Kuznetsov–Ma soliton and Akhmediev breather of higher-order nonlinear Schrödinger equation
Li Zai-Dong 1, †, , Wu Xuan 1 , Li Qiu-Yan 1 , He P B 2
Department of Applied Physics, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China
College of Physics and Microelectronics Science, Key Laboratory for Micro-Nano Physics and Technology of Hunan Province, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: lizd2018@live.com

Project supported by the Key Project of Scientific and Technological Research in Hebei Province, China (Grant No. ZD2015133).

Abstract
Abstract

In terms of Darboux transformation, we have exactly solved the higher-order nonlinear Schrödinger equation that describes the propagation of ultrashort optical pulses in optical fibers. We discuss the modulation instability (MI) process in detail and find that the higher-order term has no effect on the MI condition. Under different conditions, we obtain Kuznetsov–Ma soliton and Akhmediev breather solutions of higher-order nonlinear Schrödinger equation. The former describes the propagation of a bright pulse on a continuous wave background in the presence of higher-order effects and the soliton’s peak position is shifted owing to the presence of a nonvanishing background, while the latter implies the modulation instability process that can be used in practice to produce a train of ultrashort optical soliton pulses.

1. Introduction

During the last four decades, optical solitons have been the object of intensive theoretical and experimental studies. [ 1 4 ] This is because that optical soliton can be treated as a natural data bit in ultrahigh-speed optical telecommunication systems. [ 5 , 6 ] The all-optical communication link will play the major role in optical fiber transmission systems such as all optical networks, optical communication, and optical logic devices. There are many nonlinear dynamic models in different branches of science which have soliton-like solutions. Based on the balance of the group velocity dispersion and the self-phase modulation, an optical soliton can be formed in fiber. The nonlinear Schrödinger (NLS) equation was reported theoretically by Hasegawa and Tappert [ 1 , 2 ] to describe self-focusing and self-phase modulation of light waves [ 7 14 ] in nonlinear optics. The propagation of optical solitons [ 15 18 ] are generated by the NLS equation. [ 19 21 ] In recent years, the femtosecond optical pulse transmission technology in optical fibers has a rapid development and potential prospect. As early as 1987, the higher-order NLS equation was derived by using the multiple-scale method, [ 11 ] which is the transmission evolution equation of femtosecond optical pulses in optical fibers. The higher-order NLS equation includes the terms caused by third-order dispersion, [ 22 ] self-steepening, [ 23 ] self-frequency shift effects, [ 24 ] and so on. However, it is more difficult to deal with both in physics and mathematics because the higher-order NLS equation is a higher-order nonlinear partial differential equation. Many authors have obtained dark and bright solitary wave solutions [ 25 29 ] and W-shaped solitary wave solutions [ 30 ] of a higher-order equation by using various methods, such as the Hirota algorithm, [ 31 ] traveling wave transformation, [ 32 ] and Darboux transformation. [ 33 35 ] Some types of exact N -soliton solutions [ 36 41 ] are reported for the higher-order nonlinear equation. In this paper, we will investigate Kuznetsov–Ma soliton and Akhmediev breather solutions of the higher-order NLS equation. In terms of Darboux transformation we obtain the analytical soliton solutions and breather solutions on a continuous wave (cw) background. The higher-order effects on the breather solution are discussed in detail.

2. Modulation instability for higher-order nonlinear equation

The higher-order NLS equation [ 42 ] takes the form

where z is the propagation variable and t is the time in the moving frame, with the function q ( z , t ) being the envelop of a wave. When α = γ = 0, the higher-order integrable evolution equation ( 1 ) reduces to the standard NLS equation. [ 43 ] If only α = 0, the equation is found to be integrable and known as the ‘Lakshmanan–Porsezian–Daniel’ equation. [ 44 , 45 ] Furthermore, when only γ = 0, the equation is also integrable and known as the Hirota equation. [ 46 , 47 ]

Modulation instability (MI) [ 48 ] as a parametric process exists by the interplay between dispersive and nonlinearity effects, in which a continuous or quasi-continuous wave experience a modulation of its amplitude or phase in the presence of weak perturbation. [ 49 ] Therefore, it may act as a precursor for the formation of bright solitons. Conversely, the stable dark solitons will exist if the absence of MI is under the constant intensity background. The phenomenon of MI has been discussed and studied in many physical systems. The MI process of the steady-state solutions can be discussed by introducing the following perturbed solution:

where A ( z , t ) is a weak perturbation. The general expression A can be assumed as A = u + i υ with

where u 0 and υ 0 are real amplitudes of the perturbation, Ω denotes the real frequency of modulation perturbations, and K is the real disturbance wave number. Substituting Eq. ( 2 ) into Eq. ( 1 ) and solving the linearized equation for A , we can obtain the dispersion relation of K and Ω , which determines the modulation instability process of the steady-state cw solution as

where . When the inequality is satisfied, K becomes complex. This means that the steady-state cw solution is unstable since A experiences an exponential growth along the fiber length. This phenomenon is referred to as modulation instability since it leads to the modulation of the steady-state amplitude. From Eq. ( 3 ) we find that the higher-order term has no effect on the MI condition.

3. Kuznetsov–Ma soliton and Akhmediev breather solution

The higher-order NLS equation can be presented by the condition of compatibility of the Lax equation as

where 𝜓 = ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 ) T , and the matrices L and B have the following forms:

where

with

In the above equations the overbar stands for the complex conjugate. It is easy to verify that equation ( 1 ) can be recovered under the compatibility condition B / t L / ∂z + [ B , L ] = 0. It is well known that the bright solitary wave solutions exist for Eq. ( 1 ), which is given by the vanishing boundary condition. In addition, the bright soliton solutions can be obtained on the non-vanishing cw background. To this propose, we take the initial “seed” solution as q = A c e i( k c z + ω c t ) , which is a cw solution and satisfies the nonlinear dispersion relation

where A c and k c are arbitrary real constants, respectively.

Following the standard procedure of Darboux transformation, [ 50 52 ] we obtain the soliton solution of Eq. ( 1 ) on a cw background corresponding to eigenvalue λ 1 = ω s +i A s . This solution takes the following form:

where

with

where

and where t 0 and φ 0 are arbitrary real constants. With the different parameters in Eq. ( 6 ), we mainly discuss the properties of bright solitary wave solution which are affected by the cw background. When A s = 0, the solution of Eq. ( 6 ) reduces to the cw solution q = A c e i δ . As A c = 0, i.e., the initial seed for Eq. ( 1 ) is zero, the solution in Eq. ( 6 ) becomes

where

Therefore, equation ( 6 ) denotes a soliton solution embedded in a cw background. With the increase of A s , the cw background is gradually localized and forms Akhmediev breather [ 53 , 54 ] due to the interaction of soliton and cw background.

3.1. Kuznetsov–Ma soliton

When A c ≠ 0, ω c = −2 ω s , and , the solution in Eq. ( 6 ) reduces to

where Θ 1 = − 2 ζ 1 t − 2 ζ 1 (2 ω s ) z + t 0 , Φ 1 = −2 ζ 1 ( A s − 12 ω s A s α ) z + φ 0 , with , , , and . From Eq. ( 8 ) we see that the main characteristic properties of a bright soliton is aperiodic in t coordinate and periodic in x coordinate, which is usually called the Kuznetsov–Ma soliton. The propagation of the Kuznetsov–Ma soliton is depicted in Fig. 1 on a cw background with the higher-order effects. Also, it is easy to verify that equation ( 8 ) can reduce to the special form q 1 = e (2 1 /cosh Θ 1 A c ), at any position z 0 = (2 )/[2 ζ 1 (12 ω s A s α + A s )], n = 0, ±1, ±2, …. This result shows that this solution can be generated by coherently adding in quadrature a bright soliton to a cw background. Furthermore, from Eq. ( 8 ) we can find that the soliton intensity | q 1 | 2 has a maximum value . However, it has a minimum value , at cosh Θ 1 = 2 A s / A c sin Φ 1 A c sin Φ 1 / A s .

Fig. 1. Evolution of Kuznetsov–Ma soliton solution in Eq. ( 8 ). Parameters are as follows: A c = 0.3, A s = 0.5, κ c = ω c = 0.2, t 0 = 6, φ 0 = 0, α = 0.05, and γ = 0.025.

From Fig. 2(a) , one can find that the maximum and minimum intensities evolve along the propagation direction. The location of maximum and minimum intensity in the time–space plane is shown in Fig. 2(b) . It is clear that the narrower the soliton, the sharper the peak and the deeper the two dips at the wings of the soliton. This phenomenon indicates the characteristic breather behavior of the Kuznetsov–Ma soliton. It is easy to find that the peak position of the soliton is moved by the presence of the amplitude A c . With careful analysis we can find the soliton’s peak position is moved from its initial value t s = ( F′α + G′γ −2 ω s ) z + t 0 /2 A s to the value t st = ( + −2 ω s ) z + t 0 /2 ζ 1 with and . Thus, the amount of shift for the soliton’s peak position is given by

Fig. 2. (a) Evolution of the maximum intensity (red curve), the minimum intensity (blue curve), and the intensity of cw background (solid curve) of the solution in Eq. ( 8 ); (b) location of the maximum intensity (solid curve) and the minimum intensity (dotted curve) in the time-propagation-distance plane. The parameters are the same as in Fig. 1 .

Figure 3 describes the location of the peak of the soliton under two different situations ( A c ≠ 0 and A c = 0). From Eq. ( 9 ) we can find that the higher-order terms give the shift and , respectively. For the NLS equation ( α = γ = 0), the value of shift of the soliton’s peak position is t 0 /(2 ζ 1 ) − t 0 /(2 A s ). Compared with the NLS equation we can see that the main feature of the solution has no change except for a move of the soliton’s peak position. This phenomenon shows that the injection of a cw pulse can be used for parametric control of soliton timing. [ 55 ]

Fig. 3. Evolution of Akhmediev breather in Eq. ( 10 ) with the soliton’s peak position of the one-soliton solution q 1 in Eq. ( 7 ) (red line) and the Kuznetsov–Ma soliton solution ( 8 ) (blue line). The parameters are the same as in Fig. 1 .
3.2. Akhmediev breather

When A c ≠ 0, ω c = − 2 ω s , and , the solution in Eq. ( 6 ) reduces to the form

where

with Θ 1 = (− A s + (12 ω s A s ) α + ) N 1 z + t 0 , and Φ 1 = N 1 t + (2 ω s ) N 1 z + φ 0 , with . The solution of Eq. ( 10 ) is aperiodic in the z direction and periodic in the t direction, which is known as Akhmediev breather. Therefore, the solution of Eq. ( 10 ) can be used to describe the modulation instability process. [ 50 , 51 ] Figure shows the higher-order effects on the modulation instability process. We can observe that the main features of solitons have no change under different values of z except for the time shift.

Fig. 4. Evolution of the soliton’s peak position shift of the single soliton in Eq. ( 10 ) with and without the higher-order effects at (a) z = 0.5, (b) z = 2.5, (c) z = 4.2, and (d) z = 7.2, respectively. The parameters are α = 0.05, γ = 0.025 (blue curves); and α = γ = 0 (red curve), A s = 0.5, A c = 0.9. The other parameters are the same as in Fig. 1 .
4. Conclusions

In summary, we have exactly solved the higher-order integrable NLS equation which describes the propagation of ultrashort optical pulse in optical fibers. We have discussed the modulation instability process in detail and obtained the modulation instability conditions for a higher-order nonlinear equation. Based on the Lax pair and Darboux transformation method, bright solitary soliton solutions on a continuous wave background have been presented. With the different parameters, we give the Kuznetsov–Ma soliton and Akhmediev breather solutions of the higher-order nonlinear Schrödinger equation. The propagation characteristics of those solutions on a cw background have been analyzed in detail. When the amplitude of cw light exceeds the half of the soliton amplitude, this one-soliton solution describes the modulation instability process that can be used in practice to produce a train of ultrashort optical soliton pulses. However, the amplitude of cw light is less than half of the soliton amplitude, the one-soliton solution describes the propagation of a bright pulse on the cw background in the presence of higher-order effects, and the soliton’s peak position is shifted owing to the presence of a nonvanishing background field amplitude.

Reference
1 Hasegawa A Tappert F D 1973 Appl. Phys. Lett. 23 142
2 Hasegawa A Tappert F D 1973 Appl. Phys. Lett. 23 171
3 Malomed B A 1994 Opt. Lett. 19 341
4 Kruglov V I Peacock A C Harvey J D 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 113902
5 Hasegawa A 2000 IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 6 1161
6 Herr T Brasch V Jost J D Mirgorodskiy I Lihachev G Gorodetsky M L Kippenberg T J 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 123901
7 Mollenauer L F Stolen R H Gordon J P Tomlinson W J 1983 Opt. Lett. 8 289
8 Krőkel D Halas N J Giuliani G Grischkowsky D 1988 Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 29
9 Weiner A M Heritage J P Hawkins R J Thurston R N Kirschner E M Leaird D E Tomlinson W J 1988 Phys. Rev. Lett. 61 2455
10 Kodama Y 1985 J. Stat. Phys. 39 597
11 Kodama Y Hasegawa A 1987 IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 23 510
12 Stolen R H Lin C 1978 Phys. Rev. A 17 1448
13 Yin L H Agrawal G P 2007 Opt. Lett. 32 2031
14 Moses J Malomed B A Wise F W 2007 Phys. Rev. A 76 021802
15 Kibler B Fatome J Finot C Millot G Dias F Genty G Akhmediev N Dudley J M 2010 Nat. Phys. 6 790
16 Alexeeva N V Barashenkov I V Sukhorukov A A Kivshar Y S 2012 Phys. Rev. A 85 063837
17 Baronio F Degasperis A Conforti M Wabnitz S 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 044102
18 Zhong W P Belić M R Huang T W 2013 Phys. Rev. E 87 065201
19 Yang R C Zhang Y 2011 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 28 123
20 Holmes S Porter M A Krűger P Kevrekidis P G 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 033627
21 Yang G Y Li L Jia S T Mihalache D 2013 Rom. Rep. Phys. 65 391
22 Michel C Suret P Randoux S Jauslin H R Picozzi A 2010 Opt. Lett. 35 2367
23 Zhong X Q Tang T T Xiang A P Cheng K 2011 Opt. Commun. 284 4727
24 Ankiewicz A Soto-Crespo J M Chowdhury M A Akhmediev N 2013 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 30 87
25 Gedalin M Scott T C Band Y B 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 448
26 Chen Y Li B 2004 Chaos Soliton. Fract. 19 977
27 Kumar H Chand F 2013 Opt. Laser Technol. 54 265
28 Yang G Y Wang Y Qin Z Y Malomed B A Mihalache D Li L 2014 Phys. Rev. E 90 062909
29 Wang X Yand Bo Chen Y Yang Y Q 2014 Chin. Phys. Lett. 31 90201
30 Yan Z Y Zhang X F Liu W M 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 023627
31 Jiang Y Tian B Liu W J Sun K Li M Wang P 2012 Phys. Rev. E 85 036605
32 Liu C S 2010 Comput. Phys. Commun. 181 317
33 Tao Y S He J S 2012 Phys. Rev. E 85 026601
34 He J S Zhang H R Wang L H Porsezian K Fokas A S 2013 Phys. Rev. E 87 052914
35 Liu X Z Yu J Ren B Yang J R 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 110203
36 Wang L H Porsezian K He J S 2013 Phys. Rev. E 87 053202
37 Guo R Hao H Q 2013 Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 18 2426
38 Chowdury A Kedziora D J Ankiewicz A Akhmediev N 2014 Phys. Rev. E 90 032922
39 Baronio F Conforti M Degasperis A Lombardo S Onorato M Wabnitz S 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 034101
40 Ankiewicz A Wang Y Wabnitz S Akhmediev N 2014 Phys. Rev. E 89 012907
41 Yan Z Y Dai C Q 2013 J. Opt. 15 064012
42 Ankiewicz A Akhmediev N 2014 Phys. Lett. A 378 358
43 Zakharov V E Shabat A B 1972 Sov. Phys. JETP 34 62
44 Porsezian K Daniel M Lakshmanan M 1992 J. Math. Phys. 33 1807
45 Porsezian K 1997 Phys. Rev. E 55 3785
46 Hirota R 1973 J. Math. Phys. 14 805
47 Ankiewicz A Soto-Crespo J M Akhmediev N 2010 Phys. Rev. E 81 046602
48 Erkintalo M Hammani K Kibler B Finot C Akhmediev N Dudley J M Genty G 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 253901
49 Tai K Hasegawa A Tomita A 1986 Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 135
50 Xu Z Y Li L Li Z H Zhou G S 2003 Phys. Rev. E 67 026603
51 Li L Li Z H Li S Q Zhou G S 2004 Opt. Commun. 234 169
52 Yang G Y Li L Jia S T 2012 Phys. Rev. E 85 046608
53 Erkintalo M Genty G Wetzel B Dudley J M 2011 Phys. Lett. A 375 2029
54 Dudley J M Genty G Dias F Kibler B Akhmediev N 2009 Opt. Express. 17 21497
55 Park Q H Shin H J 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 4432