| INTERDISCIPLINARY PHYSICS AND RELATED AREAS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Configurational entropy-induced phase transition in spinel LiMn2O4 |
| Wei Hu(胡伟)1,2, Wen-Wei Luo(罗文崴)1, Mu-Sheng Wu(吴木生)1, Bo Xu(徐波)1, and Chu-Ying Ouyang(欧阳楚英)1,† |
1 Department of Physics, Laboratory of Computational Materials Physics, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China;
2 School of Ecology and Environment, Yuzhang Normal University, Nanchang 330103, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The spinel-type LiMn$_{2}$O$_{4}$ is a promising candidate as cathode material for rechargeable Li-ion batteries due to its good thermal stability and safety. Experimentally, it is observed that in this compound there occur the structural phase transitions from cubic ($Fd\bar{3}m)$ to tetragonal ($I4_{1}/{amd}$) phase at slightly below room temperature. To understand the phase transition mechanism, we compare the Gibbs free energy between cubic phase and tetragonal phase by including the configurational entropy. Our results show that the configurational entropy contributes substantially to the stability of the cubic phase at room temperature due to the disordered Mn$^{3+}$/Mn$^{4+}$ distribution as well as the orientation of the Jahn-Teller elongation of the Mn$^{3+}$O$_{6}$ octahedron in the the spinel phase. Meanwhile, the phase transition temperature is predicted to be 267.8 K, which is comparable to the experimentally observed temperature. These results serve as a good complement to the experimental study, and are beneficial to the improving of the electrochemical performance of LiMn$_{2}$O$_{4}$ cathode.
|
Received: 01 March 2022
Revised: 06 April 2022
Accepted manuscript online: 20 April 2022
|
|
PACS:
|
82.47.Aa
|
(Lithium-ion batteries)
|
| |
81.05.Hd
|
(Other semiconductors)
|
| |
82.20.Ej
|
(Quantum theory of reaction cross section)
|
|
| Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 12174162, 51962010, 12064015, and 12064014). |
Corresponding Authors:
Chu-Ying Ouyang
E-mail: cyouyang@jxnu.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Wei Hu(胡伟), Wen-Wei Luo(罗文崴), Mu-Sheng Wu(吴木生), Bo Xu(徐波), and Chu-Ying Ouyang(欧阳楚英) Configurational entropy-induced phase transition in spinel LiMn2O4 2022 Chin. Phys. B 31 098202
|
[1] He B, Chi S T, Ye A J, Mi P H, Zhang L W, Pu B W, Zou Z Y, Ran Y B, Zhao Q, Wang D, Zhang W Q, Zhao J T, Adams S, Avdeev M and Shi S Q 2020 Sci. Data 7 151
[2] Cheng Y, Shu J, Xu L, Xia Y Y, Du L L, Zhang G and Mai L Q 2021 Adv. Energy Mater. 11 2100026
[3] Shang Y, Chen N, Li Y, Chen S, Lai J, Huang Y, Qu W, Wu F and Chen R 2020 Adv. Mater. 32 2004017
[4] Gao H, Yan Q, Xu P, Liu H, Li M, Liu P, Luo J and Chen Z 2020 ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 12 51546
[5] Song D, Ikuta H, Uchida T and Wakihara M 1999 Solid State Ionics 117 151
[6] Tarascon J, Wang E, Shokoohi F, Mckinnon W and Colson S 1991 J. Electrochem. Soc. 138 2859
[7] Thackeray M M, David W I F, Bruce P G and Goodenough J B 1983 Mater. Res. Bull. 18 461
[8] Jiang Q Q, Xu L, Ma Z L and Zhang H 2015 Appl. Phys. A 119 1069
[9] Sugiyama J, Tamura T and Yanauchi H 1995 J. Phys.:Condens. Matter 7 9755
[10] Wickham D G and Croft W J 1958 J. Phys. Chem. Solids 7 351
[11] Yamada A and Tanaka M 1995 Mater. Res. Bull. 30 715
[12] Yamada A 1996 J. Solid State Chem. 122 160
[13] Mukai K, Uyama T and Yamada I 2019 ACS Omega 4 6459
[14] Oikawa K, Kamiyama T, Izumi F, Chakoumakos B C, Ikuta H, Wakihara M, Li J and Matsui Y 1998 Solid State Ionics 109 35
[15] Yamaguchi H, Yamada A and Uwe H 1998 Phys. Rev. B 58 8
[16] Rodríguez-Carvajal J, Rousse G, Masquelier C and Hervieu M 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 4660
[17] Piszora P 2004 J. Alloys Compd. 382 112
[18] Abiko H, Mitsuhiro Hibino M and Kudo T 2000 Solid State Ionics 135 115
[19] Chung K Y and Kim K B 2002 J. Electrochem. Soc. 149 A79
[20] Chung K Y and Kim K B 2004 Electrochim. Acta 49 3327
[21] Kresse G and Hafner J 1994 Phys. Rev. B 49 14251
[22] Kresse G and Furthmüller J 1996 Phys. Rev. B 54 11169
[23] Kresse G and Furthmuüller J 1996 Comput. Mater. Sci. 6 15
[24] Blochl P E 1994 Phys. Rev. B 50 17953
[25] Kresse G and Joubert D 1999 Phys. Rev. B 59 1758
[26] Perdew J P, Bruke K and Emzerhof M 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3865
[27] Anisimov V I, Zaanen J and Andersen O K 1991 Phys. Rev. B 44 943
[28] Anisimov V I, Aryasetiawan F and Lichtenstein A I 1997 J. Phys.:Condens. Matter 9 767
[29] Zheng L M, Wang H W, Luo M, Wang G Q, Wang Z Q and Ouyang C Y 2018 Solid State Ionics 320 210
[30] Xiao R J, Li H and Chen L Q 2012 Chem. Mater. 24 4242
[31] Monkhorst H J and Pack J D 1976 Phys. Rev. B 13 5188
[32] Ouyang C Y, Du Y L, Shi S Q and Lei M S 2009 Phys. Lett. A 373 2796
[33] Ouyang C Y, Shi S Q and Lei M S 2009 J. Alloys Compd. 474 370
[34] Piszora P, Paszkowicz W, Baehtz C and Wolska E 2004 J. Alloys Compd. 382 119 |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|
