|
|
|
A novel scheme of hybrid entanglement swapping and teleportation using cavity QED in the small and large detuning regimes and quasi-Bell state measurement method |
| R Pakniat1, M K Tavassoly2,3, M H Zandi1 |
1 Faculty of Physics, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran;
2 Faculty of Physics, Atomic and Molecular Group, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran;
3 Research Group of Optics and Photonics, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran |
|
|
|
|
Abstract We outline a scheme for entanglement swapping based on cavity QED as well as quasi-Bell state measurement (quasi-BSM) methods. The atom-field interaction in the cavity QED method is performed in small and large detuning regimes. We assume two atoms are initially entangled together and, distinctly two cavities are prepared in an entangled coherent-coherent state. In this scheme, we want to transform entanglement to the atom-field system. It is observed that, the fidelities of the swapped entangled state in the quasi-BSM method can be compatible with those obtained in the small and large detuning regimes in the cavity QED method (the condition of this compatibility will be discussed). In addition, in the large detuning regime, the swapped entangled state is obtained by detecting and quasi-BSM approaches. In the continuation, by making use of the atom-field entangled state obtained in both approaches in a large detuning regime, we show that the atomic as well as field states teleportation with complete fidelity can be achieved.
|
Received: 10 March 2016
Revised: 26 May 2016
Accepted manuscript online:
|
|
PACS:
|
03.67.-a
|
(Quantum information)
|
| |
42.50.Dv
|
(Quantum state engineering and measurements)
|
| |
03.67.Bg
|
(Entanglement production and manipulation)
|
| |
03.67.Hk
|
(Quantum communication)
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
M K Tavassoly
E-mail: mktavassoly@yazd.ac.ir
|
Cite this article:
R Pakniat, M K Tavassoly, M H Zandi A novel scheme of hybrid entanglement swapping and teleportation using cavity QED in the small and large detuning regimes and quasi-Bell state measurement method 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 100303
|
| [1] |
Zukowski M, Zeilinger A, Horne M A and Ekert A K 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 4287
|
| [2] |
Bose S, Vedral V and Knight P L 1999 Phys. Rev. A 60 194
|
| [3] |
Bose S, Vedral V and Knight P L 1998 Phys. Rev. A 57 822
|
| [4] |
Pan J W, Bouwmeester D, Weinfurter H and Zeilinger A 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 3891
|
| [5] |
Yang M, Song W and Cao Z L 2005 Phys. Rev. A 71 034312
|
| [6] |
Souza A D, Cardoso W B, Avelar A T and Baseia B 2009 Phys. Scr. 80 065009
|
| [7] |
Qiang W C, Cardoso W B and Zhang X H 2010 Physica A 389 5109
|
| [8] |
Lin X, Li H C, Yang R C and Huang Z P 2007 Chin. Phys. 16 919
|
| [9] |
Liao Q H, Fang G Y, Wang Y Y, Ahmad M A and Liu S 2011 Eur. Phys. J. D 61 475
|
| [10] |
Song T T, Zhang J, Gao F, Wen Q Y and Zhu F C 2009 Chin. Phys. B 18 1333
|
| [11] |
Li W, Fan M Y and Wang G W 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 120305
|
| [12] |
Ye T Y and Jiang L Z 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 050309
|
| [13] |
Man Z X, Zhang Z J and Li Y 2005 Chin. Phys. Lett. 22 18
|
| [14] |
Lu H and Guo G C 2000 Phys. Lett. A 276 209
|
| [15] |
Xue Z Y, Yang M, Yi Y M and Cao Z L 2006 Opt. Commun. 258 315
|
| [16] |
Bennett C H, Brassard G, Crépeau C, Jozsa R, Peres A and Wootters W K 1993 Phys. Rev. lett. 70 1895
|
| [17] |
Gerry C and Knight P 2005 Introductory Quantum Optics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
|
| [18] |
Barnett S M 2009 Quantum Information (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
|
| [19] |
Kim Y H, Kulik S P and Shih Y 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 1370
|
| [20] |
Ye L and Guo G C 2004 Phys. Rev. A 70 054303
|
| [21] |
Cardoso W B, Avelar A T, Baseia B and de Almeida N G 2005 Phys. Rev. A 72 045802
|
| [22] |
Zhong Z R 2008 Chin. Phys. B 17 1614
|
| [23] |
Zhong Z R 2008 Chin. Phys. Lett. 25 1687
|
| [24] |
Liu J M and Weng B 2006 Physica A 367 215
|
| [25] |
dSouza A D, Cardoso W B, Avelar A T and Baseia B 2009 Physica A 388 1331
|
| [26] |
Lu H 2001 Chin. Phys. Lett. 18 1004
|
| [27] |
Jiang W X, Fang J X, Zhu S Q and Sha J Q 2007 Chin. Phys. Lett. 24 1144
|
| [28] |
Dong J and Teng J F 2009 Chin. Phys. Lett. 26 070306
|
| [29] |
Toor A H and Zubairy M S 1992 Phys. Rev. A 45 4951
|
| [30] |
Wu C W, Han Y, Li H Y, Deng Z J, Chen P X and Li C Z 2010 Phys. Rev. A 82 014303
|
| [31] |
Scully M O and Zubairy M S 1997 Quantum Optics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
|
| [32] |
Karimi A and Tavassoly M K 2015 Phys. Scr. 90 015101
|
| [33] |
Zeng A H and Kuang L M 2005 Phys. Lett. A 338 323
|
| [34] |
Blythe P J and Varcoe B T H 2006 New J. Phys. 8 231
|
| [35] |
Yurke B and Stoler D 1986 Phys. Rev. Lett. 57 13
|
| [36] |
Karimi A and Tavassoly M K 2015 Commun. Theor. Phys. 64 341
|
| [37] |
Chakrabarti R and Jenisha B V 2015 Physica A 435 95
|
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|
