New layered metal oxides as positive electrode materials for room-temperature sodium-ion batteries*
Mu Lin-Qin, Hu Yong-Sheng†, Chen Li-Quan
Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

Corresponding author. E-mail: yshu@aphy.iphy.ac.cn

*

Abstract

In order to achieve better Na storage performance, most layered oxide positive electrode materials contain toxic and expensive transition metals Ni and/or Co, which are also widely used for lithium-ion batteries. Here we report a new quaternary layered oxide consisting of Cu, Fe, Mn, and Ti transition metals with O3-type oxygen stacking as a positive electrode for room-temperature sodium-ion batteries. The material can be simply prepared by a high-temperature solid-state reaction route and delivers a reversible capacity of 94 mAh/g with an average storage voltage of 3.2 V. This paves the way for cheaper and non-toxic batteries with high Na storage performance.

Keyword: 82.45.Yz; 82.47.Aa; 82.47.Cb; 84.60.–h; layered oxides; positive electrode; sodium-ion battery; energy storage
1. Introduction

The rapid development of renewable and sustainable energies requires large scale energy storage systems due to their characteristics of intermittence, randomness, and instability.[1, 2] Sodium-ion batteries operated at room-temperature have been attracting increasing interest for such applications because of the abundance of Na resources and the potential low cost compared to lithium-ion batteries, which are more suitable for portable electronic devices and electric vehicles.[36] Up to now, numerous positive electrode materials with different crystal structures have been investigated for Na extraction/insertion.[714] Among them, layered metal oxides have long been exploited as an important class of hosts for rechargeable batteries.[13, 1535] For instance, LiCoO2 is one of the most famous and successful positive electrode materials for lithium-ion batteries.[1] Since the discovery of NaxCoO2, which is able to store Na, [15] many other layered oxides have been extensively studied. However, in order to achieve better Na storage performance, most of them contain toxic and expensive transition metals of Ni and/or Co, [15, 16, 18, 21, 2325, 2835] which are also commonly and widely used for lithium-ion batteries. This will limit their large-scale application. Therefore, it is essential to explore new layered oxides with cheaper and environmentally-benign transition metals. For example, we recently found that the Cu2+ /Cu3+ redox couple is highly reversible in Na-containing layered oxides with high operation voltage.[36] This important finding reveals that we can use cheaper, non-toxic Cu instead of Ni or Co as a building block for the layered oxides. In this work, we further demonstrate that we can incorporate Cu and Fe into an O3-type layered oxide to form quaternary Na0.9Cu1/4Fe1/4Mn1/4Ti1/4O2, which shows a good Na storage performance in terms of both high storage capacity and high operating voltage.

2. Experiment

The Na0.9Cu1/4Fe1/4Mn1/4Ti1/4O2 material was synthesized by a simple solid-state reaction using precursors of Na2CO3 (99%), CuO (99.8%), Fe2O3 (99.5%), Mn2O3 (99%), and TiO2 (99.8%). They were ground uniformly in stoichiometric proportion and heated in air at 850  ° C for 15  h to form the final products. Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) was performed on a Bruker D8 Advance diffractometer equipped with a Cu Kα radiation source (λ 1 = 1.54060  Å , λ 2 = 1.54439  Å ). The morphologies and elemental mapping of the materials were investigated by a scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Hitachi S-4800).

The working electrode was prepared by spreading the slurry of the active material of Na0.9Cu1/4Fe1/4Mn1/4Ti1/4O2 (80  wt.%), acetylene black (15  wt.%), and the polyvinylidene fluoride (PVdF) (5  wt.%) binder on an Al foil. The working electrodes were dried at 110  ° C under a vacuum for 10  h. The electrolyte was 1  M NaClO4 in propylene carbonate. The coin-type (CR2032) cells were assembled with a pure sodium foil as the counter electrode and a glass fiber as the separator in an argon-filled glove box. The charge and discharge measurements were carried out on a Land BT2000 battery test system (Wuhan, China) in the voltage range of 2.5– 4.0  V at room temperature.

3. Results and discussion

Typically, layered metal oxides NaxMO2 (M: transition metal) can be mainly categorized as either O3 or P2 according to the definitions by Delmas et al.[37] The letters O and P represent the Na coordination environments of octahedral and prismatic sites, while the numbers refer to the number of repeating MO2 slabs in the unit cell. The formation of O3- or P2-type depends on the sodium content and the synthetic conditions. Figure  1 shows the XRD pattern of the Na0.9Cu1/4Fe1/4Mn1/4Ti1/4O2 sample synthesized at 850  ° C in air. For comparison, the standard XRD pattern of O3-NaFeO2 is also displayed in Fig.  1. It can be seen that all of the diffraction peaks of the resulting sample are in good agreement with those of NaFeO2, indicating a typical O3 phase material with no impurity. By careful examination, some peaks such as (003) and (006) are found to shift slightly to lower angles compared with those of NaFeO2. This observation is related to the Na content in this Na-deficient material. In general, in NaMO2, when a small amount of Na is extracted from the layered structure, the c axis expands slightly, leading to a downshift of the (00l) peaks.

Fig.  1. XRD pattern of as-synthesized Na0.9Cu1/4Fe1/4Mn1/4Ti1/4O2 sample and the standard JCPDS of α -NaFeO2.

Figure  2(a) shows a typical SEM image of the quaternary Na0.9Cu1/4Fe1/4Mn1/4Ti1/4O2 sample. The particle sizes are in the range from 2  μ m to 5  μ m. The surface morphology of the sample is revealed as steps in Fig.  2(b), which is a typical feature of the layered oxides. In order to check the rough distribution of four transition metals, energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) was performed. The EDS elemental mapping results in Fig.  3 reveal a homogeneous distribution of Cu, Fe, Mn, and Ti elements in the material. No aggregation of any single element was observed.

Fig.  2. Typical SEM images with different magnifications of the Na0.9Cu1/4Fe1/4Mn1/4Ti1/4O2 sample.

Fig.  3. EDS elemental mapping of the Na0.9Cu1/4Fe1/4Mn1/4Ti1/4O2 sample: (a) SEM image, (b)– (f) the corresponding elemental mapping of Na, Cu, Fe, Mn, and Ti, respectively.

To investigate the Na de-intercalation/intercalation behavior in the layered Na0.9Cu1/4Fe1/4Mn1/4Ti1/4O2 electrode, galvanostatic charge and discharge at a current rate of C/10 (10  mA/g) were carried out in sodium half cells. The results are shown in Fig.  4(a). In the first charge process, a short plateau at ca. 3.2  V was observed followed by a long slope until 4.0  V. This short plateau indicates a two-phase reaction with a phase transition from O3 to P3, which is a common characteristic of O3-type materials. The other feature, at the end of the discharge profile, is a short plateau at ca. 3.0  V, which is much higher than that of other O3-type materials such as O3-NaFe1/3Ni1/3Mn1/3O2, O3-NaNi0.5Mn0.5O2, NaxFe0.5Mn0.5O2, Na[Ni0.4 Fe0.2Mn0.2Ti0.2]O2.[24, 23, 26, 30, 33] This could be due to the incorporation of Cu and/or Ti elements into the transition metal layer.

Fig.  4. (a) The typical first galvanostatic charge and discharge profiles of the Na0.9Cu1/4Fe1/4Mn1/4Ti1/4O2 electrode cycled between 2.5  V and 4.0  V at a current rate of C/10. (b) Cycle performance of the Na0.9Cu1/4Fe1/4Mn1/4Ti1/4O2 electrode cycled between 2.5  V and 4.0  V at a current rate of 1C.

The first charge and discharge capacities are 110  mAh/g and 94  mAh/g, respectively, corresponding to a Coulombic efficiency of 85%. The average discharge voltage is ca. 3.2  V. This high operation voltage could be attributed to the co-existence of Cu2+ /Cu3+ and Fe3+ /Fe4+ redox couples with a relatively high voltage in the transition metal layer. The resulting quaternary Na0.9Cu1/4Fe1/4Mn1/4Ti1/4O2 also exhibits moderate rate capability and cyclic performance as shown in Fig.  4(b). The charge and discharge capacities at a current rate of 1C are 95.5  mAh/g and 78  mAh/g, respectively. After 90 cycles, capacity retention of 60% was achieved.

4. Conclusion

In this work, following our first discovery of the high reversibility of the Cu2+ /Cu3+ redox couple in Na-containing layered positive electrode materials, we further demonstrate that Cu and Fe can be incorporated into an O3-type layered oxide to form Na0.9Cu1/4Fe1/4Mn1/4Ti1/4O2, which was prepared by a simple solid-state reaction method. The resulting material is able to deliver a reversible capacity of 94  mAh/g with moderate rate capability and cyclic stability. We believe that the Na storage performance can be further improved in this series of new layered oxides through tuning the compositions of NaaCu1− xyzdFexMnyTizDdO2 (D: dopant, e.g., Li, Mg, Al, etc., 0< x< 1, 0< y< 1, 0 ≤ z< 1, 0 ≤ d< 1, 0.6< a ≤ 1) and controlling how oxygen stacks to form O3, P2, O'3, P3 , etc., which will show great promise for practical application in sodium-ion batteries.

Reference
1 Armand M and Tarascon J M 2008 Nature 451 652 DOI:10.1038/451652a [Cited within:2] [JCR: 38.597]
2 Yang Z, Zhang J, Kintner-Meyer M C, Lu X, Choi D, Lemmon J P and Liu J 2011 Chem. Rev. 111 3577 DOI:10.1021/cr100290v [Cited within:1] [JCR: 41.298]
3 Kim S W, Seo D H, Ma X, Ceder G and Kang K 2012 Adv. Energy Mater. 2 710 DOI:10.1002/aenm.201200026 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 10.043]
4 Palomares V, Casas-Cabanas M, Castillo-Martínez E, Han M H and Rojo T 2013 Energy Environ. Sci. 6 2312 DOI:10.1039/c3ee41031e [Cited within:1] [JCR: 11.653]
5 Pan H, Hu Y S and Chen L 2013 Energy Environ. Sci. 6 2338 DOI:10.1039/c3ee40847g [Cited within:1] [JCR: 11.653]
6 Slater M D, Kim D, Lee E and Johnson C S 2013 Adv. Funct. Mater. 23 947 DOI:10.1002/adfm.v23.8 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 9.765]
7 Doeff M M, Peng M Y, Ma Y and Jonghe L C D 1994 J. Electrochem. Soc. 141L145 DOI:10.1149/1.2059323 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 2.588]
8 Jian Z, Han W, Lu X, Yang H, Hu Y S, Zhou J, Zhou Z, Li J, Chen W, Chen D and Chen L 2013 Adv. Energy Mater. 3 156 DOI:10.1002/aenm.201200558 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 10.043]
9 Pan H, Lu X, Yu X, Hu Y S, Li H, Yang X Q and Chen L 2013 Adv. Energy Mater. 3 1186 DOI:10.1002/aenm.201300139 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 10.043]
10 Sun Y, Zhao L, Pan H, Lu X, Gu L, Hu Y S, Li H, Armand M, Ikuhara Y, Chen L and Huang X 2013 Nat. Commun. 4 1870 DOI:10.1038/ncomms2878 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 10.015]
11 Wang Y, Yu X, Xu S, Bai J, Xiao R, Hu Y S, Li H, Yang X Q, Chen L and Huang X 2013 Nat. Commun. 4 2365 DOI:10.1038/ncomms3365 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 10.015]
12 Barpand a P, Oyama G, Nishimura S, Chung S C and Yamada A 2014 Nat. Commun. 5 4358 DOI:10.1038/ncomms5358 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 10.015]
13 Kubota K, Yabuuchi N, Yoshida H, Dahbi M and Komaba S 2014 MRS Bulletin 39 416 DOI:10.1557/mrs.2014.85 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 5.024]
14 Li Y, Xu S, Wu X, Yu J, Wang Y, Hu Y S, Li H C and Huang X 2015 J. Mater. Chem. A 3 71 DOI:10.1039/C4TA05451B [Cited within:1]
15 Delmas C, Braconnier J J, Fouassier C and Hagenmuller P 1981 Solid State Ionics 3–4 165 DOI:10.1016/0167-2738(81)90076-X [Cited within:3] [JCR: 2.046]
16 Braconnier J J, Delmas C and Hagenmuller P 1982 Mater. Res. Bull. 17 993 DOI:10.1016/0025-5408(82)90124-6 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 1.913]
17 Mendiboure A, Delmas C and Hagenmuller P 1985 J. Solid State Chem. 57 323 DOI:10.1016/0022-4596(85)90194-X [Cited within:1] [JCR: 2.04]
18 Lu Z and Dahn J R 2001 J. Electrochem. Soc. 148A1225 DOI:10.1149/1.1407247 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 2.588]
19 Okada S, Takahashi Y, Kiyabu T, Doi T, Yamaki J and Nishida T 2006210th ECS Meeting Abstracts, MA2006-02, 201 [Cited within:1]
20 Komaba S, Takei C, Nakayama T, Ogata A and Yabuuchi N 2010 Electrochem. Commun. 12 355 DOI:10.1016/j.elecom.2009.12.033 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 4.425]
21 Carlier D, Cheng J H, Berthelot R, Guignard M, Yoncheva M, Stoyanova R, Hwang B J and Delmas C 2011 Dalton Trans. 40 9306 DOI:10.1039/c1dt10798d [Cited within:1]
22 Kim D, Kang S H, Slater M, Rood S, Vaughey J T, Karan N, Balasubramanian M and Johnson C S 2011 Adv. Energy Mater. 1 333 DOI:10.1002/aenm.v1.3 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 10.043]
23 Kim D, Lee E, Slater M, Lu W, Rood S and Johnson C S 2012 Electrochem. Commun. 18 66 DOI:10.1016/j.elecom.2012.02.020 [Cited within:2] [JCR: 4.425]
24 Komaba S, Yabuuchi N, Nakayama T, Ogata A, Ishikawa T and Nakai I 2012 Inorg. Chem. 51 6211 DOI:10.1021/ic300357d [Cited within:1] [JCR: 4.593]
25 Sathiya M, Hemalatha K, Ramesha K, Tarascon J M and Prakash A S 2012 Chem. Mater. 24 1846 DOI:10.1021/cm300466b [Cited within:1] [JCR: 8.238]
26 Yabuuchi N, Kajiyama M, Iwatate J, Nishikawa H, Hitomi S, Okuyama R, Usui R, Yamada Y and Komaba S 2012 Nat. Mater. 11 DOI:10.1038/nmat3309 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 35.749]
27 Yabuuchi N, Yoshida H and Komaba S 2012 Electrochemistry 80 716 DOI:10.5796/electrochemistry.80.716 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 0.934]
28 Vassilaras P, Ma X, Li X and Ceder G 2013 J. Electrochem. Soc. 160A207 DOI:10.1149/2.023302jes [Cited within:1] [JCR: 2.588]
29 Yabuuchi N, Yano M, Yoshida H, Kuze S and Komaba S 2013 J. Electrochem. Soc. 160A3131 DOI:10.1149/2.018305jes [Cited within:1] [JCR: 2.588]
30 Yoshida H, Yabuuchi N and Komaba S 2013 Electrochem. Commun. 34 60 DOI:10.1016/j.elecom.2013.05.012 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 4.425]
31 Lee E, Lu J, Ren Y, Luo X, Zhang X, Wen J, Miller D, DeWahl, AHackney S and Key B 2014 Adv. Energy Mater. 4 DOI:10.1002/aenm.201470091 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 10.043]
32 Li X, Wu D, Zhou Y N, Liu L, Yang X Q and Ceder G 2014 Electrochem. Commun. 49 51 DOI:10.1016/j.elecom.2014.10.003 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 4.425]
33 Sun X, Jin Y, Zhang C Y, Wen J W, Shao Y, Zang Y and Chen C H 2014 J. Mater. Chem. A 2 17268 DOI:10.1039/C4TA03828B [Cited within:1]
34 Xu J, Lee D H, Clément R J, Yu X, Leskes M, Andrew, Pell J, Pintacuda G, Yang X Q Grey C P and Meng Y S 2014 Chem. Mater. 26 1260 DOI:10.1021/cm403855t [Cited within:1] [JCR: 8.238]
35 Yu H, Guo S, Zhu Y, Ishida M and Zhou H 2014 Chem. Commun. 50 457 DOI:10.1039/c3cc47351a [Cited within:2] [JCR: 6.378]
36 Xu S Y, Wu X Y, Li Y M, Hu Y S and Chen L Q 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 118202 DOI:10.1088/1674-1056/23/11/118202 [Cited within:1] [JCR: 1.148] [CJCR: 1.2429]
37 Delmas C, Fouassier C and Hagenmuller P 1980 Physica B+C 99 81 DOI:10.1016/0378-4363(80)90214-4 [Cited within:1]