Effects of electron–optical phonon interactions on the polaron energy in a wurtzite ZnO/Mg xZn1− xO quantum well
Zhao Feng-Qi†, Zhang Min, Bai Jin-Hua
College of Physics and Electronic Information, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory for Physics and Chemistry of Functional Materials, Hohhot 010022, China

Corresponding author. E-mail: fqzhao@imnu.edu.cn

*Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11264027 and 11364030), the Project of Prairie Excellent Specialist of Inner Mongolia, China, and the “Thousand, Hundred and Ten” Talent Training Project Foundation of Inner Mongolia Normal University, China (Grant No. RCPY-2-2012-K-039).

Abstract

We investigated the properties of polarons in a wurtzite ZnO/Mg xZn1− xO quantum well by adopting a modified Lee–Low–Pines variational method, giving the ground state energy, transition energy, and phonon contributions from various optical-phonon modes to the ground state energy as functions of the well width and Mg composition. In our calculations, we considered the effects of confined optical phonon modes, interface-optical phonon modes, and half-space phonon modes, as well as the anisotropy of the electron effective band mass, phonon frequency, and dielectric constant. Our numerical results indicate that the electron–optical phonon interactions importantly affect the polaronic energies in the ZnO/Mg xZn1− xO quantum well. The electron–optical phonon interactions decrease the polaron energies. For quantum wells with narrower wells, the interface optical phonon and half-space phonon modes contribute more to the polaronic energies than the confined phonon modes. However, for wider quantum wells, the total contribution to the polaronic energy mainly comes from the confined modes. The contributions of the various phonon modes to the transition energy change differently with increasing well width. The contribution of the half-space phonons decreases slowly as the QW width increases, whereas the contributions of the confined and interface phonons reach a maximum at d ≈ 5.0 nm and then decrease slowly. However, the total contribution of phonon modes to the transition energy is negative and increases gradually with the QW width of d. As the composition x increases, the total contribution of phonons to the ground state energies increases slowly, but the total contributions of phonons to the transition energies decrease gradually. We analyze the physical reasons for these behaviors in detail.

PACS: 71.38.–k; 73.21.Fg; 63.20.kd
Keyword: wurtzite quantum well; electron–optical phonon interaction; polaron energy
1. Introduction

Recently, zinc oxide (ZnO) semiconductors have attracted much interest because of their potential applications in optoelectronic devices in the blue– ultraviolet wavelength region.[15] ZnO has some advantages over GaN, among which are the availability of fairly high-quality ZnO bulk single crystals and its high exciton binding energy (60 meV). ZnO-based quantum well (QW) structures also have several advantages over GaN-based QW structures, [68] including the much lower growth temperature of ZnO than that of GaN. Wurtzite ZnO exhibits mixing of the longitudinal optical (LO) and transverse optical (TO) modes because of its anisotropy.[9] As material synthesis has improved, the production of ZnO-based semiconductor alloys has led to high-quality ZnO/MgxZn1− xO multiple-QW structures.[8, 1012] In recent years, researchers have studied the luminescent properties, absorption spectra, lattice vibrations, and exciton states of ZnO/MgxZn1− xO QWs.[6, 10, 1325] For example, Coli et al. investigated the excitonic transition energies in these heterostructures, accounting for the effects of the exciton– phonon interaction.[13] Fan et al. calculated the band parameters and electronic structures of wurtzite ZnO and ZnO/MgxZn1− xO QWs by the empirical pseudopotential method.[14] Chia et al. studied how the well width affected radiative and nonradiative recombination times in ZnO/MgZnO multiple QWs.[15] Fan et al. studied the band offsets and polarization effects in wurtzite ZnO/Mg0.25Zn0.75O QWs.[17]

Using the dielectric continuum model and Loudon’ s uniaxial crystal model, Lee et al. deduced the dispersion relation of the interface (IF) phonon modes, the confined (CF) phonon modes, the half-space (HS) phonon modes, and the propagating (PR) phonon modes in wurtzite quantum structures with single and double heterointerfaces.[26] Shi et al. exactly solved the equation of motion for the p-polarization field in an arbitrary wurtzite multilayer heterostructure by using a transfer matrix method, and also obtained and discussed the dispersive relation and electron– phonon coupling functions.[27, 28]

Polarons influence carrier transport in semiconductors, which in turn influence the properties of optical– electronic devices, so it is important to understand the polaronic effects in wurtzite ZnO-based QWs. In a previous work, we calculated the binding energy of a bound polaron in ZnO/MgxZn1− xO QWs.[29] However, many of the fundamental electronic and optical properties of ZnO-based QW structures are not yet well understood. To the best of our knowledge, there is no detailed theoretical calculation for the polaronic effects in ZnO/MgxZn1− xO QW structures.

The present paper focuses on the polaronic effect and the contributions from various phonon modes to the ground state energy and transition energy in wurtzite ZnO/MgxZn1− xO QWs by considering the influence of CF phonon modes, HS phonon modes, IF phonon modes (including the LO-like and the TO-like modes), as well as the anisotropy of the electron effective band mass, phonon frequency, and dielectric constant.

2. Model and calculation

In this work, we consider a wurtzite ZnO/MgxZn1− xO QWs structure of polar dielectrics for which the well material is in the region λ = 1, | z| < d/2, and the barriers are in the region λ = 2, | z| ≥ d/2. By using the effective-mass approximation and considering the anisotropy of material parameters, the Hamiltonian of the electron– phonon system including the interactions from the CF, IF, and HS phonons can be written as

where mλ z and mλ are the material-dependent effective mass of the electron with λ = 1, 2, and aj(w) are the creation and annihilation operators of LO-like and TO-like phonons with wave vector w(w = (q, kλ z) for CF and HS phonon modes, and w = q for IF phonon modes), parity p and frequency ω . j = {p, n}, the mode index p indicates the symmetric and antisymmetric phonon modes, n indicates the CF, HS, and IF modes in LO-lik and TO-lik phonon frequency regions, V(z) is the rectangular well potential experienced by the electron and is given as

where V0 = 0.65 × Δ Eg = 844  meV[2] is the depth of the QWs.

The last term in Eq.  (1) is the Hamiltonian of the interaction between electron and phonon, [26] and is given by

For the symmetric localized modes, the coupling function gj(z) in Eq.  (3) is determined by the following equation:[26]

where , k1m can be determined by the following equation: ε 1zk1m sin(k1md/2) − ε 2zk2 cos(k1md/2) = 0, and the range of k1m is 2/d < k1m < 2(m + 1)π /d, m runs over the series of confined modes, and S is the interface area of quantum well.

For the antisymmetric localized modes, the coupling function in Eq.  (3) is determined by the following equation:[26]

where

where k1m can be determined by ε 1zk1m cos(k1md/2) + ε 2zk2 sin(k1md/2) = 0, and the range of k1m is 2(m − 0.5)π /d < k1m < 2(m + 0.5)π /d.

Similar to the CF modes, the HS and IF modes can be found in Ref.  [26]. The phonon frequencies ω for CF (HS) modes are obtained from ε λ sin2θ λ + ε λ z cos2θ λ = 0 with a proper application of parameters for material 1 (2), θ λ is an angle between w and the z axis. The direction-dependent dielectric functions, ε λ and ε λ z are functions of ω , and are given in Ref.  [26]. The frequency ω for symmetric IF modes is determined by with ε 1zε 2z < 0 (ε 1⊥ ε 1z > 0 and ε 2⊥ ε 2z > 0), and the frequency ω for antisymmetric IF modes is determined by with ε 1zε 2z < 0.

The Hamiltonian in Eq.  (1) is too complicated to be solved exactly. We now perform two unitary transformations with

the transformed Hamiltonian is given by

Here, the displacement amplitudes fj and are variational parameters which will be determined by minimizing the energies of the electron– phonon system. The wave function of the polaron can be expressed in the form

where Nn is the normalization constant, | 0〉 is the zero-phonon state of the phonon field, and φ n(z) is the wave function in the z direction. The polaronic energy can then be written as

For the ground state,

and the wave function of the first excited state is given as follows:

In Eqs.  (13) and (14), and . Here, is the sub-band energy of an electron in the QWs.

By substituting Eqs.  (11), (13), and (14) into Eq.  (12), one can obtain the ground state energy (E1) and the first excited state energy (E2) of the polaron. The transition energy from the ground state to the first excited state can be given by

3. Numerical results and discussion

To clarify the influence of the polaronic effect caused by the full optical phonon modes (CF, HS, and IF) in the wurtzite QW system, we numerically calculated the energy levels of the ground and the excited states of a polaron in wurtzite ZnO/MgxZn1− xO QWs. Table  1 lists the parameters used in the calculation, and figures  1– 5 give the calculated results. The parameters of the barrier material (MgxZn1− xO) were obtained by the effective phonon-mode approximation: QMgxZn1− xO = (1 − x)QZnO + xQMgO.

Table 1. The parameters for wurtzite QWs used in the calculation. The electron effective masses, phonon frequency, and band gap have units of electron rest mass me, meV, and eV, respectively.

Figure  1 shows the ground state energies of the polaron (E1) as a function of well width d in the wurtzite ZnO/Mg0.3Zn0.7O QW with and without phonons effect. To understand the influence of the phonons on the transition energy, we also propose the results of the transition energies, considering the presence of phonons. Figure  1 shows that the ground state energies of the polaron in both cases (with and without the influence of phonons) follow the same trend. Both decrease monotonically with increasing d, rapidly at smaller d but slowly at larger d. This behavior occurs because the polarons are more strongly confined when d is small. The contribution of the electron– optical phonon interaction to the ground state energy of the polaron in a ZnO/Mg0.3Zn0.7O QW (∼ 67– 86  meV) is much larger than in a GaAs/Al0.3Ga0.7As QW (∼ 1.8– 3.2  meV). Note that the ground state energy with phonon influence is smaller than that without phonon influence in the wurtzite ZnO/Mg0.3Zn0.7O QW. For example, for d = 8  nm, the ground state energy of the polaron is − 49.73 (20.82)  meV including (ignoring) the phonon effect. For d = 20  nm, the corresponding ground state energy of the polaron is − 65.26 (4.60)  meV. This difference demonstrates the significant influence of the phonons on the ground state energy of the polaron. Moreover, the effect becomes more obvious as the quantum well width d decreases. The transition energy decreases as the well width increases. The results of the transition energy can be compared to the experiment results, so we urge an experimental observation of these properties in wurtzite ZnO/Mg0.3Zn0.7O QW.

Fig.  1. The ground energies and the transition energies of the polaron in wurtzite ZnO/Mg0.3Zn0.7O QWs as functions of the well width d. The short dash line is the results of the transition energy with phonons.

In Fig.  2, we calculate the contributions of different phonons (CF, IF, HS modes) to the ground state energies of the polaron in wurtzite ZnO/Mg0.3Zn0.7O QWs as functions of the well width d. To understand the total contribution from the three phonon modes, we also present it in Fig.  2(a) with the symbol line. Figure  2(a) shows that the total phonon contributions are remarkable, which have a larger negative contribution to the polaron ground state energy, and it decreases gradually with increasing well width. Figure  2(a) also shows that, when d is narrow, the CF modes contribute little to the polaronic ground state energy. As the well width increases, the contributions come from symmetric, antisymmetric, and their summation CF phonon modes to E1 increase rapidly at first but slowly increase later. This behavior occurs because, as the well width increases, the tunneling effect of the electron wave function gradually weakens and becomes a nearly free electron. At the same time, the increase in coupling between electrons and confined phonons strengthens the electron– CF phonon interaction, so it dominates the contribution to E1. At larger d, the interaction between electrons and CF phonon modes increases, making it more important to the contribution to E1. Furthermore, the contribution of the symmetric CF phonon mode is larger than that of the antisymmetric CF phonon mode.

Fig.  2. Contributions of phonons to the ground energies of the polarons in wurtzite ZnO/ MgxZn1− xO QWs as functions of the well width d. The contribution Δ Ee− ph separately contributed from the CF, IF, and HS phonon modes are shown in panels (a), (b), and (c). The symbol line is the total contribution from the different phonon modes in panel (a).

Figures  2(b) and 2(c) show the contributions from the IF and HS phonon modes, revealing that, when d is very small, the main contribution to the polaron ground state energies comes from the HS modes and IF modes. As d increases, the negative contributions from the IF modes decrease smoothly. This behavior occurs because the electron– IF-phonon coupling intensity decreases gradually as d increases, decreasing the contribution to polaronic ground state energies. Figure  2(b) also shows that the contribution of the symmetric IF phonon mode is larger than that of the antisymmetric IF phonon mode. As shown in Fig.  2(c), as d decreases, the negative contribution of the HS phonon mode (including symmetric and antisymmetric) to E1 decreases markedly. As d increases, the contribution decreases gradually. When d is sufficiently large, the contribution of the HS phonon mode to E1 approaches 0. This behavior occurs because the electronic localization strengthens as d increases, decreasing the coupling intensity between the electrons and HS phonons.

Figure  3 shows the contributions of the different phonon modes to the transition energy of the polaron with different QW widths. The contribution to the transition energy is defined as Δ Ee− ph = Δ Ee− ph (excited state)– Δ Ee− ph (ground state). This figure reveals that the total contribution of the phonon modes to the transition energy is negative and increases gradually with the QW width d. This is a comprehensive result of the contributions from the various phonon modes. The contributions of the various phonon modes to the transition energy change differently with increasing well width. The contribution of the CF phonons is positive, but the contribution of the IF and HS phonons is negative. Furthermore, the contribution of the HS phonons decreases slowly with QW width, whereas the contribution of the IF phonons maximizes at d ≈ 5  nm and then decreases slowly. The contribution of the CF phonons increases as d increases, quickly reaching a maximum at d ≈ 7  nm before decreasing gradually. This behavior can be explained physically as follow. With a fixed well width, the probability of an excited-state electron to tunnel through a barrier is greater than that of a ground-state electron. Thus, electrons interact with CF (HS, IF) phonons less (more) in the excited state than in the ground state.

Fig.  3. Contributions of phonons to the transition energies of the polaron in wurtzite ZnO/ Mg0.3Zn0.7O QWs as functions of the well width d.

In Fig.  4, we further calculate the contributions of various phonon modes to the ground state energies of the polaron in wurtzite ZnO/MgxZn1− xO QWs as functions of the composition x. Figure  4(a) shows that, as the composition x increases, the total contribution of phonons to the ground state energy increases nearly linearly. This is a comprehensive result of the contributions from the various phonon modes. Figure  4(a) also demonstrates that, as x increases, the contribution of CF phonons increases very smoothly. This behavior occurs because the coupling between the electrons and CF phonons strengthens as x increases. Both the symmetric and antisymmetric CF phonon modes follow the same trend. As shown in Fig.  4(b), as x increases, the contribution of the symmetric IF phonons to the ground state energy increases while the contribution of the antisymmetric IF phonons decreases. The total contribution still increases with x because the symmetric IF phonons contribute more than the antisymmetric phonons. Figure  4(c) shows that the contribution of the HS phonons decreases as x increases. This behavior occurs because the coupling between the electrons and HS phonons weakens with increasing x. As a result, x plays an important role in determining how the phonons contribute to the ground state energy.

Fig.  4. Contributions of phonons to the ground state energies of the polaron in wurtzite ZnO/ MgxZn1− xO QWs as functions of the composition x for given d = 12  nm. The contribution Δ Ee− ph separately contributed from the CF, IF, and HS phonon modes are shown in panels (a), (b), and (c). The symbol line is the total contribution from the different phonon modes.

Figure  5 shows the contributions of phonons to the transition energies of the polaron in wurtzite ZnO/MgxZn1− xO QWs as functions of the composition x. As the composition x increases, the contributions of various phonons decrease gradually. This behavior occurs because the quantum confinement of an electron strengthens as x increases. The tunneling probability of the electron to the barrier decreases, which slowly decreases the contributions of phonons to the transition energies.

Fig.  5. Contributions of phonons to the transition energies of the polaron in wurtzite ZnO/ MgxZn1− xO QWs as functions of the composition x.

Our results also show that the contributions induced by the LO-like confined, interface, and half-space phonon modes to the ground state energy of the polaron are approximately two orders of magnitude larger than that induced by the TO-like phonons; thus, the latter contribution can be ignored. Our calculation does not account for the propagating phonons because LO-like propagating phonons do not exist in ZnO/MgxZn1− xO QWs because of the condition of ε 1⊥ ε 1z < 0.[26]

4. Conclusion

We variationally calculated the phonon contributions from various optical– phonon modes to the ground state and transition energies as functions of the well width and Mg composition, considering the influence of confined optical phonon modes, interface-optical phonon modes, half-space phonon modes, as well as the anisotropy of the electron effective band mass, dielectric constant, and phonon frequency. Our main conclusions are summarized as follows.

(i) The interaction between optical phonon modes and electrons can effectively decrease the ground state energies. For QWs with narrower wells, the interface optical phonon and half-space phonon modes contribute more to the polaronic energy than the confined phonon modes; for a wider well width, this relation is reversed.

(ii) The contributions from the different phonon modes to the ground state and transition energies change differently with changing well width. The phonon modes contribute less to the ground state energy than to the excited state energies. However, the total contribution to the transition energies increases slightly and gradually as the quantum well width d increases.

(iii) As the composition x increases, the total contribution of phonons to the ground state energy increases nearly linearly. Both the CF (symmetric and antisymmetric) and symmetric IF phonon modes increase as the composition x increases; however, the contributions of the HS and antisymmetric IF phonon modes decrease as the composition x increases.

(iv) As the composition x increases, various phonon modes gradually contribute less to the transition energy of the polaron in wurtzite ZnO/MgxZn1− xO QWs.

(v) The contributions induced by the LO-like confined, interface, and half-space phonon modes to the ground state energy of the polaron are approximately two orders larger than that induced by the TO-like phonons, and the latter contribution can be ignored.

Reference
1 Nomura K, Ohta H, Ueda K, Kamiya T, Hirano M and Hosono H 2003 Science 300 1269 DOI:10.1126/science.1083212 [Cited within:1]
2 Ozgur U, Alivov Y I, Liu C, Teke A, Reshchikov M A, Dogan S, Avrutin V, Cho S J and Morkoc H 2005 J. Appl. Phys. 98 041301 DOI:10.1063/1.1992666 [Cited within:1]
3 Bagnall D M, Chen Y F, Zhu Z, Yao T, Shen M Y and Goto T 1998 Appl. Phys. Lett. 73 1038 DOI:10.1063/1.122077 [Cited within:1]
4 Gu S L, Zhang R, Zhou S M, Li S Z, Hang Y, Xu J and Liu H X 2006 Acta Phys. Sin. 55 1398(in Chinese) [Cited within:1]
5 Gruber T, Kirchner C, Kling R, Reuss F and Waag A 2004 Appl. Phys. Lett. 84 5359 DOI:10.1063/1.1767273 [Cited within:1]
6 Park S H 2007 J. Korean Phys. Soc. 51 1404 DOI:10.3938/jkps.51.1404 [Cited within:2]
7 Makino T, Chia C H, Tuan N T, Sun H D, Segawa Y, Kawasaki M, Ohtomo A, Tamura K and Koinuma H 2000 Appl. Phys. Lett. 77 975 DOI:10.1063/1.1289066 [Cited within:1]
8 Zhang B P, Binh N T, Wakatsuki K, Liu C Y, Segawa Y and Usami N 2005 Appl. Phys. Lett. 86 032105 DOI:10.1063/1.1850594 [Cited within:2]
9 Lee B C, Kim K V and Stroscio M A 1997 Phys. Rev. B 56 997 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.56.997 [Cited within:1]
10 bretagnon T, Lefebvre P, Guillet T, Taliercio T, Gil B and Morhain C 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 90 201912 DOI:10.1063/1.2740576 [Cited within:2]
11 Makino T, Chia C H, Tuan N T, Sun H D, Segawa Y, Kawasaki M, Ohtomo A, Tamura K and Koinuma H 2000 Appl. Phys. Lett. 77 1632 DOI:10.1063/1.1308540 [Cited within:1]
12 Sadofev S, Blumstengel S, Cui J, Puls J, Rogaschewski S, Schäfer P, Sadofyev Y G and Henneberger F 2005 Appl. Phys. Lett. 87 091903 DOI:10.1063/1.2034113 [Cited within:1]
13 Coli G and Bajaj K K 2001 Appl. Phys. Lett. 78 2861 DOI:10.1063/1.1370116 [Cited within:2]
14 Fan W J, Xia J B, Agus P A, Tan S T, Yu S F and Sun X W 2006 J. Appl. Phys. 99 013702 DOI:10.1063/1.2150266 [Cited within:1]
15 Y M, Su S C and Mei T 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. 90 096801(in Chinese) [Cited within:1]
16 Xu T N, Wu H Z, Qiu D J and Chen N B 2003 Chin. Phys. Lett. 20 1829 DOI:10.1088/0256-307X/20/10/349 [Cited within:1]
17 Fan W J, Abiyasa A P, Tan S T, Yu S F, Sun X W, Xia J B, Yeo Y C, Li M F and Chong T C 2006 J. Cryst. Growth 287 28 DOI:10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2005.10.037 [Cited within:1]
18 Furno E, Chiaria S, Penna M, Bellotti E and Goano M 2010 J. Electron. Mater. 39 936 DOI:10.1007/s11664-010-1163-y [Cited within:1]
19 Lin D Y, Huang T P, Kao Y C, Huang C C, Kuo H C and Chang L 2011 Physica E 44 659 DOI:10.1016/j.physe.2011.11.001 [Cited within:1]
20 Weston L, Cui X Y, Delley B and Stampfl C 2012 Phys. Rev. B 86 205322 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.86.205322 [Cited within:1]
21 Stölzel M, Kupper J, Brand t M, Muller A, Benndorf C, Lorenz M and Grundmann M 2012 J. Appl. Phys. 111 063701 DOI:10.1063/1.3693555 [Cited within:1]
22 Wang L, Ma J G and Xu H Y 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 102 031905 DOI:10.1063/1.4788685 [Cited within:1]
23 Su S C, Zhu H and Zhang L X 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 103 131104 DOI:10.1063/1.4822265 [Cited within:1]
24 Fang X, Wang X H and Zhao D X 2014 Physica E 59 93 DOI:10.1016/j.physe.2013.12.010 [Cited within:1]
25 Puls J, Sadofev S, Schäfer P and Henneberger F 2014 Phys. Rev. B 89 081301 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.89.081301 [Cited within:1]
26 Lee B C, Kim K W, Stroscio M A and Dutta M 1998 Phys. Rev. B 58 4860 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.58.4860 [Cited within:7]
27 Shi J J 2003 Phys. Rev. B 68 165335 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.68.165335 [Cited within:1]
28 Shi J J, Chu X L and Goldys E M 2004 Phys. Rev. B 70 115318 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.70.115318 [Cited within:1]
29 Zhao F Q, Guo Z Z and Zhu J 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 116 013512 DOI:10.1063/1.4887075 [Cited within:1]
30 Lambrecht W, Rodina A V, Limpijunmnong S, Segall B and Meyer B K 2002 Phys. Rev. B 65 075207 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.65.075207 [Cited within:1]
31 Ashkenov N, Mbenkum B N, Bundesmann C, Riede V, Lorenz M, Spemann D, Kaidashev E M, Kasic A, Schubert M, Grundmann M, Wagner G, Neumann H, Darakchieva V, Arwin H and Monemar B 2003 J. Appl. Phys. 93 126 DOI:10.1063/1.1526935 [Cited within:1]
32 Wu H Z, Qiu D J, Cai Y J, Xu X L and Chen N B 2002 J. Cryst. Growth 245 50 DOI:10.1016/S0022-0248(02)01711-6 [Cited within:1]
33 Coleman V, Buda M, Tan H, Jagadish C, Phillips M, Koike K, Sasa S, Inoue M and Yano M 2006 Semcicod. Sci. Technol. 21 L25 DOI:10.1088/0268-1242/21/3/L02 [Cited within:1]
34 Janoti A, Segev D and van del Walle C G 2006 Phys. Rev. B 74 045202 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.74.045202 [Cited within:1]
35 Julier M, Campo J, Gil B and Lascaray J P 1998 Phys. Rev. B 57 R6791 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.57.R6791 [Cited within:1]
36 Lawes G, Risbud A S, Ramirez A P and Seshadri R 2005 Phys. Rev. B 71 045201 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.71.045201 [Cited within:1]