Singular and non-topological soliton solutions for nonlinear fractional differential equations
Guner Ozkan†
Cankiri Karatekin University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of International Trade, Cankiri 18100, Turkey

Corresponding author. E-mail: ozkanguner@karatekin.edu.tr

Abstract

In this article, the fractional derivatives are described in the modified Riemann–Liouville sense. We propose a new approach, namely an ansatz method, for solving fractional differential equations (FDEs) based on a fractional complex transform and apply it to solve nonlinear space–time fractional equations. As a result, the non-topological as well as the singular soliton solutions are obtained. This method can be suitable and more powerful for solving other kinds of nonlinear fractional FDEs arising in mathematical physics.

PACS: 02.30.Jr; 05.45.Yv
Keyword: solitons; ansatz method; the space–time fractional Boussinesq equation; the space–time fractional (2+1)-dimensional breaking soliton equations
1. Introduction

Fractional differential equations are the generalizations of classical differential equations with integer orders. In recent years, fractional differential equations have played an important role in different research areas such as mechanics, engineering, signal processing, stochastic dynamical system, plasma physics, electricity, electrochemistry, biology, control theory, systems identification, economics and finance.[14]

Finding approximate and exact solutions to the fractional differential equations is an important task. Many powerful and reliable methods have been proposed to obtain the exact solutions of fractional differential equations. For example, these methods include the (G′ /G)-expansion method, [57] the first integral method, [810] the fractional sub-equation method, [1113] the exp-function method, [1416] the fractional functional variable method, [17, 18] the fractional modified trial equation method, [19] Kudryashov method, [20, 21] ansatz method, [22] and so on.

The theory of solitons is one of the very important areas of research in ocean dynamics, optics, plasma physics, fluid dynamics, semiconductors, and engineering. In these areas, the study of solitary waves attracts a lot of attention. Therefore, it is important to focus on solitary waves in a detailed manner from a mathematical point of view. Biswas et al. obtained optical solitons and soliton solutions with higher-order dispersion by using the ansatz method.[2325] This method was used by many authors.[2631] But, applications of this method are rather rare in the nonlinear fractional differential equations.

The rest of this paper is organized as follows: In Section  2, we describe the modified Riemann– Liouville derivative and explain how we can convert fractional differential equations into integer-order differential equations. In Sections  3 and 4, we apply this method to establish the exact solutions for the space– time fractional Boussinesq equation and the space– time fractional (2+ 1)-dimensional breaking soliton equations and to employ a variety of exact solutions to determine non-topological soliton solutions and singular soliton solutions. Conclusions are presented in Section  5.

2. Description of the modified Riemann– Liouville derivative

Fractional calculus theory is almost more than two decades old in the literature. There are several approaches to the generalization of the notion of differentiation to fractional orders, e.g., Riemann– Liouville, Grü nwald– Letnikow, and Caputo.[32, 33] But the first major contribution to give proper definition is due to Jumarie’ s modified Riemann– Liouville derivative[34, 35] as shown below.

Definition 1 Assume that f : RR, xf (x) denotes a continuous (but not necessarily differentiable) function. The modified Riemann– Liouville derivative of order α is defined by the expression[36]

in which Γ (· ) is the Gamma function defined by[37]

or

It imposes advantages of fast convergence, higher stability, and higher accuracy to derive different types of numerical algorithms.

Definition 2 The Mittag– Leffler function with two parameters is defined as[38]

this function is used to solve fractional differential equations as the exponential function in integer order systems.

We list some important properties for the modified Riemann– Liouville derivative as follows:

Property 1

Property 2

Property 3

where a and b are constants.

We consider the following general nonlinear FDEs of the type

where and are the modified Riemann– Liouville derivatives and P is a polynomial in u = u(x, t) and its fractional derivatives.

By using the fractional complex transform we can convert fractional differential equations into integer-order differential equations

where k and c are nonzero arbitrary constants. Also, by using the chain rule

where and are called the sigma indexes see Refs.  [39]– [41], without loss of generality we can take , where l is a constant.

Substituting Eq.  (9) with Eq.  (5) and Eq.  (10) into Eq.  (8), we can rewrite Eq.  (8) in the following nonlinear ordinary differential equation (ODE);

where Q is a polynomial in U(ξ ) and its total derivatives U′ , U″ , U‴ , … , such that

If possible, we should integrate Eq.  (11) term-by-term one or more times.

3. The space– time fractional Boussinesq equation

The first equation is called the space– time fractional Boussinesq equation which has the form[42]

Here γ = const > 0 is the dispersion parameter depending on the compression and rigidity characteristics of the material, β = const is the coefficient controlling nonlinearity, u(x, t) is the vertical deflection, and the quadratic nonlinearity (u2)xx accounts for the curvature of the bending beam. α is a parameter describing the order of the fractional time and space derivative.

The bright and singular soliton solutions to Eq.  (12) will be obtained with the help of the ansatz method.[43, 44] In order to solve Eq.  (12), we use the following transformations,

where k and c are non-zero constants.

Substituting Eq.  (14) with Eqs.  (5) and (10) into Eq.  (12), this equation  (Eq.  (12)) reduced into an ODE

where “ U′ ” = dU /dξ . By integrating twice and setting the constants of integration to be zero, we obtain

3.1. The bright (non-topological) soliton solution

The solitary wave ansatz for the bright (non-topological) 1-soliton solution, i.e., the hypothesis, is[45, 46]

where

Here, A, c, and k are nonzero arbitrary constants. The unknown p will be determined during the course of derivation of the solutions of Eq.  (1).

Therefore from Eqs.  (17) and (18), it is possible to get

and

Thus, substituting the ansatz Eqs.  (17)– (20) into Eq.  (16), yields

Now, from Eq.  (21), equating the exponents p + 2 and 2p leads to

From Eq.  (21), setting the coefficients of sechp+ 2ξ and sech2pξ terms to zero, we obtain

by using Eq.  (22), we have

We find, from setting the coefficients of sechpξ terms in Eq.  (21) to zero

also we get

From Eq.  (26) it is important to note that

Thus, the 1-soliton solution of Eq.  (12) is given by

where A is given by Eq.  (24) and c is given by Eq.  (26). Also, the constraint condition is shown in Eq.  (27). The evolution of exact solution for Eq.  (28) with α = 0.5 and α = 1.0 is shown in Fig.  1.

Fig.  1. The exact solution for Eq.  (28) with α = 0.5 (a) and α = 1 (b) respectively, when k = 1, γ = − 2, β = − 1, b = − 1.

3.2. Singular soliton solution

For singular solitons, the starting hypothesis is given by[4749]

where

where A, k, and c are nonzero arbitrary constants. The unknown p will be determined during the course of derivation of the solutions of Eq.  (16). Equation  (29) and its derivatives gives

and

Substituting Eqs.  (29)– (32) into Eq.  (16), we have

Similarly, from Eq.  (33), equating the exponents p + 2 and 2p leads to

and

From Eq.  (33), setting the coefficients of cschp+ 2ξ and csch2pξ terms to zero, we obtain

by using Eq.  (35) and after some calculations, we have

We find, from setting the coefficients of cschpξ terms in Eq.  (33) to zero

also we get

From Eq.  (39) it is important to note that

Thus, the singular soliton solution of Eq.  (12) is given by

where A is given by Eq.  (37), c is given by Eq.  (39) and the constraint condition is shown in Eq.  (40). The evolution of the exact solution for Eq.  (41) with α = 0.5 and α = 1.0 is shown in Fig.  2.

Fig.  2. The exact solution for (41) with α = 0.5 (a) and α = 1 (b) respectively, when k = 1, γ = − 2, β = − 1, b = − 1.

4. The space– time fractional (2+ 1)-dimensional breaking soliton equations

We consider the space– time fractional (2+ 1)-dimensional breaking soliton equations[50]

where 0 < α ≤ 1. In Ref.  [50], Wen and Zheng applied the fractional sub-equation method to construct exact solutions of these equations. Equations  (42) have been discussed in Ref.  [51] using three different types of method, namely, the (G′ /G)-expansion method, the functional variable method, and the exp-function method. When α = 1, equations  (42) are called the (2+ 1)-dimensional breaking soliton equations and some periodic wave solutions, non-traveling wave solutions, and Jacobi elliptic function solutions were found in Refs.  [52]– [55].

Now, we introduce the following transformations

where k, w, and c are non-zero constants.

Substituting Eq.  (44) with Eqs.  (5) and (10) into Eq.  (42), equations  (42) can be reduced into an ODE

where “ U′ ” = dU / dξ and “ V′ ” = dV/dξ .

Integrating the second equation in the system and ignoring constants of integration we obtain

Substituting Eq.  (46) into the first equation of the system we find

Integrating Eq.  (47) and ignoring constants of integration, we find

4.1. The bright (non-topological) soliton solution

Substituting the ansatz [Eqs.  (17)– (20)] into Eq.  (48), yields

Now, from Eq.  (49), equating the exponents p + 2 and 2p leads to

From Eq.  (49), setting the coefficients of sechp+ 2ξ and sech2pξ terms to zero, we obtain,

by using Eq.  (50) and after some calculations, we have

We find, from setting the coefficients of sechpξ terms in Eq.  (49) to zero

also we get

Thus, the non-topological soliton solution of Eq.  (42) is given by

and from Eq.  (46) we get

where A is given by Eq.  (52) and c is given by Eq.  (54).

4.2. Singular soliton solution

Substituting Eqs.  (30)– (33) into Eq.  (48), we have

Similarly, from Eq.  (57), equating the exponents p + 2 and 2p we obtain p = 2. From Eq.  (57), setting the coefficients of cschp+ 2ξ and csch2pξ terms to zero, we obtain

after some calculations, we have

We find, from setting the coefficients of cschpξ terms in Eq.  (57) to zero

also we get

Thus, the 1-soliton solution of Eq.  (42) is given by

and

5. Conclusion

In this paper, we studied the non-topological and singular soliton solutions of nonlinear differential equations with fractional order. As a result, two types of soliton solutions for them have been successfully found. There are constraint conditions that must hold in order for the solitons to exist. The ansatz method was effectively used to achieve the goal set for this work. We have predicted that fractional complex transform with the help of the ansatz method can be extended to solve many systems of nonlinear fractional partial differential equations in mathematical and physical sciences.

Reference
1 Podlubny I 1999 Fractional Differential Equations California Academic Press [Cited within:1]
2 Klafter J, Lim S C and Metzler R 2011 Fractional Dynamics in Physics: Recent Advances Singapore World Scientific [Cited within:1]
3 Tarasov V E 2011 Fractional Dynamics: Applications of Fractional Calculus to Dynamics of Particles, Fields and Media Berlin Springer [Cited within:1]
4 Mainardi F 2010 Fractional Calculus and Waves in Linear Viscoelasticity London Imperial College Press [Cited within:1]
5 Zheng B 2012 Commun. Theor. Phys. 58 623 DOI:10.1088/0253-6102/58/5/02 [Cited within:1]
6 Bekir A and Guner O 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 110202 DOI:10.1088/1674-1056/22/11/110202 [Cited within:1]
7 Zayed E M E and Arnous A H 2014 European Journal of Academic Essays 1 6 [Cited within:1]
8 Taghizadeh N, Mirzazadeh M and Farahrooz F 2013 J. Math. Anal. Appl. 374 549 [Cited within:1]
9 Bekir A, Guner O and Unsal O 2015 J. Comp. Nonlinear Dyn. 10 463 [Cited within:1]
10 Zayed E M E and Amer Y A 2014 Int. J. Phys. Sci. 9 174 DOI:10.5897/IJPS [Cited within:1]
11 Zhang S and Zhang H Q 2011 Phys. Lett. A 375 1069 DOI:10.1016/j.physleta.2011.01.029 [Cited within:1]
12 Alzaidy J F 2013 British J. Math. & Comput. Sci. 3 153 [Cited within:1]
13 Tong B, He Y, Wei L and Zhang X 2012 Phys. Lett. A 376 2588 DOI:10.1016/j.physleta.2012.07.018 [Cited within:1]
14 Bekir A, Guner O and Cevikel A C 2013 Abstract and Applied Analysis 2013 426462 [Cited within:1]
15 Guner O and Cevikel A C 2014 The Scientific World Journal 2014 489495 DOI:10.1155/2014/489495 [Cited within:1]
16 Guner O and Bekir A 2015 Int. J. Biomath. 8 1550003 DOI:10.1142/S1793524515500035 [Cited within:1]
17 Liu W and Chen K 2013 Pramana J. Phys. 81 3 DOI:10.1007/s12043-013-0555-y [Cited within:1]
18 Guner O and Eser D 2014 Adv. Math. Phys. 2014 456804 [Cited within:1]
19 Bulut H, Baskonus H M and Pand ir Y 2013 Abstract and Applied Analysis 2013 636802 [Cited within:1]
20 Ege S M and Mısırlı E 2014 Advances in Difference Equations 2014 135 DOI:10.1186/1687-1847-2014-135 [Cited within:1]
21 Inc M and Kılıcı B 2014 Waves in Rand om and Complex Media 24 393 DOI:10.1080/17455030.2014.927083 [Cited within:1]
22 Mirzazadeh M 2015 Pramana J. Phys. 85 17 [Cited within:1]
23 Savescu M, Khan K R, Kohl R, Moraru L, Yildirim A and Biswas A 2013 J. Nanoelectron. Optoelectron. 8 208 DOI:10.1166/jno.2013.1459 [Cited within:1]
24 Kohl R, Biswas A, Milovic D and Zerrad E 2008 Opt. Laser Technol. 40 647 DOI:10.1016/j.optlastec.2007.10.002 [Cited within:1]
25 Triki H and Biswas A 2011 Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 3 958 [Cited within:1]
26 Bekir A, Aksoy E and Guner O 2013 J. Nonlinear Opt. Phys. & Mater. 22 1350015 DOI:10.1364/JOSAA.28.002519 [Cited within:1]
27 Eslami M. and Mirzazadeh M. 2013 Eur. Phys. J. Plus 128 1 [Cited within:1]
28 Bekir A and Guner O 2013 Ocean Engineering 74 276 DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.10.002 [Cited within:1]
29 Boubir B, Triki H and Wazwaz A M 2013 Appl. Math. Model. 37 420 DOI:10.1016/j.apm.2012.03.012 [Cited within:1]
30 Bekir A, Aksoy E and Guner O 2012 Phys. Scr. 85 035009 DOI:10.1088/0031-8949/85/03/035009 [Cited within:1]
31 Triki H and Wazwaz A M 2011 Appl. Math. Comput. 217 8846 DOI:10.1016/j.amc.2011.03.050 [Cited within:1]
32 Samko S G, Kilbas A A and Marichev O I 1993 Fractional Integrals and Derivatives: Theory and Applications Switzerland Gordon and Breach Science Publishers [Cited within:1]
33 Caputo M 1967 Geophys. J. Royal Astronom. Soc. 13 529 DOI:10.1111/j.1365-246X.1967.tb02303.x [Cited within:1]
34 Jumarie G 2006 Comput. Math. Appl. 51 1367 DOI:10.1016/j.camwa.2006.02.001 [Cited within:1]
35 Tarasov V E 2013 Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 18 2945 DOI:10.1016/j.cnsns.2013.04.001 [Cited within:1]
36 Jumarie G 2009 Appl. Math. Lett. 22 378 DOI:10.1016/j.aml.2008.06.003 [Cited within:1]
37 Hartley T and Lorenzo C F 2002 Nonlinear Dyn. 29 201 DOI:10.1023/A:1016534921583 [Cited within:1]
38 Kilbas A A, Srivastava H M and Trujillo J J 2006 Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations Amsterdam Elsevier [Cited within:1]
39 He J H, Elegan S K and Li Z B 2012 Phys. Lett. A 376 257 DOI:10.1016/j.physleta.2011.11.030 [Cited within:1]
40 Saad M, Elagan S K, Hamed Y S and Sayed M 2013 Int. J. Basic & Appl. Sci. 13 23 DOI:10.1002/mpr.1482 [Cited within:1]
41 Elghareb T, Elagan S K, Hamed Y S and Sayed M 2013 Int. J. Basic & Appl. Sci. 13 19 DOI:10.1002/mpr.1482 [Cited within:1]
42 Jafari H, Tajadodi H, Baleanu D, Al-Zahrani A A, Alhamed Y A and Zahid A H 2013 Romanian Rep. Phys. 65 1119 [Cited within:1]
43 Triki H and Wazwaz A M 2009 Phys. Lett. A 373 2162 DOI:10.1016/j.physleta.2009.04.029 [Cited within:1]
44 Ebadi G and Biswas A 2011 Math. Comput. Model. 53 694 DOI:10.1016/j.mcm.2010.10.005 [Cited within:1]
45 Biswas A, Triki H and Labidi M 2011 Physics of Wave Phenomena 19 24 DOI:10.3103/S1541308X11010067 [Cited within:1]
46 Bekir A and Guner O 2013 Pramana J. Phys. 81 203 DOI:10.1007/s12043-013-0568-6 [Cited within:1]
47 Chowdhury A and Biswas A 2012 Math. Sci. 6 42 DOI:10.1186/2251-7456-6-42 [Cited within:1]
48 Inc M, Ulutas E and Biswas A 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 060204 DOI:10.1088/1674-1056/22/6/060204 [Cited within:1]
49 Song M, Liu Z, Zerrad Z and Biswas A 2013 Appl. Math. Inf. Sci. 7 1333 DOI:10.12785/amis/070409 [Cited within:1]
50 Wen C and Zheng B 2013 Wseas Transactions on Mathematics 5 12 [Cited within:2]
51 Bekir A and Guner O 2014 Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 15 463 [Cited within:1]
52 Zhang S 2007 Phys. Lett. A 368 470 DOI:10.1016/j.physleta.2007.04.038 [Cited within:1]
53 Peng Y Z and Krishnan E V 2005 Commun. Theor. Phys. 44 807 DOI:10.1088/6102/44/5/807 [Cited within:1]
54 Ren Y J, Liu S T and Zhang H Q 2006 Commun. Theor. Phys. 45 15 DOI:10.1088/0253-6102/45/1/003 [Cited within:1]
55 Chen Y, Li B and Zhang H Q 2003 Commun. Theor. Phys. 40 137 DOI:10.1088/0253-6102/40/2/137 [Cited within:1]