|
|
|
Phase-matching quantum key distribution with light source monitoring |
| Wen-Ting Li(李文婷)1, Le Wang(王乐)1,2, Wei Li(李威)1,2, and Sheng-Mei Zhao(赵生妹)1,2,† |
1 Institute of Signal Processing Transmission, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210003, China;
2 Key Laboratory of Broadband Wireless Communication and Sensor Network Technology, Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210003, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The transmission loss of photons during quantum key distribution (QKD) process leads to the linear key rate bound for practical QKD systems without quantum repeaters. Phase matching quantum key distribution (PM-QKD) protocol, an novel QKD protocol, can overcome the constraint with a measurement-device-independent structure, while it still requires the light source to be ideal. This assumption is not guaranteed in practice, leading to practical secure issues. In this paper, we propose a modified PM-QKD protocol with a light source monitoring, named PM-QKD-LSM protocol, which can guarantee the security of the system under the non-ideal source condition. The results show that our proposed protocol performs almost the same as the ideal PM-QKD protocol even considering the imperfect factors in practical systems. PM-QKD-LSM protocol has a better performance with source fluctuation, and it is robust in symmetric or asymmetric cases.
|
Received: 10 August 2021
Revised: 12 November 2021
Accepted manuscript online:
|
|
PACS:
|
03.67.Dd
|
(Quantum cryptography and communication security)
|
| |
05.30.Rt
|
(Quantum phase transitions)
|
| |
05.40.-a
|
(Fluctuation phenomena, random processes, noise, and Brownian motion)
|
| |
06.30.-k
|
(Measurements common to several branches of physics and astronomy)
|
|
| Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos.61871234 and 62001249) and Open Research Fund Program of the State Key Laboratory of Low-Dimensional Quantum Physics,Tsinghua University (Grant No.KF201909). |
Corresponding Authors:
Sheng-Mei Zhao,E-mail:zhaosm@njupt.edu
E-mail: zhaosm@njupt.edu
|
| About author: 2021-12-8 |
Cite this article:
Wen-Ting Li(李文婷), Le Wang(王乐), Wei Li(李威), and Sheng-Mei Zhao(赵生妹) Phase-matching quantum key distribution with light source monitoring 2022 Chin. Phys. B 31 050310
|
[1] Mayers D 2001 J. ACM 48 351
[2] Lo H K and Chau H F 1999 Science 283 2050
[3] Shor P W and Preskill J 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 441
[4] Bennett C H and Brassard G 1984 Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems and Signal Processing, Bangalore, India, 175
[5] Ekert A K 1991 Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 661
[6] Wang X B 2005 Phys. Rev. A 72 012322
[7] Wang X B, Yang L, Peng C Z and Pan J W 2009 New J. Phys. 11 075006
[8] Lo H K, Curty M and Qi B 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 130503
[9] Wang L, Zhao S M, Gong L Y and Cheng W W 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 120307
[10] Guan J Y, Cao Z, Liu Y, Shen-Tu G L, Pelc J S, Fejer M M, Peng C H, Ma X F, Zhang Q and Pan J W 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 180502
[11] Wang L and Zhao S M 2017 Quantum Inform. Process. 16 100
[12] Pirandola S, Laurenza R, Ottaviani C and Banchi L 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 1
[13] Lucamarini M, Yuan Z L, Dynes J F and Shields A J 2018 Nature 557 400
[14] Tamaki K, Lo H K, Fung C H F and Qi B 2012 Phys. Rev. A 85 042307
[15] Chen G, Wang L, Li W, Zhao Y, Zhao S M and Gruska J 2020 Quantum Inform. Process. 19 416
[16] Teng J, Yin Z Q, Yuan Fan G J, L u F Y, Wang R, Wang S, Chen W, Huang W, Xu B J, Guo G C and Han Z F 2021 Phys. Rev. A 104 062441
[17] Wang X B, Yu Z W and Hu X L 2018 Phys. Rev. A 98 062323
[18] Xu H, Yu Z W, Jiang C, Hu X L and Wang X B 2020 Phys. Rev. A 101 042330
[19] Cui C, Yin Z Q, Wang R, Chen W, Wang S, Guo G C and Han Z F 2019 Phys. Rev. Appl. 11 034053
[20] Xue K, Zhao S M, Mao Q P and Xu R 2021 Quantum Inform. Process. 20 320
[21] Chen J P, Zhang C, Liu Y, Jiang C, Zhang W J, Han Z Y, Ma S Z, Hu X L, Li Y H, Liu H, Zhou F, Jiang H F, Chen T Y, Li H, You L X, Wang Z, Wang X B, Zhang Q and Pan J W 2021 Nat. Photonics 15 570
[22] Ma X, Zeng P and Zhou H 2018 Phys. Rev. X 8 031043
[23] Jin A, Zeng P, Penty R V and Ma X F 2021 Phys. Rev. Appl. 16 034017
[24] Wang X B 2007 Phys. Rev. A 75 052301
[25] Peng X, Jiang H, Xu B J, Ma X F and Guo H 2008 Opt. Lett. 33 2077
[26] Xu F 2015 Phys. Rev. A 92 012333
[27] Qiao Y C, Wang G, Li Z Y, Xu B J and Guo H 2019 Phys. Rev. A 99 052302
[28] Qiao Y C, Chen Z Y, Zhang Y C, Xu B J and Guo H 2020 Entropy 22 36
[29] Wang G, Li Z, Q iao Y, Chen Z, Peng X and Guo H 2018 IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 54 9300110
[30] Zeng P, Wu W J and Ma X F 2020 Phys. Rev. Appl. 13 064013
[31] Yu Y, Wang L, Zhao S M and Mao Q P 2021 Opt. Express 29 2227
[32] Zhang X X, Wang Y, Jiang M S, Zhou C, Lu Y F and Bao W S 2021 JOSA B 38 724
[33] Lu F Y, Yin Z Q, Wang R, Yuan-Fan G J, Wang S, He D Y, Chen W, Huang W, Xu B J, Guo G C and Han Z F 2019 New J. Phys. 21 123030 |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|
