Please wait a minute...
Chin. Phys. B, 2020, Vol. 29(10): 107401    DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/ab99b5
CONDENSED MATTER: ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE, ELECTRICAL, MAGNETIC, AND OPTICAL PROPERTIES Prev   Next  

Simulation study of device physics and design of GeOI TFET with PNN structure and buried layer for high performance

Bin Wang(王斌)1,†, Sheng Hu(胡晟)1, Yue Feng(冯越)1, Peng Li(李鹏)2, Hui-Yong Hu(胡辉勇)1, and Bin Shu(舒斌)1
1 State Key Discipline Laboratory of Wide Bandgap Semiconductor Technology, School of Microelectronics, Xidian University, Xi’an 710071, China
2 Xi’an Microelectronic Technology Institute, Xi’an 710054, China
Abstract  

Large threshold voltage and small on-state current are the main limitations of the normal tunneling field effect transistor (TFET). In this paper, a novel TFET with gate-controlled P+N+N+ structure based on partially depleted GeOI (PD-GeOI) substrate is proposed. With the buried P+-doped layer (BP layer) introduced under P+N+N+ structure, the proposed device behaves as a two-tunneling line device and can be shut off by the BP junction, resulting in a high on-state current and low threshold voltage. Simulation results show that the on-state current density Ion of the proposed TFET can be as large as 3.4 × 10−4 A/μm, and the average subthreshold swing (SS) is 55 mV/decade. Moreover, both of Ion and SS can be optimized by lengthening channel and buried P+ layer. The off-state current density of TTP TFET is 4.4 × 10−10 A/μm, and the threshold voltage is 0.13 V, showing better performance than normal germanium-based TFET. Furthermore, the physics and device design of this novel structure are explored in detail.

Keywords:  Ge-based TFET      two line tunneling paths      point tunneling      on-state current density  
Received:  23 April 2020      Revised:  26 May 2020      Accepted manuscript online:  05 June 2020
PACS:  74.55.+v (Tunneling phenomena: single particle tunneling and STM)  
  85.30.Tv (Field effect devices)  
  85.30.De (Semiconductor-device characterization, design, and modeling)  
Corresponding Authors:  Corresponding author. E-mail: wbin@xidian.edu.cn   
About author: 
†Corresponding author. E-mail: wbin@xidian.edu.cn
* Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61704130), the Science Research Plan in Shaanxi Province, China (Grant No. 2018JQ6064), and the Science and Technology Project on Analog Integrated Circuit Laboratory, China (Grant No. JCKY2019210C029).

Cite this article: 

Bin Wang(王斌)†, Sheng Hu(胡晟), Yue Feng(冯越), Peng Li(李鹏), Hui-Yong Hu(胡辉勇), and Bin Shu(舒斌) Simulation study of device physics and design of GeOI TFET with PNN structure and buried layer for high performance 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 107401

Fig. 1.  

Cross section of device structure of normal PNN TFET based on FD-GeOI.

Fig. 2.  

Cross-section of two tunneling paths (TTP) TFET based on PD-GeOI substrate.

Fig. 3.  

Computed energy-band diagrams of TTP TFET for both off-state (solid line, |VDS| = 1 V, VGS = 0 V) and on-state (dashed line, |VDS| = 1 V, VGS = 1 V) along (a) line tunneling path 1 and (b) line tunneling path 2.

Parameter TTP TFET PNN TFET
Gate length Lch/nm 100 100
Channel doping/cm−3 1 × 1019 1 × 1019
HfO2 thickness Tox/nm 3 3
Buried layer length LBP/nm 50
Epitaxial layer doping Nepicm−3 1 × 1017
Buried doing NBP/cm−3 1 × 1020
Lightly doped region NLD/cm−3 5 × 1018
Gate metal aluminum gold
Source/drain-metal aluminum aluminum
Source/drain-doping/cm−3 1 × 1020 1 × 1020
Table 1.  

Simulated device parameters used in this study.

Fig. 4.  

Transfer characteristics of FD-GOI TFET and proposed TTP TFET.

Fig. 5.  

Composition of current of the proposed TTP TFET.

Fig. 6.  

Transfer characteristics of TTP TFET for different lengths of buried layer LBP.

Fig. 7.  

Distributions of surface electron density along x axis of TTP TFET for different values of LBP at VGS = 1 V and VDS = 1 V.

Fig. 8.  

Point tunneling width when LBP = 50 nm and 100 nm at VGS = 0 V and VDS = 1 V.

Fig. 9.  

Band bending from channel to LDR along x axis at the upper right-hand corner of the buried layer for (a) off-state at VDS = 1 V, VGS = 0 V and (b) on-state at VDS = 1 V, VGS = 1 V.

Fig. 10.  

Transfer characteristics of TTP TFET for different doping concentrations of slightly doped region (NLDR).

Fig. 11.  

Plots of optimized performance of TTP TFET for LBP = 50 nm, 250 nm, 450 nm, and 650 nm at Lgap = 50 nm.

Fig. 12.  

Output characteristics of TTP TFET.

[1]
Benneventi G B, Gnani E, Gnud A, Reggianii S, Baccarani G 2015 IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 62 44 DOI: 10.1109/TED.2014.2371071
[2]
Mallikarjunarao, Ranjan R, Pradhan K P, Artola L, Sahu P K 2016 Superlattices Micro. 97 70
[3]
Damrongplasit N, Kim S H, Liu T K 2013 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 34 184 DOI: 10.1109/LED.2012.2235404
[4]
Aslam M, Yadav S, Soni D, Sharma D 2017 Superlattices Micro. 112 86
[5]
Kang H Y, Hu H Y, Wang B 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 0118501 DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/25/11/118501
[6]
Rahimian M, Fathipour M 2016 J. Comput. Electron. 15 1297 DOI: 10.1007/s10825-016-0895-1
[7]
International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductor, http://www.itrs.net/.
[8]
Soni D, Sharma D, Yadav S, Aslam M, Sharma N 2018 Superlattices Micro. 113 94
[9]
Alper C, Palestri P, Padilla J L, LonescuA M 2016 IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 63 2603 DOI: 10.1109/TED.2016.2557282
[10]
Yang Z 2016 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 37 839 DOI: 10.1109/LED.2016.2574821
[11]
Wang W, Wang P F, Zhang C M, Lin X, Liu X Y, Sun Q Q, Zhou P, Zhang D W 2014 IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 61 193 DOI: 10.1109/TED.2013.2289075
[12]
Li W, Liu H, Wang S, Chen S 2017 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 38 403 DOI: 10.1109/LED.2017.2661318
[13]
Chen S, Liu H, Wang S, Li W, Wang X, Zhao L 2018 Nanoscale Research Lett. 13 313 DOI: 10.1186/s11671-018-2734-8
[14]
Imenabadi R M, Saremi M, Vandenberghe W G 2017 IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 64 4752 DOI: 10.1109/TED.2017.2755507
[15]
Singh B, Rai T, Gola D, Singh K, Goel E, Kumar S, Tiwari P, Jit S 2017 Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing 71 161 DOI: 10.1016/j.mssp.2017.07.014
[16]
Low K, Zhan C, Han G, Yang Y, Goh K, Guo P, Toh E, Yeo Y 2012 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 51 02
[17]
Mitra S, Goswami R, Bhowmick B 2016 Superlattices Micro. 92 37
[18]
Wang P Y, Tsui B Y 2016 IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 63 1788 DOI: 10.1109/TED.2016.2535373
[19]
Wang H, Han G, Jiang X, Liu Y, Zhang J, Hao Y 2019 IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 66 1985 DOI: 10.1109/TED.2019.2898328
[20]
Han T, Liu H, Chen S, Wang S, Li W 2019 Micromachines 10 424 DOI: 10.3390/mi10060424
[21]
Avci U, Chu-Kung B, Agrawal A, Dewey G, Le V 2015 IEEE International Electron. Dev. Meeting December 7–9, 2015 Washington DC, USA 891
[22]
Krishnamohan T, Kim D, Raghunathan S, Saraswat K 2008 IEEE International Electron. Dev. Meeting December 15–17, 2008 San Francisco, USA
[23]
Zhang Q, Sutar S, Kosel T, Seabaugh A 2009 Solid-State Electrons 53 30
[24]
Takagi S, Kim W, Jo K, Matsumura R, Takaguchi R, Katoh T, Bae T, Kato K, Takenaka M 2018 ECS Trans. 86 75
[25]
Katoh T, Matsumura R, Takaguchi R, Takenaka M, Takagi S 2018 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 57 04
[26]
Matsumura R, Katoh T, Takaguchi R, Takenaka M, Takagi S 2018 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 57 04
[27]
Liu X, Hu H Y, Wang B, Wang M, Han G, Cui S, Zhang H M 2017 Superlattices Micro. 102 7
[28]
Wang B, Zhang H M, Hu H Y, Shi X W 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 067402 DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/27/6/067402
[29]
Colinge J P, Lee C W, Afzalian A, Akhavan N, Yan R, Ferain I, Razavi P, O’Neil B, Blake A, White M, Kelleher A, McCarthy B, Murphy R 2010 Nat. Nanotechnol. 5 225 DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2010.15
[1] Thermoelectric signature of Majorana zero modes in a T-typed double-quantum-dot structure
Cong Wang(王聪) and Xiao-Qi Wang(王晓琦). Chin. Phys. B, 2023, 32(3): 037304.
[2] Electronic properties and interfacial coupling in Pb islands on single-crystalline graphene
Jing-Peng Song(宋靖鹏) and Ang Li(李昂). Chin. Phys. B, 2022, 31(3): 037401.
[3] Device physics and design of FD-SOI JLFET with step-gate-oxide structure to suppress GIDL effect
Bin Wang(王斌), Xin-Long Shi(史鑫龙), Yun-Feng Zhang(张云峰), Yi Chen(陈伊), Hui-Yong Hu(胡辉勇), and Li-Ming Wang(王利明). Chin. Phys. B, 2021, 30(4): 047401.
[4] Evidence for topological superconductivity: Topological edge states in Bi2Te3/FeTe heterostructure
Bin Guo(郭斌), Kai-Ge Shi(师凯歌), Hai-Lang Qin(秦海浪), Liang Zhou(周良), Wei-Qiang Chen(陈伟强), Fei Ye(叶飞), Jia-Wei Mei(梅佳伟), Hong-Tao He(何洪涛), Tian-Luo Pan(潘天洛), Gan Wang(王干). Chin. Phys. B, 2020, 29(9): 097403.
[5] Surface Majorana flat bands in j=3/2 superconductors with singlet-quintet mixing
Jiabin Yu(于家斌), Chao-Xing Liu(刘朝星). Chin. Phys. B, 2020, 29(1): 017402.
[6] Topological superconductivity in a Bi2Te3/NbSe2 heterostructure: A review
Hao Zheng(郑浩), Jin-Feng Jia(贾金锋). Chin. Phys. B, 2019, 28(6): 067403.
[7] Image charge effect on the light emission of rutile TiO2(110) induced by a scanning tunneling microscope
Chaoyu Guo(郭钞宇), Xiangzhi Meng(孟祥志), Qin Wang(王钦), Ying Jiang(江颖). Chin. Phys. B, 2018, 27(7): 077301.
[8] Enhancement of off-state characteristics in junctionless field effect transistor using a field plate
Bin Wang(王斌), He-Ming Zhang(张鹤鸣), Hui-Yong Hu(胡辉勇), Xiao-Wei Shi(史小卫). Chin. Phys. B, 2018, 27(6): 067402.
[9] Dynamic localization of two electrons in AC-driven triple quantum dots and quantum dot shuttles
Jin-Xian Qu(屈晋先), Su-Qing Duan(段素青), Ning Yang(杨宁). Chin. Phys. B, 2017, 26(12): 127308.
[10] Observation of mode-like features in tunneling spectra of iron-based superconductors
Gong Jing (巩靖), Hou Xing-Yuan (侯兴元), Zhu Jun (朱军), Jie Yun-Yin (揭云印), Gu Ya-Dong (谷亚东), Shen Bing (沈冰), Ren Cong (任聪), Li Chun-Hong (李春红), Shan Lei (单磊). Chin. Phys. B, 2015, 24(7): 077402.
[11] Electronic phase diagram of NaFe1-xCoxAs investigated by scanning tunneling microscopy
Zhou Xiao-Dong (周晓东), Cai Peng (蔡鹏), Wang Ya-Yu (王亚愚). Chin. Phys. B, 2013, 22(8): 087413.
No Suggested Reading articles found!