Key design parameters and optimum method of medium- and high-velocity synchronous induction coilgun based on orthogonal experimental design

doi:10.1088/1674-1056/28/2/024102

Abstract The energy conversion efficiency of a multistage synchronous induction coilgun (MSSICG) has become one of the key factors that restricts its industrialization. To improve the launch efficiency of medium- and high-velocity MSSICG, we propose an optimization design scheme combining orthogonal experimental design (OED) and self-consistent design method in this paper. The OED is introduced to reduce the number of iterations and improve the identification accuracy and efficiency. A self-consistent design model is established to overcome a defect that the parameters that need to be optimized will multiply as the number of coil stages increases. The influence of six factors (radial thickness of armature, axial length of armature, axial length of coil, capacitance, wire diameter, and slip speed) on the launch efficiency are then evaluated by range analysis. This work presents a valuable reference for optimizing medium- and high-velocity MSSICG.

Keywords: multistage synchronous induction coilgun (MSSICG) self-consistent design orthogonal experimental design (OED) range analysis

Received: 07 September 2018
Revised: 24 November 2018
Accepted manuscript online:

PACS:	41.75.Lx	(Other advanced accelerator concepts)
	85.70.Ay	(Magnetic device characterization, design, and modeling)
	85.70.Rp	(Magnetic levitation, propulsion and control devices)

Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 5140130).

Corresponding Authors: Xiao-Bo Niu
E-mail: 1215409612@qq.com

Cite this article:

Kai-Pei Liu(刘开培), Xiao-Bo Niu(牛小波), Ya-Dong Zhang(张亚东), Zeng-Chao Ji(季曾超), Jian-Yuan Feng(冯建源), Wen-Qi Li(李文琦) Key design parameters and optimum method of medium- and high-velocity synchronous induction coilgun based on orthogonal experimental design 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 024102

[1]	Ma W M and Lu J Y 2017 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 45 1071
[2]	Shurdal B D and Gaigler R L 2009 IEEE Trans. Magn. 45 458
[3]	Lu J Y and Ma W M 2011 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 39 116
[4]	Deng Z G, Zhang W H, Zheng J, et al. 2016 IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 26 3602408
[5]	Bertola L, Cox T, Wheeler P, Garvey S and Morvan H 2016 IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 26 3602911
[6]	Narevicius E, Libson A, Parthey C G, Chavez I, Narevicius J, Even U and Raizen M G 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 093003.1
[7]	Turman B N, Kaye R J and Crawford M 2006 25th Army Sci Conf. 1
[8]	Sterzelmeier K, Brommer V and Sinniger L 2001 IEEE Trans. Magn. 37 238
[9]	Aubuchont M S, Lockner T R and Turman B N 2005 IEEE Int. Pulsed Power Conf. 75
[10]	Lu J Y, Ma W M, Zhang X, Long X L and Tan S 2016 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 44 2211
[11]	Fair H D 2015 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 43 1112
[12]	Schoeder J M, Gully J H and Driga M D 1989 IEEE Trans. Magn. 25 504
[13]	Kolkert W J and Jamet F 1999 IEEE Trans. Magn. 35 25
[14]	Zhang Y D, Ruan J J, Hu Y C, Gong R H and Wen W 2013 Chin. Phys. 22 084102
[15]	Tao X, Wang S H, Huangfu Y P, Wang S and Wang Y Q 2015 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 43 1028
[16]	Niu X B, Liu K P, Zhang Y D, Xiao G and Gong Y J 2017 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 45 1622
[17]	Liu W B, Cao Y J, Zhang Y, Wang J and Yang D W 2011 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 39 100
[18]	Cao Y J, Liu W B, Li R F, Zhang Y and Zou B G 2009 IEEE Trans. Magn. 45 518
[19]	Xiang H J, Yuan J S, Gao X B and Li Z Y 2012 6th Int. Conf. on Electromagn. Field Problems and Appl.
[20]	Zhang Y D, Xiao G, Gong Y J, Niu X B and Liu K P 2017 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 45 1574
[21]	Zhu Y W, Yan Z M, Dong L and Wang Y 2009 High Voltage Engineering 35 3054 (in Chinese)
[22]	Xiang H J, Lei B, Li Z Y and Zhao K Y 2015 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 43 1198
[23]	Zhang Y J, Liu K P, Liao J P, Zhang Y D, Wu C L and Hu Y C 2012 16th Int. Symp. Electromagn. Launch Technol.
[24]	Zhang Y D, Ruan J J, Niu X B, Tan T Y and Wen W 2015 IEEE Trans. Dielect. Elect. Insul. 22 2073
[25]	Le D V, Go B S, Song M G, Park M and Yu I K 2018 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 46 3612
[26]	Zhang T, Guo W, Su Z Z, Cao B, Ren R, Li M T, Ge X and Li J X 2015 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 43 1203
[27]	He J L, Levi E, Zabar Z and Birenbaum L 1989 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 17 429
[28]	Liu S B, Ruan J J, Peng Y, Zhang Y J and Zhang Y D 2011 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 39 382
[29]	Niu X B, Liu K P, Zhang Y D, Xiao Z R, Xiao G and Gong Y J 2018 Energy 144 1
[30]	Wang M, Cao Y J, Wang C X, Wang H J and Chen J L 2016 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 44 885
[31]	Marder B 1993 IEEE Trans. Magn. 29 701
[32]	Shokair I R, Cowan M, Kaye R J and Marder B M 1995 IEEE Trans. Magn. 31 510
[33]	Winder M M 1991 IEEE Trans. Magn. 27 634
[34]	Kaye R J 2005 IEEE Trans. Magn. 41 194
[35]	Liu S B, Ruan J J, Du Z Y, and Huang D C 2010 Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society 25 1 (in Chinese)
[36]	Ji L J, Si Y F, Liu H F, Song X L, Zhu W and Zhu A P 2014 Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 184 122
[37]	Tu Y P, Luo M X, Ying G F and Ding L J 2012 Proc. CSEE 32 139 (in Chinese)
[38]	Li Y Y and Hu C R 2005 Experiment design and data processing (Beijing: Chem. Ind. Press) p. 62 (in Chinese)

[1]	Comparison of performance between rescaled range analysis and rescaled variance analysis in detecting abrupt dynamic change He Wen-Ping (何文平), Liu Qun-Qun (刘群群), Jiang Yun-Di (姜允迪), Lu Ying (卢莹). Chin. Phys. B, 2015, 24(4): 049205.

No Suggested Reading articles found!

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Metrics
Related Articles

Key design parameters and optimum method of medium- and high-velocity synchronous induction coilgun based on orthogonal experimental design

Cite this article:

Online attention