Multi-hop teleportation based on W state and EPR pairs
Zhan Hai-Tao1, Yu Xu-Tao1, Xiong Pei-Ying1, Zhang Zai-Chen2, †,
State Key Laboratory of Millimeter Waves, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
National Mobile Communications Research Laboratory, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: zczhang@seu.edu.cn

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61571105), the Prospective Future Network Project of Jiangsu Province, China (Grant No. BY2013095-1-18), and the Independent Project of State Key Laboratory of Millimeter Waves, China (Grant No. Z201504).

Abstract
Abstract

Multi-hop teleportation has significant value due to long-distance delivery of quantum information. Many studies about multi-hop teleportation are based on Bell pairs, partially entangled pairs or W state. The possibility of multi-hop teleportation constituted by partially entangled pairs relates to the number of nodes. The possibility of multi-hop teleportation constituted by double W states is after n-hop teleportation. In this paper, a multi-hop teleportation scheme based on W state and EPR pairs is presented and proved. The successful possibility of quantum information transmitted hop by hop through intermediate nodes is deduced. The possibility of successful transmission is after n-hop teleportation.

1. Introduction

Quantum teleportation plays a significant role in the quantum communication and has drawn more and more attention in recent decades due to its potential applications.[16] Quantum teleportation, first proposed by Bennett et al. in 1993,[7] could transmit quantum information from a source particle to a destination particle by quantum entanglement. Shared entanglement can be achieved by generating an EPR pair and distributing this pair to the source and destination in advance.[8] The first experiment was realized in 1997, and a quantum teleportation distance of 143 kilometers has been achieved by Ma et al.[9]

Long-distance delivery of quantum information is an essential challenge in the future quantum network. Considering the quantum entanglement state can be generated and distributed between smaller segments, quantum repeaters are used as a router to share and distribute quantum entanglement.[10] In recent decades, lots of innovative approaches have been proposed in the quantum teleportation domain.[1115] In recent years, some significant research works have been done in the domain of multi-hop quantum teleportation. Wang et al.[16] analyzed the multi-hop teleportation based on arbitrary Bell pairs using EPR-pair bridging. The possibility of multi-hop teleportation based on partially entangled state has a relationship with the number of the nodes N. If N is odd, the possibility of successful transmission , where K is the hops of the transmission.[17] If N is even, the destination node will add another teleportation to itself.[18] Dur et al.[19] studied the use of N pairs Werner states for quantum communication over long distances, but they focused on purification. Su et al.[20] proposed a quantum teleportation scheme using double W states and its successful possibility is after one hop teleportation. Shi et al.[21] proposed a quantum wireless multi-hop network and the information is transmitted from the source to the destination using Werner states as the quantum channel directly.

In this paper, we proposed a multi-hop quantum transmission scheme using the combination of W state and EPR pairs and proved its feasibility. The quantum information is transmitted hop by hop via intermediate nodes through the quantum channel established by W state and EPR pairs. We assume that the sender intends to teleport an unknown two-level quantum state: |ψ⟩ = α |00⟩ + β |11⟩ to the receiver. Firstly, we deduce the possibility of successful transmission after one hop teleportation. The recovered qubits are used as the teleported states for the next-hop teleportation. Based on the results of one-hop and two-hop teleportation, we make an assumption about multi-hop possibility and use mathematical induction to prove this assumption. Finally, we obtain a higher possibility of after n-hop teleportation compared to the schemes only using double W states.

The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Sections 2 and 3, the details of the multi-hop teleportation are discussed and proved, including one-hop, two-hop, and multi-hop teleportation. The conclusions are presented in Section 4. Operations of the Pauli operator used in this paper are introduced in Appendix A.

2. One-hop teleportation

The fidelity of the quantum entanglement decreases as the distance increases in the long-distance quantum transmission. It is practical to transmit quantum states from source to destination in a multi-hop way with more than one intermediate state. In the following two sections, a multi-hop transmission method based on W state and EPR pairs is presented and its validity is verified.

There are two nodes in Fig. 1. Alice is the source node and Bob is the destination node. Alice holds particles 1, 2, 3, and 6. Bob holds particles 4, 5, 7, and 8. Particle 8 is an auxiliary particle. The quantum state to be transmitted is |ψ12⟩ = α |00⟩ 12 + β |11⟩ 12, where α and β satisfy α2 + β2 = 1. Particles 6 and 7 share an EPR pair represented as . Particles 3–5 are in a W state represented as: . The W state and EPR pair constitute the quantum channel.

Fig. 1. One-hop teleportation.

The process of quantum state transmission is described as follows.

According to this process, the entire quantum circuit is given in Fig. 2. The solid line represents quantum data and the wavy line represents classical measurement results.

Fig. 2. One-hop quantum circuit.

The entire system can be represented as

Considering the following equation:

expression (1) can be rewritten as

After the Bell measurement on particles 1 and 3, the possibility of getting is

The possibility of getting is

Assuming the measurement result is , ignoring the coefficient, then the system state becomes

The possibility of getting , , , and is

Assuming the measurement result is , then the system state is

At last, after the measurement, if the |0⟩4 is obtained with the possibility of , the system state would turn into: α|10⟩ 57 + β|01⟩ 57 and the possibility is

Every destination state can be turned into

by introducing the auxiliary particle and performing a Pauli operator, so the entire possibility of the one-hop teleportation is . The related Pauli operators are given in Appendix A. With the same method, we obtain Table 1.

Table 1.

Results of one-hop teleportation for |ψ12 ⊗ |W345 ⊗ |ψ67.

.
3. Multi-hop teleportation
3.1. two-hop case

As shown in Fig. 3, Alice is the source node, Cindy is the destination node, and Bob is the intermediate node. The states of particles 1 and 2 will be transmitted through the quantum channel constituted by W state and EPR pairs.

Fig. 3. Two-hop teleportation.

From the deduction of one-hop teleportation, after the first teleportation, the four possible states of particles 5 and 7 are: α|10⟩57 ± β|01⟩57, α|01⟩57 ± β|00⟩57, α|00⟩57 ± β|11⟩57, and α|01⟩57 ± β|10⟩57. Assuming that α|00⟩57 + β|11⟩57 (same as α|00⟩57β|11⟩57) is achieved at node Bob after one-hop teleportation, the system state can be represented as

Considering the following equation:

expression (9) can be rewritten as

The expression (10) is similar to expression (2). By carrying out the same calculation as expression (2), we obtain the same four-type results with the same possibility. Our calculation also indicates that α|01⟩57 ± β|00⟩57 and α|01⟩57 ± β|10⟩ 57 cannot reach the same four-type results as in the one-hop case. When we get α|01⟩57 ± β|00⟩57 and α|01⟩57 ± β|10⟩ 57 in the intermediate nodes, we introduce an auxiliary particle and perform the corresponding Pauli operator to get the state α|00⟩57 + β|11⟩57. Therefore, after two-hop teleportation we can finally obtain the four-type results with the same possibility. The possibility of each type is . The possibility of the entire two-hop teleportation system is . The flow charts are shown in Table 2.

Table 2.

Two-hop teleportation flow charts.

.
3.2. n-hop case

According to the results of the 1-hop and 2-hop cases, we consider that the system gets the four-type results: α|10⟩ ± β|01⟩, α|01⟩ ± β|00⟩, α|00⟩ ± β|11⟩, and α|01⟩ ± β|10⟩ after (n−1)-hop teleportation and we assume that the possibility of each type is , so the entire possibility of (n−1)-hop teleportation is

α|01⟩ ± β|00⟩ and α|01⟩ ± β|10⟩ can be converted to α|00⟩ + β|11⟩ by introducing the auxiliary particle and performing the Pauli operator. Therefore, after n-hop teleportation we can gain the four-type results and the possibility of each type is . At the destination, we can recover the state α|00⟩ + β|11⟩ by introducing the auxiliary particle and performing the Pauli operator. The entire possibility is . The process can be seen in Fig. 4.

Fig. 4. n-hop teleportation.
4. Conclusion

We assume that quantum information at the source node is teleported through a multi-hop quantum channel based on W state and EPR pairs and we deduce the expression of each type of the results at the destination node and its possibility. We also introduce an auxiliary particle and give the corresponding operation of the Pauli operator to recover the message. The possibility of each type is and we can recover the transmitted message with the possibility of after n-hop teleportation. There are still some issues worthy of study. In this paper, quantum channels are established by maximally entangled states. In practice, the maximally entangled state usually degrades and changes to a partially entangled state. A scheme using partially entangled states is worth studying. Meanwhile, a more efficient approach by introducing more auxiliary particles is also worth studying.

Reference
1Ikram MZhu S YZubairy M S 2000 Phys. Rev. 62 022307
2Loock P VBraunstein S L 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 3482
3Horodecki RHorodecki PHorodecki MHorodecki K 2009 Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 865
4Cheng S TWang C YTao M H 2005 IEEE J. Sel. Area. Comm. 23 1424
5Long G LDeng F GWang CLi X HWen KWang W Y 2007 Front. Phys. 2 251
6Bouwmeester DPan J WMattle KEibl MWeinfurter HZeilinger A 1997 Nature 390 575
7Bennett C HBrassard GCrepeau CJozsa RPeres AWootters W K 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 1895
8Nielsen M AChuang I L2010Quantum Computing and Quantum Information10th Anniversary edn.New YorkCambridge University Press607860–78
9Ma X SHerbst TScheidl TWang DKropatschek SNaylor WWittmann BMech AKofler JAnisimova EMakarov VJennewein TUrsin RZeilinger A 2012 Nature 489 269
10Meter R VLadd T DMunro W JNemoto K 2009 IEEEACM Transactions on Networking 17 1002
11Marinatto LWeber T 2000 Found. Phys. Lett. 13 119
12Lu HGuo G C 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 276 209
13Cao MZhu S Q 2005 Commun. Theor. Phys. 43 69
14Deng F GLi C YLi Y SZhou H YWang Y 2005 Phys. Rev. 72 022338
15Gao T 2004 Commun. Theor. Phys. 42 223
16Wang KYu X TLu S LGong Y X 2014 Phys. Rev. 89 022329
17Cai X FYu X TShi L HZhang Z C 2014 Front. Phys. 9 646
18Yu X TZhang Z CXu J 2014 Chin. Phys. 23 010303
19Duan L MLukin M DCirac J IZoller P 2001 Nature 414 413
20Su X QGuo G C2007Quantum Teleportation on Quantum InformationVol. 1BeijingScience and Technology of China Press131(in Chinese)
21Shi L HYu X TCai X FGong Y XZhang Z C 2015 Chin. Phys. 24 050308