ELECTROMAGNETISM, OPTICS, ACOUSTICS, HEAT TRANSFER, CLASSICAL MECHANICS, AND FLUID DYNAMICS |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Effect of thermally induced birefringence on high power picosecond azimuthal polarization Nd:YAG laser system |
Hongpan Peng(彭红攀), Ce Yang(杨策), Shang Lu(卢尚), Ning Ma(马宁), Meng Chen(陈檬) |
Laser Engineering Research Institute, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China |
|
|
Abstract Pulse-burst 1064-nm picosecond azimuthal polarization beam amplification up to an average power of 16.32 W using side-pumped Nd: YAG amplifiers has been demonstrated. The maximum envelop energy as much as 16.32 mJ, corresponding to a power amplification factor of 299.5%. A simple criterion was defined to help estimate the amount of depolarization in Nd:YAG amplifier stages. The degree of depolarization of the beam was 7.1% and the beam quality was measured to be M2 = 3.69. The reason for the azimuthal polarization depolarization and beam quality degradation were explained theoretically and experimentally during the amplification process.
|
Received: 13 November 2018
Revised: 04 December 2018
Published: 05 February 2019
|
PACS:
|
42.25.Lc
|
(Birefringence)
|
|
42.60.Da
|
(Resonators, cavities, amplifiers, arrays, and rings)
|
|
42.65.Re
|
(Ultrafast processes; optical pulse generation and pulse compression)
|
|
29.25.Lg
|
(Ion sources: polarized)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. U1631240), the Education Commission Program of Beijing, and Beijing Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. KZ201510005001). |
Corresponding Authors:
Meng Chen
E-mail: chenmeng@bjut.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Hongpan Peng(彭红攀), Ce Yang(杨策), Shang Lu(卢尚), Ning Ma(马宁), Meng Chen(陈檬) Effect of thermally induced birefringence on high power picosecond azimuthal polarization Nd:YAG laser system 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 024205
|
[1] |
Meier M, Romano V and Feurer T 2007 Appl. Phys. A 86 329
|
[2] |
Weber R, Michalowski A, et al. 2011 Phys. Proc. 12 21
|
[3] |
Chang C, Chen X and Pu J 2017 Opt. Rev. 24 188
|
[4] |
Martynas B, Mindaugas G, Peter G K and G 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 98 201101
|
[5] |
Machavariani G, Lumer Y, Moshe I, Meir A and Jackel S 2008 Appl. Opt. 46 3304
|
[6] |
Moshe I and Jackel S 2005 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 22 1228
|
[7] |
Bourderionnet J, Brignon A, Huignard J P and Frey R 2002 Opt. Commun. 204 299
|
[8] |
Beresna M, Gecevicius M, Kazansky P and Gertus T 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 98 233901
|
[9] |
Machavariani G, Lumer Y, Moshe I, Meir A and Jackel S 2008 Opt. Commun. 281 732
|
[10] |
Lin D, Daniel J M O, Gecevičius M, Beresna M, Kazansky P G and Clarkson W A 2014 Opt. Lett. 39 5359
|
[11] |
Kampfe T, Tonchev S, Tishchenko A V, Gergov D and Parriaux O 2012 Opt. Express 20 5392
|
[12] |
Xia K G, Ueda K I and Li J L 2012 Appl. Phys. B 107 47
|
[13] |
Long M L, Chen M and Li G 2017 Chin. Opt. Lett. 15 49
|
[14] |
Meir A, Machavariani G, Moshe I, Jackel S and Lumer Y 2008 Appl. Opt. 47 3886
|
[15] |
Koechner W andRice D 1970 IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 6 557-566
|
[16] |
Loescher A, Negel J P, Graf T and Ahmed M A 2012 Opt. Lett. 40 5758
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|