| INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Measurement of T wave in magnetocardiography using tunnel magnetoresistance sensor |
| Zhihong Lu(陆知宏)1,2,3, Shuai Ji(纪帅)1,2,3, and Jianzhong Yang(杨建中)1,2,3,† |
1 Department of Precision Instrument, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
2 Beijing Innovation Center for Future Chips, Beijing 100084, China;
3 State Key Laboratory of Precision Measurement Technology and Instruments, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Several critical clinical applications of magnetocardiography (MCG) involve its T wave. The T wave's accuracy directly affects the diagnostic accuracy of MCG for ischemic heart disease and arrhythmogenic. Tunnel magnetoresistance (TMR) attracts attention as a new MCG measurement technique. However, the T waves measured by TMR are often drowned in noise. The accuracy of T waves needs to be discussed to determine the clinical value of MCG measured by TMR. This study uses an improved empirical mode decomposition (EMD) algorithm and averaging to eliminate the noise in the MCG measured by TMR. The MCG signals measured by TMR are compared with MCG measured by the optically pumped magnetometer (OPM) to judge its accuracy. Using the MCG measured by OPM as a reference, the relative errors in time and amplitude of the T wave measured by TMR are 3.4% and 1.8%, respectively. This is the first demonstration that TMR can accurately measure the time and amplitude of MCG T waves. The ability to provide reliable T wave data illustrates the significant clinical application value of TMR in MCG measurement.
|
Received: 01 June 2022
Revised: 22 October 2022
Accepted manuscript online: 25 November 2022
|
|
PACS:
|
07.07.Df
|
(Sensors (chemical, optical, electrical, movement, gas, etc.); remote sensing)
|
| |
07.55.Ge
|
(Magnetometers for magnetic field measurements)
|
|
| Fund: Project supported by the Suzhou Tsinghua innovation leading action project (Grant No. 2016SZ0217) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFB0500902). |
Corresponding Authors:
Jianzhong Yang
E-mail: yang-jz@tsinghua.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Zhihong Lu(陆知宏), Shuai Ji(纪帅), and Jianzhong Yang(杨建中) Measurement of T wave in magnetocardiography using tunnel magnetoresistance sensor 2023 Chin. Phys. B 32 020703
|
[1] Mäkijärvi M, Korhonen P, Jurkko R, Väänänen H, Siltanen P, and Hänninen H 2010 Comprehensive Electrocardiology (London: Springer) pp. 2007-2028
[2] Nalbach M and Dössel O 2002 Physica C 372-376 254258
[3] Fenici R, Brisinda D and Meloni A M 2005 Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 5 291
[4] Jensen K, Skarsfeldt M A, Stærkind H, Arnbak J, Balabas M V, Olesen S, Bentzen B H and Polzik E S 2018 Sci. Rep. 8 16218
[5] Kim Y J, Savukov I and Newman S 2019 Appl. Phys. Lett. 114 143702
[6] Lembke G, Erné S N, Nowak H, Menhorn B and Pasquarelli A 2014 Biomed. Opt. Express 5 876
[7] Zhao W L, Tao X C, Ye C F and Tao Y 2022 Sensors 22 1021
[8] Fujiwara K, Oogane M, Kanno A, Imada M, Jono J, Terauchi T, Okuno T, Aritomi Y, Morikawa M, Tsuchida M, Nakasato N and Ando Y 2018 Appl. Phys. Express 11 023001
[9] Wang M L, Wang Y, Peng L and Ye C F 2019 IEEE Sens. J. 19 1
[10] Oogane M, Fujiwara K, Kanno A, Nakano T, Wagatsuma H, Arimoto T, Mizukami S, Kumagai S, Matsuzaki H, Nakasato N and Ando Y 2021 Appl. Phys. Express 12 123002
[11] Mariyappa N, Parasakthi C, Sengottuvel S, Gireesan K, Patel R, Janawadkar M P, Sundar C S and Radhakrishnan T S 2012 Physica C 477 15
[12] Zhu K and Kiourti A 2022 IEEE Open J. Antennas Propag. 3 732
[13] Vink A S, Neumann B, Lieve K V, Sinner M F, Hofman N, Kadi E S, Schoenmaker M HA, Slaghekke H M J, de Jong J S S G, Clur S B, Blom N A, Kääb S, Wilde A A M and Postema P G 2018 Circulation 138 2345
[14] Watanabe S and Yamada S 2008 J. Arrhythmia 24 417
[15] Horigome H, Takahashi M I, Asaka M, Shigemitsu S, Kandori A and Tsukada K 2000 Acta Paediatr. 89 64
[16] Tang P T, Shenasa M and Boyle N G 2017 Card. Electrophysiol Clin. 9 693
[17] Zhang S L and Cao N 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 040702
[18] Zhu K, Shah A M, Berkow J and Kiourti A 2021 IEEE J. Electromagn. RF Microw. Med. Biol. 5 124
[19] Zhang Y, Wolters N, Schubert J, Lomparski D, Banzet M, Panaitov G, Krause H J, Muck M and Braginski A I 2003 IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 13 389
[20] Li J J, Du P C, Fu J Q, Fu J Q, Wang X T, Zhou Q and Wang R Q 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 040703
[21] Huang N E, Shen Z, Long S, Wu M L, Shih H, Zheng Q, Yen N C, Tung C C and Liu H 1998 Proc. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 454 903
[22] Wu Z H and Huang N E 2009 Adv. Adapt. Data Analysis 1 141
[23] Torres M E, Colominas M, Schlotthauer G and Flandrin P 2011 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, May 22-27, 2011, Prague, Czech Republic, p. 4144
[24] Colominas M A, Schlotthauer G and Torres M E 2014 Biomed Signal Process Control 14 19
[25] Liao Y P, He C C and Guo Q 2018 Symmetry 10 269
[26] Patrick E M, Gari D C, Lionel T and Leonard A S 2003 IEEE. Trans. Biomed. Eng. 50 289 |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|
