO)32-(MgO)12 which is at the electrical percolation threshold and the other being Co75/(CoO)15-(MgO)10 which is above the electrical percolation threshold. Small Co metal particles covered with a CoO shell can be seen that have an approximately spherical shape and that are embedded in a non-magnetic MgO matrix. The interface between the ferromagnetic (FM) Co metal core and the AFM CoO shell is irregular and roughness in these isolated particles. As shown in (Figs. 2(b) and 2(c)) for Co56/(CoO)32-(MgO)12, these Co/CoO particles are quite separated. Increasing the Co metal volume fraction, the particles size seems to increase slightly and, more importantly, the coverage concentration of Co/CoO particles becomes larger so that the Co/CoO particles will form a connected network as is obvious from Fig. 2(d). These results are thus consistent with the existence of a percolation threshold at around 56% Co metal volume fraction. The aforementioned interface roughness between the FM core and the AFM shell as well as the small particle size in our granular films are the factors that increase the HE in the Co/CoO-MgO granular film. Another aspect that becomes clear from the HRTEM images shown in Fig. 2 is that the Co core of the Co/CoO core/shell exhibits a crystalline structure with a lattice spacing of about 2.13 nm similar to the lattice parameter of 2.5 nm for hcp Co. On the other hand, the MgO matrix as well as possibly the CoO shells have a non-crystalline or amorphous character as can easily be seen from the inter-granular spaces shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. High-resolution transmission electron micrographs showing the size and morphology of (a) the Co22/(CoO)24-(MgO)15, (b) and (c) the Co56/(CoO)32-(MgO)12, and (d) the Co75/(CoO)15-(MgO)10 samples.

In order to characterize the chemical aspects as well as the electronic and magnetic structure of the samples, we have performed Co2p x-ray photoemission spectroscopy (XPS), x-ray absorption (XAS), and x-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD) measurements with the resulting data shown in Fig. 3. As can be seen from the XPS data, the Co2p lines consist of a superposition of Co metal and CoO spectra (plus the CoLMM Auger line at 777 eV binding energy), giving evidence for the Co/CoO chemical structure of the core/shell nano-granules. This is corroborated by the CoL2, 3 absorption data in Fig. 3(b) the spectra taken from the Co75/(CoO)15-(MgO)10 sample using circular polarized light with the photon spin parallel (μ + -red line) and antiparallel (μ -black line) with respect to an external magnetic field of 6 T. The experimental XMCD difference spectrum Δ μ = μ + μ is shown as a red line in Fig. 3(d) (red line). While the absorption spectra in Fig. 3(b) can clearly be assigned to the multiplet structures of divalent Co2+ as in, e.g., CoO, the difference spectrum is very similar to that of LaCo0.5Mn0.5O3[18] in which the Co ions have a divalent state and octahedral crystal field symmetry. Simulations based on atomic crystal field multiplet calculations have been performed in order to estimate the CoO versus the Co metal contribution from the Co/CoO core/shell particles by superposing the calculated Co2+ spectra (Fig. 3(e)– black line) with experimental spectra from Co metal (Fig. 3(e)– purple line). The resulting simulated XMCD spectrum is shown together with the corresponding experimental spectrum in Fig. 3(d) (green and red solid lines, respectively). From the results of this simulation shown in Figs. 3(c) and 3(d), we can estimate a CoO contribution to the XMCD signal of 70%.[19] While the results from the HRTEM, XPS, and XAS/XMCD measurements confirm the basic chemical nature of the Co/CoO core/shell particles, the electron escape depth for the latter two techniques have to be taken into account, which is a few Å ngstroem and a few nm for XPS and XAS, respectively. Taking the average diameter of the Co/CoO core/shell particles into account, these obviously result in an overestimation of the CoO shell contribution as compared to the Co core. Thus, while the results from the HRTEM, XPS and XAS/XMCD are useful for determining the chemical microstructure, the overall stoichiometry as determined by our EDX measurements gives a correct perspective on the sample system as a whole.

Fig. 3. (a) XPS spectra of Co75/(CoO)15-(MgO)10 (top) and Co22/(CoO)24-(MgO)15 (bottom). (b) Experimental μ + and μ spectra of Co75/(CoO)15-(MgO)10. (c) Simulated μ + and μ spectra generated from a superposition of calculated data for CoO and experimental data for Co metal. (d) Comparison of the experimental XMCD spectrum of Co75/(CoO)15-(MgO)10, and (e) the simulated XMCD spectrum by a superposition of the calculated XMCD from the CoO shell (the black line shown in panel (e)) and experimental Co metal XMCD (the magenta line shown in panel (e)).

Based on the data given in Figs. 3(b)– 3(e), we have performed an evaluation of the Co2p XMCD spectra using the approximate XMCD sum rules derived by Carra et al. This leads to an experimental ratio of morb/mspin of the Co2+ orbital over the spin over a magnetic moment of 0.24.[22] Going now further and using the explicit sum rules by Thole et al, the XMCD spectra yield for the Co2+ in a mspin = 2.54μ B and a morb = 0.61μ B. Table 1 gives a comparison of these figures with the corresponding values for CoO and Co metal, which gives evidence for the large magnetic anisotropy in these samples as provided by the Co2+ ions.

Fig. 4. Magnetic hysteresis loops of (a) the Co56/(CoO)32-(MgO)12 sample and (b) the Co75/(CoO)15-(MgO)10 sample measured at 2 K after cooling the samples in zero field (ZFC) or in a 5 kOe cooling field (FC), respectively. The inserts show the details of the hysteresis loops.

Table 1. Overview on the spin and orbital magnetic moments for different sample systems.

It is well known that magnetic granular films are good candidates to realize prominent/peculiar magnetic properties such as a large HE and an enhanced coercivity that remarkably differ from the magnetic properties of bulk materials.[20] We thus measured the magnetic properties by using a Quantum Design superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) magnetometer. The magnetic coercivity HC (i.e., the half-width of the magnetic hysteresis loop) is an important parameter to characterize magnetic materials. Coercivity is a complex property that is determined by the competition among magneto-crystalline anisotropy energy (MAE), domain wall creation, and structural defects. For nanoparticles, both volume anisotropy and surface anisotropy contribute to the MAE.[21] For very small particles, the volume anisotropy is proportional to the particle volume, while the symmetry breaking at the nanoparticle surface results in the surface anisotropy.[22, 23] In our granular films, the sample just at the percolation threshold has the highest ratio of surface to volume, which contributes to the MAE. Thus, it is interesting to study the effect of the Co metal volume fraction on the magnetic properties. Our results show that below the percolation threshold, increasing the Co metal content will slightly enlarge the size of the Co clusters and also increase HC and HE. Both HC and HE reach the maximum around the percolation threshold. As illustrated in Fig. 4(a), the hysteresis loop for zero-field cooling (ZFC) of Co56/(CoO)32-(MgO)12 is symmetric and does not exhibit exchange bias. The HC of the ZFC curve is about 4784 Oe. On the other hand, the hysteresis loop under 5 kOe field cooling (FC) exhibits a clear asymmetry as compared to the ZFC data yielding a high HE of about 2743 Oe while HC increases to 6135 Oe. This already indicates the influence of HE (namely the exchange coupling between the Co metal core and the CoO-MgO shell) on the size of HC.

For comparison, the ZFC and FC magnetization curves of the Co75/(CoO)15-(MgO)10 sample have been measured under the same conditions. From the ZFC data for Co75/(CoO)15-(MgO)10 shown in Fig. 4(b), we obtain a HC of only 1807 Oe, whereas the FC data yield a HC of about 3679 Oe and a HE of 1696 Oe. We have performed magnetization measurements for samples well below the percolation threshold and found that for these samples, both HC and HE are quite small. On the other hand, based on the magnetic force microscopy (MFM) measurements that we have performed on the samples above the percolation threshold, we could determine that these are multi-domain like and we thus believe that in this case, the decrease of HC is mainly due to magnetic domain motion.

The temperature dependence of the exchange bias HE and the coercive field HC has also been investigated. All the magnetic hysteresis loops were measured from 2 K to 200 K after cooling in a 2 kOe field. The resulting HE and HC as a function of temperature for Co56/(CoO)32-(MgO)12 and Co75/(CoO)15-(MgO)10 samples are summarized in Fig. 5. As shown in Fig. 5, HE decreases dramatically as the temperature increases and vanishes at about 200 K. The thermal dependence of HE reflects the thermal dependence of the pinned uncompensated spins of the CoO shell at the interface with the Co metal core.[24] On the other hand, the coercive field HC decreases as temperature increases due to superparamagnetism.[25] It is interesting to see that for both samples, the temperature behavior of HC is quite similar to that of HE, which also indicates the contribution of the exchange bias to the enhancement of HC.

Fig. 5. Magnetic hysteresis loops of (a) the Co56/(CoO)32-(MgO)12 sample and (b) the Co75/(CoO)15-(MgO)10 sample. All data were taken by warming up after cooling down to 2 K in a 2 kOe field. The inserts show the details of the hysteresis loops. (c) Exchange bias HE as a function of temperature for the Co56/(CoO)32-(MgO)12 sample and the Co75/(CoO)15-(MgO)10 sample. (d) Magnetic coercive field HC as a function of temperature for the Co56/(CoO)32-(MgO)12 sample and the Co75/(CoO)15-(MgO)10 sample.

We investigated the dependence of HE and HC on the cooling field HFC and the results from the Co56/(CoO)32-(MgO)12 sample are shown in Fig. 6. The SQUID hysteresis loops were measured in the − 5 T to + 5 T range after cooling from room temperature down to 2 K in various cooling fields (HFC = 1 kOe to 50 kOe). As the sample is cooled through TN, the AFM surface spins of the CoO shell couple to the external magnetic cooling field HFC. HFC thus modifies the AFM surface spin structure and will possibly enlarge the uncompensated magnetic moment.[26, 27] Thus, as shown in Fig. 6, both HC and HE increase almost logarithmically with increasing cooling field. The uncompensated spins do saturate at a high HFC value of about 2.5 T. Consequently, when HFC is above 2.5 T both HC and HE reach their maximum values of 7121 Oe and 3435 Oe, respectively. In analogy to the findings by Domingo et al., [28] for high cooling fields HC saturates while the HE slightly decreases as shown in Fig. 6.

Fig. 6. (a) Exchange bias HE and (b) coercive field HC as functions of the cooling field HFC for Co56/(CoO)32-(MgO)12 measured after cooling the sample down to 2 K.

4. Conclusion

In conclusion, a quite large coercive field HC of about 7121 Oe and an exchange bias HE of about 3435 Oe are achieved in the Co56/(CoO)32-(MgO)12 samples which is located right at an electrical percolation threshold. The ferromagnetic XMCD signal from the nominally AFM CoO shell yields the existence of rotatable uncompensated Co2+ spins. From the temperature-dependence of both HC and HE we could derive a strong functional dependence between the underlying pinned and rotatable uncompensated spins. Thus, the exchange bias systems based on Co/CoO-MgO nano-granular films may provide a way to tune the behavior of magnetic storage devices and provide new possibilities for improving the magnetic properties of exchange bias-based magnetic devices.

Acknowledgment

XMCD experiments were performed at the BL29 Boreas beamline of the ALBA Synchrotron Light Facility with the collaboration of ALBA staff.

Reference
1 Nogués J, Sort J, Langlais V, Skumryeva V, Suriñach S, Muñoz J S and Baró M D 2005 Phys. Rep. 422 65 DOI:10.1016/j.physrep.2005.08.004 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 22.929]
2 Skumryev V, Stoyanov S, Zhang Y, Hadjipanayis G, Givord D and Nogués J 2003 Nature 423 850 DOI:10.1038/nature01687 [Cited within:2] [JCR: 38.597]
3 Meiklejohn W H and Bean C P 1956 Phys. Rev. 102 1413 DOI:10.1103/PhysRev.102.1413 [Cited within:2] [JCR: 6.583]
4 Cheng Z H, Luo Y and Zhao G P 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 176102(in Chinese) DOI:10.7498/aps.62.176102 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 1.016] [CJCR: 1.691]
5 Zhang H W, Zhou W P and Liu E K 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 147501(in Chinese) [Cited within:1] [JCR: 1.016] [CJCR: 1.691]
6 Shi Z, Du J and Zhou S M 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 027503 DOI:10.1088/1674-1056/23/2/027503 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 1.148] [CJCR: 1.2429]
7 Hong J I, Leo T, Smith D J and Berkowitz A E 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 117204 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.117204 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 7.943]
8 Nogués J, Leighton C and Schuller I K 2000 Phys. Rev. B 61 1315 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.61.1315 [Cited within:1]
9 Sort J, Suriñach S, Muñoz J S, Baró M D, Nogués J, Chouteau G, Skumryev V and Hadjipanayis G C 2002 Phys. Rev. B 65 174420 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.65.174420 [Cited within:1]
10 Ohldag H, Scholl A, Nolting F, Arenholz E, Maat S, Young A T, Carey M and Stöhr J 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 017203 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.017203 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 7.943]
11 Sort J, Nogués J, Amils X, Suriñach S, Muñoz J S and Baró M D 1999 Appl. Phys. Lett. 75 3177 DOI:10.1063/1.125269 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 3.794]
12 Sort J, Langlais V, Doppiu S, Dieny B, Suriñach S, Muñoz J S, Baró M D, Laurent Ch and Nogués J 2004 Nanotechnology 15 211 DOI:10.1088/0957-4484/15/1/038 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 3.842]
13 Sort J, Nogués J, Suriñach S, Muñoz J S, Baró M D, Chappel E, Dupont F and Chouteau G 2001 Appl. Phys. Lett. 79 1142 DOI:10.1063/1.1392308 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 3.794]
14 Hou Z P, Su F and Wang W Q 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 087501(in Chinese) [Cited within:1] [JCR: 1.016] [CJCR: 1.691]
15 Xiao G and Chien C L 1988 J. Appl. Phys. 63 4252 DOI:10.1063/1.340195 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 0.71]
16 Zheng N, Abdul Q and Ram C 2011 Chin. Phys. Lett. 28 098301 DOI:10.1088/0256-307X/28/9/098301 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 0.811] [CJCR: 0.4541]
17 Abeles B, Sheng P, Coutts M D and Arie Y 1975 Adv. Phys. 24 407 DOI:10.1080/00018737500101431 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 34.294]
18 Burnus T, Hu Z, Hsieh H H, Joly V L J, Joy P A, Haverkort M W, Wu H, Tanaka A, Lin H J, Chen C T and Tjeng L H 2008 Phys. Rev. B 77 125124 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.77.125124 [Cited within:1]
19 Ge C, Wan X, Pellegrin E, Hu Z, Valvidares M, Barla A, Liang W I, Chu Y H, Zou W and Du Y 2013 Nanoscale 5 10236 DOI:10.1039/c3nr02013d [Cited within:2] [JCR: 6.233]
20 Nakagawa T, Takagi Y and Yokoyama T 2012 Phys. Rev. B 86 144418 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.86.144418 [Cited within:1]
21 Tamion A, Raufast C, Hillenkamp M, Bonet E, Jouanguy J, Canut B, Bernstein E, Boisron O, Wernsdorfer W and Dupuis V 2010 Phys. Rev. B 81 144403 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.81.144403 [Cited within:1]
22 Jamet M, Wernsdorfer W, Thirion C, Mailly D, Dupuis V, Mélinon P and Pérez A 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 4767 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.4676 [Cited within:2] [JCR: 7.943]
23 Rusponi S, Cren T, Weiss N, Epple M, Buluschek P, Claude L and Brune H 2003 Nat. Mater. 2 546 DOI:10.1038/nmat930 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 35.749]
24 Del Bianco L, Boscherini F, Fiorini A L, Tamisari M, Spizzo F, Vittori A M and Piscopiello E 2008 Phys. Rev. B 77 094408 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.77.094408 [Cited within:1]
25 Gittleman J I, Abeles B and Bozowski S 1974 Phys. Rev. B 9 3891 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.9.3891 [Cited within:1]
26 Leighton C, Nogueś J, Jon̈sson-Åkerman B J and Schuller I K 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 3466 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.3466 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 7.943]
27 Nogués J, Lederman D, Moran T J and Schuller I K 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 4624 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.4624 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 7.943]
28 Domingo N, Testa A M, Fiorani D, Binns C, Baker S and Tejada J 2007 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 316 155 DOI:10.1016/j.jmmm.2007.02.058 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 1.826]