| INTERDISCIPLINARY PHYSICS AND RELATED AREAS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
“Refractivity-from-clutter” based on local empirical refractivity model |
| Xiaofeng Zhao(赵小峰) |
| College of Meteorology and Oceanography, National University of Defense Technology, Nanjing 211101, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Constructing sophisticated refractivity models is one of the key problems for the RFC (refractivity from clutter) technology. If prior knowledge of the local refractivity environment is available, more accurate parameterized model can be constructed from the statistical information, which in turn can be used to improve the quality of the local refractivity retrievals. The validity of this proposal was demonstrated by range-dependent refractivity profile inversions using the adjoint parabolic equation method to the Wallops'98 experimental data.
|
Received: 14 July 2018
Revised: 23 September 2018
Accepted manuscript online:
|
|
PACS:
|
84.40.-x
|
(Radiowave and microwave (including millimeter wave) technology)
|
| |
07.07.Df
|
(Sensors (chemical, optical, electrical, movement, gas, etc.); remote sensing)
|
|
| Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41775027 and 41405025). |
Corresponding Authors:
Xiaofeng Zhao
E-mail: zxf_best@126.com
|
Cite this article:
Xiaofeng Zhao(赵小峰) “Refractivity-from-clutter” based on local empirical refractivity model 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 128401
|
| [1] |
Zhang J P, Zhang Y S, Wu Z S, Zhang Y S and Hu R X 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 124101 (in Chinese)
|
| [2] |
Penton S E and Hackett E E 2018 Radio Sci. 53 804
|
| [3] |
Douvenot R, Fabbro V, Gerstoft P, Bourlier C and Saillard J 2008 Radio Sci. 43 RS6005
|
| [4] |
Zhao X F, Huang S X, Xiang J and Shi W L 2011 Chin. Phys. B 20 099201
|
| [5] |
Zhu X, Li J, Zhu M, Jiang Z and Li Y 2018 IEEE Geosci. Remote S. 15 1307
|
| [6] |
Zhao X F and Huang S X 2012 J. Atmos. Sci. 69 2808
|
| [7] |
Zhao X F and Huang S X 2014 J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. 31 1250
|
| [8] |
Zhao X F, Yardim C, Wang D X and Howe B M 2017 J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. 34 1113
|
| [9] |
Karimian A, Yardim C, Gerstoft P, HodgkissWS and Barrios A E 2011 Radio Sci. 46 RS6013
|
| [10] |
Rogers L T, Hattan C P and Stapleton J K 2000 Radio Sci. 35 955
|
| [11] |
Gerstoft P, Rogers L T, Krolik J L and Hodgkiss W S 2003 Radio Sci. 38 8053
|
| [12] |
Liu X, Huang W and Gill E W 2017 IEEE Geosci. Remote S. 14 1740
|
| [13] |
Xie J, Chen W, Zhang D, Zu S and Chen Y 2017 IEEE Geosci. Remote S. 14 1213
|
| [14] |
Li J, Innanen K A, Tao G 2017 Geophysics 82 D265
|
| [15] |
Kuttler J R and Dockery G D 1991 Radio Sci. 26 381
|
| [16] |
Zhu C, Byrd R H, Lu P and Nocedal J 1997 ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 23 550
|
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|
