Please wait a minute...
Chin. Phys. B, 2013, Vol. 22(4): 047401    DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/22/4/047401
RAPID COMMUNICATION Prev   Next  

Study on signal intensity of low field nuclear magnetic resonance via indirect coupling measurement

Jiang Feng-Ying (蒋凤英)a b, Wang Ning (王宁)b, Jin Yi-Rong (金贻荣)b, Deng Hui (邓辉)b, Tian Ye (田野)b, Lang Pei-Lin (郎佩琳)a, Li Jie (李洁)b, Chen Ying-Fei (陈莺飞)b, Zheng Dong-Ning (郑东宁)b
a School of Science, Key Laboratory of Information Photonics and Optical Communications, Beijing University of Postsand Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China;
b Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
Abstract  We carry out an ultra-low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) experiment based on high-Tc superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs). The measurement field is in a micro-tesla range (~ 10 μT-100 μT) and the experiment is conducted in a home-made magnetically-shielded-room (MSR). The measurements are performed by an indirect coupling method in which the signal of nuclei precession is indirectly coupled to the SQUID through a tuned copper coil transformer. In such an arrangement, the interferences of applied measurement and polarization field to the SQUID sensor are avoided and the performance of the SQUID is not destroyed. In order to compare the detection sensitivity obtained by using SQUID with that achieved by using the conventional low-noise-amplifier, we perform the measurements by using a commercial room temperature amplifier. The results show that in a wide frequency range (~ 1 kHz-10 kHz) the measurements with the SQUID sensor exhibit a higher signal-to-noise ratio. Further, we discuss the dependence of NMR peak magnitude on measurement frequency. We attribute the reduction of the peak magnitude at high frequency to the increased field inhomogeneity with measurement field increasing. This is verified by compensating the field gradient using three sets of gradient coils.
Keywords:  indirect coupling measurement      superconducting quantum interference devices      low field nuclear magnetic resonance  
Received:  31 December 2012      Revised:  31 December 2012      Accepted manuscript online: 
PACS:  74.25.nj (Nuclear magnetic resonance)  
  76.60.-k (Nuclear magnetic resonance and relaxation)  
  85.25.Dq (Superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs))  
Fund: Project supported by the State Key Development Program for Basic Research of China (Grant Nos. 2011CBA00106 and 2009CB929102) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11104333, 11161130519, and 10974243).
Corresponding Authors:  Zheng Dong-Ning     E-mail:  dzheng@iphy.ac.cn

Cite this article: 

Jiang Feng-Ying (蒋凤英), Wang Ning (王宁), Jin Yi-Rong (金贻荣), Deng Hui (邓辉), Tian Ye (田野), Lang Pei-Lin (郎佩琳), Li Jie (李洁), Chen Ying-Fei (陈莺飞), Zheng Dong-Ning (郑东宁) Study on signal intensity of low field nuclear magnetic resonance via indirect coupling measurement 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 047401

[1] Liao S H, Huang K W, Yang H C, Yen C T, Chen M J, Chen H H, Horng H E and Yang S Y 2010 Appl. Phys. Lett. 97 263701
[2] Volegov P L, Mosher J C, Espy M A and Kraus Jr R H 2005 J. Magn. Reson. 175 103
[3] Volegov P L, Matlachov A N, Espy M A, George J S and Kraus R H Jr 2004 Magn. Reson. Med. 52 467
[4] Matlachov A N, Volegov P L, Espy M A, Stolz R, Fritzsch L, Zakosarenko V, Meyer H G and Kraus R H Jr 2005 IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 15 676
[5] Zotev V S, Matlashov A N, Volegov P L, Urbaitis A V, Espy M A and Kraus R H Jr 2007 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 20 s367
[6] Espy M, Flynn M, Gomez J, Hanson C, Kraus R, Magnelind P, Maskaly K, Matlashov A, Newman S, Owens T, Peters M, Sandin H, Savukov I, Schultz L, Urbaitis A, Volegov P and Zotev V 2010 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 23 034023
[7] Greenberg Y S 1998 Rev. Mod. Phys. 70 175
[8] Kumar S, Avrin W F and Whitecotton B R 1996 IEEE Trans. Magn. 32 5261
[9] Möβ le M, Myers W R, Lee S K, Kelso N, Hatridge M, Pines A and Clarke J 2005 IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 15 757
[10] Lee S K, Möβ le M, Myers W R, Kelso N, Trabesinger A H, Pines A and Clarke J 2005 Magn. Reson. Med. 53 9
[11] McDermott R, Lee S K, Haken B, Trabesinger A H, Pines A and Clarke J 2004 PNAS 101 7857
[12] Clarke J, Hatridge M and Möβ le M 2007 Ann. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 9 389
[13] Bernarding J 2006 J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 128 714
[14] Li S, Ren Y F, Wang N, Tian Y, Chen Y F, Li J and Zheng D N 2009 Acta Phys. Sin. 58 5744 (in Chinese)
[15] Liao S H, Yang H C, Horng H E, Yang S Y, Chen H H, Hwang D W and Hwang L P 2009 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 22 045008
[16] Qiu L, Zhang Y, Krause H J, Braginski A I and Offenhäusser A 2009 J. Magn. Reson. 196 101
[1] Multiplexing technology based on SQUID for readout of superconducting transition-edge sensor arrays
Xinyu Wu(吴歆宇), Qing Yu(余晴), Yongcheng He(何永成), Jianshe Liu(刘建设), and Wei Chen(陈炜). Chin. Phys. B, 2022, 31(10): 108501.
[2] Low-Tc direct current superconducting quantum interference device magnetometer-based 36-channel magnetocardiography system in a magnetically shielded room
Qiu Yang (邱阳), Li Hua (李华), Zhang Shu-Lin (张树林), Wang Yong-Liang (王永良), Kong Xiang-Yan (孔祥燕), Zhang Chao-Xiang (张朝祥), Zhang Yong-Sheng (张永升), Xu Xiao-Feng (徐小峰), Yang Kang (杨康), Xie Xiao-Ming (谢晓明). Chin. Phys. B, 2015, 24(7): 078501.
[3] Quantum search via superconducting quantum interference devices in a cavity
Lu Yan(卢艳), Dong Ping(董萍), Xue Zheng-Yuan(薛正远), and Cao Zhuo-Liang(曹卓良). Chin. Phys. B, 2007, 16(12): 3601-3604.
No Suggested Reading articles found!