X-ray-boosted photoionization for the measurement of an intense laser pulse

doi:10.1088/1674-1056/22/6/063201

中国物理B ›› 2013, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (6): 63201-063201.doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/22/6/063201

• ATOMIC AND MOLECULAR PHYSICS • 上一篇下一篇

X-ray-boosted photoionization for the measurement of an intense laser pulse

葛愉成, 何海萍

School of Physics and State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

收稿日期:2012-10-14 修回日期:2013-01-21 出版日期:2013-05-01 发布日期:2013-05-01
基金资助:
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11175010).

X-ray-boosted photoionization for the measurement of an intense laser pulse

Ge Yu-Cheng (葛愉成), He Hai-Ping (何海萍)

School of Physics and State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

Received:2012-10-14 Revised:2013-01-21 Online:2013-05-01 Published:2013-05-01
Contact: Ge Yu-Cheng E-mail:gyc@pku.edu.cn
Supported by:
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11175010).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： Investigations show that the X-ray-boosted photoionization (XBP) has the following advantages for in-situ measurements of ultrahigh laser intensity I and field envelope F(t) (time t, pulse duration τ_L, carrier-envelope-phase φ): accuracy, dynamic ranges, and rapidness. The calculated XBP spectra resemble inversely proportional functions of the photoelectron momentum shift. The maximum momentum p and the observable value Q (defined as a double integration of a normalized photoelectron energy spectrum, PES) linearly depend on I^1/2 and τ_L, respectively. φ and F(t) can be determined from the PES cut-off energy and peak positions. The measurable laser intensity can be up to and over 10¹⁸ W/cm² by using high energy X-rays and highly charged inert gases.

关键词: measurement of ultrahigh laser pulse, X-ray-boosted photoionization, photoelectron energy spectrum, quantum interference

Abstract: Investigations show that the X-ray-boosted photoionization (XBP) has the following advantages for in-situ measurements of ultrahigh laser intensity I and field envelope F(t) (time t, pulse duration τ_L, carrier-envelope-phase φ): accuracy, dynamic ranges, and rapidness. The calculated XBP spectra resemble inversely proportional functions of the photoelectron momentum shift. The maximum momentum p and the observable value Q (defined as a double integration of a normalized photoelectron energy spectrum, PES) linearly depend on I^1/2 and τ_L, respectively. φ and F(t) can be determined from the PES cut-off energy and peak positions. The measurable laser intensity can be up to and over 10¹⁸ W/cm² by using high energy X-rays and highly charged inert gases.

Key words: measurement of ultrahigh laser pulse, X-ray-boosted photoionization, photoelectron energy spectrum, quantum interference

中图分类号: (Multiphoton ionization and excitation to highly excited states)

32.80.Rm

42.50.Hz (Strong-field excitation of optical transitions in quantum systems; multiphoton processes; dynamic Stark shift) 42.65.Re (Ultrafast processes; optical pulse generation and pulse compression)

葛愉成, 何海萍. X-ray-boosted photoionization for the measurement of an intense laser pulse[J]. 中国物理B, 2013, 22(6): 63201-063201.

Ge Yu-Cheng (葛愉成), He Hai-Ping (何海萍). X-ray-boosted photoionization for the measurement of an intense laser pulse[J]. Chin. Phys. B, 2013, 22(6): 63201-063201.

参考文献 28

[1]	Krauss G, Lohss S, Hanke T, Sell A, Eggert S, Huber R and Leitenstorfer A 2010 Nat. Photon. 4 33
[2]	Yanovsky V, Chvykov V, Kalinchenko G, Rousseau P, Planchon T, Matsuoka T, Maksimchuk A, Nees J, Cheriaux G, Mourou G and Krushelnick K 2008 Opt. Express 16 2109
[3]	Wiehle R, Witzel B and Helm H 2003 Phys. Rev. A 67 063405
[4]	Goulielmakis E, Schultze M, Hofstetter M, Yakovlev V S, Gagnon J, Uiberacker M, Aquila A L, Gullikson E M, Attwood D T, Kienberger R, Krausz F and Kleineberg U 2008 Science 320 1614
[5]	Bula C, McDonald K T, Prebys E J; Bamber C, Boege S, Kotseroglou T, Melissinos A C, Meyerhofer D D, Ragg W; Burke D L, Field R C, Horton-Smith G, Odian A C, Spencer J E, Walz D; Berridge S C, Bugg W M, Shmakov K and Weidemann A W 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 3116
[6]	Mourou G and Tajima T 2011 Science 331 41
[7]	L'Huillier A, Lompre L A, Mainfray G and Manus C 1983 J. Phys. B 16 1363
[8]	Link A, Chowdhury E A, Morrison J T, Ovchinnikov V M, Offermann D, Woerkom L V, Freeman R R, Pasley J, Shipton E, Beg F, Rambo P, Schwarz J, Geissel M, Edens A and Porter J L 2006 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 77 10E723
[9]	Akahane Y, Ma J L, Fukuda Y, Aoyoma M, Kiriyama H, Sheldakova J V, Kudryashov A V and Yamakawa K 2006 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 77 023102
[10]	Alnaser A S, Tong X M, Osipov T, Voss S, Maharjan C M, Shan B, Chang Z and Cocke C L 2004 Phy. Rev. A 70 023413
[11]	Smeenk C, Salvail J Z, Arissian L, Corkum P B, Hebeisen C T and Staudte A 2011 Opt. Express 19 9336
[12]	Scrinzi A, Geissler M and Brabec T 2001 Phy. Rev. Lett. 86 412
[13]	Itatani J, Quéré F, Yudin G L, Ivanov M Y, Krausz F and Corkum P B 2002 Phy. Rev. Lett. 88 173903
[14]	Bandrauk A D, Chelkowski S and Shon N H 2002 Phy. Rev. Lett. 89 283903
[15]	Quéré F, Itatani J, Yudin G L and Corkum P B 2003 Phy. Rev. Lett. 90 073902
[16]	Ge Y C 2006 Phys. Rev. A 74 015803
[17]	Ge Y C 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77 033851
[18]	Ge Y C and He H P 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 023804
[19]	Ge Y C 2008 Chin. Phys. B 17 2072
[20]	Ge Y C 2008 Chin. Phys. B 17 4492
[21]	Ge Y C 2009 Chin. Phys. B 18 1473
[22]	Ge Y C and He H P 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 103302
[23]	Drescher M, Hentschel M, Kienberger R, Tempea G, Spielmann C, Reider G A, Corkum P B and Krausz F 2001 Science 291 1923
[24]	Hentschel M, Kienberger R, Spielmann C, Reider G A, Milosevic N, Brabec T, Corkum P B, Heinzmann U, Drescher M and Krausz F 2001 Nature 414 509
[25]	Drescher M, Hentschel M, Kienberger R, Uiberacker M, Yakovlev V, Scrinzi A, Westerwalbesloh T, Kleineberg U, Heinzmann U and Krausz F 2002 Nature 419 803
[26]	Kienberger R, Goulielmakies E, Uiberacker M, Baltuska A, Yakovlev V, Bammer F, Scrinzi A, Westerwalbesloh T, Kleineberg U, Heinzmann U, Drescher M and Krausz F 2004 Nature 427 817
[27]	Goulielmakis E, Uiberacker M, Kienberger R, Baltuska A, Yakovlev V, Scrinzi A, Westerwalbesloh T, Kleineberg U, Heinzmann U, Drescher M and Krausz F 2004 Science 305 1267
[28]	Lewenstein M, Balcou P, Ivanov M Y, L'Huillier A and Corkum P B 1994 Phy. Rev. A 49 2117

X-ray-boosted photoionization for the measurement of an intense laser pulse

X-ray-boosted photoionization for the measurement of an intense laser pulse

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 28

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	Xinyu Wu(吴歆宇), Qing Yu(余晴), Yongcheng He(何永成), Jianshe Liu(刘建设), and Wei Chen(陈炜). Multiplexing technology based on SQUID for readout of superconducting transition-edge sensor arrays[J]. 中国物理B, 2022, 31(10): 108501-108501.
[2]	Fengzheng Zhu(朱风筝), Xiaoyu Liu(刘晓煜), Yue Guo(郭月), Ningyue Wang(王宁月), Liguang Jiao(焦利光), and Aihua Liu(刘爱华). Chirp-dependent ionization of hydrogen atoms in the presence of super-intense laser pulses[J]. 中国物理B, 2021, 30(9): 94209-094209.
[3]	Miao-Di Guo(郭苗迪) and Hong-Mei Li(李红梅). Absorption interferometer of two-sided cavity[J]. 中国物理B, 2021, 30(5): 54202-054202.
[4]	Dan Liu(刘丹), Yichun Gao(高益淳), Jianqin Xu(许建琴), and Jing Qian(钱静). Stable quantum interference enabled by coexisting detuned and resonant STIRAPs[J]. 中国物理B, 2021, 30(5): 53701-053701.
[5]	杨康, 王佳磊, 孔祥燕, 杨瑞虎, 陈桦. Optimization of pick-up coils for weakly damped SQUID gradiometers[J]. 中国物理B, 2018, 27(5): 50701-050701.
[6]	李波, 董慧, 黄小磊, 邱阳, 陶泉, 朱建明. Performance study of aluminum shielded room for ultra-low-field magnetic resonance imaging based on SQUID: Simulations and experiments[J]. 中国物理B, 2018, 27(2): 20701-020701.
[7]	韩玉峰, 朱成杰, 黄仙山, 羊亚平. Dynamic properties of atomic collective decay in cavity quantum electrodynamics[J]. 中国物理B, 2018, 27(12): 124206-124206.
[8]	刘杰, 高鹤, 李刚, 李正伟, 张颖珊, 刘建设, 陈炜. Modulation depth of series SQUIDs modified by Josephson junction area[J]. 中国物理B, 2017, 26(9): 98501-098501.
[9]	杨磊, 马晓欣, 李小英. Quantum interference between heralded single photon stateand coherent state[J]. 中国物理B, 2017, 26(7): 74206-074206.
[10]	史建新, 许伟伟, 孙国柱, 陈健, 康琳, 吴培亨. Macroscopic resonant tunneling in an rf-SQUID flux qubit under a single-cycle sinusoidal driving[J]. 中国物理B, 2017, 26(4): 47402-047402.
[11]	李森, 黄光耀, 郭景琨, 康宁, Philippe Caroff, 徐洪起. Ballistic transport and quantum interference in InSb nanowire devices[J]. 中国物理B, 2017, 26(2): 27305-027305.
[12]	潘长宁, 何军, 方卯发. Tunable thermoelectric properties in bended graphene nanoribbons[J]. 中国物理B, 2016, 25(7): 78102-078102.
[13]	Nzar Rauf Abdullah, Aziz H Fatah, Jabar M A Fatah. Effects of magnetic field on photon-induced quantum transport in a single dot-cavity system[J]. 中国物理B, 2016, 25(11): 114206-114206.
[14]	范子龙, 任玉坤, 曾浩生. Entanglement and non-Markovianity of a multi-level atom decaying in a cavity[J]. 中国物理B, 2016, 25(1): 10303-010303.
[15]	Azmat Iqbal, A. Afaq. Photodetachment of H^- near a hard wall with arbitrary laser polarization direction[J]. 中国物理B, 2015, 24(8): 83201-083201.