Abnormal variation of magnetic properties with Ce content in (PrNdCe)2Fe14B sintered magnets prepared by dual alloy method
Zhang Xue-Feng1, 2, Lan Jian-Ting1, 2, Li Zhu-Bai1, †, , Liu Yan-Li1, 2, Zhang Le-Le1, 2, Li Yong-Feng1, 2, Zhao Qian1, 2
Key Laboratory of Integrated Exploitation of Bayan Obo Multi-Metal Resources, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou 014010, China
School of Mathematics, Physics and Biological Engineering, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou 014010, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: lzbgj@163.com

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51461033, 51571126, 51541105, and 11547032), the Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia, China (Grant No. 2013MS0110), and the Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology Innovation Fund, China.

Abstract
Abstract

Resource-saving (PrNdCe)2Fe14B sintered magnets with nominal composition (PrNd)15−xCexFe77B8 (x = 0−10) were prepared using a dual alloy method by mixing (PrNd)5Ce10Fe77B8 with (PrNd)15Fe77B8 powders. For Ce atomic percent of 1% and 2%, coercivity decreases dramatically. With further increase of Ce atomic percent, the coercivity increases, peaks at 6.38 kOe in (PrNd)11Ce4Fe77B8, and then declines gradually. The abnormal dependence of coercivity is likely related to the inhomogeneity of rare earth chemical composition in the intergranular phase, where PrNd concentration is strongly dependent on the additive amount of (PrNd)5Ce10Fe77B8 powders. In addition, for Ce atomic percent of 8%, 7%, and 6% the coercivity is higher than that of magnets prepared by the conventional method, which shows the advantage of the dual alloy method in preparing high abundant rare earth magnets.

1. Introduction

(PrNd)2Fe14B permanent magnets are a high energy product and are widely used in numerous devices, promoting the technology development in the areas of computers, motors, miniature speakers, and wind turbines, etc.[13] However, their mass production and wide application give rise to the unbalanced use of rare earth and the backlog of Ce.[411] Ce ion is in a strongly mixed-valent α-like state rather than the trivalent γ state, so it is nonmagnetic and the magnetocrystalline anisotropy is low in Ce2Fe14B.[12,13] Furthermore, the phase diagram and phase constitution of Ce–Fe–B are different from those of Nd–Fe–B,[14,15] and the minor phases possibly lead to a large variation of magnetic properties. It is a big challenge to obtain relatively high magnetic properties in the resource-saving and low cost Ce2Fe14B magnets using the conventional sintered method.[1619] The rare earth substitution could optimize the phase constitution and thus enhance the coercivity in (PrNdCe)2Fe14B magnets,[2022] and the dual alloy method is a feasible way to improve the magnetic properties by mixing (NdCe)2Fe14B with Nd2Fe14B powders.[23] For reducing the cost of this type of magnet, the amount of Ce should be further increased in the resource-saving permanent magnets, therefore, it is necessary to probe how the Ce element affects the magnetic properties in (PrNdCe)2Fe14B magnets. In this paper, we investigate the magnetic properties of (PrNdCe)2Fe14B sintered magnets prepared by mixing Ce-rich powders of (PrNd)5Ce10Fe77B8 (the atomic ratio of Pr/Nd is 0.8) with (PrNd)15Fe77B8 powders. It is found that the coercivity is abnormally dependent on the Ce content, and that in high Ce content magnets prepared by the dual alloy method the coercivity is higher than that of conventional sintered magnets. It is expected that these investigations could serve as a reference for optimizing the composition designing in preparing high abundant rare earth magnets.

2. Experiment

Two kinds of ingots with nominal compositions (PrNd)5Ce10Fe77B8 and (PrNd)15Fe77B8 were prepared, respectively, by induction melting of PrNd, Ce, Fe and FeB under the protection of high-purity argon. The 1 wt% excessive of rare earth elements was used to compensate the weight loss in the induction melting process. The ingots were broken to small pieces and then crushed to powders in a grinder. (PrNd)5Ce10Fe77B8 and (PrNd)15Fe77B8 powders were mixed in molar ratios of 0, 1/10, 1/5, 3/10, 2/5, 1/2, 3/5, 7/10, 4/5, 9/10, and 1, respectively, corresponding to the nominal compositions of (PrNd)15Fe77B8, (PrNd)14Ce1Fe77B8, (PrNd)13Ce2Fe77B8, (PrNd)12Ce3Fe77B8, (PrNd)11Ce4Fe77B8, (PrNd)10Ce5Fe77B8, (PrNd)9Ce6Fe77B8, (PrNd)8Ce7Fe77B8, (PrNd)7Ce8Fe77B8, (PrNd)6Ce9Fe77B8, and (PrNd)5Ce10Fe77B8. Ball milling was performed in petroleum ether for 45 min and the particle size were decreased to 3–5 μm. The fine mixed powders were compacted to green pellets after alignment under a 2 T pulsed magnetic field and then cold isostatic pressed at 300 MPa. The vacuum sintering was carried out at 1040–1080 °C for 2 h, and then the as-sintered magnets were annealed at 900 °C and 600 °C for 2–4 h, respectively. With the increase of Ce content, the sintering temperature was decreased correspondingly for optimizing the coercivity. Magnetic properties were measured using a NIM-200C hysteresis graph. The phase constitution, microstructure and chemical composition of the intergranular phase were observed by x-ray diffraction (XRD) spectrum, backscattered electron (BSE) of a scanning electron microscope (SEM), and an energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS), respectively.

3. Results and discussion

XRD patterns show that Re2Fe14B is the main phase for these sintered magnets. Figure 1(a) displays the demagnetization loops for these sintered magnets, which were prepared by the dual alloy method except (PrNd)15Fe77B8 and (PrNd)5Ce10Fe77B8 magnets. The variations of coercivity and energy product with the Ce atomic percent are shown in Fig. 1(b). It can be seen that a little additive amount of (PrNd)5Ce10Fe77B8 powders results in a dramatic drop of coercivity Hc. While, with the further increase of additive amount, the coercivity increases firstly, peaks at 6.38 kOe in (PrNd)11Ce4Fe77B8 magnets, and then decreases gradually. The variation of energy product (BHmax) follows that of coercivity with Ce content.

Fig. 1. (a) The demagnetization loops for the sintered magnets prepared by the dual alloy method, and (b) the variations of coercivity Hc and energy product BHmax with the Ce atomic percent.

Ce element substitution would result in the decrease of magnetocrystalline anisotropy and coercivity in (NdCe)2Fe14B magnets,[24] but among these sintered magnets, the coercivity is abnormally dependent on the Ce content. Similar experiments on the coercivity variation were observed in Refs. [20], [25], and [26]. Coercivity is dependent not only on the intrinsic magnetic properties, but also on the microstructure. Figure 2 shows the surface micromorphology investigated by BSE for the (PrNd)15Fe77B8, (PrNd)11Ce4Fe77B8, (PrNd)9Ce6Fe77B8, and (PrNd)5Ce10Fe77B8 magnets, respectively. For the (PrNd)15Fe77B8 and (PrNd)11Ce4Fe77B8, there are some darker pores on the surface, but less amount of pores present in the (PrNd)9Ce6Fe77B8 and (PrNd)5Ce10Fe77B8 magnets. Possibly, the Ce element lowers the melting point of the intergranular phase and improves the wetting characteristics of the liquid phase in the sinter process,[27,28] enhancing the interfacial bond strength at the grain boundary. It can be seen that in (PrNd)9Ce6Fe77B8 and (PrNd)5Ce10Fe77B8 magnets there exist two regions in the intergranular phase. As shown by the arrows in Fig. 2(c), one is gray black and the other is a little brighter enveloping the gray region. Figure 3 shows the EDS intensities of Pr, Nd, Ce, and Fe for the main matrix, intergranular gray, and bright regions, respectively, in the (PrNd)9Ce6Fe77B8 magnet. The intensities of Fe are strongest in the main matrix, indicating a high content of Fe, which is well consistent with the chemical composition of main phase (PrNdCe)2Fe14B. The intensities of rare earth elements increase in the intergranular phase, but the intensities of Pr, Nd, Ce, and Fe are different between intergranular gray and bright regions. This fact suggests that Pr, Nd, and Ce cannot be completely dissolved with each other and the chemical composition is inhomogeneous in the intergranular phase.

Fig. 2. The surface micromorphology investigated by BSE for the (PrNd)15Fe77B8 (a), (PrNd)11Ce4Fe77B8 (b), (PrNd)9Ce6Fe77B8 (c), and (PrNd)5Ce10Fe77B8 (d), respectively.
Fig. 3. The EDS intensities of Pr, Nd, Ce, and Fe for the (PrNd)9Ce5Fe77B8 magnet in the main matrix, intergranular gray, and brighter regions, respectively.

The nucleation of reversed domain and coercivity are related to the intergranular rare earth-rich phase and grain boundary.[29,30] In order to explore the relationship between the coercivity and the intergranular phase, the element distribution was investigated near the grain boundary by line scanning using EDS. The intergranular phase of (PrNd)15Fe77B8 magnets is rich in Pr and Nd elements (shown in Fig. 4(a)). As shown in Fig. 4(b), even for the addition of a little amount of (PrNd)5Ce10Fe77B8 powders, the Ce element is evident in the intergranular phase in the (PrNd)13Ce2Fe77B8 magnet. It is noted that the element segregation and phase separation were observed near the grain boundary in the (PrNd)11Ce4Fe77B8 magnet, in which the intergranular phase is rich in Ce but poor in Pr and Nd (shown in Fig. 4(c)). For further increase of the additive amount, the contents of Pr and Nd increase in the intergranular phase, and all of the Pr, Nd and Ce contents are high in the intergranular phase of the (PrNd)7Ce8Fe77B8 magnet (shown in Fig. 4(d)).

Fig. 4. The element distribution near the grain boundary for (PrNd)15Fe77B8 (a), (PrNd)13Ce2Fe77B8 (b), (PrNd)11Ce4Fe77B8 (c), and (PrNd)7Ce8Fe77B8 (d) magnets, respectively.

In the (Nd1−xCex)2Fe14B (x ≤ 0.3) magnets, Ce is predicted to have limited alloying with a preference for larger R(4g) sites due to the atomic size effect, resulting in weak partial ordering.[31] This is consistent with Ce segregation near the grain boundary in this experiment for (PrNd)15−xCexFe79B6 (x ≤ 4). The high c-axis manetocrystalline anisotropy originates from the R(4g) site in the Nd2Fe14B lattice.[32] Ce element aggregation in the intergranular phase and the substitution for R(4g) sites may heavily ruin the magnetocrystalline anisotropy at the grain boundary and decrease the nucleation field,[33] which is likely to result in the dramatic drop of coercivity in (PrNd)14Ce1Fe77B and (PrNd)13Ce2Fe77B8 magnets. The further increase of Ce content leads to an increase of coercivity in the (PrNd)12Ce3Fe77B8 and (PrNd)11Ce4Fe77B8 magnets, but the underlying mechanism remains unclear. Similar results were reported in (Re1−xCex)2(FeCo)14B magnets as x is in the range of 0.20–0.30,[20,25,26] and it proposed that the anomaly was possibly related to the phase separation.[25] Magnetization reversal and coercivity are strongly dependent on the self-interaction between perfect and defect regions at the grain outer layer.[34] As shown in Fig. 4(c), Ce enrichment whereas a lack of PrNd in the intergranular phase implies the inhomogeneous distribution of rare earth elements near the grain boundary, which possibly leads to an abrupt change in anisotropy and may vary the characteristics of self-interaction at the grain outer layer. Further research is being planned to investigate the abnormal dependence of coercivity on Ce content by checking the phase separation near the grain boundary and the variation in anisotropy. For further increase of the (PrNd)5Ce10Fe77B8 additive amount, the Ce content increases in the magnets, and the homogeneity of chemical composition near the grain boundary is improved, but the coercivity decreases gradually.

For comparasion, the (PrNdCe)2Fe14B magnets were prepared by the conventional powder metallurgy method using the same sintering and annealing process. Figure 5 shows the demagnetization loops for two types of magnets with the same nominal compositions of the (PrNd)9Ce6Fe77B8, (PrNd)8Ce7Fe77B8, and (PrNd)7Ce8Fe77B8 magnets, respectively. The suffix (S) denotes the magnets prepared by the conventional method. It can be seen that the coercivity of the magnets prepared by the dual alloy method is higher than that of corresponding conventional magnets. In addition, compared with that in (PrNd)5Ce10Fe77B8, the coecivity improves largely in (PrNd)7Ce8Fe77B8 and (PrNd)8Ce7Fe77B8 magnets (shown in Fig. 1). These facts indicate the advantage of the dual alloy approach for improving the magnetic properties in Ce-rich (PrNdCe)2Fe14B magnets.[35] It is noted that the remanence of the sintered magnets is low due to the high rare earth content. Properly reducing the rare earth amount in (PrNdCe)–Fe–B could improve saturation magnetization, and doping Cu, Al, and/or Zn is a feasible way to enhance the coercivity, so it has much room to improve the energy product in this type of magnets prepared by the dual alloy method.

Fig. 5. The demagnetization loops for the two types of magnets with nominal compositions, (PrNd)9Ce6Fe77B8, (PrNd)8Ce7Fe77B8, and (PrNd)7Ce8Fe77B8, and the suffix (S) denotes the magnets prepared by the conventional method.
4. Conclusions

In summary, (PrNdCe)15Fe77B8 sintered magnets were prepared using the dual alloy method by mixing (PrNd)5Ce10Fe77B8 with (PrNd)15Fe77B8 powders. The magnetic properties is abnormally dependent on the Ce atomic percent, and the corecivity peak at 6.38 kOe in (PrNd)11Ce4Fe77B8 magnets. In Ce-rich magnets prepared by the dual alloy method, coercivity is higher than that of corresponding magnets prepared by the conventional method. It is expected that these investigations could serve as a reference for optimizing the composition design in preparing high abundant rare earth magnets.

Reference
1Sagawa MFujimura STogawa NYamamoto HMatsuura Y 1984 J. Appl. Phys. 55 2083
2Croat J JHerbst J FLee R WPinkerton F E 1984 Appl. Phys. Lett. 44 148
3Cai L WGuo SDing G FChen R JLiu JLee DYan A R 2015 Chin. Phys. 24 097505
4Herbst J F 1991 Rev. Mod. Phys. 63 819
5Burzo E 1998 Rep. Prog. Phys. 61 1099
6Wang X CZhu M GLi WZheng L YZhao D LDu XDu A 2015 Electron. Mater. Lett. 11 109
7Coey J M D 2012 Scripta Mater. 67 524
8Chang H WChen C HHsieh C CChang W C 2011 J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 11 2756
9Zhang MLi Z BShen B GHu F XSun J R 2015 J. Alloys Compd. 651 144
10Skoug E JMeyer M SPinkerton F ETessema M MHaddad DHerbst J F 2013 J. Alloys Compd. 574 552
11Zhang X FShi YMa QLiu Y LShi M FLi Y FWang G FZhao Z R2015Rare Metal. Mat. Eng.44748
12Abache COesterreicher J 1986 J. Appl. Phys. 60 3671
13Capehart T WMishra R KMeisner G PFuerst C DHerbst J F 1993 Appl. Phys. Lett. 63 3642
14Yan C JGuo SChen R JLee DYan A R 2014 Chin. Phys. 23 107501
15Herbst J FMeyer M SPinkerton F E 2012 J. Appl. Phys. 111 07A718
16Zhou S XWang Y GHøier R 1994 J. Appl. Phys. 75 6268
17Xing M YHan J ZLin ZWan F WLin CLiu S QWang C SYang J BYang Y C2012J. Magn. Magn. Mater.331140
18Li DBogatin Y 1991 J. Appl. Phys. 69 5515
19Zhou Q YLiu ZGuo SYan A RLee D 2015 IEEE Trans. Magn. 51 2104304
20Yan C JGuo SChen R JLee DYan A R 2014 IEEE Trans. Magn. 50 2102605
21Li WLi AFeng HHuang SWang JZhu M 2015 IEEE Trans. Magn. 51 2103603
22Yan CGuo SChen RLee DYan A 2014 IEEE Trans. Magn. 50 2104604
23Zhu M GLi WWang J DZheng L YLi Y FZhang KFeng H BLiu T 2014 IEEE Trans. Magn. 50 1000104
24Li Z BShen B GZhang MHu F XSun J R 2015 J. Alloys Compd. 628 325
25Pathak A KKhan MGschneidner K AJrMcCallum R WZhou LSun KDennis K WZhou CPinkerton F EKramer M JPecharsky V K 2015 Adv. Mater. 27 2263
26Pei KZhang XLin MYan A 2016 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 398 96
27Huang S LFeng H BZhu M GLi A HLi Y FSun Y CZhang YLi W 2015 Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 22 417
28Huang S LFeng H BZhu M GLi A HZhang YLi W 2014 Aip Adv. 4 107127
29Kronmüller HDurst K DSagawa M 1988 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 74 291
30Ju J YTang XChen R JWang J ZYin W ZLee DYan A R 2015 Chin. Phys. 24 017504
31Alam AKhan MMccallum R WJohnson D D 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 102 042402
32Haskel DLang J CIslam ZCady ASrajer GVeenendaal M VCanfield P C 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 217207
33Chu L HLiu YLi JMa Y LLi C Y 2012 IEEE Trans. Magn. 48 2092
34Li Z BShen B GZhang MZhang YHu F XSun J R 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 106 042403
35Zhu M GHan RLi WHuang S LZheng D WSong L WShi X N 2015 IEEE Trans. Magn. 51 2104604