Time evolution of negative binomial optical field in a diffusion channel
Liu Tang-Kun†a), Wu Pan-Pana), Shan Chuan-Jiaa), Liu Ji-Binga), Fan Hong-Yib)
College of Physics and Electronic Science, Hubei Normal University, Huangshi 435002, China
Department of Material Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China

Corresponding author. E-mail: tkliuhs@163.com

*Project supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. 2012CB922103), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11175113, 11274104, and 11404108), and the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province, China (Grant No. 2011CDA021).

Abstract

We find the time evolution law of a negative binomial optical field in a diffusion channel. We reveal that by adjusting the diffusion parameter, the photon number can be controlled. Therefore, the diffusion process can be considered a quantum controlling scheme through photon addition.

PACS: 03.65.–w; 42.50.–p; 02.90.+p
Keyword: negative binomial optical field; time evolution; diffusion channel; integration within an ordered product (IWOP) of operators
1. Introduction

In a recent paper, [1] we have pointed out that an initial number state | l⟩ ⟨ l| undergoing through a diffusion channel, described by the master equation[2, 3]

would become a new photon optical field, named the Laguerre-polynomial-weighted chaotic state, whose density operator is

Here ∷ is the normal ordering symbol, and Ll is the Laguerre polynomial. Experimentally, this new mixed state may be implemented, i.e., when a number state enters into a diffusion channel. Remarkably, this state possesses photon number Tr(a) = l + κ t at time t, so we can control the photon number by adjusting the diffusion parameter κ ; this mechanism may have applications in quantum controlling.

To go a step further, we derive the evolution law of a negative binomial state (NBS) in a diffusion channel in this paper. Physically, when an atom absorbs some photons from a thermo light beam, the corresponding photon field will be in a negative binomial state. We are thus challenged by the questions: how an initial NBS evolves in a diffusion channel, what is the final state, and what is the photon number distribution in the final state. To the best of our knowledge, such questions have not been touched on in the literature before.

Our paper is arranged as follows. In Section 2, we convert the density operator of NBS into the normally ordered form. In Section 3, based on the Kraus-operator solution corresponding to the diffusion channel, we find the evolution law of NBS in the diffusion channel. Then in Section 4, we calculate the photon number distribution in the final state.

2. Normally ordered form of the density operator of the negative binomial state

Corresponding to the negative-binomial formula

there exists a negative-binomial state of quantum optical field[4]

where is the Fock state, a is the photon creation operator, and | 0⟩ is the vacuum state in the Fock space. NBS is intermediate between a pure thermal state and a fully coherent state, and its nonclassical properties and algebraic characteristics have already been studied in detail in Refs.  [5] and [6]. The photon number average in this state is

Using [a, a] = 1 and one can reform Eq.  (4) as

where ρ c denotes a chaotic field

Equation  (6) tells us that when some photons are detected for a chaotic state, e.g., after detecting several photons, the chaotic light field exhibits a negative-binomial distribution. One can further show TrΣ c = 1, and

is the mean number of photons in the chaotic light field. According to the Bose– Einstein distribution, where β = 1/(kBT), kB is the Boltzmann constant, and ω is the frequency of the chaotic light field. We can derive the normally ordered form of the density operator of NBS. Let ln(1 − γ ) = f, then nc = e  f/(1 − e  f). By introducing the coherent state representation and employing the technique of integration within an ordered product (IWOP) of operators, [7, 8] we reform Eq.  (6) as

where we have used and the definition of Laguerre polynomials

Equation  (9) is quite different from Eq.  (1), so they represent different optical fields.

3. Evolution law of the negative binomial state in a diffusion channel

In Ref.  [9], by using the entangled state representation and the IWOP technique, we have derived the infinite sum form of ρ (t)

where

satisfies and is trace conservative.

Now we examine the time evolution of the negative binomial optical field in a diffusion channel. Substituting into Eq.  (11), we have

in which we first consider the summation over n. Using

we have

From Eq.  (9), we have

It follows

Substituting Eq.  (17) into Eq.  (15) and multiplying we obtain

Then using the new generating function formula about the Laguerre polynomials[10]

we obtain

For ρ (t) in Eq.  (13), we need to perform the summation over m. Using the summation technique within normal ordering, we have

where

Comparing ρ (t) in Eq.  (21) with ρ 0 in Eq.  (9), we can see the big difference. Now we must check if Trρ (t) = 1. In fact, using the coherent state’ s completeness relation and

we do have

4. Photon number average in the final state

Now we evaluate the photon number average in the final state. Using Eqs.  (10) and (21)– (24), we have

Comparing with Eq.  (5), we find that after passing through a diffusion channel, the photon average of NBS varies from (s + 1) (1 − γ )/ γ to tk + (s + 1) (1 − γ )/ γ ,

This result is encouraging, since by adjusting the diffusion parameter κ , we can control the photon number. When κ is small, it slightly increases by an amount of κ t. Therefore, the diffusion process of NBS can be considered as a quantum controlling scheme through photon addition.

Reference
1 Fan H Y, Lou S Y and Pan X Y 2014 Sci. Chin. Phys. Mech. Astron. 57 1649 [Cited within:1]
2 Carmichael H J 1999 Statistical Methods in Ouantum Optics I, Master Equation and Fokker-Planck Equations Berlin Springer-Verlag [Cited within:1]
3 Orszag M 2000 Quantum Optics Berlin Springer-Verlag [Cited within:1]
4 Agarwal G S 1992 Phys. Rev. A 45 1787 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevA.45.1787 [Cited within:1]
5 Fan H Y and Jing S C 1994 Phys. Rev. A 50 1909 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevA.50.1909 [Cited within:1]
6 Fan H Y and Jing S C 1995 Commun. Theor. Phys. 24 377 DOI:10.1088/0253-6102/24/3/377 [Cited within:1]
7 Fan H Y, Lu H L and Fan Y 2006 Ann. Phys. 321 480 DOI:10.1016/j.aop.2005.09.011 [Cited within:1]
8 Fan H Y 2003 J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclass. Opt. 5 R147 DOI:10.1088/1464-4266/5/4/201 [Cited within:1]
9 Liu T K, Shan C J, Liu J B and Fan H Y 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 030303 DOI:10.1088/1674-1056/23/3/030303 [Cited within:1]
10 Fan H Y, Lou S Y, Pan X Y and Da C 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 240301(in Chinese) DOI:10.7498/aps.62.240301 [Cited within:1]