| INTERDISCIPLINARY PHYSICS AND RELATED AREAS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Pedestrian choice behavior analysis and simulation of vertical walking facilities in transfer station |
| Yong-Xing Li(李永行)1, Hong-Fei Jia(贾洪飞)1, Jun Li(李军)2, Ya-Nan Zhou(周亚楠)1, Zhi-Lu Yuan(原志路)1, Yan-Zhong Li(李延忠)3,4 |
1 College of Transportation, Jilin University, Changchun 130025, China;
2 College of Management Science and Information Engineering, Jilin University of Finance and Economics, Changchun 130117, China;
3 Department of Applied Mathematics, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Changchun 130022, China;
4 College of Mathematics and Statistics, Beihua University, Jilin 132013, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Considering the interlayer height, luggage, the difference between queuing pedestrians, and walking speed, the pedestrian choice model of vertical walking facilities is established based on a support vector machine. This model is verified with the pedestrian flow data of Changchun light-rail transfer station and Beijing Xizhimen transfer station. Adding the pedestrian choice model of vertical walking facilities into the pedestrian simulation model which is based on cellular automata, the pedestrian choice behavior is simulated. In the simulation, the effects of the dynamic influence factors are analyzed. To reduce the conflicts between pedestrians in opposite directions, the layout of vertical walking facilities is improved. The simulations indicate that the improved layout of vertical walking facilities can improve the efficiency of pedestrians passing.
|
Received: 07 April 2016
Revised: 09 June 2016
Accepted manuscript online:
|
|
PACS:
|
89.40.-a
|
(Transportation)
|
| |
02.50.Cw
|
(Probability theory)
|
| |
05.65.+b
|
(Self-organized systems)
|
|
| Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51278221 and 51378076) and the Science Technology Development Project of Jilin Province, China (Grant No. 20140204027SF). |
Corresponding Authors:
Hong-Fei Jia
E-mail: jiahf@jlu.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Yong-Xing Li(李永行), Hong-Fei Jia(贾洪飞), Jun Li(李军), Ya-Nan Zhou(周亚楠), Zhi-Lu Yuan(原志路), Yan-Zhong Li(李延忠) Pedestrian choice behavior analysis and simulation of vertical walking facilities in transfer station 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 108901
|
| [1] |
Shi R J, Ding Y, Bai Y, Xu Q and Li M G 2015 Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology 15 185 (in Chinese)
|
| [2] |
Ji X F, Zhang J and Ren B 2013 Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 392 5089
|
| [3] |
Iversen M K, Händel M N, Jensen E N, Frederiksen P and Heitmann B L 2007 International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disor- ders 31 950
|
| [4] |
Zhang N, Zhang Y L and Zhang X J 2015 KSCE J. Civil Eng. 3 742
|
| [5] |
Cao S H 2009 “Analysis and Modeling on Passengers Traffic Characteristics for Urban Rail Transit”, MS Dissertation (Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University) (in Chinese)
|
| [6] |
Li Q, Ji C X, Jia L M and Qin Y 2014 Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society 6 965305
|
| [7] |
Lee Y C 2005 “Pedestrian Walking and Choice Behavior on Stairways and Escalators in Public Transport Facilities”, Ph. D. Dissertation (Deft: Deft University of Technology)
|
| [8] |
Ryoichi N, Masahiro F and Takashi N 2005 Physica A 358 516
|
| [9] |
Masahiro F and Takashi N 2007 Physica A 377 269
|
| [10] |
Wei J, Zhang H, Guo Y Y and Gu M S 2015 Phys. Lett. A 379 1081
|
| [11] |
Qu Y C, Gao Z Y, Xiao Y and Li X G 2014 Safety Science 70 189
|
| [12] |
Tobias K, Anna G, Andreas K, Hubert K, Tim M K and Michael S 2008 Safety Science 46 72
|
| [13] |
Yue H, Guan H Z, Zhang J and Shao C F 2010 Physica A 389 527
|
| [14] |
Song W G, Yu Y F, Wang B H and Fan W C 2006 Physica A 371 658
|
| [15] |
Helbing D, Buzna L and Johansson A 2005 Transportation Science 39 1
|
| [16] |
Helbing D, Farkas I and Vicsek T 2000 Nature 407 487
|
| [17] |
Li X and Dong L Y 2012 Chin. Phys. Lett. 29 098902
|
| [18] |
Zarita Z and Lim E A 2012 Chin. Phys. Lett. 29 078901
|
| [19] |
Chen J, Pang M B and Yang M Acta Phys. Sin. 63 094502 (in Chinese)
|
| [20] |
Wang Q L, Chen Y, Dong H R, Zhou M and Ning B 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 038901
|
| [21] |
Kalogeiton V S, Papadopoulos D P, Georgilas I P, Sirdkoulis G C and Adamatzky A I 2015 Int. J. Gen. Sys. 44 354
|
| [22] |
Georgoudas I, Sirakoulis G and Andreadis I 2011 IEEE Systems Jour-nal 5 129
|
| [23] |
Tsiftsis A, Georgoudas I G and Sirakoulis G C 2015 IEEE Systems Journal 10 649
|
| [24] |
Vihas C, Georgoudas I G and Sirakoulis G C 2013 Journal of Cellular Automata 8 333
|
| [25] |
Seyfried A, Steffen B, Klingsch W and Boltes M 2005 Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2005 10002
|
| [26] |
Johansson A, Helbing D, Al-Abideen and Al-Bosta 2008 Advances in Complex Systems 11 497
|
| [27] |
Zacharias J and Tang B S 2015 Preventive Medicine Reports 2 529
|
| [28] |
Zacharias J and Ling R 2015 Environment and Behavior 6 694
|
| [29] |
Srikukenthirana S, Shalaby A and Morrow E 2014 Transportation Re-search Procedia 2 624
|
| [30] |
Yu R, Wang G X, Zheng J Y and Wang H Y 2013 Journal of Trans-portation Systems Engineering and Information Technology 13 130 (in Chinese)
|
| [31] |
Li Q Q, Gao D Q and Yang B S 2009 Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition) 39 131 (in Chinese)
|
| [32] |
Ding S F, Qi B J and Tan H Y 2011 Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China 40 2 (in Chinese)
|
| [33] |
Li J, Wang J, Dong Y F, Jia H F and Li Y Z 2015 Mathematical Problems in Engineering 9 645989
|
| [34] |
Huang H J and Guo R Y 2008 Phys. Rev. E 2 021131
|
| [35] |
Varasa A, Cornejo M D, Mainemer D, Toledo B, Rogana J, Munoz V and Valdivia J A 2007 Physica A 631
|
| [36] |
Jian X X and Zhang X N 2014 Mathematical Problems in Engineering 7 714267
|
| [37] |
Kirchner A and Schadschneider A 2002 Physica A 312 260
|
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|
