|
|
|
Optomechanical state transfer between two distant membranes in the presence of non-Markovian environments |
| Jiong Cheng(程泂)1, Xian-Ting Liang(梁先庭)1, Wen-Zhao Zhang(张闻钊)2, Xiangmei Duan(段香梅)1 |
1 Department of Physics, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China;
2 Beijing Computational Science Research Center(CSRC), Beijing 100193, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The quantum state transfer between two membranes in coupled cavities is studied when the system is surrounded by non-Markovian environments. An analytical approach for describing non-Markovian memory effects that impact on the state transfer between distant membranes is presented. We show that quantum state transfer can be implemented with high efficiency by utilizing the experimental spectral density, and the performance of state transfer in non-Markovian environments is much better than that in Markovian environments, especially when the tunneling strength between the two cavities is not very large.
|
Received: 28 August 2018
Revised: 10 October 2018
Accepted manuscript online:
|
|
PACS:
|
03.65.Yz
|
(Decoherence; open systems; quantum statistical methods)
|
| |
03.65.Ud
|
(Entanglement and quantum nonlocality)
|
| |
42.50.Dv
|
(Quantum state engineering and measurements)
|
|
| Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11704205, 11704026, 21773131, and 11574167), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2018M632437), the Natural Science Foundation of Ningbo City (Grant No. 2018A610199), and K C Wong Magna Fund in Ningbo University, China. |
Corresponding Authors:
Jiong Cheng, Xiangmei Duan
E-mail: chengjiong@nbu.edu.cn;duanxiangmei@nbu.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Jiong Cheng(程泂), Xian-Ting Liang(梁先庭), Wen-Zhao Zhang(张闻钊), Xiangmei Duan(段香梅) Optomechanical state transfer between two distant membranes in the presence of non-Markovian environments 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 120302
|
| [1] |
Zhou L, Han Y, Jing J and Zhang W 2011 Phys. Rev. A 83 052117
|
| [2] |
Lü X Y, Wu Y, Johansson J R, Jing H, Zhang J and Nori F 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 093602
|
| [3] |
Wang M, Lü X Y, Wang Y D, You J Q and Wu Y 2016 Phys. Rev. A 94 053807
|
| [4] |
Lü X Y, Zhu G L, Zheng L L and Wu Y 2018 Phys. Rev. A 97 033807
|
| [5] |
Zoller P, Beth Th, Binosi D, et al. 2005 Eur. Phys. J. D 36 203
|
| [6] |
Marquardt F and Girvin S M 2009 Physics 2 40
|
| [7] |
Aspelmeyer M, Kippenberg T J and Marquardt F 2014 Rev. Mod. Phys. 86 1391
|
| [8] |
Tian L and Wang H 2010 Phys. Rev. A 82 053806
|
| [9] |
Safavi-Naeini A H and Painter O 2011 New J. Phys. 13 013017
|
| [10] |
Nielsen M A and Chuang I I 2010 Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
|
| [11] |
Chang D E, Safavi-Naeini A H, Hafezi M and Painter O 2011 New J. Phys. 13 023003
|
| [12] |
Schmidt M, Ludwig M and Marquardt F 2012 New J. Phys. 14 125005
|
| [13] |
Tian L 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 153604
|
| [14] |
Wang Y D and Clerk A A 2012 New J. Phys. 14 105010
|
| [15] |
Wang Y D and Clerk A A 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 153603
|
| [16] |
Palomaki T A, Harlow J W, Teufel J D, Simmonds R W and Lehnert K W 2013 Nature 495 210
|
| [17] |
Pei P, Huang H F, Guo Y Q, Zhang X Y and Dai J F 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 024203
|
| [18] |
Yousif T, Zhou W and Zhou L 2014 J. Mod. Opt. 61 1180
|
| [19] |
Rao S, Hu X, Li L and Xu J 2015 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 48 185501
|
| [20] |
de Moraes Neto G D, Andrade F M, Montenegro V and Bose S 2016 Phys. Rev. A 93 062339
|
| [21] |
Giovannetti V and Vitali D 2001 Phys. Rev. A 63 023812
|
| [22] |
Grröblacher S, Trubarov A, Prigge N, Cole G D, Aspelmeyer M and Eisert J 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 7606
|
| [23] |
Breuer H P and Petruccione F 2002 The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
|
| [24] |
Cheng J, Zhang W Z, Han Y and Zhou L 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 23678
|
| [25] |
Mu Q, Zhao X and Yu T 2016 Phys. Rev. A 94 012334
|
| [26] |
Triana J F, Estrada A F and Pachón L A 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 183602
|
| [27] |
Zhang W Z, Cheng J, Li W D and Zhou L 2016 Phys. Rev. A 93 063853
|
| [28] |
Zhang W Z, Han Y, Xiong B and Zhou L 2017 New J. Phys. 19 083022
|
| [29] |
Song J, Li C, Xia Y, Zhang Z J and Jiang Y Y 2017 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 50 175502
|
| [30] |
Li Y L and Fang M F 2011 Chin. Phys. B 20 100312
|
| [31] |
Zhang W M, Lo P Y, Xiong H N, Tu M W Y and Nori F 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 170402
|
| [32] |
Ciccarello F 2015 Phys. Rev. A 91 062121
|
| [33] |
Cresser J D 1992 J. Mod. Opt. 39 2187
|
| [34] |
Leggett A J, Chakravarty S, Dorsey A T, Fisher M P A, Garg A and Zwerger W 1987 Rev. Mod. Phys. 59 1
|
| [35] |
Weiss U 2008 Quantum Dissipative Systems, 3rd edn. (Singapore: World Scientific Press)
|
| [36] |
Schwinger J 1961 J. Math. Phys. 2 407
|
| [37] |
Keldysh L V 1965 Sov. Phys. JETP 20 1018
|
| [38] |
Jahne K, Yurke B and Gavish U 2007 Phys. Rev. A 75 010301
|
| [39] |
Sete E A and Eleuch H 2015 Phys. Rev. A 91 032309
|
| [40] |
Xiong H N, Zhang W M and Tu M W Y 2012 Phys. Rev. A 86 032107
|
| [41] |
Scully M O and Zubairy M S 1997 Quantum Optics (Canbridge: Canbridge University Press)
|
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|
