|
|
|
Projectile electron loss in collisions of light charged ions with helium |
| Yin Yong-Zhi (尹永智)a, Wang Yun (王赟)b, Chen Xi-Meng (陈熙萌)a |
a School of Nuclear Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China;
b Department of Radiation Protection, Gansu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Lanzhou 730000, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract We investigate the single-electron loss processes of light charged ions (Li1+,2+, C2+,3+,5+, and O2+,3+) in collisions with helium. To better understand the experimental results, we propose a theoretical model to calculate the cross section of projectile electron loss. In this model, an ionization radius of the incident ion was defined under the classical over-barrier model, and we developed “strings” to explain the processes of projectile electron loss, which is similar with the molecular over-barrier model. Theoretical calculations are in good agreement with the experimental results for the cross section of single-electron loss and the ratio of double-to-single ionization of helium associated with one-electron loss.
|
Received: 26 August 2013
Revised: 15 November 2013
Accepted manuscript online:
|
|
PACS:
|
34.50.Fa
|
(Electronic excitation and ionization of atoms (including beam-foil excitation and ionization))
|
| |
34.10.+x
|
(General theories and models of atomic and molecular collisions and interactions (including statistical theories, transition state, stochastic and trajectory models, etc.))
|
|
| Fund: Project supported by the Special Program for Key Basic Research of the Ministry of Science and Technology, China (Grant No. 2002CCA00900) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Ministry of Education of China (Grant No. lzujbky-2013-5). |
Corresponding Authors:
Chen Xi-Meng
E-mail: chenxm@lzu.edu.cn
|
| About author: 34.50.Fa; 34.10.+x |
Cite this article:
Yin Yong-Zhi (尹永智), Wang Yun (王赟), Chen Xi-Meng (陈熙萌) Projectile electron loss in collisions of light charged ions with helium 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 053401
|
| [1] |
Santos A C F, Sigaud G M, Melo W S, Sant'Anna M M and Montenegro E C 2010 Phys. Rev. A 82 012704
|
| [2] |
Montenegro E C, Meyerhof W E and McGuire J H 1994 Adv. At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 34 249
|
| [3] |
Chen X M, Jiang L J, Zhou P, Zhou C L, Gao Z M, Qiu X Y, Cui Y, Wang X A, Lou F J, Lu X Y, Jia J J, Chen L, Shao J X, Lu Y and Wang F 2011 Chin. Phys. B 20 013402
|
| [4] |
Bates D R and Griffing G N 1955 Proc. Phys. Soc. A 68 90
|
| [5] |
Anholt R 1986 Phys. Lett. A 114 126
|
| [6] |
McGuire J H, Stolterfoht N and Simony P T 1981 Phys. Rev. A 24 97
|
| [7] |
Dmitriev I S, Zhileikin Y M and Nikolaev V S 1966 Sov. Phys. JETP 22 352
|
| [8] |
Gillespie G H 1978 Phys. Rev. A 18 1967
|
| [9] |
Montenegro E C, Melo W S, Meyerhof W E and de Pinho A G 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 3033
|
| [10] |
Montenegro E C and Meyerhof W E 1991 Phys. Rev. A 44 7229
|
| [11] |
Montenegro E C, Sigaud G M and Meyerhof W E 1992 Phys. Rev. A 45 1575
|
| [12] |
Santos A C F, Sigaud G M, Melo W S, Sant'Anna M M and Montenegro E C 2011 J. Phys. B 44 045202
|
| [13] |
Grande P L, Schiwietz G, Sigaud G M and Montenegro E C 1996 Phys. Rev. A 54 2983
|
| [14] |
Voitkiv A B, Sigaud G M and Montenegro E C 1999 Phys. Rev. A 59 2794
|
| [15] |
Meron M and Johnson B M 1990 Phys. Rev. A 41 1365
|
| [16] |
Melo W S, Sant'Anna M M, Santos A C F, Sigaud G M and Montenegro E C 1999 Phys. Rev. A 60 1124
|
| [17] |
Kirchner T and Horbatsch M 2001 Phys. Rev. A 63 62718
|
| [18] |
Cocke C L and Olson R E 1991 Phys. Rep. 205 153
|
| [19] |
Ostrovsky V N 1995 J. Phys. B 28 3901
|
| [20] |
Foil J, Olson R E, Santos A C F, Sigaud G M and Montenegro E C 2001 J. Phys. B 34 L503
|
| [21] |
Shao J X, Chen X M and Ding B W 2007 Phys. Rev. A 75 012701
|
| [22] |
Chen X M, Lu Y X, Gao Z M, Cui Y, Liu Y W and Du J 2007 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 262 161
|
| [23] |
Zou X R, Shao J X, Chen X M, Cui Y, Gao Z M, Yin Y Z, Ding B W, Li Z and Yu D Y 2009 Phys. Rev. A 80 052701
|
| [24] |
Sattin F 2000 Phys. Rev. A 62 042711
|
| [25] |
Sattin F 2001 Phys. Rev. A 64 034704
|
| [26] |
Niehaus A 1986 J. Phys. B 19 2925
|
| [27] |
McGuire J H 1982 Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 1153
|
| [28] |
Woitke O, Zavodszky P A, Ferguson S M, Houck J H and Tanis J A 1998 Phys. Rev. A 57 2692
|
| [29] |
Hülskötter H P, Meyerhof W E, Dillard E and Guardala N 1989 Phys. Rev. Lett. 63 1938
|
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|
