Effect of the dispersion on multipartite continuous-variable entanglement in optical parametric amplifier*
Zhao Chao-Yinga),b)†
College of Science, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018, China
State Key Laboratory of Quantum Optics and Quantum Optics Devices, Institute of Opto-Electronics, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China

Corresponding author. E-mail: zchy49@hdu.edu.cn

*Project supported by the State Key Laboratory of Quantum Optics and Quantum Optics Devices, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China (Grant No. KF201401) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11404084).

Abstract

Based on the quantum fluctuations, we adopt the method of generalized V1 criterion to investigate multipartite entanglement characteristics in an optical parametric amplification system with the consideration of dispersion. The nonlinear interaction becomes strong because of the existence of dispersion coefficient σ . Considering the influence of dispersion factor σ , with increasing the pump parameter μ , the value of minimum variance V1 decreases and the squeezing curve nearly equals 1/(1 + μ ). The larger particle number N results in a smaller variance and higher entanglement.

Keyword: 03.65.Ud; 42.50.Lc; 42.65.Yj; dispersion; multipartite entanglement; optical parametric amplifier
1. Introduction

The continuous variable (CV) entanglement light has been an interesting research subject theoretically and experimentally, as it could be used as a basic resource for this new type of information processing.[1] The experimental achievements include demonstrations of quantum teleportation, [2] quantum dense coding, [3] and quantum cryptographic communication[4] by using the squeezed light. The bipartite CV entanglement states of a light field were studied in Refs.  [5] and [6] and demonstrated experimentally[7] for a non-degenerate optical parametric amplifier (NOPA). The production of tripartite CV entangled beams by mixing squeezed states with linear optical elements can be found in Refs.  [8]– [13]. The genuine four-partite CV entanglement has been experimentally generated.[14] Pfister et al. proposed multipartite CV entanglement from concurrent nonlinearities through the generalization of bipartite interaction Hamiltonian to N-partite interaction Hamiltonian .[15] Based on previous work, [16] we derive the generalized V1 criterion for multipartite entanglement.[17]

At present, the squeezing and entanglement of pulse frequency combs have attracted a great deal of attention because of their potential applications in quantum communication. The dispersion is one of the critical factors. In order to avoid the dispersion effect, the interaction lengths may be restricted to being very short, which limits the degree of squeezing.[1821] Takahashi et al. investigated the effects of dispersion on both quadrature squeezing and photon statistics by varying the interaction length when pumping a PPLN crystal with fs pulses.[22] We studied the phase mismatched phenomenon resulting from the dispersion effect, by periodically changing the polarity of crystal to obtain the optimal squeezing condition, and obtained the characteristic of EPR entanglements.[23] In this paper, we discuss the influence of the dispersion effect, find the solution of the time-dependent FPE with the dispersion, and investigate the entanglement characteristics for N = 2– 5 partite. The investigation is especially important for the pulse OPO and the quantum characteristics of pulse frequency combs.

2. Theory model

The Hamiltonian describing this system for multipartite entanglement is

where

According to the non-degenerate mode operators b1, … , bN obtained by Ref.  [17] and the standard technique, [24] we define α j = 〈 bj〉 , j = 1 ∼ N, α 0 = 〈 a0 〉 . Assuming the dynamic equation to have the initial values α 10 = α 20 = · · · = α N0 = 1, α 00 = 0, we have α 1 = α 2 = · · · = α N . Considering the interaction between the medium and the optical field, we have the nonlinear susceptibility χ = χ ′ + iχ ″ , where χ ′ is the revised refractive index, χ ″ is the gain, the dispersion effect is neglected, and only the imaginary part χ ″ is retained. The semi-classical equations describing the interactions between pump wave α 0 (τ ) and parametric waves α 1 (τ ), α 2 (τ ) become[25]

Here τ = γ 1t is the dimensionless time, γ 1 and γ 2 are the damping rates, and decay ratio γ r = γ 2/γ 1, is the amplitude of external coherent field, and m = N − 1 is the number of particles.

Considering the influence of dispersion,

is the dielectric coefficient, the refractive index of the nonlinear susceptibility is

the real part n′ denotes the revised refractive index when the light with different frequencies passes through a medium, whereas the imaginary part n″ denotes the gain.[23] When α 1 = α 2, in terms of Eq.  (2), the semi-classical equation for the DOPA system becomes

Assuming α 0 to be real and writing the complex α 1 as containing real and imaginary parts, equation  (3) turns into

We take the parameters and assume the dispersion factor σ = χ χ ″ = 0.5, the numerical solutions of α 0, and β 1 with γ r = 0.5, η = 1/1000, and μ = 2 are depicted in Fig.  1.

Fig.  1. Relations among the pump wave α 0 (solid line), steady state value of the pump wave (straight line), and the parameter wave β 1 (dashed line) for σ = 0, 1, N = 2– 5 respectively.

Figures  1(a) and 1(b) describe the relations among pump wave α 0, steady state value of the pump wave, and parameter wave β 1 for σ = 0, 1, N = 2– 5, respectively. Considering the effect of dispersion, the straight line corresponds to steady state value , the solid line corresponds to pump wave α 0, and the dashed line corresponds to parameter wave β 1 . Comparing Fig.  1(b) with Fig.  1(a), we have , where denotes the steady state value of the pump wave without dispersion. The squeezing curve contracts to the left, nearly equals 1/(1 + μ ).

3. Multipartite entanglement for NOPA system with dispersion

Considering the effect of dispersion, according to Eq.  (2), the complex , and the semi-classical equations for the NOPA system turn into[26]

Considering the initial condition , α 00 = 0, the numerical solutions of Eq.  (5) yield the dependences of the parametric functions α 1, α 2 on the squeezing parameter r

The quantum fluctuation of the time-dependent linearly driven NOPA system is[27]

The correlation between X1 and Y2 is

The variance criterion V1 is[23]

In the following, we investigate the influence of dispersion on multipartite entanglement. (i) μ = 0.5 for below-threshold, (ii) μ = 1 for the threshold, (iii) μ = 2 for the above-threshold, and (iv) μ = 10 for far-above-threshold. The results of numerical calculation of V1 versus r with η = 1/1000 and γ r = 10 for N = 2– 5 are depicted in Figs.  2 and 3.

Figures  2 and 3 depict the minimum variance V1 as a function of squeezing parameter r = μ τ for σ = 0, 1, respectively. From bottom to top, the plots are for bipartite entanglement (N = 2, solid curve), tripartite entanglement (N = 3, narrow dashed curve), four-particle entanglement (N = 4, wide dashed curve), and five-particle entanglement (N = 5, dashed– dotted curve). Given dispersion factor σ , with the increase of pump parameter μ , the value of minimum variance V1 decreases. Comparing Fig.  3 with Fig.  2, the scope of entanglement decreases from 10 to 2. The phase increases with the increase of pump parameter μ , namely φ = μ r = 10 × 1.5 ≈ 5π , the polarity of gain medium changes many times, the net gain descends as shown in Figs.  2 and 3.

Fig.  2. Plots of variance V1 versus τ with σ = 0, μ = 0.5 (a), μ = 1 (b), μ = 2 (c), μ = 10 (d).

Fig.  3. Plots of variance V1 versus τ with σ = 1, μ = 0.5 (a), μ = 1 (b), μ = 2 (c), and μ = 10 (d).

4. Conclusions

In this paper, we investigate the multipartite entanglement of FNOPA system with considering the effect of dispersion, the results are as shown in Figs.  1– 3. The nonlinear interaction becomes strong due to dispersion coefficient σ . With the increase of pump parameter μ , the minimum variance V1 decreases. The minimum variance V1 decreases with the increase of the number N of particles.

Reference
1 Braunstein S L and Loock P V 2005 Rev. Mod. Phys. 77 513 DOI:10.1103/RevModPhys.77.513 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 44.982]
2 Furusawa A, Sørensen J L, Braunstein S L, Fuchs C A, Kimble H J and Polzik E S 1998 Science 282 706 DOI:10.1126/science.282.5389.706 [Cited within:1]
3 Li X, Pan Q, Jing J, Zhang J, Xie C and Peng K 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 047904 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.047904 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 7.943]
4 Zhang J, Xie C D and Peng K C 2003 Europhys. Lett. 61 579 DOI:10.1209/epl/i2003-00134-y [Cited within:1] [JCR: 2.26]
5 Reid M D and Drummond P D 1988 Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 2731 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.60.2731 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 7.943]
6 Reid M D 1989 Phys. Rev. A 40 913 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevA.40.913 [Cited within:1]
7 Ou Z Y, Pereira S F, Kimble H J and Peng K C 1992 Phys, Rev. Lett. 68 3663 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.3663 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 7.943]
8 Pereira S F, Ou Z Y and Kimble H J 2002 Phys. Rev. A 62 042311 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 3.042]
9 Jing J, Zhang J, Yan Y, Zhao F, Xie C and Peng K 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 167903 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.167903 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 7.943]
10 Aoki T, Takei N, Yonezawa H, Wakui K, Hiraoka T, Furusawa A and Loock P V 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 080404 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.080404 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 7.943]
11 Guo J, Zou H X, Zhai Z H, Zhang J X and Gao J R 2005 Phys. Rev. A 71 034305 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevA.71.034305 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 3.042]
12 Loock P V and Furusawa A 2003 Phys. Rev. A 67 052315 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevA.67.052315 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 3.042]
13 Olsen M K and Bradley A S 2006 J. Phys. B: At. Mod. Opt. Phys. 39 127 DOI:10.1088/0953-4075/39/1/011 [Cited within:1]
14 Tan A H, Wang Y, Jin X L, Su X L, Jia X J, Zhang J, Xie C D and Peng K C 2008 Phys. Rev. A 78 013828 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevA.78.013828 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 3.042]
15 Pfister O, Feng S, Jennings G, Pooser R and Xie D R 2004 Phys. Rev. A 70 020302 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevA.70.020302 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 3.042]
16 Zhao C Y and Tan W H 2007 J. Mod. Opt. 54 97 DOI:10.1080/09500340600879270 [Cited within:1]
17 Zhao C Y, Tan W H, Xu J R and Ge F 2011 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 28 1067 [Cited within:2] [JCR: 2.21]
18 Werner M J, Raymer M G, Beck M and Drummond P D 1995 Phys. Rev. A 52 4202 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevA.52.4202 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 3.042]
19 Wenger J, Tualie-Brouri R and Grangier P 2004 Opt. Lett. 29 1267 DOI:10.1364/OL.29.001267 [Cited within:1]
20 Lu D M Acta Phys. Sin. 2014 63 DOI:10.7498/aps.63.0603012014060301(inChinese) [Cited within:1] [JCR: 1.016] [CJCR: 1.691]
21 Liu P, Feng X M and Jin G R 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 030310 DOI:10.1088/1674-1056/23/3/030310 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 1.148] [CJCR: 1.2429]
22 Takahashi Y, Soderholm J, Hirano K, Namekata N, Machida S, Mori S, Kurimura S, Komatsu S and Inoue S 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77 043801 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevA.77.043801 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 3.042]
23 Zhao C Y and Tan W H 2006 J. Mod. Opt. 53 1965 DOI:10.1080/09500340600733402 [Cited within:3]
24 Carmichael H J 1999 Statistical Methods in Quantum Optics I Berlin Springer [Cited within:1]
25 Zhao C Y and Tan W H 2011 J. Mod. Opt. 58 1611 DOI:10.1080/09500340.2011.610905 [Cited within:1]
26 Zhao C Y and Tan W H 2007 Chin. Phys. 16 644 DOI:10.1088/1009-1963/16/3/015 [Cited within:1]
27 Tan W H 2009 Introduction to Quantum Optics I Beijing Science Press(in Chinese) [Cited within:1]